The most likely case where this error happens is when the user specifies
too many register operands. Don't make it look like an internal LLVM bug
when we can see that the error is coming from an inline asm instruction.
For other instructions we keep the "ran out of registers" error.
llvm-svn: 192041
When MC was first added, targets could use hasRawTextSupport to keep features
working before they were added to the MC interface.
The design goal of MC is to provide an uniform api for printing assembly and
object files. Short of relaxations and other corner cases, a object file is
just another representation of the assembly.
It was never the intention that targets would keep doing things like
if (hasRawTextSupport())
Set flags in one way.
else
Set flags in another way.
When they do that they create two code paths and the object file is no longer
just another representation of the assembly. This also then requires testing
with llc -filetype=obj, which is extremelly brittle.
This patch removes some of these hacks by replacing them with smaller ones.
The ARM flag setting is trivial, so I just moved it to the constructor. For
Mips, the patch adds two temporary hack directives that allow the assembly
to represent the same things as the object file was already able to.
The hope is that the mips developers will replace the hack directives with
the same ones that gas uses and drop the -print-hack-directives flag.
I will also try to implement a target streamer interface, so that we can
move this out of the common code.
In summary, for any new work, two rules of the thumb are
* Don't use "llc -filetype=obj" in tests.
* Don't add calls to hasRawTextSupport.
llvm-svn: 192035
Summary:
The clang-apply-replacements process is now invoked to apply
replacements between applying transforms. This resulted in a massive
simplification of the tool:
- FileOverrides class no longer needed.
- Change tracking and code formatting no longer needed.
- No more dependency on libclangApplyReplacements.
- Final syntax check is easier to do directly now than with a separate
header/source pair.
Replacement handling stuff abstracted into a new header/source pair to
de-clutter ClangModernize.cpp somewhat.
Tests updated.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1836
llvm-svn: 192032
is updated to use DITypeRef.
Move isUnsignedDIType and getOriginalTypeSize from DebugInfo.h to be static
helper functions in DwarfCompileUnit. We already have a static helper function
"isTypeSigned" in DwarfCompileUnit, and a pointer to DwarfDebug is added to
resolve the derived-from field. All three functions need to go across link
for derived-from fields, so we need to get hold of a type identifier map.
A pointer to DwarfDebug is also added to DbgVariable in order to resolve the
derived-from field.
Debug info verifier is updated to check a derived-from field is a TypeRef.
Verifier will not go across link for derived-from fields, in debug info finder,
we go across the link to add derived-from fields to types.
Function getDICompositeType is only used by dragonegg and since dragonegg does
not generate identifier for types, we use an empty map to resolve the
derived-from field.
When printing a derived-from field, we use DITypeRef::getName to either return
the type identifier or getName of the DIType.
A paired commit at clang is required due to changes to DIBuilder.
llvm-svn: 192018
I've changed it so we don't set highest level warnings (all) for MSVC when building projects using cmake and instead leave the default. That's /W4 on my machine and seems to be ok.
With all warnings on for msvc, we see literally thousands of warnings. 99.99% aren't relevant and just obscure the ones that are.
I think the user can still override things if they want something different from the command line when using cmake.
llvm-svn: 192010
The issue this patch seeks to address is that MS's compiler (cl.exe) doesn't support the __attribute__((__weak__)) or __atribute__((__visibility__("default")) syntax; so a solution must be found where cl.exe doesn't see this syntax.
This patch seeks to solve this problem by changing code patterned like this:
__attribute__((__weak__, __visibility__("default")))
void* operator new(size_t size, const std::nothrow_t&) _NOEXCEPT { /*snip*/; return p; }
to code like this:
_LIBCPP_WEAK
void* operator new(size_t size, const std::nothrow_t&) _NOEXCEPT { return p; }
Howard: Thanks for all the comments regarding the default visibility
tag on the definition. I agree it isn't needed, and that there are lots
of other places where it is missing. That being said, I'm not wanting
to rock the boat on that issue right now. So I've added it back to the
definition via _LIBCPP_FUNC_VIS. A later pass dedicated just to this
issue can bring things in to a consistent state one way or the other.
Note that we do not want to have the exact same attributes on the
declaration and defintion in this case. The declaration should not be
marked weak, whereas the definition should (which is what G M's patch
did). I've fully tested on OS X to ensure that the resultant attribute
syntax actually works.
llvm-svn: 192007
UpdatePHINodes has an optimization to reuse an existing PHI node, where it
first deletes all of its entries and then replaces them. Unfortunately, in the
case where we had duplicate predecessors (which are allowed so long as the
associated PHI entries have the same value), the loop removing the existing PHI
entries from the to-be-reused PHI would assert (if that PHI was not the one
which had the duplicates).
llvm-svn: 192001
This radar extends the notion of one-liner summaries to automagically apply in a few interesting cases
More specifically, this checkin changes the printout of ValueObjects to print on one-line (as if type summary add -c had been applied) iff:
this ValueObject does not have a summary
its children have no synthetic children
its children are not a non-empty base class without a summary
its children do not have a summary that asks for children to show up
the aggregate length of all the names of all the children is <= 50 characters
you did not ask to see the types during a printout
your pointer depth is 0
This is meant to simplify the way LLDB shows data on screen for small structs and similarly compact data types (e.g. std::pair<int,int> anyone?)
Feedback is especially welcome on how the feature feels and corner cases where we should apply this printout and don't (or viceversa, we are applying it when we shouldn't be)
llvm-svn: 191996
Aaron Ballman