Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Johannes Doerfert 7c01357cef Introduce an invalid context for each statement
Collect the error domain contexts (formerly in the ErrorDomainCtxMap)
  for each statement in the new InvalidContext member variable. While
  this commit is basically a [NFC] it is a first step to make hoisting
  sound by allowing a more fine grained record of invalid contexts,
  e.g., here on statement level.

llvm-svn: 266053
2016-04-12 09:57:34 +00:00
Michael Kruse 959a8dc39f Update to ISL 0.16.1
llvm-svn: 257898
2016-01-15 15:54:45 +00:00
Michael Kruse 5a9a65e43f Prepare unit tests for update to ISL 0.16
ISL 0.16 will change how sets are printed which breaks 117 unit tests
that text-compare printed sets. This patch re-formats most of these unit
tests using a script and small manual editing on top of that. When
actually updating ISL, most work is done by just re-running the script
to adapt to the changed output.

Some tests that compare IR and tests with single CHECK-lines that can be
easily updated manually are not included here.

The re-format script will also be committed afterwards. The per-test
formatter invocation command lines options will not be added in the near
future because it is ad hoc and would overwrite the manual edits.
Ideally it also shouldn't be required anymore because ISL's set printing
has become more stable in 0.16.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16095

llvm-svn: 257851
2016-01-15 00:48:42 +00:00
Johannes Doerfert fc4bfc465a [FIX] Create empty invariant equivalence classes
We now create all invariant equivalence classes for required invariant loads
  instead of creating them on-demand. This way we can check if a parameter
  references an invariant load that is actually not executed and was therefor
  not materialized. If that happens the parameter is not materialized either.

This fixes bug 25469.

llvm-svn: 252701
2015-11-11 04:30:07 +00:00
Johannes Doerfert af3e301a67 [FIX] Restructure invariant load equivalence classes
Sorting is replaced by a demand driven code generation that will pre-load a
  value when it is needed or, if it was not needed before, at some point
  determined by the order of invariant accesses in the program. Only in very
  little cases this demand driven pre-loading will kick in, though it will
  prevent us from generating faulty code. An example where it is needed is
  shown in:
    test/ScopInfo/invariant_loads_complicated_dependences.ll

  Invariant loads that appear in parameters but are not on the top-level (e.g.,
  the parameter is not a SCEVUnknown) will now be treated correctly.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13831

llvm-svn: 250655
2015-10-18 12:39:19 +00:00
Johannes Doerfert 697fdf891c Consolidate invariant loads
If a (assumed) invariant location is loaded multiple times we
  generated a parameter for each location. However, this caused compile
  time problems for several benchmarks (e.g., 445_gobmk in SPEC2006 and
  BT in the NAS benchmarks). Additionally, the code we generate is
  suboptimal as we preload the same location multiple times and perform
  the same checks on all the parameters that refere to the same value.

  With this patch we consolidate the invariant loads in three steps:
    1) During SCoP initialization required invariant loads are put in
       equivalence classes based on their pointer operand. One
       representing load is used to generate a parameter for the whole
       class, thus we never generate multiple parameters for the same
       location.
    2) During the SCoP simplification we remove invariant memory
       accesses that are in the same equivalence class. While doing so
       we build the union of all execution domains as it is only
       important that the location is at least accessed once.
    3) During code generation we only preload one element of each
       equivalence class with the unified execution domain. All others
       are mapped to that preloaded value.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13338

llvm-svn: 249853
2015-10-09 17:12:26 +00:00
Johannes Doerfert 09e3697f44 Allow invariant loads in the SCoP description
This patch allows invariant loads to be used in the SCoP description,
  e.g., as loop bounds, conditions or in memory access functions.

  First we collect "required invariant loads" during SCoP detection that
  would otherwise make an expression we care about non-affine. To this
  end a new level of abstraction was introduced before
  SCEVValidator::isAffineExpr() namely ScopDetection::isAffine() and
  ScopDetection::onlyValidRequiredInvariantLoads(). Here we can decide
  if we want a load inside the region to be optimistically assumed
  invariant or not. If we do, it will be marked as required and in the
  SCoP generation we bail if it is actually not invariant. If we don't
  it will be a non-affine expression as before. At the moment we
  optimistically assume all "hoistable" (namely non-loop-carried) loads
  to be invariant. This causes us to expand some SCoPs and dismiss them
  later but it also allows us to detect a lot we would dismiss directly
  if we would ask e.g., AliasAnalysis::canBasicBlockModify(). We also
  allow potential aliases between optimistically assumed invariant loads
  and other pointers as our runtime alias checks are sound in case the
  loads are actually invariant. Together with the invariant checks this
  combination allows to handle a lot more than LICM can.

  The code generation of the invariant loads had to be extended as we
  can now have dependences between parameters and invariant (hoisted)
  loads as well as the other way around, e.g.,
    test/Isl/CodeGen/invariant_load_parameters_cyclic_dependence.ll
  First, it is important to note that we cannot have real cycles but
  only dependences from a hoisted load to a parameter and from another
  parameter to that hoisted load (and so on). To handle such cases we
  materialize llvm::Values for parameters that are referred by a hoisted
  load on demand and then materialize the remaining parameters. Second,
  there are new kinds of dependences between hoisted loads caused by the
  constraints on their execution. If a hoisted load is conditionally
  executed it might depend on the value of another hoisted load. To deal
  with such situations we sort them already in the ScopInfo such that
  they can be generated in the order they are listed in the
  Scop::InvariantAccesses list (see compareInvariantAccesses). The
  dependences between hoisted loads caused by indirect accesses are
  handled the same way as before.

llvm-svn: 249607
2015-10-07 20:17:36 +00:00