when the expression source range overlaps the declaration range.
This can happen for C++ constructor expressions whose range generally
include the variable declaration, e.g.:
MyCXXClass foo; // Make sure pointing at 'foo' returns a VarDecl cursor.
rdar://9124499.
llvm-svn: 133930
variable declaration that it belongs to.
This can happen for C++ constructor expressions whose range generally
include the variable declaration, e.g.:
MyCXXClass foo; // Make sure we don't annotate 'foo' as a CallExpr cursor.
rdar://9124499.
llvm-svn: 133929
Language-design credit goes to a lot of people, but I particularly want
to single out Blaine Garst and Patrick Beard for their contributions.
Compiler implementation credit goes to Argyrios, Doug, Fariborz, and myself,
in no particular order.
llvm-svn: 133103
+keyPathsForValuesAffecting<Key> completion was mislabeled as an
instance method, and +automaticallyNotifiesObserversOf<Key> was
missing entirely. Fixes <rdar://problem/9516762>.
llvm-svn: 132452
CXTranslationUnit_NestedMacroInstantiations, which indicates whether
we want to see "nested" macro instantiations (e.g., those that occur
inside other macro instantiations) within the detailed preprocessing
record. Many clients (e.g., those that only care about visible tokens)
don't care about this information, and in code that uses preprocessor
metaprogramming, this information can have a very high cost.
Addresses <rdar://problem/9389320>.
llvm-svn: 130990
that we've previously seen, both in declared methods and from previous
KVC completions, to eliminate duplicates. Fixes <rdar://problem/9162207>.
llvm-svn: 130890
which determines whether a particular file is actually a header that
is intended to be guarded from multiple inclusions within the same
translation unit.
llvm-svn: 130808
3 lines of code and improve a bunch of information in the libclang view
of the code.
Updates the two tests that exercise this with the new data, checking
that each new source location actually points back to the declared
template parameter.
llvm-svn: 130656
ObjC NeXt runtime where method pointer registered in
metadata belongs to an unrelated method. Ast part of this fix,
I turned at @end missing warning (for class
implementations) into an error as we can never
be sure that meta-data being generated is correct.
// rdar://9072317
llvm-svn: 130019
double data[20000000] = {0};
we would blow out the memory by creating 20M Exprs to fill out the initializer.
To fix this, if the initializer list initializes an array with more elements than
there are initializers in the list, have InitListExpr store a single 'ArrayFiller' expression
that specifies an expression to be used for value initialization of the rest of the elements.
Fixes rdar://9275920.
llvm-svn: 129896
adjust the a ending macro location to the end of the instantiation
location before adjusting it to the end of the token. Fixes
<rdar://problem/9021561>.
llvm-svn: 129872
implementation such as
@synthesize Prop1 =
Give priority to ivars whose type matches or closely matches the
property type (as we do for several other kinds of
results). Additionally, if there is an ivar with the same name as the
property, or differs only due to a _ prefix or suffix, give that ivar
a priority bump. Finally, verify that this search is properly
returning ivars within class extensions and implementations
(<rdar://problem/8488854>).
llvm-svn: 129699
completion, look through block pointer and function pointer types to the
result type of the block/function. Fixes <rdar://problem/9282583>.
llvm-svn: 129535
a couple of operator overloads which form interesting expressions in the
AST.
I added test cases for both bugs with the c-index-test's token
annotation feature. Also, thanks to John McCall for confirming that this
is the correct solution.
llvm-svn: 128768
walk the preprocessing record *before* walking the declarations, so
they we pretend that we actually respect the phases of translation.
We still walk the preprocessing record after the declarations when
performing token annotation or finding the cursor at a location, since
those routines depend on those semantics.
Fixes <rdar://problem/9137195>.
llvm-svn: 127776
template arguments. I believe that this is the last place in the AST
where we were storing a source range for a nested-name-specifier
rather than a proper nested-name-specifier location structure. (Yay!)
There is still a lot of cleanup to do in the TreeTransform, which
doesn't take advantage of nested-name-specifiers with source-location
information everywhere it could.
llvm-svn: 126844
template specialization types. This also required some parser tweaks,
since we were losing track of the nested-name-specifier's source
location information in several places in the parser. Other notable
changes this required:
- Sema::ActOnTagTemplateIdType now type-checks and forms the
appropriate type nodes (+ source-location information) for an
elaborated-type-specifier ending in a template-id. Previously, we
used a combination of ActOnTemplateIdType and
ActOnTagTemplateIdType that resulted in an ElaboratedType wrapped
around a DependentTemplateSpecializationType, which duplicated the
keyword ("class", "struct", etc.) and nested-name-specifier
storage.
- Sema::ActOnTemplateIdType now gets a nested-name-specifier, which
it places into the returned type-source location information.
- Sema::ActOnDependentTag now creates types with source-location
information.
llvm-svn: 126808
template specialization types. There are still a few rough edges to
clean up with some of the parser actions dropping
nested-name-specifiers too early.
llvm-svn: 126776
nested-name-speciciers within elaborated type names, e.g.,
enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind
Fixes in this iteration include:
(1) Compute the type-source range properly for a dependent template
specialization type that starts with "template template-id ::", as
in a member access expression
dep->template f<T>::f()
This is a latent bug I triggered with this change (because now we're
checking the computed source ranges for dependent template
specialization types). But the real problem was...
(2) Make sure to set the qualifier range on a dependent template
specialization type appropriately. This will go away once we push
nested-name-specifier locations into dependent template
specialization types, but it was the source of the
valgrind errors on the buildbots.
llvm-svn: 126765
information for qualifier type names throughout the parser to address
several problems.
The commit message from r126737:
Push nested-name-specifier source location information into elaborated
name types, e.g., "enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind".
Aside from the normal changes, this also required some tweaks to the
parser. Essentially, when we're looking at a type name (via
getTypeName()) specifically for the purpose of creating an annotation
token, we pass down the flag that asks for full type-source location
information to be stored within the returned type. That way, we retain
source-location information involving nested-name-specifiers rather
than trying to reconstruct that information later, long after it's
been lost in the parser.
With this change, test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp is showing
much improved results again, since that code has lots of
nested-name-specifiers.
llvm-svn: 126748
name types, e.g., "enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind".
Aside from the normal changes, this also required some tweaks to the
parser. Essentially, when we're looking at a type name (via
getTypeName()) specifically for the purpose of creating an annotation
token, we pass down the flag that asks for full type-source location
information to be stored within the returned type. That way, we retain
source-location information involving nested-name-specifiers rather
than trying to reconstruct that information later, long after it's
been lost in the parser.
With this change, test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp is showing
much improved results again, since that code has lots of
nested-name-specifiers.
llvm-svn: 126737
DependentNameTypeLoc. Teach the recursive AST visitor and libclang how to
walk DependentNameTypeLoc nodes.
Also, teach libclang about TypedefDecl source ranges, so that we get
those. The massive churn in test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp
is a good thing: we're annotating a lot more of this test correctly
now.
llvm-svn: 126729
Argyrios Kyrtzidis