will allow multiple context with different loop unroll parameters to run. This is a minor change and no effect
on existing application.
llvm-svn: 129449
without whatever this was trying to do. When/if someone has the time to do some empirical
evaluations, it might be worth it to figure out what this code was trying to do and see if
it's worth resurrecting/fixing.
llvm-svn: 123684
must be called in the pass's constructor. This function uses static dependency declarations to recursively initialize
the pass's dependencies.
Clients that only create passes through the createFooPass() APIs will require no changes. Clients that want to use the
CommandLine options for passes will need to manually call the appropriate initialization functions in PassInitialization.h
before parsing commandline arguments.
I have tested this with all standard configurations of clang and llvm-gcc on Darwin. It is possible that there are problems
with the static dependencies that will only be visible with non-standard options. If you encounter any crash in pass
registration/creation, please send the testcase to me directly.
llvm-svn: 116820
perform initialization without static constructors AND without explicit initialization
by the client. For the moment, passes are required to initialize both their
(potential) dependencies and any passes they preserve. I hope to be able to relax
the latter requirement in the future.
llvm-svn: 116334
register pressure and thus excess spills, which we don't currently recover from well. This should
be re-evaluated in the future if our ability to generate good spills/splits improves.
Partial fix for <rdar://problem/7635585>.
llvm-svn: 114919
not unrolling loops that contain calls that would be better off getting inlined. This mostly
comes up when an interleaved devirtualization pass has devirtualized a call which the inliner
will inline on a future pass. Thus, rather than blocking all loops containing calls, add
a metric for "inline candidate calls" and block loops containing those instead.
llvm-svn: 113535
unrolling threshold to the optimize-for-size threshold. Basically, for loops containing calls, unrolling
can still be profitable as long as the loop is REALLY small.
llvm-svn: 113439
The threshold value of 50 is arbitrary, and I chose it simply by analogy to the inlining thresholds, where
the baseline unrolling threshold is slightly smaller than the baseline inlining threshold. This could
undoubtedly use some tuning.
llvm-svn: 113306
dependence on DominanceFrontier. Instead, add an explicit DominanceFrontier
pass in StandardPasses.h to ensure that it gets scheduled at the right
time.
Declare that loop unrolling preserves ScalarEvolution, and shuffle some
getAnalysisUsages.
This eliminates one LoopSimplify and one LCCSA run in the standard
compile opts sequence.
llvm-svn: 109413
Chris Lattner