Support Narrowing conversions to bool in if constexpr condition
under C++23 language mode.
Only if constexpr is implemented as the behavior of static_assert
is already conforming. Still need to work on explicit(bool) to
complete support.
OpenMP 5.1 added support for writing OpenMP directives using [[]]
syntax in addition to using #pragma and this introduces support for the
new syntax.
In OpenMP, the attributes take one of two forms:
[[omp::directive(...)]] or [[omp::sequence(...)]]. A directive
attribute contains an OpenMP directive clause that is identical to the
analogous #pragma syntax. A sequence attribute can contain either
sequence or directive arguments and is used to ensure that the
attributes are processed sequentially for situations where the order of
the attributes matter (remember:
https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.attr.grammar#4.sentence-4).
The approach taken here is somewhat novel and deserves mention. We
could refactor much of the OpenMP parsing logic to work for either
pragma annotation tokens or for attribute clauses. It would be a fair
amount of effort to share the logic for both, but it's certainly
doable. However, the semantic attribute system is not designed to
handle the arbitrarily complex arguments that OpenMP directives
contain. Adding support to thread the novel parsed information until we
can produce a semantic attribute would be considerably more effort.
What's more, existing OpenMP constructs are not (often) represented as
semantic attributes. So doing this through Attr.td would be a massive
undertaking that would likely only benefit OpenMP and comes with
additional risks. Rather than walk down that path, I am taking
advantage of the fact that the syntax of the directives within the
directive clause is identical to that of the #pragma form. Once the
parser recognizes that we're processing an OpenMP attribute, it caches
all of the directive argument tokens and then replays them as though
the user wrote a pragma. This reuses the same OpenMP parsing and
semantic logic directly, but does come with a risk if the OpenMP
committee decides to purposefully diverge their pragma and attribute
syntaxes. So, despite this being a novel approach that does token
replay, I think it's actually a better approach than trying to do this
through the declarative syntax in Attr.td.
The `-analyzer-display-progress` displayed the function name of the
currently analyzed function. It differs in C and C++. In C++, it
prints the argument types as well in a comma-separated list.
While in C, only the function name is displayed, without the brackets.
E.g.:
C++: foo(), foo(int, float)
C: foo
In crash traces, the analyzer dumps the location contexts, but the
string is not enough for `-analyze-function` in C++ mode.
This patch addresses the issue by dumping the proper function names
even in stack traces.
Reviewed By: NoQ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105708
This reverts commit 6775fc6ffa.
It also reverts "[lldb] Fix compilation by adjusting to the new ASTContext signature."
This reverts commit 03a3f86071.
We see some failures on the lldb infrastructure, these changes might play a role
in it. Let's revert it now and see if the bots will become green.
Ref: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104918
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033 contained a discussion regarding efficient
modeling of error recovery. @rjmccall has outlined the key ideas:
Conceptually, we can split the translation unit into a sequence of partial
translation units (PTUs). Every declaration will be associated with a unique PTU
that owns it.
The first key insight here is that the owning PTU isn't always the "active"
(most recent) PTU, and it isn't always the PTU that the declaration
"comes from". A new declaration (that isn't a redeclaration or specialization of
anything) does belong to the active PTU. A template specialization, however,
belongs to the most recent PTU of all the declarations in its signature - mostly
that means that it can be pulled into a more recent PTU by its template
arguments.
The second key insight is that processing a PTU might extend an earlier PTU.
Rolling back the later PTU shouldn't throw that extension away. For example, if
the second PTU defines a template, and the third PTU requires that template to
be instantiated at float, that template specialization is still part of the
second PTU. Similarly, if the fifth PTU uses an inline function belonging to the
fourth, that definition still belongs to the fourth. When we go to emit code in
a new PTU, we map each declaration we have to emit back to its owning PTU and
emit it in a new module for just the extensions to that PTU. We keep track of
all the modules we've emitted for a PTU so that we can unload them all if we
decide to roll it back.
