We found issues with a number of intrinsics when building them with
C++, so it makes sense to guard these tests with some extra RUN lines
to build the tests in C++ mode.
Summary:
The following feature macros have been added:
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BF16
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE_MATMUL_INT8
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE_MATMUL_FP32
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE_MATMUL_FP64
The driver has been updated to enable them accordingly to the value of
the target feature passed at command line.
The SVE ACLE tests using the macros have been modified to work with
the target feature instead of passing the macro at command line.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, efriedma, c-rhodes, kmclaughlin, SjoerdMeijer, rengolin
Subscribers: tschuett, kristof.beyls, rkruppe, psnobl, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82623
This patch enables the following macros when their corresponding
target attributes are set:
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE (+sve)
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE2 (+sve2)
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE2_AES (+sve2-aes)
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE2_BITPERM (+sve2-bitperm)
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE2_SHA3 (+sve2-sha3)
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE2_SM4 (+sve2-sm4)
This implies that the base SVE and SVE2 ACLE (00bet2) are now feature
complete, meaning that all intrinsics are implemented in LLVM and Clang.
Disclaimer:
To implement the ACLE we have had to fix up many parts of LLVM to make it
support scalable vectors. We have also used many target-specific intrinsics
to reduce reliance on parts of LLVM where we know scalable vectors may
not yet be handled properly (e.g. some transformation might drop the
'scalable' flag on a vector type). While we've done a best effort with
the limited testing that is available to us, we're still working to improve the
stability of the implementation. Additionally, Clang may print warnings
that code may have miscompiled. We find this often to be a false alarm
where the wrong interfaces have been used in LLVM and where resulting
code is not actually incorrect. However, this warrants a bug report
and investigation. If you find any bugs or issues, please raise them on
bugs.llvm.org and let us know!
Reviewers: rengolin, efriedma, david-arm, SjoerdMeijer
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81725
Sander de Smalen