Fixes PR18435, where we generated a base ctor instead of a complete
ctor, and so failed to construct virtual bases when constructing the
complete object.
llvm-svn: 199160
Before this patch GetOrCreateLLVMFunction would add a decl to
DeferredDeclsToEmit even when it was being called by the function trying to
emit that decl.
llvm-svn: 196753
available always-inline functions. This breaks libc++'s locale
implementation. Code generation for this case should be fixed, but this
is a stop gap fix for clang 3.4.
llvm-svn: 195501
This patch disables aliasing (and rauw) of derived dtors to base dtors at -O0.
This optimization can have a negative impact on the debug quality.
This was a latent bug for some time with local classes, but got noticed when it
was generalized and broke gdb's destrprint.exp.
llvm-svn: 194618
Now that the relevant tests use -mconstructor-aliases and the missing
features have been implemented, we can just drop this.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 194595
The problem was that given
template<typename T>
struct foo {
~foo() {}
};
template class foo<int>;
We would produce a alias, creating a comdat with D0 and D1, since the symbols
have to be weak. Another TU is not required to have a explicit template
instantiation definition or an explict template instantiation declaration and
for
template<typename T>
struct foo {
~foo() {}
};
foo<int> a;
we would produce a comdat with only one symbol in it.
llvm-svn: 194520
The assert this patch deletes was valid only when aliasing D2 to D1, not when
looking at a base class. Since the assert was in the path where we had already
decided to not produce an alias, just drop it.
llvm-svn: 194411
It is not safe to emit alias to undefined (not supported by ELF or COFF), but
it is safe to rauw when the alias would have been internal or linkonce_odr.
llvm-svn: 194307
Unlike an alias a rauw is always safe, so we don't need to avoid this
optimization when the replacement is not know to be available in every TU.
llvm-svn: 194288
On the microsoft ABI clang is producing one weak_odr and one linkonce_odr
destructor, which is reasonable since only one is required.
The fix is simply to move the assert past the special case treatment of
linkonce_odr.
llvm-svn: 194158
This is a small optimization on linux, but should help more on windows
where msvc only outputs one destructor if there would be two identical ones.
llvm-svn: 194095
This is a small optimization on linux, but should help more on windows
where msvc only outputs one destructor if there would be two identical ones.
llvm-svn: 194046
With this patch we produce alias for cases like
template<typename T>
struct foobar {
foobar() {
}
};
template struct foobar<void>;
We just have to be careful to produce the same aliases in every TU because
of comdats.
llvm-svn: 194000
With this patch we produce alias for cases like
template<typename T>
struct foobar {
foobar() {
}
};
template struct foobar<void>;
It is safe to use aliases to weak symbols, as long and the alias itself is also
weak.
llvm-svn: 192300
Based on Peter Collingbourne's destructor patches.
Prior to this change, clang was considering ?1 to be the complete
destructor and the base destructor, which was wrong. This lead to
crashes when clang tried to emit two LLVM functions with the same name.
In this ABI, TUs with non-inline dtors might not emit a complete
destructor. They are emitted as inline thunks in TUs that need them,
and they always delegate to the base dtors of the complete class and its
virtual bases. This change uses the DeferredDecls machinery to emit
complete dtors as needed.
Currently in clang try body destructors can catch exceptions thrown by
virtual base destructors. In the Microsoft C++ ABI, clang may not have
the destructor definition, in which case clang won't wrap the virtual
virtual base destructor calls in a try-catch. Diagnosing this in user
code is TODO.
Finally, for classes that don't use virtual inheritance, MSVC always
calls the base destructor (?1) directly. This is a useful code size
optimization that avoids emitting lots of extra thunks or aliases.
Implementing it also means our existing tests continue to pass, and is
consistent with MSVC's output.
We can do the same for Itanium by tweaking GetAddrOfCXXDestructor, but
it will require further testing.
Reviewers: rjmccall
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1066
llvm-svn: 186828
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
filter_decl_iterator had a weird mismatch where both op* and op-> returned T*
making it difficult to generalize this filtering behavior into a reusable
library of any kind.
This change errs on the side of value, making op-> return T* and op* return
T&.
(reviewed by Richard Smith)
llvm-svn: 155808
optional argument passed through the variadic ellipsis)
potentially affects how we need to lower it. Propagate
this information down to the various getFunctionInfo(...)
overloads on CodeGenTypes. Furthermore, rename those
overloads to clarify their distinct purposes, and make
sure we're calling the right one in the right place.
This has a nice side-effect of making it easier to construct
a function type, since the 'variadic' bit is no longer
separable.
This shouldn't really change anything for our existing
platforms, with one minor exception --- we should now call
variadic ObjC methods with the ... in the "right place"
(see the test case), which I guess matters for anyone
running GNUStep on MIPS. Mostly it's just a substantial
clean-up.
llvm-svn: 150788
destructors of abstract classes. It's undefined behavior to actually
call the destructor (e.g., via delete), but the presence of code that
calls this destructor doesn't make the program
ill-formed. Fixes <rdar://problem/9819242>.
llvm-svn: 136180
that the destructor body is trivial and that all member variables also have either
trivial destructors or trivial destructor bodies, we don't need to initialize the
vtable pointers since no virtual member functions will be called on the destructor.
Fixes PR9181.
llvm-svn: 131368
simplify the logic of initializing function parameters so that we don't need
both a variable declaration and a type in FunctionArgList. This also means
that we need to propagate the CGFunctionInfo down in a lot of places rather
than recalculating it from the FAL. There's more we can do to eliminate
redundancy here, and I've left FIXMEs behind to do it.
llvm-svn: 127314
Aaron Ballman