Most declarations/definitions will only refer to entities from the same or
earlier PTUs. However, it is possible (primarily by defining a
previously-declared entity, but also through templates or ADL) for an entity
that belongs to one PTU to refer to something from a later PTU. We will have to
keep track of this and prevent unwinding to later PTU when we recognize it.
Fortunately, this should be very rare; and crucially, we don't have to do the
bookkeeping for this if we've only got one PTU, e.g. in normal compilation.
Otherwise, PTUs after the first just need to record enough metadata to be able
to revert any changes they've made to declarations belonging to earlier PTUs,
e.g. to redeclaration chains or template specialization lists.
It should even eventually be possible for PTUs to provide their own slab
allocators which can be thrown away as part of rolling back the PTU. We can
maintain a notion of the active allocator and allocate things like Stmt/Expr
nodes in it, temporarily changing it to the appropriate PTU whenever we go to do
something like instantiate a function template. More care will be required when
allocating declarations and types, though.
We would want the PTU to be efficiently recoverable from a Decl; I'm not sure
how best to do that. An easy option that would cover most declarations would be
to make multiple TranslationUnitDecls and parent the declarations appropriately,
but I don't think that's good enough for things like member function templates,
since an instantiation of that would still be parented by its original class.
Maybe we can work this into the DC chain somehow, like how lexical DCs are.
We add a different kind of translation unit `TU_Incremental` which is a
complete translation unit that we might nonetheless incrementally extend later.
Because it is complete (and we might want to generate code for it), we do
perform template instantiation, but because it might be extended later, we don't
warn if it declares or uses undefined internal-linkage symbols.
This patch teaches clang-repl how to recover from errors by disconnecting the
most recent PTU and update the primary PTU lookup tables. For instance:
```./clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 12; error;
In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1:
input_line_0:1:13: error: C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations
int i = 12; error;
^
error: Parsing failed.
clang-repl> int i = 13; extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=13
clang-repl> quit
```
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104918
Replace the clang builtin function and LLVM intrinsic previously used to select
the f64x2.promote_low_f32x4 instruction with custom combines from standard
SelectionDAG nodes. Implement the new combines to share code with the similar
combines for f64x2.convert_low_i32x4_{s,u}. Resolves PR50232.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105675
This change is intended as initial setup. The plan is to add
more semantic checks later. I plan to update the documentation
as more semantic checks are added (instead of documenting the
details up front). Most of the code closely mirrors that for
the Swift calling convention. Three places are marked as
[FIXME: swiftasynccc]; those will be addressed once the
corresponding convention is introduced in LLVM.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95561
This reverts commit 52aeacfbf5.
There isn't full agreement on a path forward yet, but there is agreement that
this shouldn't land as-is. See discussion on https://reviews.llvm.org/D105338
Also reverts unreviewed "[clang] Improve `-Wnull-dereference` diag to be more in-line with reality"
This reverts commit f4877c78c0.
And all the related changes to tests:
This reverts commit 9a0152799f.
This reverts commit 3f7c9cc274.
This reverts commit 329f8197ef.
This reverts commit aa9f58cc2c.
This reverts commit 2df37d5ddd.
This reverts commit a72a441812.
C++23 will make these conversions ambiguous - so fix them to make the
codebase forward-compatible with C++23 (& a follow-up change I've made
will make this ambiguous/invalid even in <C++23 so we don't regress
this & it generally improves the code anyway)
D105314 added the abibility choose to use AsmParser for parsing inline
asm. -no-intergrated-as will override this default if specified
explicitly.
If toolchain choose to use MCAsmParser for inline asm, don't pass
the option to disable integrated-as explictly unless set by user.
Reviewed By: #powerpc, shchenz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105512
Named return of a variable with aligned attribute would
trip an assert in case alignment was dependent.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105380
This patch implaments the load and reserve and store conditional
builtins for the PowerPC target, in order to have feature parody with
xlC on AIX.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105236
Named return of a variable with aligned attribute would
trip an assert in case alignment was dependent.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105380
This option implies -fdump-record-layouts but dumps record layout information with canonical field types, which can be more useful in certain cases when comparing structure layouts.
