This is related to but not blocked by <rdar://problem/12137950>
("Return-by-value structs do not have associated regions")
This reverts r164875 / 3278d41e17749dbedb204a81ef373499f10251d7.
llvm-svn: 164952
-Allow Sema to do more processing on the initial Expr before checking it.
-Remove the special conditions in HandleExpr()
-Move the code so that only one call site is needed.
-Removed the function from Sema and only call it locally.
-Warn on potentially evaluated reference variables, not just casts to r-values.
-Update tests.
llvm-svn: 164951
It is possible and valid to have a state manager and associated objects
without having a SubEngine or checkers.
Patch by Olaf Krzikalla!
llvm-svn: 164947
Lookup can nevertheless find them due to the serialized lookup table.
For instance when reading a template decl's templatedDecl, it will search for existing decls that it could be a redeclaration of, and find the half-read template decl.
Thus there is no point in asserting the names of decls.
llvm-svn: 164932
This fixes a regression from r162254, the optimizer has problems reasoning
about the smaller memcpy as it's often not safe to widen a store but making it
smaller is.
llvm-svn: 164917
the validation occurred.
The original implementation was pessimistic - we assumed that ivars
which escape are invalidated. This version is optimistic, it assumes
that the ivars will always be explicitly invalidated: either set to nil
or sent an invalidation message.
llvm-svn: 164868
We can't specialize the usual llvm::DenseMapInfo at the end of the file
because by that point the DenseMap in FunctionScopeInfo has already been
instantiated.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 164862
Summary:
When issuing a diagnostic message for the -Wimplicit-fallthrough diagnostics, always try to find the latest macro, defined at the point of fallthrough, which is immediately expanded to "[[clang::fallthrough]]", and use it's name instead of the actual sequence.
Known issues:
* uses PP.getSpelling() to compare macro definition with a string (anyone can suggest a convenient way to fill a token array, or maybe lex it in runtime?);
* this can be generalized and used in other similar cases, any ideas where it should reside then?
Reviewers: doug.gregor, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D50
llvm-svn: 164858
New output:
warning: weak property may be unpredictably set to nil
note: property declared here
note: assign the value to a strong variable to keep the object alive
during use
<rdar://problem/12277204>
llvm-svn: 164857
The infrastructure for -Warc-repeated-use-of-weak got a little too heavy
to leave sitting at the top of Sema.cpp.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 164856
Like properties, loading from a weak ivar twice in the same function can
give you inconsistent results if the object is deallocated between the
two loads. It is safer to assign to a strong local variable and use that.
Second half of <rdar://problem/12280249>.
llvm-svn: 164855
The motivating example:
if (self.weakProp)
use(self.weakProp);
As with any non-atomic test-then-use, it is possible a weak property to be
non-nil at the 'if', but be deallocated by the time it is used. The correct
way to write this example is as follows:
id tmp = self.weakProp;
if (tmp)
use(tmp);
The warning is controlled by -Warc-repeated-use-of-receiver, and uses the
property name and base to determine if the same property on the same object
is being accessed multiple times. In cases where the base is more
complicated than just a single Decl (e.g. 'foo.bar.weakProp'), it picks a
Decl for some degree of uniquing and reports the problem under a subflag,
-Warc-maybe-repeated-use-of-receiver. This gives a way to tune the
aggressiveness of the warning for a particular project.
The warning is not on by default because it is not flow-sensitive and thus
may have a higher-than-acceptable rate of false positives, though it is
less noisy than -Wreceiver-is-weak. On the other hand, it will not warn
about some cases that may be legitimate issues that -Wreceiver-is-weak
will catch, and it does not attempt to reason about methods returning weak
values.
Even though this is not a real "analysis-based" check I've put the bug
emission code in AnalysisBasedWarnings for two reasons: (1) to run on
every kind of code body (function, method, block, or lambda), and (2) to
suggest that it may be enhanced by flow-sensitive analysis in the future.
The second (smaller) half of this work is to extend it to weak locals
and weak ivars. This should use most of the same infrastructure.
