Flags are clang's default UI is flags.
We can have an env var in addition to that, but in D69825 nobody has yet
mentioned why this needs an env var, so omit it for now. If someone
needs to set the flag via env var, the existing CCC_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS
mechanism works for it (set CCC_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS=+-fno-integrated-cc1
for example).
Also mention the cc1-in-process change in the release notes.
Also spruce up the test a bit so it actually tests something :)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72769
D39317 made clang use .init_array when no gcc installations is found.
This change changes all gcc installations to use .init_array .
GCC 4.7 by default stopped providing .ctors/.dtors compatible crt files,
and stopped emitting .ctors for __attribute__((constructor)).
.init_array should always work.
FreeBSD rules are moved to FreeBSD.cpp to make Generic_ELF rules clean.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71434
Summary:
Implicit Conversion Sanitizer is *almost* feature complete.
There aren't *that* much unsanitized things left,
two major ones are increment/decrement (this patch) and bit fields.
As it was discussed in
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39519 | PR39519 ]],
unlike `CompoundAssignOperator` (which is promoted internally),
or `BinaryOperator` (for which we always have promotion/demotion in AST)
or parts of `UnaryOperator` (we have promotion/demotion but only for
certain operations), for inc/dec, clang omits promotion/demotion
altogether, under as-if rule.
This is technically correct: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/zPgD
As it can be seen in `InstCombineCasts.cpp` `canEvaluateTruncated()`,
`add`/`sub`/`mul`/`and`/`or`/`xor` operators can all arbitrarily
be extended or truncated:
901cd3b3f6/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp (L1320-L1334)
But that has serious implications:
1. Since we no longer model implicit casts, do we pessimise
their AST representation and everything that uses it?
2. There is no demotion, so lossy demotion sanitizer does not trigger :]
Now, i'm not going to argue about the first problem here,
but the second one **needs** to be addressed. As it was stated
in the report, this is done intentionally, so changing
this in all modes would be considered a penalization/regression.
Which means, the sanitization-less codegen must not be altered.
It was also suggested to not change the sanitized codegen
to the one with demotion, but i quite strongly believe
that will not be the wise choice here:
1. One will need to re-engineer the check that the inc/dec was lossy
in terms of `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins
2. We will still need to compute the result we would lossily demote.
(i.e. the result of wide `add`ition/`sub`traction)
3. I suspect it would need to be done right here, in sanitization.
Which kinda defeats the point of
using `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins:
we'd have two `add`s with basically the same arguments,
one of which is used for check+error-less codepath and other one
for the error reporting. That seems worse than a single wide op+check.
4. OR, we would need to do that in the compiler-rt handler.
Which means we'll need a whole new handler.
But then what about the `CompoundAssignOperator`,
it would also be applicable for it.
So this also doesn't really seem like the right path to me.
5. At least X86 (but likely others) pessimizes all sub-`i32` operations
(due to partial register stalls), so even if we avoid promotion+demotion,
the computations will //likely// be performed in `i32` anyways.
So i'm not really seeing much benefit of
not doing the straight-forward thing.
While looking into this, i have noticed a few more LLVM middle-end
missed canonicalizations, and filed
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44100 | PR44100 ]],
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44102 | PR44102 ]].
Those are not specific to inc/dec, we also have them for
`CompoundAssignOperator`, and it can happen for normal arithmetics, too.
But if we take some other path in the patch, it will not be applicable
here, and we will have most likely played ourselves.
TLDR: front-end should emit canonical, easy-to-optimize yet
un-optimized code. It is middle-end's job to make it optimal.
I'm really hoping reviewers agree with my personal assessment
of the path this patch should take..
This originally landed in 9872ea4ed1
but got immediately reverted in cbfa237892
because the assertion was faulty. That fault ended up being caused
by the enum - while there will be promotion, both types are unsigned,
with same width. So we still don't need to sanitize non-signed cases.
So far. Maybe the assert will tell us this isn't so.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44054 | PR44054 ]].
Refs. https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/940
Reviewers: rjmccall, erichkeane, rsmith, vsk
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, aaron.ballman, t.p.northover, efriedma, regehr
Tags: #llvm, #clang, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70539
The asssertion that was added does not hold,
breaks on test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/analyze.c
Will reduce the testcase and revisit.
This reverts commit 9872ea4ed1, 870f3542d3.
Summary:
Implicit Conversion Sanitizer is *almost* feature complete.
There aren't *that* much unsanitized things left,
two major ones are increment/decrement (this patch) and bit fields.
As it was discussed in
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39519 | PR39519 ]],
unlike `CompoundAssignOperator` (which is promoted internally),
or `BinaryOperator` (for which we always have promotion/demotion in AST)
or parts of `UnaryOperator` (we have promotion/demotion but only for
certain operations), for inc/dec, clang omits promotion/demotion
altogether, under as-if rule.
This is technically correct: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/zPgD
As it can be seen in `InstCombineCasts.cpp` `canEvaluateTruncated()`,
`add`/`sub`/`mul`/`and`/`or`/`xor` operators can all arbitrarily
be extended or truncated:
901cd3b3f6/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp (L1320-L1334)
But that has serious implications:
1. Since we no longer model implicit casts, do we pessimise
their AST representation and everything that uses it?
2. There is no demotion, so lossy demotion sanitizer does not trigger :]
Now, i'm not going to argue about the first problem here,
but the second one **needs** to be addressed. As it was stated
in the report, this is done intentionally, so changing
this in all modes would be considered a penalization/regression.
Which means, the sanitization-less codegen must not be altered.
It was also suggested to not change the sanitized codegen
to the one with demotion, but i quite strongly believe
that will not be the wise choice here:
1. One will need to re-engineer the check that the inc/dec was lossy
in terms of `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins
2. We will still need to compute the result we would lossily demote.
(i.e. the result of wide `add`ition/`sub`traction)
3. I suspect it would need to be done right here, in sanitization.
Which kinda defeats the point of
using `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins:
we'd have two `add`s with basically the same arguments,
one of which is used for check+error-less codepath and other one
for the error reporting. That seems worse than a single wide op+check.
4. OR, we would need to do that in the compiler-rt handler.
Which means we'll need a whole new handler.
