CFI instructions that set appropriate cfa offset and cfa register are now
inserted in emitEpilogue() in X86FrameLowering.
Majority of the changes in this patch:
1. Ensure that CFI instructions do not affect code generation.
2. Enable maintaining correct information about cfa offset and cfa register
in a function when basic blocks are reordered, merged, split, duplicated.
These changes are target independent and described below.
Changed CFI instructions so that they:
1. are duplicable
2. are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
3. can be compared as equal
Add information to each MachineBasicBlock about cfa offset and cfa register
that are valid at its entry and exit (incoming and outgoing CFI info). Add
support for updating this information when basic blocks are merged, split,
duplicated, created. Add a verification pass (CFIInfoVerifier) that checks
that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match incoming
values of their successors.
Incoming and outgoing CFI information is used by a late pass
(CFIInstrInserter) that corrects CFA calculation rule for a basic block if
needed. That means that additional CFI instructions get inserted at basic
block beginning to correct the rule for calculating CFA. Having CFI
instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA calculation rule
for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic block reordering,
or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the blocks have wrong
cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block above them.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18046
llvm-svn: 306529
This patch improves the mul instruction combine function (combineMul)
by adding new layer of logic.
In this patch, we are adding the ability to fold (mul x, -((1 << c) -1))
or (mul x, -((1 << c) +1)) into (neg(X << c) -x) or (neg((x << c) + x) respective.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28232
llvm-svn: 292358
Summary: This patch adds support of conversion (mul x, 2^N + 1) => (add (shl x, N), x) and (mul x, 2^N - 1) => (sub (shl x, N), x) if the multiplication can not be converted to LEA + SHL or LEA + LEA. LLVM has already supported this on ARM, and it should also be useful on X86. Note the patch currently only applies to cases where the constant operand is positive, and I am planing to add another patch to support negative cases after this.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14603
llvm-svn: 255415
Summary: This patch adds support of conversion (mul x, 2^N + 1) => (add (shl x, N), x) and (mul x, 2^N - 1) => (sub (shl x, N), x) if the multiplication can not be converted to LEA + SHL or LEA + LEA. LLVM has already supported this on ARM, and it should also be useful on X86. Note the patch currently only applies to cases where the constant operand is positive, and I am planing to add another patch to support negative cases after this.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14603
llvm-svn: 255391
Reduce integer multiplication by a constant of the form k*2^c, where k is in {3,5,9} into a lea + shl. Previously it was only done for imulq on 64-bit platforms, but it makes sense for imull and 32-bit as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7196
llvm-svn: 227308
Petar Jovanovic