In r330377 and r338425 we have already identified what constitutes function
argument constructors and added stubs in order to prevent confusing them
with other temporary object constructors.
Now we implement a ConstructionContext sub-class to carry all the necessary
information about the construction site, namely call expression and argument
index.
On the analyzer side, the patch interacts with the recently implemented
pre-C++17 copy elision support in an interesting manner. If on the CFG side we
didn't find a construction context for the elidable constructor, we build
the CFG as if the elidable constructor is not elided, and the non-elided
constructor within it is a simple temporary. But the same problem may occur
in the analyzer: if the elidable constructor has a construction context but
the analyzer doesn't implement such context yet, the analyzer should also
try to skip copy elision and still inline the non-elided temporary constructor.
This was implemented by adding a "roll back" mechanism: when elision fails,
roll back the changes and proceed as if it's a simple temporary. The approach
is wonky, but i'm fine with that as long as it's merely a defensive mechanism
that should eventually go away once all construction contexts become supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48681.
llvm-svn: 338436
Like any normal funciton, Objective-C message can return a C++ object
in Objective-C++. Such object would require a construction context.
This patch, therefore, is an extension of r327343 onto Objective-C++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48608
llvm-svn: 338426
CFG now correctly identifies construction context for temporaries constructed
for the purpose of passing into a function as an argument.
Such context is still not fully implemented because the information it provides
is not rich enough: it doens't contain information about argument index.
It will be addresssed later.
This patch is an extension of r330377 to C++ construct-expressions and
Objective-C message expressions which aren't call-expressions but require
similar handling. C++ new-expressions with placement arguments still remain to
be handled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49826
llvm-svn: 338425
Artem Dergachev