But then what about the `CompoundAssignOperator`,
it would also be applicable for it.
So this also doesn't really seem like the right path to me.
5. At least X86 (but likely others) pessimizes all sub-`i32` operations
(due to partial register stalls), so even if we avoid promotion+demotion,
the computations will //likely// be performed in `i32` anyways.
So i'm not really seeing much benefit of
not doing the straight-forward thing.
While looking into this, i have noticed a few more LLVM middle-end
missed canonicalizations, and filed
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44100 | PR44100 ]],
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44102 | PR44102 ]].
Those are not specific to inc/dec, we also have them for
`CompoundAssignOperator`, and it can happen for normal arithmetics, too.
But if we take some other path in the patch, it will not be applicable
here, and we will have most likely played ourselves.
TLDR: front-end should emit canonical, easy-to-optimize yet
un-optimized code. It is middle-end's job to make it optimal.
I'm really hoping reviewers agree with my personal assessment
of the path this patch should take..
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44054 | PR44054 ]].
Reviewers: rjmccall, erichkeane, rsmith, vsk
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, aaron.ballman, t.p.northover, efriedma, regehr
Tags: #llvm, #clang, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70539
For RISC-V the value provided to -march should determine whether to
compile for 32- or 64-bit RISC-V irrespective of the target provided to
the Clang driver. This adds a test for this flag for RISC-V and sets the
Target architecture correctly in these cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54214
Summary:
Clang/LLVM is a cross-compiler, and so we don't have to make a choice
about `-march`/`-mabi` at build-time, but we may have to compute a
default `-march`/`-mabi` when compiling a program. Until now, each
place that has needed a default `-march` has calculated one itself.
This patch adds a single place where a default `-march` is calculated,
in order to avoid calculating different defaults in different places.
This patch adds a new function `riscv::getRISCVArch` which encapsulates
this logic based on GCC's for computing a default `-march` value
when none is provided. This patch also updates the logic in
`riscv::getRISCVABI` to match the logic in GCC's build system for
computing a default `-mabi`.
This patch also updates anywhere that `-march` is used to now use the
new function which can compute a default. In particular, we now
explicitly pass a `-march` value down to the gnu assembler.
GCC has convoluted logic in its build system to choose a default
`-march`/`-mabi` based on build options, which would be good to match.
This patch is based on the logic in GCC 9.2.0. This commit's logic is
different to GCC's only for baremetal targets, where we default
to rv32imac/ilp32 or rv64imac/lp64 depending on the target triple.
Tests have been updated to match the new logic.
Reviewers: asb, luismarques, rogfer01, kito-cheng, khchen
Reviewed By: asb, luismarques
Subscribers: sameer.abuasal, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69383
Summary:
By additional regex match, grouping of main include can be enabled in files that are not normally considered as a C/C++ source code.
For example, this might be useful in templated code, where template implementations are being held in *Impl.hpp files.
On the occassion, 'assume-filename' option description was reworded as it was misleading. It has nothing to do with `style=file` option and it does not influence sourced style filename.
Reviewers: rsmith, ioeric, krasimir, sylvestre.ledru, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, cfe-commits
Patch by: furdyna
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67750
-mvzeroupper will force the vzeroupper insertion pass to run on
CPUs that normally wouldn't. -mno-vzeroupper disables it on CPUs
where it normally runs.
To support this with the default feature handling in clang, we
need a vzeroupper feature flag in X86.td. Since this flag has
the opposite polarity of the fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write we
used to use to disable the pass, we now need to add this new
flag to every CPU except KNL/KNM and BTVER2 to keep identical
behavior.
Remove -fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write which is no longer used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69786
Taking a value and the bitwise-or it with a non-zero constant will always
result in a non-zero value. In a boolean context, this is always true.
if (x | 0x4) {} // always true, intended '&'
This patch creates a new warning group -Wtautological-bitwise-compare for this
warning. It also moves in the existing tautological bitwise comparisons into
this group. A few other changes were needed to the CFGBuilder so that all bool
contexts would be checked. The warnings in -Wtautological-bitwise-compare will
be off by default due to using the CFG.
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42666
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66046
llvm-svn: 375318
I noticed that compiling on Windows with -fno-ms-compatibility had the
side effect of defining __GNUC__, along with __GNUG__, __GXX_RTTI__, and
a number of other macros for GCC compatibility. This is undesirable and
causes Chromium to do things like mix __attribute__ and __declspec,
which doesn't work. We should have a positive language option to enable
GCC compatibility features so that we can experiment with
-fno-ms-compatibility on Windows. This change adds -fgnuc-version= to be
that option.
My issue aside, users have, for a long time, reported that __GNUC__
doesn't match their expectations in one way or another. We have
encouraged users to migrate code away from this macro, but new code
continues to be written assuming a GCC-only environment. There's really
nothing we can do to stop that. By adding this flag, we can allow them
to choose their own adventure with __GNUC__.
This overlaps a bit with the "GNUMode" language option from -std=gnu*.
The gnu language mode tends to enable non-conforming behaviors that we'd
rather not enable by default, but the we want to set things like
__GXX_RTTI__ by default, so I've kept these separate.
Helps address PR42817
Reviewed By: hans, nickdesaulniers, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68055
llvm-svn: 374449
Summary:
Quote from http://eel.is/c++draft/expr.add#4:
```
4 When an expression J that has integral type is added to or subtracted
from an expression P of pointer type, the result has the type of P.
(4.1) If P evaluates to a null pointer value and J evaluates to 0,
the result is a null pointer value.
(4.2) Otherwise, if P points to an array element i of an array object x with n
elements ([dcl.array]), the expressions P + J and J + P
(where J has the value j) point to the (possibly-hypothetical) array
element i+j of x if 0≤i+j≤n and the expression P - J points to the
(possibly-hypothetical) array element i−j of x if 0≤i−j≤n.
(4.3) Otherwise, the behavior is undefined.
```
Therefore, as per the standard, applying non-zero offset to `nullptr`
(or making non-`nullptr` a `nullptr`, by subtracting pointer's integral value
from the pointer itself) is undefined behavior. (*if* `nullptr` is not defined,
i.e. e.g. `-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks` was *not* specified.)
