This reverts the revert commit 437f0bbcd5.
It adds a new toVPRecipeResult, which forces VPRecipeOrVPValueTy to be
constructed with a VPRecipeBase *. This should address ambiguous
constructor issues for recipe sub-types that also inherit from VPValue.
The new assertions check that Addressables removed when removing
external or absolute symbols are not referenced by another symbol.
A comment on post-fixup passes is updated: vmaddrs have all been
set up by the time the pre-fixup passes are run, post-fixup passes
run after fixups have been applied to content.
(CMTST A, A) will only set elements to 0 if the element is 0 in A. Use
it for != 0 compares, which currently use (vnot (CMEQz A)). This saves a
mvn instruction.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97303
Add the remaining missing builtin function declarations that have enum
or typedef argument or return types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96860
Passing the MSVC include dirs via -isystem makes them included before
clang's own include resource dir (<prefix>/lib/clang/<version>/include).
This causes includes of stddef.h to bypass clang's stddef.h which
defines max_align_t, which libc++ needs defined.
This was added in 4372f06d0f when the
initial windows testing support was added, and has been brought along
since. It's unclear if this was needed back then - now it no longer is
needed at least, and since libc++ started depending on max_align_t, this
became an issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97167
Remove a stray -lib argument in guardcf-lto.ll; llvm-lib doesn't
support generating import libs from a def file unlike lib.exe.
Previously this worked because the -lib argument was ignored
(printing only a warning).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96699
Currently the load/store optimizer will only fold in increments of the
same size as the load/store. This patch expands that to any legal
immediate for the post-inc instruction.
This is a recommit of 3b34b06fc5 with correctness fixes and extra
tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95885
This reverts commit 6b286d93f7 because
in some cases when the optimizer evaluates the global initializer,
__llvm_prf_cnts may not be entirely zero initialized.
We know the input is going to be expanded as well, so we should
just ask for the already expanded operands. Otherwise we create
nodes that are just going to need to be legalized.
-O1 and above do dont call real optimizer pipeline in ThinLTO PreLink.
Also clang can't add PostLink OptimizerLastEPCallbacks for in-process ThinLTO.
This results in missing sanitizer passes with ThinLTO.
Simple working solution is just call OptimizerLastEPCallbacks
at the end of buildThinLTOPreLinkDefaultPipeline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96320
Patch takes advantage of the implicit default behavior to reduce the number of attributes, which in turns reduces compilation time.
Reviewed By: serge-sans-paille
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97116
The current size of the llvm-project repository exceeds 1 GB. A shallow clone can save a lot of space and time. Some developers might not aware of this feature.
Reviewed By: awarzynski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97118
Previously there was no way to control how module destructors were emitted
by `ModuleAddressSanitizerPass`. However, we want language frontends (e.g. Clang)
to be able to decide how to emit these destructors (if at all).
This patch introduces the `AsanDtorKind` enum that represents the different ways
destructors can be emitted. There are currently only two valid ways to emit destructors.
* `Global` - Use `llvm.global_dtors`. This was the previous behavior and is the default.
* `None` - Do not emit module destructors.
The `ModuleAddressSanitizerPass` and the various wrappers around it have been updated
to take the `AsanDtorKind` as an argument.
The `-asan-destructor-kind=` command line argument has been introduced to make this
easy to test from `opt`. If this argument is specified it overrides the value passed
to the `ModuleAddressSanitizerPass` constructor.
Note that `AsanDtorKind` is not `bool` because we will introduce a new way to
emit destructors in a subsequent patch.
Note that `AsanDtorKind` is given its own header file because if it is declared
in `Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.h` it leads to compile error
(Module is ambiguous) when trying to use it in
`clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.def`.
rdar://71609176
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96571
Currently managed variables are emitted as undefined symbols, which
causes difficulty for diagnosing undefined symbols for non-managed
variables.
This patch transforms managed variables in device compilation so that
they can be emitted as normal variables.
Reviewed by: Artem Belevich
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96195
The non-flag setting variants of instructions may have different regclass
requirements. If so, we need to constrain them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97343
This is for XCOFF DWARF support.
Seems when DWARF debug is enable, symbol 0 has special usage
for AIX binder. At least, symbol 0 can not be the .text
section. Otherwise, we get some binding time error.