Reviewed By: stevewan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105112
Allow a preprocessor observer to be notified of mark pragmas. Although
this does not impact code generation in any way, it is useful for other
clients, such as clangd, to be able to identify any marked regions.
Reviewed By: dgoldman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105368
A user reported an issue to me via email that Clang was accepting some
code that GCC was rejecting. After investigation, it turned out to be a
general problem of us failing to properly reject attributes written in
the type position in C when they don't apply to types. The root cause
was a terminology issue -- we sometimes use "CXX11Attr" to mean [[]] in
C++11 mode and sometimes [[]] in general -- and this came back to bite
us because in this particular case, it really meant [[]] in C++ mode.
I fixed the issue by introducing a new function
AttributeCommonInfo::isStandardAttributeSyntax() to represent [[]] in
either C or C++ mode.
This fix pointed out that we've had the issue in some of our existing
tests, which have all been corrected. This resolves
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50954.
Before this patch, the dependence of CallExpr was only computed in the
constructor, the dependence bits might not reflect truth -- some arguments might
be not set (nullptr) during this time, e.g. CXXDefaultArgExpr will be set via
the setArg method in the later parsing stage, so we need to recompute the
dependence bits.
This extends the effects of [[ http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1825r0.html | P1825 ]] to all C++ standards from C++11 up to C++20.
According to Motion 23 from Cologne 2019, P1825R0 was accepted as a Defect Report, so we retroactively apply this all the way back to C++11.
Note that we also remove implicit moves from C++98 as an extension
altogether, since the expanded first overload resolution from P1825
can cause some meaning changes in C++98.
For example it can change which copy constructor is picked when both const
and non-const ones are available.
This also rips out warn_return_std_move since there are no cases where it would be worthwhile to suggest it.
This also fixes a bug with bailing into the second overload resolution
when encountering a non-rvref qualified conversion operator.
This was unnoticed until now, so two new test cases cover these.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104500
This patch adds a new clang builtin, __arithmetic_fence. The purpose of the
builtin is to provide the user fine control, at the expression level, over
floating point optimization when -ffast-math (-ffp-model=fast) is enabled.
The builtin prevents the optimizer from rearranging floating point expression
evaluation. The new option fprotect-parens has the same effect on
parenthesized expressions, forcing the optimizer to respect the parentheses.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, kpn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100118
Added the option `-altivec-src-compat=[mixed,gcc,xl]`. The default at this time is `mixed`.
The default behavior for clang is for all vector compares to return a scalar unless the vectors being
compared are vector bool or vector pixel. In that case the compare returns a
vector. With the gcc case all vector compares return vectors and in the xl case
all vector compares return scalars.
This patch does not change the default behavior of clang.
This option will be used in future patches to implement behaviour compatibility for the vector bool/pixel types.
Reviewed By: bmahjour
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103615
This commit adds a function to the top-class of SVal hierarchy to
provide type information about the value. That can be extremely
useful when this is the only piece of information that the user is
actually caring about.
Additionally, this commit introduces a testing framework for writing
unit-tests for symbolic values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104550
This reverts commit c3fe847f9d.
Tests fail in non-asserts builds because they assume named IR, by the
looks of it (testing for the "entry" label, for instance). I don't know
enough about the update_cc_test_checks.py stuff to know how to manually
fix these tests, so reverting for now.
This patch adds a new clang builtin, __arithmetic_fence. The purpose of the
builtin is to provide the user fine control, at the expression level, over
floating point optimization when -ffast-math (-ffp-model=fast) is enabled.
The builtin prevents the optimizer from rearranging floating point expression
evaluation. The new option fprotect-parens has the same effect on
parenthesized expressions, forcing the optimizer to respect the parentheses.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, kpn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100118
Added the option `-altivec-src-compat=[mixed,gcc,xl]`. The default at this time is `mixed`.
