The AMD64rm instruction used in the test case was incorrect. Since
the first input register to AND64rm is tied to output register, they
must be the same.
Thanks for Jesper Antonsson for pointing this out!
llvm-svn: 305756
- MIParser: If the successor list is not specified successors will be
added based on basic block operands in the block and possible
fallthrough.
- MIRPrinter: Adds a new `simplify-mir` option, with that option set:
Skip printing of block successor lists in cases where the
parser is guaranteed to reconstruct it. This means we still print the
list if some successor cannot be determined (happens for example for
jump tables), if the successor order changes or branch probabilities
being unequal.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31262
llvm-svn: 302289
Summary:
With this change ImplicitNullCheck optimization uses alias analysis
and can use load/store memory access for implicit null check if there
are other load/store before but memory accesses do not alias.
Patch by Serguei Katkov!
Reviewers: sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30331
llvm-svn: 296440
Summary:
This change allows usage of store instruction for implicit null check.
Memory Aliasing Analisys is not used and change conservatively supposes
that any store and load may access the same memory. As a result
re-ordering of store-store, store-load and load-store is prohibited.
Patch by Serguei Katkov!
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: atrick, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29400
llvm-svn: 294338
Summary:
Currently the test implicit-null-checks.mir crashes if we run llc with
-enable-implicit-null-checks -start-before implicit-null-checks
options. Change fixes the RET instruction causing the crash.
Patch by Serguei Katkov!
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29390
llvm-svn: 293789
Summary:
This change allows a re-order of two intructions if their uses
are overlapped.
Patch by Serguei Katkov!
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29120
llvm-svn: 293775
Summary:
This change rewrites a core component in the ImplicitNullChecks pass for
greater simplicity since the original design was over-complicated for no
good reason. Please review this as essentially a new pass. The change
is almost NFC and I've added a test case for a scenario that this new
code handles that wasn't handled earlier.
The implicit null check pass, at its core, is a code hoisting transform.
It differs from "normal" code transforms in that it speculates
potentially faulting instructions (by design), but a lot of the usual
hazard detection logic (register read-after-write etc.) still applies.
We previously detected hazards by keeping track of registers defined and
used by machine instructions over an instruction range, but that was
unwieldy and did not actually confer any performance benefits. The
intent was to have linear time complexity over the number of machine
instructions considered, but it ended up being N^2 is practice.
This new version is more obviously O(N^2) (with N capped to 8 by
default) in hazard detection. It does not attempt to be clever in
tracking register uses or defs (the previous cleverness here was a
source of bugs).
Once this is checked in, I'll extract out the `IsSuitableMemoryOp` and
`CanHoistLoadInst` lambda into member functions (they're too complicated
to be inline lambdas) and do some other related NFC cleanups.
Reviewers: reames, anna, atrick
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27592
llvm-svn: 290394
ImplicitNullCheck keeps track of one instruction that the memory
operation depends on that it also hoists with the memory operation.
When hoisting this dependency, it would sometimes clobber a live-in
value to the basic block we were hoisting the two things out of. Fix
this by explicitly looking for such dependencies.
I also noticed two redundant checks on `MO.isDef()` in IsMIOperandSafe.
They're redundant since register MachineOperands are either Defs or Uses
-- there is no third kind. I'll change the checks to asserts in a later
commit.
llvm-svn: 287213
We don't track callee clobbered registers correctly, so avoid hoisting
across calls.
Note: for this bug to trigger we need a `readonly` call target, since we
already have logic to not hoist across potentially storing instructions
either.
llvm-svn: 287159
Rename AllVRegsAllocated to NoVRegs. This avoids the connotation of
running after register and simply describes that no vregs are used in
a machine function. With that we can simply compute the property and do
not need to dump/parse it in .mir files.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23850
llvm-svn: 279698
tracksSubRegLiveness only depends on the Subtarget and a cl::opt, there
is not need to change it or save/parse it in a .mir file.
Make the field const and move the initialization LiveIntervalAnalysis to the
MachineRegisterInfo constructor. Also cleanup some code and fix some
instances which better use MachineRegisterInfo::subRegLivenessEnabled() instead
of TargetSubtargetInfo::enableSubRegLiveness().
llvm-svn: 279676
Specifying isSSA is an extra line at best and results in invalid MI at
worst. Compute the value instead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22722
llvm-svn: 279600
Currently the MIR framework prints all its outputs (errors and actual
representation) on stderr.
This patch fixes that by printing the regular output in the output
specified with -o.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22251
llvm-svn: 275314
These tests don't actually care about the internal opcode number, but have to
be updated whenever we add a new one for GlobalISel. That's bad.
llvm-svn: 274774
When trying to convert a loading instruction into a FAULTING_LOAD, we
sometimes face code like this:
if %R10 is not null:
%R9<def> = MOV32ri Immediate
%R9<def, tied> = AND32rm %R9, 0x20(%R10)
else:
goto TRAP
In these cases we would like to use the AND32rm instruction as the
faulting operation by hoisting the "depedency" def-ing %R9 also above
the control flow, transforming the program into:
%R9<def> = MOV32ri Immediate
%R9<def, tied> = FAULTING_LOAD_OP(AND32rm %R9, 0x20(%R10), FailPath: TRAP)
This change teaches ImplicitNullChecks to do the above, when safe.
llvm-svn: 273501
Sanjoy Das