To make things more fun, in C (6.5.6p8), applying *any* offset to null pointer
is undefined, although Clang front-end pessimizes the code by not lowering
that info, so this UB is "harmless".
Since rL369789 (D66608 `[InstCombine] icmp eq/ne (gep inbounds P, Idx..), null -> icmp eq/ne P, null`)
LLVM middle-end uses those guarantees for transformations.
If the source contains such UB's, said code may now be miscompiled.
Such miscompilations were already observed:
* https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190826/687838.html
* https://github.com/google/filament/pull/1566
Surprisingly, UBSan does not catch those issues
... until now. This diff teaches UBSan about these UB's.
`getelementpointer inbounds` is a pretty frequent instruction,
so this does have a measurable impact on performance;
I've addressed most of the obvious missing folds (and thus decreased the performance impact by ~5%),
and then re-performed some performance measurements using my [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed ]] benchmark:
(all measurements done with LLVM ToT, the sanitizer never fired.)
* no sanitization vs. existing check: average `+21.62%` slowdown
* existing check vs. check after this patch: average `22.04%` slowdown
* no sanitization vs. this patch: average `48.42%` slowdown
Reviewers: vsk, filcab, rsmith, aaron.ballman, vitalybuka, rjmccall, #sanitizers
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, nickdesaulniers, nikic, ychen, dtzWill, xbolva00, dberris, arphaman, rupprecht, reames, regehr, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67122
llvm-svn: 374293
This matches how GCC handles it, see e.g. https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/HPplnl.
GCC documents the gnu_inline attribute with "In C++, this attribute does
not depend on extern in any way, but it still requires the inline keyword
to enable its special behavior."
The previous behaviour of gnu_inline in C++, without the extern
keyword, can be traced back to the original commit that added
support for gnu_inline, SVN r69045.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67414
llvm-svn: 373078
-Wtautological-overlap-compare and self-comparison from -Wtautological-compare
relay on detecting the same operand in different locations. Previously, each
warning had it's own operand checker. Now, both are merged together into
one function that each can call. The function also now looks through member
access and array accesses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66045
llvm-svn: 372453
Allow this warning to detect a larger number of constant values, including
negative numbers, and handle non-int types better.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66044
llvm-svn: 372448
AVX512 instructions can cause a frequency drop on these CPUs. This
can negate the performance gains from using wider vectors. Enabling
prefer-vector-width=256 will prevent generation of zmm registers
unless explicit 512 bit operations are used in the original source
code.
I believe gcc and icc both do something similar to this by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67259
llvm-svn: 371694
As far as I can tell, gcc passes 256/512 bit vectors __int128 in memory. And passes a vector of 1 _int128 in an xmm register. The backend considers <X x i128> as an illegal type and will scalarize any arguments with that type. So we need to coerce the argument types in the frontend to match to avoid the illegal type.
I'm restricting this to change to Linux and NetBSD based on the
how similar ABI changes have been handled in the past.
PS4, FreeBSD, and Darwin are unaffected. I've also added a
new -fclang-abi-compat version to restore the old behavior.
This issue was identified in PR42607. Though even with the types changed, we still seem to be doing some unnecessary stack realignment.
llvm-svn: 371169
-Deprecate -mmpx and -mno-mpx command line options
-Remove CPUID detection of mpx for -march=native
-Remove MPX from all CPUs
-Remove MPX preprocessor define
I've left the "mpx" string in the backend so we don't fail on old IR, but its not connected to anything.
gcc has also deprecated these command line options. https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=GCC-Patch-To-Drop-MPX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66669
llvm-svn: 370393
This broke compiling some ASan tests with never versions of MSVC/the Win
SDK, see https://crbug.com/996675
> MSVC 2017 update 3 (_MSC_VER 1911) enables /Zc:twoPhase by default, and
> so should clang-cl:
> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/reference/zc-twophase
>
> clang-cl takes the MSVC version it emulates from the -fmsc-version flag,
> or if that's not passed it tries to check what the installed version of
> MSVC is and uses that, and failing that it uses a default version that's
> currently 1911. So this changes the default if no -fmsc-version flag is
> passed and no installed MSVC is detected. (It also changes the default
> if -fmsc-version is passed or MSVC is detected, and either indicates
> _MSC_VER >= 1911.)
>
> As mentioned in the MSDN article, the Windows SDK header files in
> version 10.0.15063.0 (Creators Update or Redstone 2) and earlier
> versions do not work correctly with /Zc:twoPhase. If you need to use
> these old SDKs with a new clang-cl, explicitly pass /Zc:twoPhase- to get
> the old behavior.
>
> Fixes PR43032.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66394
llvm-svn: 369647
MSVC 2017 update 3 (_MSC_VER 1911) enables /Zc:twoPhase by default, and
so should clang-cl:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/reference/zc-twophase
clang-cl takes the MSVC version it emulates from the -fmsc-version flag,
or if that's not passed it tries to check what the installed version of
MSVC is and uses that, and failing that it uses a default version that's
currently 1911. So this changes the default if no -fmsc-version flag is
passed and no installed MSVC is detected. (It also changes the default
if -fmsc-version is passed or MSVC is detected, and either indicates
_MSC_VER >= 1911.)
As mentioned in the MSDN article, the Windows SDK header files in
version 10.0.15063.0 (Creators Update or Redstone 2) and earlier
versions do not work correctly with /Zc:twoPhase. If you need to use
these old SDKs with a new clang-cl, explicitly pass /Zc:twoPhase- to get
the old behavior.
Fixes PR43032.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66394
llvm-svn: 369402
Some targets such as Python 2.7.16 still use VERSION in
their builds. Without VERSION defined, the source code
has syntax errors.
Reverting as it will probably break many other things.
Noticed by Sterling Augustine
llvm-svn: 365992
Summary:
It has been introduced in 2011 for gcc compat:
ad1a4c6e89
it is probably time to remove it
Reviewers: rnk, dexonsmith
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: dschuff, aheejin, fedor.sergeev, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64062
llvm-svn: 365962
This affects users of older (pre 2.26) binutils in such a way that they can't necessarily
work around it as it doesn't support the compress option on the command line. Reverting
to unblock them and we can revisit whether to make this change now or fix how we want
to express the option.
