Both copy/alloc ops are using memref dialect after this change.
Reviewed By: silvas, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109480
* Add new pass option `print-data-flow-edges`, default value `true`.
* Add new pass option `print-control-flow-edges`, default value `false`.
* Remove `PrintCFGPass`. Same functionality now provided by
`PrintOpPass`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106342
* Visualize blocks and regions as subgraphs.
* Generate DOT file directly instead of using `GraphTraits`. `GraphTraits` does not support subgraphs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106253
Add a new clone operation to the memref dialect. This operation implicitly
copies data from a source buffer to a new buffer. In contrast to the linalg.copy
operation, this operation does not accept a target buffer as an argument.
Instead, this operation performs a conceptual allocation which does not need to
be performed manually.
Furthermore, this operation resolves the dependency from the linalg-dialect
in the BufferDeallocation pass. In addition, we also extended the canonicalization
patterns to fold clone operations. The copy removal pass has been removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99172
These utilities are more closely associated with the buffer
optimizations and buffer deallocation than with the dialect conversion
stuff in Bufferize.h. So move them out.
This makes Bufferize.h very easy to understand and completely focused on
dialect conversion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91563
This pass allows removing getResultConversionKind from
BufferizeTypeConverter. This pass replaces the AppendToArgumentsList
functionality. As far as I could tell, the only use of this functionlity
is to perform the transformation that is implemented in this pass.
Future patches will remove the getResultConversionKind machinery from
BufferizeTypeConverter, but sending this patch for individual review for
clarity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90071
There are several pieces of pattern rewriting infra in IR/ that really shouldn't be there. This revision moves those pieces to a better location such that they are easier to evolve in the future(e.g. with PDL). More concretely this revision does the following:
* Create a Transforms/GreedyPatternRewriteDriver.h and move the apply*andFold methods there.
The definitions for these methods are already in Transforms/ so it doesn't make sense for the declarations to be in IR.
* Create a new lib/Rewrite library and move PatternApplicator there.
This new library will be focused on applying rewrites, and will also include compiling rewrites with PDL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89103
The current BufferPlacement transformation contains several concepts for
hoisting allocations. However, more advanced hoisting techniques should not be
integrated into the BufferPlacement transformation. Hence, this CL refactors the
current BufferPlacement pass into three separate pieces: BufferDeallocation and
BufferAllocation(Loop)Hoisting. Moreover, it extends the hoisting functionality
by allowing to move allocations out of loops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87756
-- Introduces a pass that normalizes the affine layout maps to the identity layout map both within and across functions by rewriting function arguments and call operands where necessary.
-- Memref normalization is now implemented entirely in the module pass '-normalize-memrefs' and the limited intra-procedural version has been removed from '-simplify-affine-structures'.
-- Run using -normalize-memrefs.
-- Return ops are not handled and would be handled in the subsequent revisions.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Varma <abhishek.varma@polymagelabs.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84490
This pass removes redundant dialect-independent Copy operations in different
situations like the following:
%from = ...
%to = ...
... (no user/alias for %to)
copy(%from, %to)
... (no user/alias for %from)
dealloc %from
use(%to)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82757
This dialect contains various structured control flow operaitons, not only
loops, reflect this in the name. Drop the Ops suffix for consistency with other
dialects.
Note that this only moves the files and changes the C++ namespace from 'loop'
to 'scf'. The visible IR prefix remains the same and will be updated
separately. The conversions will also be updated separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79578
- Exports MLIR targets to be used out-of-tree.
- mimicks `add_clang_library` and `add_flang_library`.
- Fixes libMLIR.so
After https://reviews.llvm.org/D77515 libMLIR.so was no longer containing
any object files. We originally had a cludge there that made it work with
the static initalizers and when switchting away from that to the way the
clang shlib does it, I noticed that MLIR doesn't create a `obj.{name}` target,
and doesn't export it's targets to `lib/cmake/mlir`.
