Static data members were causing a problem because I mistakenly
assumed all members would affect a class's layout and so the
Layout member would be non-null.
llvm-svn: 305229
This reworks the way virtual bases are handled, and also the way
padding is detected across multiple levels of aggregates, producing
a much more accurate result.
llvm-svn: 301203
In a followup patch I intend to introduce an additional dumping
mode which dumps a graphical representation of a class's layout.
In preparation for this, the text-based layout printer needs to
be split out from the graphical layout printer, and both need
to be able to use the same code for printing the intro and outro
of a class's definition (e.g. base class list, etc).
This patch does so, and in the process introduces a skeleton
definition for the graphical printer, while currently making
the graphical printer just print nothing.
NFC
llvm-svn: 300134
Previously the dumping of class definitions was very primitive,
and it made it hard to do more than the most trivial of output
formats when dumping. As such, we would only dump one line for
each field, and then dump non-layout items like nested types
and enums.
With this patch, we do a complete analysis of the object
hierarchy including aggregate types, bases, virtual bases,
vftable analysis, etc. The only immediately visible effects
of this are that a) we can now dump a line for the vfptr where
before we would treat that as padding, and b) we now don't
treat virtual bases that come at the end of a class as padding
since we have a more detailed analysis of the class's storage
usage.
In subsequent patches, we should be able to use this analysis
to display a complete graphical view of a class's layout including
recursing arbitrarily deep into an object's base class / aggregate
member hierarchy.
llvm-svn: 300133
Eugene Zelenko