This reverts commit bdb21337e6e1732c9895966449c33c408336d295/r360403.
llvm-svn: 360703
Since July 15, 2015 (binutils-gdb commit
19a7fe52ae3d0971e67a134bcb1648899e21ae1c, included in 2.26), gas
--compress-debug-sections=zlib (gcc -gz) means zlib-gabi:
SHF_COMPRESSED. Before that it meant zlib-gnu (.zdebug).
clang's -gz was introduced in rC306115 (Jun 2017) to indicate zlib-gnu. It
is 2019 now and it is not unreasonable to assume users of the new
feature to have new linkers (ld.bfd/gold >= 2.26, lld >= rLLD273661).
Change clang's default accordingly to improve standard conformance.
zlib-gnu becomes out of fashion and gets poorer toolchain support.
Its mangled names confuse tools and are more likely to cause problems.
Reviewed By: compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61689
llvm-svn: 360403
Summary:
This revision adds basic support for formatting C# files with clang-format, I know the barrier to entry is high here so I'm sending this revision in to test the water as to whether this might be something we'd consider landing.
Tracking in Bugzilla as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40850
Justification:
C# code just looks ugly in comparison to the C++ code in our source tree which is clang-formatted.
I've struggled with Visual Studio reformatting to get a clean and consistent style, I want to format our C# code on saving like I do now for C++ and i want it to have the same style as defined in our .clang-format file, so it consistent as it can be with C++. (Braces/Breaking/Spaces/Indent etc..)
Using clang format without this patch leaves the code in a bad state, sometimes when the BreakStringLiterals is set, it fails to compile.
Mostly the C# is similar to Java, except instead of JavaAnnotations I try to reuse the TT_AttributeSquare.
Almost the most valuable portion is to have a new Language in order to partition the configuration for C# within a common .clang-format file, with the auto detection on the .cs extension. But there are other C# specific styles that could be added later if this is accepted. in particular how `{ set;get }` is formatted.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, krasimir, benhamilton, JonasToth
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58404
llvm-svn: 356662
Add an install target for clang's API headers, which allows them to be
included in distributions. The install rules already existed, but they
lacked a component and a target, making them only accessible via a full
install. These headers are useful for writing clang-based tooling, for
example. They're the clang equivalent to the llvm-headers target and
complement the clang-libraries target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58317
llvm-svn: 355853
Summary:
The current install-clang-headers target installs clang's resource
directory headers. This is different from the install-llvm-headers
target, which installs LLVM's API headers. We want to introduce the
corresponding target to clang, and the natural name for that new target
would be install-clang-headers. Rename the existing target to
install-clang-resource-headers to free up the install-clang-headers name
for the new target, following the discussion on cfe-dev [1].
I didn't find any bots on zorg referencing install-clang-headers. I'll
send out another PSA to cfe-dev to accompany this rename.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-February/061365.html
Reviewers: beanz, phosek, tstellar, rnk, dim, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, jdoerfert, #sanitizers, openmp-commits, lldb-commits, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #lldb, #openmp, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58791
llvm-svn: 355340
This is a fix for https://reviews.llvm.org/D51229 where we pass the
address_space qualified type as the modified type of an AttributedType. This
change now instead wraps the AttributedType with either the address_space
qualifier or a DependentAddressSpaceType.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55447
llvm-svn: 351997
Summary:
UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice.
Having a way to detect it is nice though.
[[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says:
```
We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute.
...
If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour.
```
This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute.
Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes.
The compiler-rt part is D54590.
This is a second commit, the original one was r351105,
which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing.
Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589
llvm-svn: 351177
Summary:
UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice.
Having a way to detect it is nice though.
[[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says:
```
We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute.
...
If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour.
```
This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute.
Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes.
The compiler-rt part is D54590.
Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589
llvm-svn: 351105
Summary: The change itself landed as r348365, see the comment for more details.
Reviewers: arphaman, EricWF
Reviewed By: arphaman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55322
llvm-svn: 348394
When debugging a boost build with a modified
version of Clang, I discovered that the PTH implementation
stores TokenKind in 8 bits. However, we currently have 368
TokenKinds.
The result is that the value gets truncated and the wrong token
gets picked up when including PTH files. It seems that this will
go wrong every time someone uses a token that uses the 9th bit.
Upon asking on IRC, it was brought up that this was a highly
experimental features that was considered a failure. I discovered
via googling that BoostBuild (mostly Boost.Math) is the only user of
this
feature, using the CC1 flag directly. I believe that this can be
transferred over to normal PCH with minimal effort:
https://github.com/boostorg/build/issues/367
Based on advice on IRC and research showing that this is a nearly
completely unused feature, this patch removes it entirely.
Note: I considered leaving the build-flags in place and making them
emit an error/warning, however since I've basically identified and
warned the only user, it seemed better to just remove them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54547
Change-Id: If32744275ef1f585357bd6c1c813d96973c4d8d9
llvm-svn: 348266
Summary:
clang has `-Wextra-semi` (D43162), which is not dictated by the currently selected standard.
While that is great, there is at least one more source of need-less semis - 'null statements'.
Sometimes, they are needed:
```
for(int x = 0; continueToDoWork(x); x++)
; // Ugly code, but the semi is needed here.
```
But sometimes they are just there for no reason:
```
switch(X) {
case 0:
return -2345;
case 5:
return 0;
default:
return 42;
}; // <- oops
;;;;;;;;;;; <- OOOOPS, still not diagnosed. Clearly this is junk.
```
Additionally:
```
if(; // <- empty init-statement
true)
;
switch (; // empty init-statement
x) {
...
}
for (; // <- empty init-statement
int y : S())
;
}
As usual, things may or may not go sideways in the presence of macros.
While evaluating this diag on my codebase of interest, it was unsurprisingly
discovered that Google Test macros are *very* prone to this.
And it seems many issues are deep within the GTest itself, not
in the snippets passed from the codebase that uses GTest.
So after some thought, i decided not do issue a diagnostic if the semi
is within *any* macro, be it either from the normal header, or system header.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39111 | PR39111 ]]
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, efriedma
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52695
llvm-svn: 347339
Summary:
As reported by @regehr (thanks!) on twitter (https://twitter.com/johnregehr/status/1057681496255815686),
we (me) has completely forgot about the binary assignment operator.
