This patch attempts to represent a shuffle as a repeating shuffle (recognisable by is128BitLaneRepeatedShuffleMask) with the source input(s) in their original lanes, followed by a single permutation of the 128-bit lanes to their final destinations.
On AVX2 we can additionally attempt to match using 64-bit sub-lane permutation. AVX2 can also now match a similar 'broadcasted' repeating shuffle.
This patch has several benefits:
* Avoids prematurely matching with lowerVectorShuffleByMerging128BitLanes which can require both inputs to have their input lanes permuted before shuffling.
* Can replace PERMPS/PERMD instructions - although these are useful for cross-lane unary shuffling, they require their shuffle mask to be pre-loaded (and increase register pressure).
* Matching the repeating shuffle makes use of a lot of existing shuffle lowering.
There is an outstanding minor AVX1 regression (combine_unneeded_subvector1 in vector-shuffle-combining.ll) of a previously 128-bit shuffle + subvector splat being converted to a subvector splat + (2 instruction) 256-bit shuffle, I intend to fix this in a followup patch for review.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16537
llvm-svn: 260834
As shown in:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23203
...we currently die because lowering believes that mfence is allowed without SSE2 on x86-64,
but the instruction def doesn't know that.
I don't know if allowing mfence without SSE is right, but if not, at least now it's consistently wrong. :)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17219
llvm-svn: 260828
Tests for the new scalarize all private access options will be
included with a future commit.
The only functional change is to make the split/scalarize behavior
for private access of > 4 element vectors to be consistent
with the flat/global handling. This makes the spilling worse
in the two changed tests.
llvm-svn: 260804
Replace spills to memory with spills to registers, if possible. This
applies mostly to predicate registers (both scalar and vector), since
they are very limited in number. A spill of a predicate register may
happen even if there is a general-purpose register available. In cases
like this the stack spill/reload may be eliminated completely.
This optimization will consider all stack objects, regardless of where
they came from and try to match the live range of the stack slot with
a dead range of a register from an appropriate register class.
llvm-svn: 260758
Rewrite the code to handle all pseudo-instructions in a single pass.
This temporarily reverts spill slot optimization that used general-
purpose registers to hold values of spilled predicate registers.
llvm-svn: 260696
Historically, AMD internal sp3 assembler has flat_store* addr, data
format. To match existing code and to enable reuse, change LLVM
definitions to match. Also update MC and CodeGen tests.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16927
Patch by: Nikolay Haustov
llvm-svn: 260694
Summary:
It is possible that the loop condition can be a boolean constant (infinite loop,
for example). So we sould handle constant condition in annotating a loop. This
patch adds this functionality to support annotating constant condition.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm
Subscribers: llvm-commits, arsenm
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15093
llvm-svn: 260692
We can generate the actual instructions from the intrinsics without the
need for pseudo-instructions. Also, since the intrinsics have a side-
effect in a form of a store, attempt to optimize away loads from the
store location.
llvm-svn: 260690
Summary:
Before this change, callee-save registers would be rounded up to even
pairs of GPRs and FPRs. This change eliminates these extra padding
load/stores, though it does keep the stack allocation the same size
unless both the GPR and FPR sets have an odd size, in which case one
full pair stack slot (16 bytes) is saved.
This optimization cannot currently be done for MachO targets since they
rely on a fast-path .debug_frame equivalent that can only encode
callee-save registers as pairs.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, rengolin, mcrosier, jmolloy
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17000
llvm-svn: 260689
The DataLayout can calculate alignment of vectors based on the alignment
of the element type and the number of elements. In fact, it is the product
of these two values. The problem is that for vectors of N x i1, this will
return the alignment of N bytes, since the alignment of i1 is 8 bits. The
vector types of vNi1 should be aligned to N bits instead. Provide explicit
alignment for HVX vectors to avoid such complications.
llvm-svn: 260678
This was hardcoded to the static private size, but this
would be missing the offset and additional size for someday
when we have dynamic sizing.
Also stops always initializing flat_scratch even when unused.
In the future we should stop emitting this unless flat instructions
are used to access private memory. For example this will initialize
it almost always on VI because flat is used for global access.
llvm-svn: 260658
Introduce a subtarget feature for this, and leave the default with
the current behavior which assumes up to 16-byte loads/stores can
be used. The field also seems to have the ability to be set to 2 bytes,
but I'm not sure what that would be used for.
llvm-svn: 260651
This is just a trivial implementation:
- Support only arguments passed in registers.
- Support only "plain" arguments, i.e., no sext/zext attribute.
At this point, it is possible to play with the IRTranslator on AArch64:
llc -mtriple arm64-<vendor>-<os> -print-machineinstrs <input.ll> -o - -global-isel
For now, we only support the translation of program with adds and returns.
Follow-up patches are on their way to add a test case (the MIRParser is
not ready as it is).
llvm-svn: 260600
Summary:
It's possible to have resource descriptors and samplers stored in
VGPRs, either by a VMEM instruction or in the case of samplers,
floating-point calculations. When this happens, we need to use
v_readfirstlane to copy these values back to sgprs.
Reviewers: mareko, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17102
llvm-svn: 260599
Summary:
When we split SMRD instructions into two MUBUFs we were adding the users
of the newly created MUBUFs to the VALU worklist. However, the only
users these instructions had was the REG_SEQUENCE that was inserted
by splitSMRD when the original SMRD instruction was split.
We need to make sure to add the users of the original SMRD to the VALU
worklist before it is split.
I have a test case, but it requires one other bug fix, so it will be
added in a later commt.
Reviewers: mareko, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17101
llvm-svn: 260588
Simon Pilgrim