Similar to D119787 for PPC64.
A hidden undefined weak may change its binding to local before some
`isUndefinedWeak` code, so some `isUndefinedWeak` code needs to be changed to
`isUndefined`. The undefined non-weak case has been errored, so just using
`isUndefined` is fine.
The Linux kernel recently has a usage that a branch from 0xffff800008491ee0
references a hidden undefined weak symbol `vfio_group_set_kvm`.
It relies on the behavior that a branch to undefined weak resolving to the next
instruction, otherwise it'd see spurious relocation out of range errors.
Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1624
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123750
Fixes issue 47690. The reproduction steps produced a shared object
from clang directly, and then fed the shared object back into
lld. With no regular object files, this assert was hit. I'm not sure
if we need to or should be looking for equivalent fields in shared
objects.
Code object version 5 will use the same EFlags as version 4, so we only need to add an additional case
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122190
In many call sites we know uncompression cannot happen (non-SHF_ALLOC, or the
data (even if compressed) must have been uncompressed by a previous pass).
Prefer rawData in these cases. data() increases code size and prevents
optimization on rawData.
Reported by Stefan Pintilie in D119773.
For a branch to a hidden undefined weak symbol, there is an
`assert(sym->getVA());` failure in PPC64LongBranchTargetSection::writeTo for a
-no-pie link. The root cause is that we unnecessarily create the thunk for the
-no-pie link.
Fix this by changing the condition to just `s.isUndefined()`. See the inline
comment.
Rename ppc64-weak-undef-call.s to ppc64-undefined-weak.s to be consistent with
other architectures.
Reviewed By: sfertile, stefanp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119787
Currently `this->getName() == newSym.getName()`.
By keeping the old nameData/nameSize, newSym's nameData/nameSize will be
ignored. The call sites can avoid calling getName().
printTraceSymbol needs to take the symbol name since `other`'s name is empty.
-fprofile-use=/-fprofile-sample-use= compiles may produce REL-format
.rel.llvm.call-graph-profile even if the prevailing format is RELA on AArch64.
Add R_AARCH64_NONE to getImplicitAddend to fix this linker error:
```
ld.lld: error: internal linker error: cannot read addend for relocation R_AARCH64_NONE
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://crbug.com and run tools/clang/scripts/process_crashreports.py (only works inside Google) which will upload a report and include the crash backtrace.
```
This diff adds support for ADRP+ADD optimization for AArch64 described in
d2ca58c54b
i.e. under appropriate constraints
ADRP x0, symbol
ADD x0, x0, :lo12: symbol
can be turned into
NOP
ADR x0, symbol
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117614
Move all variables at file-scope or function-static-scope into a hosting structure (lld::CommonLinkerContext) that lives at lldMain()-scope. Drivers will inherit from this structure and add their own global state, in the same way as for the existing COFFLinkerContext.
See discussion in https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-June/151184.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108850
to decrease sizeof(SymbolUnion) by 8 on ELF64 platforms.
Symbols needing such information are typically 1% or fewer (5134 out of 560520
when linking clang, 19898 out of 5550705 when linking chrome). Storing them
elsewhere can decrease memory usage and symbol initialization time.
There is a ~0.8% saving on max RSS when linking a large program.
Future direction:
* Move some of dynsymIndex/verdefIndex/versionId to SymbolAux
* Support mixed TLSDESC and TLS GD without increasing sizeof(SymbolUnion)
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116281
GCC's powerpc32 port predefines `PPC` as a macro in GNU C++ mode in some configurations (Linux,
FreeBSD, and some others. See `builtin_define_std ("PPC"); ` in gcc/config/rs6000).
```
% powerpc-linux-gnu-g++ -E -dM -xc++ /dev/null -o - | grep -w PPC
#define PPC 1
```
Fixes https://bugs.gentoo.org/829599
Reviewed By: thesamesam
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116017
(Fixed an issue about GOT on a copy relocated alias.)
(Fixed an issue about not creating r_addend=0 IRELATIVE for unreferenced non-preemptible ifunc.)
The idea is to make scanRelocations mark some actions are needed (GOT/PLT/etc)
and postpone the real work to postScanRelocations. It gives some flexibility:
* Make it feasible to support .plt.got (PR32938): we need to know whether GLOB_DAT and JUMP_SLOT are both needed.
* Make non-preemptible IFUNC handling slightly cleaner: avoid setting/clearing sym.gotInIgot
* -z nocopyrel: report all copy relocation places for one symbol
* Make GOT deduplication feasible
* Make parallel relocation scanning feasible (if we can avoid all stateful operations and make Symbol attributes atomic), but parallelism may not be the appealing choice
Since this patch moves a large chunk of code out of ELFT templates. My x86-64
executable is actually a few hundred bytes smaller.
For ppc32-ifunc-nonpreemptible-pic.s: I remove absolute relocation references to non-preemptible ifunc
because absolute relocation references are incorrect in -fpie mode.
Reviewed By: peter.smith, ikudrin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114783
needsPltAddr is equivalent to `needsCopy && isFunc`. In many places, it is
equivalent to `needsCopy` because the non-STT_FUNC cases are ruled out.
Reviewed By: ikudrin, peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115603
Currently, LLD does not support the complete set of ARM group relocations.
Given that I intend to start using these in the Linux kernel [0], let's add
support for these.