In AST, it isn't represented as separate `ImplicitCastExpr`'s,
but as a single `CompoundAssignOperator`, that does all the casts internally.
Which means, out of these two, only the first one is diagnosed:
```
auto foo() {
unsigned char c = 255;
c = c + 1;
return c;
}
auto bar() {
unsigned char c = 255;
c += 1;
return c;
}
```
https://godbolt.org/z/JNyVc4
This patch does handle the `CompoundAssignOperator`:
```
int main() {
unsigned char c = 255;
c += 1;
return c;
}
```
```
$ ./bin/clang -g -fsanitize=integer /tmp/test.c && ./a.out
/tmp/test.c:3:5: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'int' of value 256 (32-bit, signed) to type 'unsigned char' changed the value to 0 (8-bit, unsigned)
#0 0x2392b8 in main /tmp/test.c:3:5
#1 0x7fec4a612b16 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x22b16)
#2 0x214029 in _start (/build/llvm-build-GCC-release/a.out+0x214029)
```
However, the pre/post increment/decrement is still not handled.
Reviewers: rsmith, regehr, vsk, rjmccall, #sanitizers
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: mclow.lists, cfe-commits, regehr
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53949
llvm-svn: 347258
Summary:
the previous patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/rC346642) has been reverted because of test failure under windows.
So this patch fix the test cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/code-coverage-filter.c.
Reviewers: marco-c
Reviewed By: marco-c
Subscribers: cfe-commits, sylvestre.ledru
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54600
llvm-svn: 347144
Summary:
These options are taking regex separated by colons to filter files.
- if both are empty then all files are instrumented
- if -fprofile-filter-files is empty then all the filenames matching any of the regex from exclude are not instrumented
- if -fprofile-exclude-files is empty then all the filenames matching any of the regex from filter are instrumented
- if both aren't empty then all the filenames which match any of the regex in filter and which don't match all the regex in filter are instrumented
- this patch is a follow-up of https://reviews.llvm.org/D52033
Reviewers: marco-c, vsk
Reviewed By: marco-c, vsk
Subscribers: cfe-commits, sylvestre.ledru
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52034
llvm-svn: 346642
This is the second half of Implicit Integer Conversion Sanitizer.
It completes the first half, and finally makes the sanitizer
fully functional! Only the bitfield handling is missing.
Summary:
C and C++ are interesting languages. They are statically typed, but weakly.
The implicit conversions are allowed. This is nice, allows to write code
while balancing between getting drowned in everything being convertible,
and nothing being convertible. As usual, this comes with a price:
```
void consume(unsigned int val);
void test(int val) {
consume(val);
// The 'val' is `signed int`, but `consume()` takes `unsigned int`.
// If val is negative, then consume() will be operating on a large
// unsigned value, and you may or may not have a bug.
// But yes, sometimes this is intentional.
// Making the conversion explicit silences the sanitizer.
consume((unsigned int)val);
}
```
Yes, there is a `-Wsign-conversion`` diagnostic group, but first, it is kinda
noisy, since it warns on everything (unlike sanitizers, warning on an
actual issues), and second, likely there are cases where it does **not** warn.
The actual detection is pretty easy. We just need to check each of the values
whether it is negative, and equality-compare the results of those comparisons.
The unsigned value is obviously non-negative. Zero is non-negative too.
https://godbolt.org/g/w93oj2
We do not have to emit the check *always*, there are obvious situations
where we can avoid emitting it, since it would **always** get optimized-out.
But i do think the tautological IR (`icmp ult %x, 0`, which is always false)
should be emitted, and the middle-end should cleanup it.
This sanitizer is in the `-fsanitize=implicit-conversion` group,
and is a logical continuation of D48958 `-fsanitize=implicit-integer-truncation`.
As for the ordering, i'we opted to emit the check **after**
`-fsanitize=implicit-integer-truncation`. At least on these simple 16 test cases,
this results in 1 of the 12 emitted checks being optimized away,
as compared to 0 checks being optimized away if the order is reversed.
This is a clang part.
The compiler-rt part is D50251.
Finishes fixing [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21530 | PR21530 ]], [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37552 | PR37552 ]], [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35409 | PR35409 ]].
Finishes partially fixing [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9821 | PR9821 ]].
Finishes fixing https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/940.
Only the bitfield handling is missing.
Reviewers: vsk, rsmith, rjmccall, #sanitizers, erichkeane
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: chandlerc, filcab, cfe-commits, regehr
Tags: #sanitizers, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50250
llvm-svn: 345660
This reverts commit r345487, which reverted r345486. I think the crashes were
caused by an OOM on the builder, trying again to confirm...
llvm-svn: 345517
This commit enables pushing an empty #pragma clang attribute push, then adding
multiple attributes to it, then popping them all with #pragma clang attribute
pop, just like #pragma clang diagnostic. We still support the current way of
adding these, #pragma clang attribute push(__attribute__((...))), by treating it
like a combined push/attribute. This is needed to create macros like:
DO_SOMETHING_BEGIN(attr1, attr2, attr3)
// ...
DO_SOMETHING_END
rdar://45496947
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53621
llvm-svn: 345486
Summary:
- Add `UETT_PreferredAlignOf` to account for the difference between `__alignof` and `alignof`
- `AlignOfType` now returns ABI alignment instead of preferred alignment iff clang-abi-compat > 7, and one uses _Alignof or alignof
Patch by Nicole Mazzuca!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53207
llvm-svn: 345419
This can be used to preserve profiling information across codebase
changes that have widespread impact on mangled names, but across which
most profiling data should still be usable. For example, when switching
from libstdc++ to libc++, or from the old libstdc++ ABI to the new ABI,
or even from a 32-bit to a 64-bit build.
The user can provide a remapping file specifying parts of mangled names
that should be treated as equivalent (eg, std::__1 should be treated as
equivalent to std::__cxx11), and profile data will be treated as
applying to a particular function if its name is equivalent to the name
of a function in the profile data under the provided equivalences. See
the documentation change for a description of how this is configured.
Remapping is supported for both sample-based profiling and instruction
profiling. We do not support remapping indirect branch target
information, but all other profile data should be remapped
appropriately.
