explicit specialization to a warning for C++98 mode (this is a defect report
resolution, so per our informal policy it should apply in C++98), and turn
the warning on by default for C++11 and later. In all cases where it fires, the
right thing to do is to remove the pointless explicit instantiation.
llvm-svn: 280308
C++11 requires const objects to have a user-provided constructor, even for
classes without any fields. DR 253 relaxes this to say "If the implicit default
constructor initializes all subobjects, no initializer should be required."
clang is currently the only compiler that implements this C++11 rule, and e.g.
libstdc++ relies on something like DR 253 to compile in newer versions. This
change makes it possible to build code that says `const vector<int> v;' again
when using libstdc++5.2 and _GLIBCXX_DEBUG
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60284).
Fixes PR23381.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16552
llvm-svn: 261297
DR407, the C++ standard doesn't really say how this should work. Here's what we
do (which is consistent with DR407 as far as I can tell):
* When performing name lookup for an elaborated-type-specifier, a tag
declaration hides a typedef declaration that names the same type.
* When performing any other kind of lookup, a typedef declaration hides
a tag declaration that names the same type.
In any other case where lookup finds both a typedef and a tag (that is, when
they name different types), the lookup will be ambiguous. If lookup finds a
tag and a typedef that name the same type, and finds anything else, the lookup
will always be ambiguous (even if the other entity would hide the tag, it does
not also hide the typedef).
llvm-svn: 252959
selects a deleted function, the outer function is still a candidate even though
the initialization sequence is "otherwise ill-formed".
llvm-svn: 227169
use __thiscall. (This doesn't actually work for MSVC; they don't allow the
__thiscall qualifier here, but it's sufficient to demonstrate that we do
implement the intent of the DR.)
llvm-svn: 217213
elements from {}, rather than value-initializing them. This permits calling an
initializer-list constructor or constructing a std::initializer_list object.
(It would also permit initializing a const reference or rvalue reference if
that weren't explicitly prohibited by other rules.)
llvm-svn: 210091
Summary:
Naming the destructor using a typedef-name for the class-name is
well-formed.
This fixes PR19620.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3583
llvm-svn: 209319
Summary:
Declaring a function as inline after it has been defined is in violation
of [dcl.fct.spec]p4. The program would get a strong definition instead
of getting a function with linkonce_odr linkage.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3220
llvm-svn: 205129
Richard Smith