This is due to MLIR using `add_llvm_library` under the hood, which adds
the target to `llvmexports`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78773
[MLIR] Fix libMLIR.so and LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB
Primarily, this patch moves all mlir references to LLVM libraries into
either LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS or LINK_COMPONENTS. This enables magic in
the llvm cmake files to automatically replace reference to LLVM components
with references to libLLVM.so when necessary. Among other things, this
completes fixing libMLIR.so, which has been broken for some configurations
since D77515.
Unlike previously, the pattern is now that mlir libraries should almost
always use add_mlir_library. Previously, some libraries still used
add_llvm_library. However, this confuses the export of targets for use
out of tree because libraries specified with add_llvm_library are exported
by LLVM. Instead users which don't need/can't be linked into libMLIR.so
can specify EXCLUDE_FROM_LIBMLIR
A common error mode is linking with LLVM libraries outside of LINK_COMPONENTS.
This almost always results in symbol confusion or multiply defined options
in LLVM when the same object file is included as a static library and
as part of libLLVM.so. To catch these errors more directly, there's now
mlir_check_all_link_libraries.
To simplify usage of add_mlir_library, we assume that all mlir
libraries depend on LLVMSupport, so it's not necessary to separately specify
it.
tested with:
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=on,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB + LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79067
[MLIR] Move from using target_link_libraries to LINK_LIBS
This allows us to correctly generate dependencies for derived targets,
such as targets which are created for object libraries.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79243
Three commits have been squashed to avoid intermediate build breakage.
We have provided a generic buffer assignment transformation ported from
TensorFlow. This generic transformation pass automatically analyzes the values
and their aliases (also in other blocks) and returns the valid positions for
Alloc and Dealloc operations. To find these positions, the algorithm uses the
block Dominator and Post-Dominator analyses. In our proposed algorithm, we have
considered aliasing, liveness, nested regions, branches, conditional branches,
critical edges, and independency to custom block terminators. This
implementation doesn't support block loops. However, we have considered this in
our design. For this purpose, it is only required to have a loop analysis to
insert Alloc and Dealloc operations outside of these loops in some special
cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78484
This revision adds the initial pass for performing SCCP generically in MLIR. SCCP is an algorithm for propagating constants across control flow, and optimistically assumes all values to be constant unless proven otherwise. It currently supports branching control, with support for regions and inter-procedural propagation being added in followups.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78397
There were some unused CMakeFiles for Affine/IR and Affine/EDSC.
This change builds separate MLIRAffineOps and MLIRAffineEDSC libraries
using those CMakeFiles. This combination replaces the old MLIRAffine
library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78317
This will greatly simplify a number of things related to passes:
* Enables generation of pass registration
* Enables generation of boiler plate pass utilities
* Enables generation of pass documentation
This revision focuses on adding the basic structure and adds support for generating the registration for passes in the Transforms/ directory. Future revisions will add more support and move more passes over.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76656
This allows conversion of a ParallelLoop from N induction variables to
some nuber of induction variables less than N.
The first intended use of this is for the GPUDialect to convert
ParallelLoops to iterate over 3 dimensions so they can be launched as
GPU Kernels.
To implement this:
- Normalize each iteration space of the ParallelLoop
- Use the same induction variable in a new ParallelLoop for multiple
original iterations.
- Split the new induction variable back into the original set of values
inside the body of the ParallelLoop.
Subscribers: mgorny, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, aartbik, liufengdb, Joonsoo, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76363
Move some of the affine transforms and their test cases to their
respective dialect directory. This patch does not complete the move, but
takes care of a good part.
Renames: prefix 'affine' to affine loop tiling cl options,
vectorize -> super-vectorize
Signed-off-by: Uday Bondhugula <uday@polymagelabs.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76565
Summary:
Change AffineOps Dialect structure to better group both IR and Tranforms. This included extracting transforms directly related to AffineOps. Also move AffineOps to Affine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76161
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components.
