Since C++11, the C++ standard has a forward progress guarantee
[intro.progress], so all such functions must have the `mustprogress`
requirement. In addition, from C11 and onwards, loops without a non-zero
constant conditional or no conditional are also required to make
progress (C11 6.8.5p6). This patch implements these attribute deductions
so they can be used by the optimization passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86841
Add the --include-generated-funcs option to update_cc_test_checks.py so that any
functions created by the compiler that don't exist in the source will also be
checked.
We need to maintain the output order of generated function checks so that
CHECK-LABEL works properly. To do so, maintain a list of functions output for
each prefix in the order they are output. Use this list to output checks for
generated functions in the proper order.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83004
After D85099, if we have attribute group in the function signature that hasn't
been seen before, and later a callsite with the same attribute group, filecheck will evaluate
the first attribute group to for example '#0 {'. We now include { in the args_and_sig group to avoid this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86769
With this patch we will match most *uses* of "temporary" named things in
the IR via regular expressions, not their name at creation time. The new
"values" we match are:
- "unnamed" globals: `@[0-9]+`
- debug metadata: `!dbg ![0-9]+`
- loop metadata: `!loop ![0-9]+`
- tbaa metadata: `!tbaa ![0-9]+`
- range metadata: `!range ![0-9]+`
- generic metadata: `metadata ![0-9]+`
- attributes groups: `#[0-9]`
We still don't match the declarations but that can be done later. This
patch can introduce churn when existing check lines contain the old
hardcoded versions of the above "values". We can add a flag to opt-out,
or opt-in, if necessary.
Reviewed By: arichardson, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85099
Summary:
This introduces new flag to the update_test_checks and
update_cc_test_checks that allows for function attributes
to be checked in a check-line. If the flag is not set,
the behavior should remain the same.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: arichardson, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83629
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69701 added support for on-the-fly argument
changes for update scripts. I recently wanted to keep some manual check
lines in a test generated by update_cc_test_checks.py in our CHERI fork, so
this commit adds support for UTC_ARGS in update_cc_test_checks.py. And since
I was refactoring the code to be in common.py, I also added it for
update_llc_test_checks.py.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78478
Previously the script only handled C input, this change extends the JSON
parsing to to also include C++ function types such as methods, constructors
and destructors.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80914
Function declarations can in fact have an 'inner' node that lists the
ParmVarDecls. It seems like either the JSON output has changed or that I
tested the original JSON parsing change with test files that only have
function definitions without arguments.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80913
This is effectively reverting rGbfdc2552664d to avoid test churn
while we figure out a better way forward.
We at least salvage the warning on name conflict from that patch
though.
If we change the default string again, we may want to mass update
tests at the same time. Alternatively, we could live with the poor
naming if we change -instnamer.
This also adds a test to LLVM as suggested in the post-commit
review. There's a clang test that is also affected. That seems
like a layering violation, but I have not looked at fixing that yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80584
Having tests that depend on clang inside llvm/ are not a good idea since
it can break incremental `ninja check-llvm`.
Fixes https://llvm.org/PR44798
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, MaskRay, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74051
Atmn Patel