Based on the discussion in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-October/135574.html, the
conclusion was reached that the ARM backend should produce vcmp instead
of vcmpe instructions by default, i.e. not be producing an Invalid
Operation exception when either arguments in a floating point compare
are quiet NaNs.
In the future, after constrained floating point intrinsics for floating
point compare have been introduced, vcmpe instructions probably should
be produced for those intrinsics - depending on the exact semantics
they'll be defined to have.
This patch logically consists of the following parts:
- Revert http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=294945&view=rev and
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=294968&view=rev, which
implemented fine-tuning for when to produce vcmpe (i.e. not do it for
equality comparisons). The complexity introduced by those patches
isn't needed anymore if we just always produce vcmp instead. Maybe
these patches need to be reintroduced again once support is needed to
map potential LLVM-IR constrained floating point compare intrinsics to
the ARM instruction set.
- Simply select vcmp, instead of vcmpe, see simple changes in
lib/Target/ARM/ARMInstrVFP.td
- Adapt lots of tests that tested for vcmpe (instead of vcmp). For all
of these test, the intent of what is tested for isn't related to
whether the vcmp should produce an Invalid Operation exception or not.
Fixes PR43374.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68463
llvm-svn: 374025
Those two subtarget features were awkward because their semantics are
reversed: each one indicates the _lack_ of support for something in
the architecture, rather than the presence. As a consequence, you
don't get the behavior you want if you combine two sets of feature
bits.
Each SubtargetFeature for an FP architecture version now comes in four
versions, one for each combination of those options. So you can still
say (for example) '+vfp2' in a feature string and it will mean what
it's always meant, but there's a new string '+vfp2d16sp' meaning the
version without those extra options.
A lot of this change is just mechanically replacing positive checks
for the old features with negative checks for the new ones. But one
more interesting change is that I've rearranged getFPUFeatures() so
that the main FPU feature is appended to the output list *before*
rather than after the features derived from the Restriction field, so
that -fp64 and -d32 can override defaults added by the main feature.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: srhines, javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, zzheng, Petar.Avramovic, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60691
llvm-svn: 361845
I am working on making FileCheck stricter (in D54769 and D53710) so that it
issues diagnostics when there's something wrong with tests.
This is a cleanup for dangling prefixes in the ARM codegen tests, e.g.:
--check-prefixes=A,B
where A occurs in the check file, but B doesn't. This can be innocent if A does
all the required checking, but can also be a bug in that test if it results in
the test actually not checking anything (if A for example only checks a common
label). Test CodeGen/ARM/smml.ll is such an example.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54842
llvm-svn: 347487
The ARM Runtime ABI document (IHI0043) defines the AEABI floating point
helper functions in section 4.1.2 The floating-point helper functions.
The functions listed in this section must always use the base AAPCS calling
convention.
This test generates calls to all the helper functions that llvm supports
and checks that the base AAPCS calling convention has been used. We test
the equivalent of -mfloat-abi=soft, -mfloat-abi=softfp, -mfloat-abi=hardfp
with an FPU that supports single and double precision, and one that only
supports double precision.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35904
llvm-svn: 309371
Jon Roelofs