Add correct C_FILE symbol at index 0 here to make AIX binder
work.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97117
{D95809} introduced a mechanism for synthetic symbol creation of personality
pointers. When multiple section relocations referred to the same personality
pointer, it would deduplicate them. However, it neglected to consider that we
could have symbol relocations that also refer to the same personality pointer.
This diff fixes it.
In practice, this mix of relocations arises when there is a statically-linked
personality routine that is referenced from multiple object files. Within the
same object file, it will be referred to via section relocations, but
(obviously) other object files will refer to it via symbol relocations. Failing
to deduplicate these references resulted in us going over the
3-personality-pointer limit when linking some larger applications.
Fixes llvm.org/PR48389.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis, alexshap
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97245
The silent failures had confused me a few times.
I haven't added a similar check for platform yet as we don't yet have logic to
infer the platform automatically, and so adding that check would require
updating dozens of test files.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis, alexshap
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97209
I've adjusted the RelocAttrBits to better fit the semantics of
the relocations. In particular:
1. *_UNSIGNED relocations are no longer marked with the `TLV` bit, even
though they can occur within TLV sections. Instead the `TLV` bit is
reserved for relocations that can reference thread-local symbols, and
*_UNSIGNED relocations have their own `UNSIGNED` bit. The previous
implementation caused TLV and regular UNSIGNED semantics to be
conflated, resulting in rebase opcodes being incorrectly emitted for TLV
relocations.
2. I've added a new `POINTER` bit to denote non-relaxable GOT
relocations. This distinction isn't important on x86 -- the GOT
relocations there are either relaxable or non-relaxable loads -- but
arm64 has `GOT_LOAD_PAGE21` which loads the page that the referent
symbol is in (regardless of whether the symbol ends up in the GOT). This
relocation must reference a GOT symbol (so must have the `GOT` bit set)
but isn't itself relaxable (so must not have the `LOAD` bit). The
`POINTER` bit is used for relocations that *must* reference a GOT
slot.
3. A similar situation occurs for TLV relocations.
4. ld64 supports both a pcrel and an absolute version of
ARM64_RELOC_POINTER_TO_GOT. But the semantics of the absolute version
are pretty weird -- it results in the value of the GOT slot being
written, rather than the address. (That means a reference to a
dynamically-bound slot will result in zeroes being written.) The
programs I've tried linking don't use this form of the relocation, so
I've dropped our partial support for it by removing the relevant
RelocAttrBits.
Reviewed By: alexshap
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97031
We may need to do some customization for DWARF unit length in DWARF
section headers for some targets for some code generation path.
For example, for XCOFF in assembly path, AIX assembler does not require
the debug section containing its debug unit length in the header.
Move emitDwarfUnitLength to MCStreamer class so that we can do
customization in different Streamers
Reviewed By: ikudrin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95932
The maintainer of libdwarf kindly provided this patch with a bunch of
historic DWARF extensions that are missing from Dwarf.def. This list
is helpful to avoid potential conflicts in the user-defined vendor
extension space in the future.
Patch by David Anderson!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97242
Blocks that contain only a single branch instruction to the next block can be skipped in analyzing the loop-nest structure.
This is currently done by `getSingleSuccessor()`.
However, the branch instruction might have multiple targets which happen to all be the same.
In this case, the block should still be considered as empty and skipped.
An example is `test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/update-condbranch-duplicate-successors.ll` (the LIT test for this patch is modified from it as well).
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97286
This is a simple patch to update SimplifyCFG's passingValueIsAlwaysUndefined to inspect more attributes.
A new function `CallBase::isPassingUndefUB` checks attributes that imply noundef.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97244
This prevents a bug in the pass instrumentation implementation where the main thread would end up with a different pass manager in different runs of the pass.
This got me pretty recently... TrailingObjects cannot be copied or
moved, since they need to be pre-allocated. This patch deletes the copy
and move operations (plus re-adds the default ctor).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97324
The order in which the nested calls to Builder.buildWhatever are
evaluated in differs between GCC and Clang.
This caused a bot failure because the MIR in the testcase was
coming out in a different order than expected.
Rather than using nested calls, pull them out in order to fix the
order of evaluation.
Kadir Cetinkaya