Part of <rdar://problem/12280249>
llvm-svn: 164854
Previously the analyzer treated all inlined constructors like lvalues,
setting the value of the CXXConstructExpr to the newly-constructed
region. However, some CXXConstructExprs behave like rvalues -- in
particular, the implicit copy constructor into a pass-by-value argument.
In this case, we want only the /contents/ of a temporary object to be
passed, so that we can use the same "copy each argument into the
parameter region" algorithm that we use for scalar arguments.
This may change when we start modeling destructors of temporaries,
but for now this is the last part of <rdar://problem/12137950>.
llvm-svn: 164830
An rvalue has no address, but calling a C++ member function requires a
'this' pointer. This commit makes the analyzer create a temporary region
in which to store the struct rvalue and use as a 'this' pointer whenever
a member function is called on an rvalue, which is essentially what
CodeGen does.
More of <rdar://problem/12137950>. The last part is tracking down the
C++ FIXME in array-struct-region.cpp.
llvm-svn: 164829
Struct rvalues are represented in the analyzer by CompoundVals,
LazyCompoundVals, or plain ConjuredSymbols -- none of which have associated
regions. If the entire structure is going to persist, this is not a
problem -- either the rvalue will be assigned to an existing region, or
a MaterializeTemporaryExpr will be present to create a temporary region.
However, if we just need a field from the struct, we need to create the
temporary region ourselves.
This is inspired by the way CodeGen handles calls to temporaries;
support for that in the analyzer is coming next.
Part of <rdar://problem/12137950>
llvm-svn: 164828
- The size of the packed vector is often small, save mallocs using SmallBitVector.
- Copying SmallBitVectors is also cheap, remove a level of indirection.
llvm-svn: 164827
diagnostic count.
If a DiagnosticConsumer sub-class overwrites IncludeInDiagnosticCounts,
this should change diagnostic counts. However, it currently also
influences Diag.ErrorOccurred, which in turn influences the behavior of
parsing and semantic analysis (in a way that can make it crash).
llvm-svn: 164824
have PPCallbacks::InclusionDirective pass the character range for the filename quotes or brackets.
rdar://11113134 & http://llvm.org/PR13880
llvm-svn: 164743
Xcode-style clang builds only support Xcode's architectures, so mips
isn't available and the driver tries to use gcc instead. cc1 will go
ahead and do -fsyntax-only for any platform it knows about even if it
can't actually compile.
llvm-svn: 164742
This checker is annotation driven. It checks that the annotated
invalidation method accesses all ivars of the enclosing objects that are
objects of type, which in turn contains an invalidation method.
This is driven by
__attribute((annotation("objc_instance_variable_invalidator")).
llvm-svn: 164716
where an attribute is attached to a forward declaration of a template function,
and refers to parameters of that declaration, but is then inherited by the
definition of that function. When the definition is instantiated, the
parameter references need to be remapped.
llvm-svn: 164710
This also adds a definition for uint64_t, which was causing build failures
on some platforms. (I'm actually surprised this didn't happen on more
builders, but maybe the search paths are different.)
llvm-svn: 164706
typeid (and a couple other non-standard places where we can transform an
unevaluated expression into an evaluated expression) is special
because it introduces an an expression evaluation context,
which conflicts with the mechanism to compute the current
lambda mangling context. PR12123.
I would appreciate if someone would double-check that we get the mangling
correct with this patch.
llvm-svn: 164658
enough information so we can mangle them correctly in cases involving
dependent parameter types. (This specifically impacts cases involving
null pointers and cases involving parameters of reference type.)
Fix the mangler to use this information instead of trying to scavenge
it out of the parameter declaration.
<rdar://problem/12296776>.
llvm-svn: 164656
This makes the behavior clearer concerning literals with the maximum
number of digits. For a 32-bit example, 4,000,000,000 is a valid uint32_t,
but 5,000,000,000 is not, so we'd have to count 10-digit decimal numbers
as "unsafe" (meaning we have to check for overflow when parsing them,
just as we would for numbers with 11 digits or higher). This is the same,
only with 64 bits to play with.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 164639
Jordan Rose