Support is only added for the new pass manager. If someone wants to also
add support for this for the old pass manager, doing so should be
straightforward.
llvm-svn: 344199
With clang-cl, when the user specifies /Yc or /Yu without a filename
the compiler uses a #pragma hdrstop in the main source file to
determine the end of the PCH. If a header is specified with /Yc or
/Yu #pragma hdrstop has no effect.
The optional #pragma hdrstop filename argument is not yet supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51391
llvm-svn: 341963
Summary:
C and C++ are interesting languages. They are statically typed, but weakly.
The implicit conversions are allowed. This is nice, allows to write code
while balancing between getting drowned in everything being convertible,
and nothing being convertible. As usual, this comes with a price:
```
unsigned char store = 0;
bool consume(unsigned int val);
void test(unsigned long val) {
if (consume(val)) {
// the 'val' is `unsigned long`, but `consume()` takes `unsigned int`.
// If their bit widths are different on this platform, the implicit
// truncation happens. And if that `unsigned long` had a value bigger
// than UINT_MAX, then you may or may not have a bug.
// Similarly, integer addition happens on `int`s, so `store` will
// be promoted to an `int`, the sum calculated (0+768=768),
// and the result demoted to `unsigned char`, and stored to `store`.
// In this case, the `store` will still be 0. Again, not always intended.
store = store + 768; // before addition, 'store' was promoted to int.
}
// But yes, sometimes this is intentional.
// You can either make the conversion explicit
(void)consume((unsigned int)val);
// or mask the value so no bits will be *implicitly* lost.
(void)consume((~((unsigned int)0)) & val);
}
```
Yes, there is a `-Wconversion`` diagnostic group, but first, it is kinda
noisy, since it warns on everything (unlike sanitizers, warning on an
actual issues), and second, there are cases where it does **not** warn.
So a Sanitizer is needed. I don't have any motivational numbers, but i know
i had this kind of problem 10-20 times, and it was never easy to track down.
The logic to detect whether an truncation has happened is pretty simple
if you think about it - https://godbolt.org/g/NEzXbb - basically, just
extend (using the new, not original!, signedness) the 'truncated' value
back to it's original width, and equality-compare it with the original value.
The most non-trivial thing here is the logic to detect whether this
`ImplicitCastExpr` AST node is **actually** an implicit conversion, //or//
part of an explicit cast. Because the explicit casts are modeled as an outer
`ExplicitCastExpr` with some `ImplicitCastExpr`'s as **direct** children.
https://godbolt.org/g/eE1GkJ
Nowadays, we can just use the new `part_of_explicit_cast` flag, which is set
on all the implicitly-added `ImplicitCastExpr`'s of an `ExplicitCastExpr`.
So if that flag is **not** set, then it is an actual implicit conversion.
As you may have noted, this isn't just named `-fsanitize=implicit-integer-truncation`.
There are potentially some more implicit conversions to be warned about.
Namely, implicit conversions that result in sign change; implicit conversion
between different floating point types, or between fp and an integer,
when again, that conversion is lossy.
One thing i know isn't handled is bitfields.
This is a clang part.
The compiler-rt part is D48959.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21530 | PR21530 ]], [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37552 | PR37552 ]], [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35409 | PR35409 ]].
Partially fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9821 | PR9821 ]].
Fixes https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/940. (other than sign-changing implicit conversions)
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, samsonov, pcc, vsk, eugenis, efriedma, kcc, erichkeane
Reviewed By: rsmith, vsk, erichkeane
Subscribers: erichkeane, klimek, #sanitizers, aaron.ballman, RKSimon, dtzWill, filcab, danielaustin, ygribov, dvyukov, milianw, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, regehr
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48958
llvm-svn: 338288
which was reverted in r337336.
The problem that required a revert was fixed in r337338.
Also added a missing "REQUIRES: x86-registered-target" to one of
the tests.
Original commit message:
> Teach Clang to emit address-significance tables.
>
> By default, we emit an address-significance table on all ELF
> targets when the integrated assembler is enabled. The emission of an
> address-significance table can be controlled with the -faddrsig and
> -fno-addrsig flags.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48155
llvm-svn: 337339
Causing multiple failures on sanitizer bots due to TLS symbol errors,
e.g.
/usr/bin/ld: __msan_origin_tls: TLS definition in /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-test/clang-ppc64be/stage1/lib/clang/7.0.0/lib/linux/libclang_rt.msan-powerpc64.a(msan.cc.o) section .tbss.__msan_origin_tls mismatches non-TLS reference in /tmp/lit_tmp_0a71tA/mallinfo-3ca75e.o
llvm-svn: 337336
By default, we emit an address-significance table on all ELF
targets when the integrated assembler is enabled. The emission of an
address-significance table can be controlled with the -faddrsig and
-fno-addrsig flags.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48155
llvm-svn: 337333
Summary:
In many cases we can't devirtualize
because definition of vtable is not present. Most of the
time it is caused by inline virtual function not beeing
emitted. Forcing emitting of vtable adds a reference of these
inline virtual functions.
Note that GCC was always doing it.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, amharc, kuhar
Subscribers: llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47108
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Pszeniczny <krzysztof.pszeniczny@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 334600
Although not very well known, diagtool is an incredibly convenient
utility for dealing with diagnostics.
Particularly useful are the "tree" and "show-enabled" commands:
- The former prints the hierarchy of diagnostic (warning) flags and
which of them are enabled by default.
- The latter can be used to replace an invocation to clang and will
print which diagnostics are disabled, warnings or errors.
For instance: `diagtool show-enabled -Wall -Werror /tmp/test.c` will
print that -Wunused-variable (warn_unused_variable) will be treated as
an error.
This patch adds them to the install target so it gets shipped with the
LLVM release. It also adds a very basic man page and mentions this
change in the release notes.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46694
llvm-svn: 332448
This implements the rule intended by the standard (see LWG 2358)
and the rule intended by the Itanium C++ ABI (see
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/51), and makes
Clang match the behavior of GCC, ICC, and MSVC.
A pedantic reading of both the standard and the ABI indicate that Clang
is currently technically correct, but that's not worth much when it's
clear that the wording is wrong in both those places.
