We would emit a libcall for a 64-bit atomic on x86 after SVN r212119. This was
due to the misuse of hasCmpxchg16 to indicate if cmpxchg8b was supported on a
32-bit target. They were added at different times and would result in the
border condition being mishandled.
This fixes the border case to emit the cmpxchg8b instruction for 64-bit atomic
operations on x86 at the cost of restoring a long-standing bug in the codegen.
We emit a cmpxchg8b on all x86 targets even where the CPU does not support this
instruction (pre-Pentium CPUs). Although this bug should be fixed, this was
present prior to SVN r212119 and this change, so this is not really introducing
a regression.
llvm-svn: 212956
We construct a temporary "atomicrmw xchg" instruction when lowering atomic
stores for widths that aren't supported natively. This isn't on the top-level
worklist though, so it won't be removed automatically and we have to do it
ourselves once that itself has been lowered.
Thanks Saleem for pointing this out!
llvm-svn: 212948
Otherwise they get freed and the implicit "isa<XYZ>" tests following
turn out badly (at least under sanitizers).
Also corrects the ordering of unordered atomic stores.
llvm-svn: 212136
The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in
terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It
also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help
out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible
instructions..
rdar://problem/13496295
llvm-svn: 212119
Saleem Abdulrasool