The default behavior for clang is for all vector compares to return a scalar unless the vectors being
compared are vector bool or vector pixel. In that case the compare returns a
vector. With the gcc case all vector compares return vectors and in the xl case
all vector compares return scalars.
This patch does not change the default behavior of clang.
This option will be used in future patches to implement behaviour compatibility for the vector bool/pixel types.
Reviewed By: bmahjour
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103615
Since RangeSet::Factory actually contains BasicValueFactory, we can
remove value factory from many function signatures inside the solver.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105005
I find as I develop I'm moving between many different languages C++,C#,JavaScript all the time. As I move between the file types I like to keep `clang-format` as my formatting tool of choice. (hence why I initially added C# support in {D58404}) I know those other languages have their own tools but I have to learn them all, and I have to work out how to configure them, and they may or may not have integration into my IDE or my source code integration.
I am increasingly finding that I'm editing additional JSON files as part of my daily work and my editor and git commit hooks are just not setup to go and run [[ https://stedolan.github.io/jq/ | jq ]], So I tend to go to [[ https://jsonformatter.curiousconcept.com/ | JSON Formatter ]] and copy and paste back and forth. To get nicely formatted JSON. This is a painful process and I'd like a new one that causes me much less friction.
This has come up from time to time:
{D10543}
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35856565/clang-format-a-json-filehttps://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18699
I would like to stop having to do that and have formatting JSON as a first class clang-format support `Language` (even if it has minimal style settings at present).
This revision adds support for formatting JSON using the inbuilt JSON serialization library of LLVM, With limited control at present only over the indentation level
This adds an additional Language into the .clang-format file to separate the settings from your other supported languages.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93528
Word on the grapevine was that the committee had some discussion that
ended with unanimous agreement on eliminating relational function pointer comparisons.
We wanted to be bold and just ban all of them cold turkey.
But then we chickened out at the last second and are going for
eliminating just the spaceship overload candidate instead, for now.
See D104680 for reference.
This should be fine and "safe", because the only possible semantic change this
would cause is that overload resolution could possibly be ambiguous if
there was another viable candidate equally as good.
But to save face a little we are going to:
* Issue an "error" for three-way comparisons on function pointers.
But all this is doing really is changing one vague error message,
from an "invalid operands to binary expression" into an
"ordered comparison of function pointers", which sounds more like we mean business.
* Otherwise "warn" that comparing function pointers like that is totally
not cool (unless we are told to keep quiet about this).
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104892
This patch adds a new option for the new Flang driver:
`-fno-analyzed-objects-for-unparse`. The semantics are similar to
`-funparse-typed-exprs-to-f18-fc` from `f18`. For consistency, the
latter is replaced with `-fno-analyzed-objects-for-unparse`.
The new option controls the behaviour of the unparser (i.e. the action
corresponding to `-fdebug-unparse`). The default behaviour is to use the
analyzed objects when unparsing. The new flag can be used to turn this
off, so that the original parse-tree objects are used. The analyzed
objects are generated during the semantic checks [1].
This patch also updates the semantics of
`-fno-analyzed-objects-for-unparse`/`-funparse-typed-exprs-to-f18-fc`
in `f18`, so that this flag is always taken into account when `Unparse`
is used (this way the semantics in `f18` and `flang-new` are identical).
The added test file is based on example from Peter Steinfeld.
[1]
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/flang/docs/Semantics.md
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103612
Consider the code
```
void f(int a0, int b0, int c)
{
int a1 = a0 - b0;
int b1 = (unsigned)a1 + c;
if (c == 0) {
int d = 7L / b1;
}
}
```
At the point of divisiion by `b1` that is considered to be non-zero,
which results in a new constraint for `$a0 - $b0 + $c`. The type
of this sym is unsigned, however, the simplified sym is `$a0 -
$b0` and its type is signed. This is probably the result of the
inherent improper handling of casts. Anyway, Range assignment
for constraints use this type information. Therefore, we must
make sure that first we simplify the symbol and only then we
assign the range.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104844
Corentin Jabot