This is an ABI break for classes that derive from a class that is empty
other than one or more unnamed non-zero-length bit-fields. Such cases
are expected to be rare, but -fclang-abi-compat=6 restores the old
behavior just in case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45174
llvm-svn: 331620
As suggested in the post-commit thread for rL331056, we should match these
clang options with the established vocabulary of the corresponding sanitizer
option. Also, the use of 'strict' is well-known for these kinds of knobs,
and we can improve the descriptive text in the docs.
So this intends to match the logic of D46135 but only change the words.
Matching LLVM commit to match this spelling of the attribute to follow shortly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46236
llvm-svn: 331209
Clang incorrectly applied the packed attribute to base classes. Per GCC's
documentation and as can be observed from its behavior, packed only applies to
members, not base classes.
This change is conditioned behind -fclang-abi-compat so that an ABI break can
be avoided by users if desired.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46218
llvm-svn: 331136
Summary:
It seems there isn't much enthusiasm for `-wtest` D45685.
This is more conservative version, which i had in the very first
revision of D44883, but that 'erroneously' got removed because of the review.
**Based on some [irc] discussions, it must really be documented that
we want all the new diagnostics to have their own flags, to ease
rollouts, transitions, etc.**
Please do note that i'm only adding `-Wno-self-assign-overloaded`,
but not `-Wno-self-assign-field-overloaded`, because i'm honestly
not aware of any false-positives from the `-field` variant,
but i can just as easily add it if wanted.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44883#1068561
Reviewers: dblaikie, aaron.ballman, thakis, rjmccall, rsmith
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: Quuxplusone, chandlerc, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45766
llvm-svn: 330651
Summary:
This has just bit me, so i though it would be nice to avoid that next time :)
Motivational case:
https://godbolt.org/g/cq9UNk
Basically, it's likely to happen if you don't like shadowing issues,
and use `-Wshadow` and friends. And it won't be diagnosed by clang.
The reason is, these self-assign diagnostics only work for builtin assignment
operators. Which makes sense, one could have a very special operator=,
that does something unusual in case of self-assignment,
so it may make sense to not warn on that.
But while it may be intentional in some cases, it may be a bug in other cases,
so it would be really great to have some diagnostic about it...
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rsmith, rtrieu, nikola, rjmccall, dblaikie
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: EricWF, lebedev.ri, thakis, Quuxplusone, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44883
llvm-svn: 329493
layout" rules.
The new rules say that a standard-layout struct has its first non-static
data member and all base classes at offset 0, and consider a class to
not be standard-layout if that would result in multiple subobjects of a
single type having the same address.
We track "is C++11 standard-layout class" separately from "is
standard-layout class" so that the ABIs that need this information can
still use it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45176
llvm-svn: 329332
Summary:
As we are only doing X.0.Z releases (not using the minor version), there is no need to keep -X.Y in the version.
So, instead, I propose the following:
Instead of having clang-7.0 in bin/, we will have clang-7
Since also matches was gcc is doing.
Reviewers: tstellar, dlj, dim, hans
Reviewed By: dim, hans
Subscribers: dim, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41808
llvm-svn: 328769
I should have done it in rL327558 / D43162, but forgot..
I'm not 100% sure about the text, but i don't think
it warrants a whole new differential revision.
llvm-svn: 327725
Summary:
--autocomplete flag now handles all the flags passed to shell, and this
implementation breaks backward compatibily before Clang 6.0.
Reviewers: teemperor, v.g.vassilev
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44191
llvm-svn: 326889
Add attribute target multiversioning to the release notes.
Additionally adds multiversioning support to the attribute
documentation for 'target'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41837
llvm-svn: 322043
Most attributes will now use the Clang<"name"> construct to provide both __attribute__((name)) and [[clang::name]] syntaxes for the attribute. Attributes deviating from this should be marked with a comment explaining why they are not supported under both spellings. Common reasons are: the attribute is provided by some other specification that controls the syntax or the attribute cannot be exposed under a particular spelling for some given reason.
Because this is a mechanical change that only introduces new spellings, there are no test cases for the commit.
llvm-svn: 320752
builtin macros
This patch implements the __is_target_arch, __is_target_vendor, __is_target_os,
and __is_target_environment Clang preprocessor extensions that were proposed by
@compnerd in Bob's cfe-dev post:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-November/056166.html.
These macros can be used to examine the components of the target triple at
compile time. A has_builtin(is_target_???) preprocessor check can be used to
check for their availability.
__is_target_arch allows you to check if an arch is specified without worring
about a specific subarch, e.g.
__is_target_arch(arm) returns 1 for the target arch "armv7"
__is_target_arch(armv7) returns 1 for the target arch "armv7"
__is_target_arch(armv6) returns 0 for the target arch "armv7"
__is_target_vendor and __is_target_environment match the specific vendor
or environment. __is_target_os matches the specific OS, but
__is_target_os(darwin) will match any Darwin-based OS. "Unknown" can be used
to test if the triple's component is specified.
rdar://35753116
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41087
llvm-svn: 320734
This adds -std=c17, -std=gnu17, and -std=iso9899:2017 as language mode flags for C17 and updates the value of __STDC_VERSION__ to the value based on the C17 FDIS. Given that this ballot cannot succeed until 2018, it is expected that we (and GCC) will add c18 flags as aliases once the ballot passes.
llvm-svn: 320089
This behaves similar to the __has_cpp_attribute builtin macro in that it allows users to detect whether an attribute is supported with the [[]] spelling syntax, which can be enabled in C with -fdouble-square-bracket-attributes.
llvm-svn: 320088
Basically a regression after r316268.
However the diagnostic is correct, but the test coverage is bad.
So just like rL316500, introduce yet more tests,
and adjust the release notes.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35200
llvm-svn: 317421
clang currently uses .init_array instead of .ctors on Linux if it detects gcc
4.7+. Make it so that it also uses .init_array if no gcc installation is found
at all – if there's no old gcc, there's nothing we need to be compatible with.
icecc for example runs clang in a very small chroot, so before this change
clang would use .ctors if run under icecc. And lld currently silently mislinks
inputs with .ctors sections, so before this clang + icecc + lld would produce
broken binaries. (But this seems like a good change independent of that lld
bug.)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39317
llvm-svn: 316713
Summary:
The warning was initially introduced in D32914 by @thakis,
and the concerns were raised there, and later in rL302247
and PR33771.