Previous version of this patch broke depencies on TableGen
targets. This appears to be because it compiled all
libraries to OBJECT libraries (probably because cmake
is generating different target names). Avoiding object
libraries results in correct dependencies.
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
add_llvm_library and add_llvm_executable may need to create new targets with
appropriate dependencies. As a result, it is not sufficient in some
configurations (namely LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on) to only call
add_dependencies(). Instead, the explicit TableGen dependencies must
be passed to add_llvm_library() or add_llvm_executable() using the DEPENDS
keyword.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74930
CMake allows calling target_link_libraries() without a keyword,
but this usage is not preferred when also called with a keyword,
and has surprising behavior. This patch explicitly specifies a
keyword when using target_link_libraries().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75725
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components.
Previous version of this patch broke depencies on TableGen
targets. This appears to be because it compiled all
libraries to OBJECT libraries (probably because cmake
is generating different target names). Avoiding object
libraries results in correct dependencies.
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
add_llvm_library and add_llvm_executable may need to create new targets with
appropriate dependencies. As a result, it is not sufficient in some
configurations (namely LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on) to only call
add_dependencies(). Instead, the explicit TableGen dependencies must
be passed to add_llvm_library() or add_llvm_executable() using the DEPENDS
keyword.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74930
When compiling libLLVM.so, add_llvm_library() manipulates the link libraries
being used. This means that when using add_llvm_library(), we need to pass
the list of libraries to be linked (using the LINK_LIBS keyword) instead of
using the standard target_link_libraries call. This is preparation for
properly dealing with creating libMLIR.so as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74864
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
add_llvm_library and add_llvm_executable may need to create new targets with
appropriate dependencies. As a result, it is not sufficient in some
configurations (namely LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on) to only call
add_dependencies(). Instead, the explicit TableGen dependencies must
be passed to add_llvm_library() or add_llvm_executable() using the DEPENDS
keyword.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74930
When compiling libLLVM.so, add_llvm_library() manipulates the link libraries
being used. This means that when using add_llvm_library(), we need to pass
the list of libraries to be linked (using the LINK_LIBS keyword) instead of
using the standard target_link_libraries call. This is preparation for
properly dealing with creating libMLIR.so as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74864
Summary:
This revision adds a utility to generate debug locations from the IR during compilation, by snapshotting to a output stream and using the locations that operations were dumped in that stream. The new locations may either;
* Replace the original location of the operation.
old:
loc("original_source.cpp":1:1)
new:
loc("snapshot_source.mlir":10:10)
* Fuse with the original locations as NamedLocs with a specific tag.
old:
loc("original_source.cpp":1:1)
new:
loc(fused["original_source.cpp":1:1, "snapshot"("snapshot_source.mlir":10:10)])
This feature may be used by a debugger to display the code at various different levels of the IR. It would also be able to show the different levels of IR attached to a specific source line in the original source file.
This feature may also be used to generate locations for operations generated during compilation, that don't necessarily have a user source location to attach to.
This requires changes in the printer to track the locations of operations emitted in the stream. Moving forward we need to properly(and efficiently) track the number of newlines emitted to the stream during printing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74019
Summary:
This breaks a cyclic library dependency where MLIRPass used the verifier
in MLIRAnalysis, but MLIRAnalysis also contained passes used for testing.
The presence of the test passes here is archaeology, predating
test/lib/Transform.
Reviewers: rriddle
Reviewed By: rriddle
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, mgorny, mehdi_amini, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, liufengdb, Joonsoo, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74067
Summary: This pass deletes all symbols that are found to be unreachable. This is done by computing the set of operations that are known to be live, propagating that liveness to other symbols, and then deleting all symbols that are not within this live set.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72482
Now that we have unrolling as a declarative pattern, we can drop a full pass that has gone stale. In the future we may want to add specific unrolling patterns for VectorTransferReadOp.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 283806880
cwz920716