Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.
A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)
import fileinput
import sys
import re
pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")
for line in sys.stdin:
sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))
Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649
llvm-svn: 230794
Summary:
There is no change to the restrictions, just the result register is stored
once in the encoding rather than twice. The rt field is zero in
MIPS32r6/MIPS64r6.
Depends on D4119
Reviewers: zoran.jovanovic, jkolek, vmedic
Reviewed By: vmedic
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4120
llvm-svn: 211019
Summary:
MIPS32r6/MIPS64r6 support has not been added yet.
inlineasm-cnstrnt-reg.ll:
Explicitly specify the CPU since it will not work on MIPS32r6/MIPS64r6
when -integrated-as is the default. We can't change the mnemonic since the
LO register is an implicit def of mtlo and MIPS32r6/MIPS64r6 has no
instructions that use LO.
2008-08-01-AsmInline.ll:
Explicitly specify the CPU since MIPS32r6/MIPS64r6 will correctly emit
different code and this is a regression test.
mips64instrs.ll and mips64muldiv.ll
Check registers and the way the multiply is used in m1
divrem.ll
Check registers and use multiple filecheck prefixes to limit redundancy
Reviewers: vmedic, jkolek, zoran.jovanovic, matheusalmeida
Reviewed By: matheusalmeida
Subscribers: matheusalmeida
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3894
llvm-svn: 210656
Summary:
- Conditional moves acting on 64-bit GPR's should require MIPS-IV rather than MIPS64
- ISD::MUL, and ISD::MULH[US] should be lowered on all 64-bit ISA's
Patch by David Chisnall
His work was sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL
I've added additional testcases to cover as much of the codegen changes
affecting MIPS-IV as I can. Where I've been unable to find an existing
MIPS64 testcase that can be re-used for MIPS-IV (mainly tests covering
ISD::GlobalAddress and similar), I at least agree that MIPS-IV should
behave like MIPS64. Further testcases that are fixed by this patch will follow
in my next commit. The testcases from that commit that fail for MIPS-IV without
this patch are:
LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/2010-07-20-Switch.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/cmov.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/eh-dwarf-cfa.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/largeimmprinting.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/longbranch.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/mips64-f128.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/mips64directive.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/mips64ext.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/mips64fpldst.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/mips64intldst.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/mips64load-store-left-right.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/sint-fp-store_pattern.ll
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
CC: matheusalmeida
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3343
llvm-svn: 206183
This update was done with the following bash script:
find test/CodeGen -name "*.ll" | \
while read NAME; do
echo "$NAME"
if ! grep -q "^; *RUN: *llc.*debug" $NAME; then
TEMP=`mktemp -t temp`
cp $NAME $TEMP
sed -n "s/^define [^@]*@\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\)(.*$/\1/p" < $NAME | \
while read FUNC; do
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)\([A-Za-z0-9_-]*\):\( *\)$FUNC: *\$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3$FUNC:/g" $TEMP
done
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-LABEL-LABEL:/;\1-LABEL:/" $TEMP
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-NEXT-LABEL:/;\1-NEXT:/" $TEMP
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-NOT-LABEL:/;\1-NOT:/" $TEMP
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-DAG-LABEL:/;\1-DAG:/" $TEMP
mv $TEMP $NAME
fi
done
llvm-svn: 186280
By default, a teq instruction is inserted after integer divide. No divide-by-zero
checks are performed if option "-mnocheck-zero-division" is used.
llvm-svn: 182306
I followed three heuristics for deciding whether to set 'true' or
'false':
- Everything target independent got 'true' as that is the expected
common output of the GCC builtins.
- If the target arch only has one way of implementing this operation,
set the flag in the way that exercises the most of codegen. For most
architectures this is also the likely path from a GCC builtin, with
'true' being set. It will (eventually) require lowering away that
difference, and then lowering to the architecture's operation.
- Otherwise, set the flag differently dependending on which target
operation should be tested.
Let me know if anyone has any issue with this pattern or would like
specific tests of another form. This should allow the x86 codegen to
just iteratively improve as I teach the backend how to differentiate
between the two forms, and everything else should remain exactly the
same.
llvm-svn: 146370
David Blaikie