I do believe that it makes sense to relax the diagnostic
e.g. in this case, when the expression originates from the
system header, which can not be modified. This prevents
adoption for the diagnostic for codebases which use pthreads
(`PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER`), gtest, etc.
As @malcolm.parsons suggests, it *may* make sense to also
not warn for the template types, but it is not obvious to
me how to do that in here.
Though, it still makes sense to complain about `NULL` macro.
While there, add more tests.
Reviewers: dblaikie, thakis, rsmith, rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: thakis
Subscribers: Rakete1111, hans, cfe-commits, thakis, malcolm.parsons
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38954
llvm-svn: 316662
rL316268 / D39122 has fixed PR35009, and now when in C,
these three(?) diagnostics properly use the enum's underlying
datatype.
While it was fixed, the test coverage was clearly insufficient,
because the -Wsign-compare change didn't show up in any of the
tests, until it was reported in the post-commit mail for rL316268.
So add the test for the -Wsign-compare diagnostic for enum
for C code, and while there, document this in the release notes.
The fix itself was obviously correct, so unless we want to silence
this new diagnosed case, i deem this commit to be NFC.
llvm-svn: 316500
The first attempt, rL315614 was reverted because one libcxx
test broke, and i did not know at the time how to deal with it.
Summary:
Currently, clang only diagnoses completely out-of-range comparisons (e.g. `char` and constant `300`),
and comparisons of unsigned and `0`. But gcc also does diagnose the comparisons with the
`std::numeric_limits<>::max()` / `std::numeric_limits<>::min()` so to speak
Finally Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147
Continuation of https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rtrieu, jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38101
llvm-svn: 315875
Summary:
Currently, clang only diagnoses completely out-of-range comparisons (e.g. `char` and constant `300`),
and comparisons of unsigned and `0`. But gcc also does diagnose the comparisons with the
`std::numeric_limits<>::max()` / `std::numeric_limits<>::min()` so to speak
Finally Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147
Continuation of https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rtrieu, jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38101
llvm-svn: 315614
Summary:
This raises our default past 1900, which controls whether char16_t is a
builtin type or not.
Implements PR34243
Reviewers: hans
Subscribers: STL_MSFT, rsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38646
llvm-svn: 315107
Summary:
This is a first half(?) of a fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147 (gcc -Wtype-limits)
GCC's -Wtype-limits does warn on comparison of unsigned value
with signed zero (as in, with 0), but clang only warns if the
zero is unsigned (i.e. 0U).
Also, be careful not to double-warn, or falsely warn on
comparison of signed/fp variable and signed 0.
Yes, all these testcases are needed.
Testing: $ ninja check-clang-sema check-clang-semacxx
Also, no new warnings for clang stage-2 build.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565
llvm-svn: 312750
-Wobjc-messaging-id is a new, non-default warning that warns about
message sends to unqualified id in Objective-C. This warning is useful
for projects that would like to avoid any potential future compiler
errors/warnings, as the system frameworks might add a method with the same
selector which could make the message send to id ambiguous.
rdar://33303354
llvm-svn: 311779
Summary:
I thought we should add this information to release notes, because we
added a new flag to clang driver.
Reviewers: v.g.vassilev, teemperor, ruiu
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36567
llvm-svn: 310700
In r309007, I made -fsanitize=null a hard prerequisite for -fsanitize=vptr. I
did not see the need for the two checks to have separate null checking logic
for the same pointer. I expected the two checks to either always be enabled
together, or to be mutually compatible.
In the mailing list discussion re: r309007 it became clear that that isn't the
case. If a codebase is -fsanitize=vptr clean but not -fsanitize=null clean,
it's useful to have -fsanitize=vptr emit its own null check. That's what this
patch does: with it, -fsanitize=vptr can be used without -fsanitize=null.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36112
llvm-svn: 309846
Originally, we weren't able to match on Type nodes themselves (only QualType),
so the hasDeclaration matcher was initially written to give what we thought are
reasonable results for QualType matches.
When we chagned the matchers to allow matching on Type nodes, it turned out
that the hasDeclaration matcher was by chance written templated enough to now
allow hasDeclaration to also match on (some) Type nodes.
This patch change the hasDeclaration matcher to:
a) work the same on Type and QualType nodes,
b) be completely explicit about what nodes we can match instead of just allowing
anything with a getDecl() to match,
c) explicitly control desugaring only one level in very specific instances.
d) adds hasSpecializedTemplate and tagType matchers to allow migrating
existing use cases that now need more explicit matchers
Note: This patch breaks clang-tools-extra. The corresponding patch there
is approved and will land in a subsequent patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27104
llvm-svn: 309809
The instrumentation generated by -fsanitize=vptr does not null check a
user pointer before loading from it. This causes crashes in the face of
UB member calls (this=nullptr), i.e it's causing user programs to crash
only after UBSan is turned on.
The fix is to make run-time null checking a prerequisite for enabling
-fsanitize=vptr, and to then teach UBSan to reuse these run-time null
checks to make -fsanitize=vptr safe.
Testing: check-clang, check-ubsan, a stage2 ubsan-enabled build
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35735https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33881
llvm-svn: 309007
Summary:
This way, the behavior of that warning flag
more closely resembles that of GCC.
Do note that there is at least one false-negative (see FIXME in tests).
Fixes PR4802.
Testing:
```
ninja check-clang-sema check-clang-semacxx
```
Reviewers: dblaikie, majnemer, rnk
Reviewed By: dblaikie, rnk
Subscribers: mclow.lists, cfe-commits, alexfh, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33102
llvm-svn: 307045
-fslp-vectorize-aggressive and -fno-slp-vectorize-aggressive flags back
under this group and test for the warning. Document the future removal
in the ReleaseNotes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34926
llvm-svn: 306965
Summary:
This way, the behavior of that warning flag
more closely resembles that of GCC.
Do note that there is at least one false-negative (see FIXME in tests).
Fixes PR4802.
Testing:
```
ninja check-clang-sema check-clang-semacxx
```
Reviewers: dblaikie, majnemer, rnk
Reviewed By: dblaikie, rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33102
llvm-svn: 305147
Nico Weber