This implements the group processing as documented in the ELF psABI. Notably,
this means support is dropped for very far symbol references that also carry a
small component, where the immediate is rotated in such a way that only part of
it wraps to the other end of the 32-bit word. To me, it seems unlikely that
this is something anyone could be relying on, but of course I could be wrong.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211122092816.2865873-8-ardb@kernel.org/
Reviewed By: peter.smith, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114172
The current TLSDESC optimization code assumes:
```
leaq x@tlsdesc(%rip), %rax
call *x@tlscall(%rax) # adjacent
```
From https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/5665 , it seems that the
two instructions may not be adjacent in GCC 10's output:
```
leaq x@tlsdesc(%rip), %rax
something else
call *x@tlscall(%rax)
```
This patch supports the case. While here, support non-RAX registers for
R_X86_64_GOTPC32_TLSDESC, in case the compiler generates inefficient:
```
leaq x@tlsdesc(%rip), %rcx # or %rdx, %rbx, %rdi, ...
movq %rcx, %rax
call *x@tlscall(%rax) # GNU ld/gold error for non-RAX
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114416
This brings back the original version of D81359.
I have found several use cases now.
* Unlike GNU ld, LLD's relocation processing is one pass. If we decide to
optimize(relax) R_X86_64_{,REX_}GOTPCRELX, we will suppress GOT generation and
cannot undo the decision later. Optimizing R_X86_64_REX_GOTPCRELX can usually
make it easy to hit `relocation R_X86_64_REX_GOTPCRELX out of range` because
the distance to GOT is usually shorter. Without --no-relax, the user has to
recompile with `-Wa,-mrelax-relocations=no`.
* The option would help during my investigationg of the root cause of https://git.kernel.org/linus/09e43968db40c33a73e9ddbfd937f46d5c334924
* There is need for relaxation for AArch64 & RISC-V. Implementing this for
x86-64 improves consistency with little target-specific cost (two-line
X86_64.cpp change).
Reviewed By: alexander-shaposhnikov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113615
This change implements support for R_ARM_THM_JUMP8 relocation in
addition to R_ARM_THM_JUMP11 which is already supported by LLD.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21225
Many diagnostics use `getErrorPlace` or `getErrorLocation` to report a location.
In the presence of line table debug information, `getErrorPlace` uses a source
file location and ignores the object file location. However, the object file
location is sometimes more useful.
This patch changes "undefined symbol" and "out of range" diagnostics to report
both object/source file locations. Other diagnostics can use similar format if
needed.
The key idea is to let `InputSectionBase::getLocation` report the object file
location and use `getSrcMsg` for source file/line information. `getSrcMsg`
doesn't leverage `STT_FILE` information yet, but I think the temporary lack of
the functionality is ok.
For the ARM "branch and link relocation" diagnostic, I arbitrarily place the
source file location at the end of the line. The diagnostic is not very common
so its formatting doesn't need to be pretty.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112518
For `InputSection` `.foo`, its `InputBaseSection::{areRelocsRela,firstRelocation,numRelocation}` basically
encode the information of `.rel[a].foo`. However, one uint32_t (the relocation section index)
suffices. See the implementation of `relsOrRelas`.
This change decreases sizeof(InputSection) from 184 to 176 on 64-bit Linux.
The maximum resident set size linking a large application (1.2G output) decreases by 0.39%.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112513
For a function call (using the default `-fplt`), GCC `-mcmodel=large` generates an assembly modifier which
leads to an R_X86_64_PLTOFF64 relocation. In real world,
http://git.ageinghacker.net/jitter (used by GNU poke) uses `-mcmodel=large`.
R_X86_64_PLTOFF64's formula is (if preemptible) `L - GOT + A` or (if non-preemptible) `S - GOT + A`
where `GOT` is (confusingly) the address of `.got.plt`
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112386
Most architectures use .got instead of .got.plt, so switching the default can
minimize customization.
This fixes an issue for SPARC V9 which uses .got .
AVR, AMDGPU, and MSP430 don't seem to use _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_.
(As I mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D62609#1534158 ,
the condition for using bti c for executable can be loosened.)
In two cases the address of a PLT may escape:
* canonical PLT entry for a STT_FUNC
* non-preemptible STT_GNU_IFUNC which is converted to STT_FUNC
The first case can be detected with `needsPltAddr`.
The second case is not straightforward to detect because for the Relocations.cpp
created `directSym`, it's difficult to know whether the associated `sym` has
exercised the `!needsPlt(expr)` code path. Just use the conservative `isInIplt`
condition. A non-preemptible ifunc not referenced by non-GOT-generating
non-PLT-generating relocations will have an unneeded `bti c`, but the cost is acceptable.
The second case fixes a bug as well: a -shared link may have non-preemptible ifunc.
Before the patch we did not emit `bti c` and could be wrong if the PLT address escaped.
GNU ld doesn't handle the case: `relocation R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 against STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol 'ifunc2' isn't handled by elf64_aarch64_final_link_relocate` (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28370)
For -shared, if BTI is enabled but PAC is disabled, the PLT entry size increases
from 16 to 24 because we have to select the PLT scheme early, but the cost is
acceptable.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110217
This patch is a followup patch to https://reviews.llvm.org/D105760 which adds this relocation. This handles the relocation in lld.
The s_branch family of instruction does the following:
PC = PC + signext(simm * 4) + 4
so we we do the opposite on the target address before writing it in the instruction stream.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105761
Since D100490 this case is diagnosed for -z rel. This commit implements
R_AARCH64_TLSDESC cases for AArch64::getImplicitAddend() and
AArch64::relocate(). However, there are probably further relocation types
that need to be handled for full support of -z rel.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47009
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100544
Fangrui Song