The current BitPermutationSelector generates a code to build a value by tracking two types of bits: ConstZero and Variable.
ConstZero means a bit we need to mask off and Variable is a bit we copy from an input value.
This patch add third type of bits VariableKnownToBeZero caused by AssertZext node or zero-extending load node.
VariableKnownToBeZero means a bit comes from an input value, but it is known to be already zero. So we do not need to mask them.
VariableKnownToBeZero enhances flexibility to group bits, since we can avoid redundant masking for these bits.
This patch also renames "HasZero" to "NeedMask" since now we may skip masking even when we have zeros (of type VariableKnownToBeZero).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48025
llvm-svn: 344347
Summary:
Extend analysis forwarding loads from preceeding stores to work with
extended loads and truncated stores to the same address so long as the
load is fully subsumed by the store.
Hexagon's swp-epilog-phis.ll and swp-memrefs-epilog1.ll test are
deleted as they've no longer seem to be relevant.
Reviewers: RKSimon, rnk, kparzysz, javed.absar
Subscribers: sdardis, nemanjai, hiraditya, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49200
llvm-svn: 344142
We want to run the Machine Scheduler instead of the List Scheduler after RA.
Checked with a performance run on a Power 9 machine with SPEC 2006 and while
some benchmarks improved and others degraded the geomean was slightly improved
with the Machine Scheduler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45265
llvm-svn: 336295
When folding an addi into a memory access that can take an immediate offset, we
were implicitly assuming that the existing offset was zero. This was incorrect.
If we're dealing with an addi with a plain constant, we can add it to the
existing offset (assuming that doesn't overflow the immediate, etc.), but if we
have anything else (i.e. something that will become a relocation expression),
we'll go back to requiring the existing immediate offset to be zero (because we
don't know what the requirements on that relocation expression might be - e.g.
maybe it is paired with some addis in some relevant way).
On the other hand, when dealing with a plain addi with a regular constant
immediate, the alignment restrictions (from the TOC base pointer, etc.) are
irrelevant.
I've added the test case from PR30280, which demonstrated the bug, but also
demonstrates a missed optimization opportunity (i.e. we don't need the memory
accesses at all).
Fixes PR30280.
llvm-svn: 280789
Fangrui Song