This patch extends the preliminary support for vector-predicated (VP)
operation legalization to include promotion of illegal integer vector
types.
Integer promotion of binary VP operations is relatively simple and
piggy-backs on the non-VP logic, but passing the two extra mask and VP
operands through to the promoted operation.
Tests have been added to the RISC-V target to cover the basic scenarios
for integer promotion for both fixed- and scalable-vector types.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108288
Fix 'platform file read' and 'platform file write' commands to correctly
detect erraneous return and report it as such. Currently, errors were
implicitly printed as a return value of -1, and the commands were
assumed to be successful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107665
Use the same codepaths as for MSVC. Mingw-w64 does have the _mktemp_s
function; on Vista and newer, msvcrt.dll does contain the function,
which ends up called. (Same thing in the UCRT.) In older versions of
msvcrt.dll (older than what libc++ supports), mingw-w64 provides a
fallback implementation.
This effectively reverts 23323e25f8 (and
d07e5c23b4). That commit tried to fix
unspecified MinGW build breakage.
This reduces the risk of temp name collisions between processes (when
running multiple tests in parallel); the path returned by
GetTempFileName can easily collide with other similar paths.
(_mktemp_s on the other hand tries to avoid such clashes by using
the process id as part of the uniqueness seed.)
This avoids stray random failures in fstreams tests in mingw configurations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98526
This patch implements extract_subvector for predicate types when
the input type is more than twice the size of the subvector that
is being extracted.
Reviewed By: CarolineConcatto
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109314
This improvement adds "assume" after removal of branch basing on UB in successor block.
Consider the following example:
```
pred:
x = ...
cond = x > 10
br cond, bb, other.succ
bb:
phi [nullptr, pred], ... // other possible preds
load(phi) // UB if we came from pred
other.succ:
// here we know that x <= 10, but this knowledge is lost
// after the branch is turned to unconditional unless we
// preserve it with assume.
```
If we remove the branch basing on knowledge about UB in a successor block,
then the fact that x <= 10 is other.succ might be lost if this condition is
not inferrable from any dominating condition. To preserve this knowledge, we
can add assume intrinsic with (possibly inverted) branch condition.
Patch by Dmitry Bakunevich!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109054
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
format.
Currently when we add a new section in the profile format and generate a profile
containing the new section, older compiler which reads the new profile will
issue an error. The forward incompatibility can cause unnecessary churn when
extending the profile. This patch removes the incompatibility when adding a new
section for extbinary format.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109398
The alignment of vector variable arguments in callee side is 4, which is
aligned with MSVC. But the caller aligns them to the size of vector
arguments. It results in run fails. This patch fixes this problem by
trimming it to 4 bytes for variable arguments on Win32.
Fixed vector arguments are passed by pointer on Win32. So they don't have
the problem.
I don't find a doc in MSDN for this calling conversion, so I did several
experiments here: https://godbolt.org/z/n1zn1Gx1z
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108887
See PR48617.
When assigning the new template arguments to the new TypeLoc, we were looping
on the argument count of the original TypeLoc instead of the new one,
which can be different when packs are present.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109406
This reverts 61ddc3d3db to reapply
91eda9c30f after fixing the " |& "
causing failures on windows.
Change-Id: Ib646c803b2274f0f24f9a8932de7aa97003529c5
- `this` used in lambda expression parameter declarations needs no capture.
- Set up CXXThisOverride for default template arguments of a lambda.
A similar fix to this is c3d2ebb60f.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102531
The basic problem being solved is that we largely give up when encountering a trip count involving an IV which is not an addrec. We will fall back to the brute force constant eval, but that doesn't have the information about the fact that we can't cycle back through the same set of values.
There's a high level design question of whether this is the right place to handle this, and if not, where that place is. The major alternative here would be to return a conservative upper bound, and then rely on two invocations of indvars to add the facts to the narrow IV, and then reconstruct SCEV. (I have not implemented the alternative and am not 100% sure this would work out.) That's arguably more in line with existing code, but I find this substantially easier to reason about. During review, no one expressed a strong opinion, so we went with this one.
