These are redundant pairs of nodes defined for
INSERT_VECTOR_ELEMENT/EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELEMENT.
insertelement/extractelement are slightly closer to the corresponding
C++ node name, and has stricter type checking so prefer it.
Update targets to only use these nodes where it is trivial to do so.
AArch64, ARM, and Mips all have various type errors on simple replacement,
so they will need work to fix.
Example from AArch64:
def : Pat<(sext_inreg (vector_extract (v16i8 V128:$Rn), VectorIndexB:$idx), i8),
(i32 (SMOVvi8to32 V128:$Rn, VectorIndexB:$idx))>;
Which is trying to do sext_inreg i8, i8.
llvm-svn: 255359
There were really two problems here. The first was that we had the truth tables
for signed i1 comparisons backward. I imagine these are not very common, but if
you have:
setcc i1 x, y, LT
this has the '0 1' and the '1 0' results flipped compared to:
setcc i1 x, y, ULT
because, in the signed case, '1 0' is really '-1 0', and the answer is not the
same as in the unsigned case.
The second problem was that we did not have patterns (at all) for the unsigned
comparisons select_cc nodes for i1 comparison operands. This was the specific
cause of PR24552. These had to be added (and a missing Altivec promotion added
as well) to make sure these function for all types. I've added a bunch more
test cases for these patterns, and there are a few FIXMEs in the test case
regarding code-quality.
Fixes PR24552.
llvm-svn: 246400
The PowerPC backend had a number of loads that were marked as canFoldAsLoad
(and I'm partially at fault here for copying around the relevant line of
TableGen definitions without really looking at what it meant). This is not
right; PPC (non-memory) instructions don't support direct memory operands, and
so there is nothing a 'foldable' instruction could be folded into.
Noticed by inspection, no test case.
The one thing we might lose by doing this is ability to fold some loads into
stackmap/patchpoint pseudo-instructions. However, this was untested, and would
not obviously have worked for extending loads, and I'd rather re-add support
for that once it can be tested.
llvm-svn: 231982
This adds support for the QPX vector instruction set, which is used by the
enhanced A2 cores on the IBM BG/Q supercomputers. QPX vectors are 256 bytes
wide, holding 4 double-precision floating-point values. Boolean values, modeled
here as <4 x i1> are actually also represented as floating-point values
(essentially { -1, 1 } for { false, true }). QPX shares many features with
Altivec and VSX, but is distinct from both of them. One major difference is
that, instead of adding completely-separate vector registers, QPX vector
registers are extensions of the scalar floating-point registers (lane 0 is the
corresponding scalar floating-point value). The operations supported on QPX
vectors mirrors that supported on the scalar floating-point values (with some
additional ones for permutations and logical/comparison operations).
I've been maintaining this support out-of-tree, as part of the bgclang project,
for several years. This is not the entire bgclang patch set, but is most of the
subset that can be cleanly integrated into LLVM proper at this time. Adding
this to the LLVM backend is part of my efforts to rebase bgclang to the current
LLVM trunk, but is independently useful (especially for codes that use LLVM as
a JIT in library form).
The assembler/disassembler test coverage is complete. The CodeGen test coverage
is not, but I've included some tests, and more will be added as follow-up work.
llvm-svn: 230413
Matt Arsenault