This is a short-term fix for PR33650 aimed to get the modules build bots green again.
Remove all the places where we use the LLVM_YAML_IS_(FLOW_)?SEQUENCE_VECTOR
macros to try to locally specialize a global template for a global type. That's
not how C++ works.
Instead, we now centrally define how to format vectors of fundamental types and
of string (std::string and StringRef). We use flow formatting for the former
cases, since that's the obvious right thing to do; in the latter case, it's
less clear what the right choice is, but flow formatting is really bad for some
cases (due to very long strings), so we pick block formatting. (Many of the
cases that were using flow formatting for strings are improved by this change.)
Other than the flow -> block formatting change for some vectors of strings,
this should result in no functionality change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34907
Corresponding updates to clang, clang-tools-extra, and lld to follow.
llvm-svn: 306878
This was originally reverted because of some non-deterministic
failures on certain buildbots. Luckily ASAN eventually caught
this as a stack-use-after-scope, so the fix is included in
this patch.
llvm-svn: 305393
This is causing failures on linux bots with an invalid stream
read. It doesn't repro in any configuration on Windows, so
reverting until I have a chance to investigate on Linux.
llvm-svn: 305371
This allows us to use yaml2obj and obj2yaml to round-trip CodeView
symbol and type information without having to manually specify the bytes
of the section. This makes for much easier to maintain tests. See the
tests under lld/COFF in this patch for example. Before they just said
SectionData: <blob> whereas now we can use meaningful record
descriptions. Note that it still supports the SectionData yaml field,
which could be useful for initializing a section to invalid bytes for
testing, for example.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34127
llvm-svn: 305366
This adds support for Symbols, StringTable, and FrameData subsection
types. Even though these subsections rarely if ever appear in a PDB
file (they are usually in object files), there's no theoretical reason
why they *couldn't* appear in a PDB. The real issue though is that in
order to add support for dumping and writing them (which will be useful
for object files), we need a way to test them. And since there is no
support for reading and writing them to / from object files yet, making
PDB support them is the best way to both add support for the underlying
format and add support for tests at the same time. Later, when we go
to add support for reading / writing them from object files, we'll need
only minimal changes in the underlying read/write code.
llvm-svn: 305037
This is the same change for the YAML Output style applied to the
raw output style. Previously we would queue up all subsections
until every one had been read, and then output them in a pre-
determined order. This was because some subsections need to be
read first in order to properly dump later subsections. This
patch allows them to be dumped in the order they appear.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34015
llvm-svn: 305034
While it's not entirely clear why a compiler or linker might
put this information into an object or PDB file, one has been
spotted in the wild which was causing llvm-pdbdump to crash.
This patch adds support for reading-writing these sections.
Since I don't know how to get one of the native tools to
generate this kind of debug info, the only test here is one
in which we feed YAML into the tool to produce a PDB and
then spit out YAML from the resulting PDB and make sure that
it matches.
llvm-svn: 304738
Previously we would expect certain subsections to appear
in a certain order because some subsections would reference
other subsections, but in practice we need to support
arbitrary orderings since some object file and PDB file
producers generate them this way. This also paves the
way for supporting Yaml <-> Object File conversion of
CodeView, since Object Files typically have quite a
large number of subsections in their debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33807
llvm-svn: 304588
The code was a mess and disorganized due to the sheer amount
of it being in one file. So I'm splitting this into three files.
One for CodeView types, one for CodeView symbols, and one for
CodeView debug subsections. NFC.
llvm-svn: 304278
Eugene Zelenko