Differential Revision: D108651
Both Wasm & Emscripten SjLj handling has a restriction that `setjmp`
cannot be called indirectly. I thought we have been erroring out on
indirect uses of `setjmp`, but some recent CL disrupted the logic and
we are not erroring out anymore.
We currently
1. Collect functions that contain `setjmp` calls in `SetjmpUsers`. This
only counts direct calls:
8f77dc459e/llvm/lib/Target/WebAssembly/WebAssemblyLowerEmscriptenEHSjLj.cpp (L869-L878)
2. Run `runSjLjOnFunction` only on those `SetjmpUsers`. Within
`runSjLjOnFunction`, if we see an indirect use of `setjmp`, we error
out:
8f77dc459e/llvm/lib/Target/WebAssembly/WebAssemblyLowerEmscriptenEHSjLj.cpp (L1218-L1221)
So if there are only indirect setjmp calls within the module,
`SetjmpUsers` will be empty, and `runSjLjOnFunction` is not even entered
once. And the indirect `setjmp` call will error out at link time. So in
this CL we check for the indirect uses of `setjmp` upfront before we
enter `runSjLjOnFunction`.
Also this currently errors out on `invoke @setjmp`, which can only occur
when using Wasm EH + Wasm SjLj within a function. We recently added Wasm
SjLj support but we don't support using Wasm EH + Wasm SjLj in the same
function yet. We plan to add this support very soon, so I don't think
it's worth creating another test file just for this. (This is an error
test so it needs its own file)
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109375
Low-level code may occasionally deal with direct access by concrete addresses
such as 0x1234. Values at these addresses act like globals: they can change
at any time. They typically wear volatile qualifiers.
Suppress all warnings on loops with conditions that involve casting anything to
a pointer-to-...-pointer-to-volatile type.
The closely related bugprone-redundant-branch-condition check
doesn't seem to be affected. Add a test just in case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108808
Verified that previously nothing was calling dataOperandHasImpliedAttr()
with AttributeList::ReturnIndex even though we had a code path for it.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109390
Adds missing semantic checks for ELEMENTAL functions and subroutines,
their dummy arguments, and their results from F'2018 15.8.1 C15100-15102.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109380
Many `flang` tests currently `FAIL` on Solaris because the module files
aren't found. I could trace this to `sys::fs::getMainExecutable` not being
implemented.
This patch does this and fixes all affected `flang` tests.
Tested on `amd64-pc-solaris2.11`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109374
Follow on to D109029. I realized we had no mention of mustprogrress in the comment (as it prexisted mustprogress in the codebase). In the process of adding it, I tweaked the preconditions into something I think is more clear. Note that mustprogress is checked in the code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109091
Right now all but the last bullet are relying on applied "must not" that
isn't there and the last bullet is a "must".
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109389
This could go either direction since the instruction
count is the same either way, but there are a few
reasons to prefer this:
1. We already do the related transform with 'and'
(see just above the new code).
2. We try (too hard) to compensate for not having this
and possibly other folds in transformZExtICmp(),
and that leads to bugs like https://llvm.org/PR51762 .
3. Codegen looks better across a variety of targets.
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/uEgn4P
This patch adds improvements for sext/zext of a vector extract in Global
ISel.
For example, this piece of code:
define i64 @si64(<4 x i32> %0, i32 %1) {
%3 = extractelement <4 x i32> %0, i64 1
%s = sext i32 %3 to i64
ret i64 %s
}
Used to have this lowering:
si64:
mov s0, v0.s[1]
fmov w8, s0
sxtw x0, w8
ret
Whereas this patch makes it lower to this:
si64:
smov x0, v0.h[0]
ret
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108137
Fraser Cormack