This time invoking llc with "-march=x86-64" in the testcase, so we don't assume
the default target is x86.
Summary:
If we have
%vreg0<def> = PHI %vreg2<undef>, <BB#0>, %vreg3, <BB#2>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg2,%vreg3
%vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32ri8 %vreg0<kill,tied0>, 1, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg0
then we can't just change %vreg0 into %vreg3, since %vreg2 is actually
undef. We would have to also copy the undef flag to be able to change the
register.
Instead we deal with this case like other cases where we can't just
replace the register: we insert a COPY. The code creating the COPY already
copied all flags from the PHI input, so the undef flag will be transferred
as it should.
Reviewers: kparzysz
Reviewed By: kparzysz
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38235
llvm-svn: 314882
Summary:
If we have
%vreg0<def> = PHI %vreg2<undef>, <BB#0>, %vreg3, <BB#2>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg2,%vreg3
%vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32ri8 %vreg0<kill,tied0>, 1, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg0
then we can't just change %vreg0 into %vreg3, since %vreg2 is actually
undef. We would have to also copy the undef flag to be able to change the
register.
Instead we deal with this case like other cases where we can't just
replace the register: we insert a COPY. The code creating the COPY already
copied all flags from the PHI input, so the undef flag will be transferred
as it should.
Reviewers: kparzysz
Reviewed By: kparzysz
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38235
llvm-svn: 314879
This re-applies commit r313685, this time with the proper updates to
the test cases.
Original commit message:
Unreachable blocks in the machine instr representation are these
weird empty blocks with no successors.
The MIR printer used to not print empty lists of successors. However,
the MIR parser now treats non-printed list of successors as "please
guess it for me". As a result, the parser tries to guess the list of
successors and given the block is empty, just assumes it falls through
the next block (if any).
For instance, the following test case used to fail the verifier.
The MIR printer would print
entry
/ \
true (def) false (no list of successors)
|
split.true (use)
The MIR parser would understand this:
entry
/ \
true (def) false
| / <-- invalid edge
split.true (use)
Because of the invalid edge, we get the "def does not
dominate all uses" error.
The fix consists in printing empty successor lists, so that the parser
knows what to do for unreachable blocks.
rdar://problem/34022159
llvm-svn: 313696
Unreachable blocks in the machine instr representation are these
weird empty blocks with no successors.
The MIR printer used to not print empty lists of successors. However,
the MIR parser now treats non-printed list of successors as "please
guess it for me". As a result, the parser tries to guess the list of
successors and given the block is empty, just assumes it falls through
the next block (if any).
For instance, the following test case used to fail the verifier.
The MIR printer would print
entry
/ \
true (def) false (no list of successors)
|
split.true (use)
The MIR parser would understand this:
entry
/ \
true (def) false
| / <-- invalid edge
split.true (use)
Because of the invalid edge, we get the "def does not
dominate all uses" error.
The fix consists in printing empty successor lists, so that the parser
knows what to do for unreachable blocks.
rdar://problem/34022159
llvm-svn: 313685
Summary:
Hopefully this also clarifies exactly when and why we're rewriting
certiain S_LOCALs using reference types: We're using the reference type
to stand in for a zero-offset load.
Reviewers: inglorion
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37309
llvm-svn: 312247
Summary:
Some variables show up in Visual Studio as "optimized out" even in -O0
-Od builds. This change fixes two issues that would cause this to
happen. The first issue is that not all DIExpressions we generate were
recognized by the CodeView writer. This has been addressed by adding
support for DW_OP_constu, DW_OP_minus, and DW_OP_plus. The second
issue is that we had no way to encode DW_OP_deref in CodeView. We get
around that by changinge the type we encode in the debug info to be
a reference to the type in the source code.
This fixes PR34261.
The reland adds two extra checks to the original: It checks if the
DbgVariableLocation is valid before checking any of its fields, and
it only emits ranges with nonzero registers.
Reviewers: aprantl, rnk, zturner
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits, aprantl, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36907
llvm-svn: 312034
Summary:
Some variables show up in Visual Studio as "optimized out" even in -O0
-Od builds. This change fixes two issues that would cause this to
happen. The first issue is that not all DIExpressions we generate were
recognized by the CodeView writer. This has been addressed by adding
support for DW_OP_constu, DW_OP_minus, and DW_OP_plus. The second
issue is that we had no way to encode DW_OP_deref in CodeView. We get
around that by changinge the type we encode in the debug info to be
a reference to the type in the source code.
This fixes PR34261.
Reviewers: aprantl, rnk, zturner
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits, aprantl, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36907
llvm-svn: 311957
Summary:
Most DIExpressions are empty or very simple. When they are complex, they
tend to be unique, so checking them inline is reasonable.
This also avoids the need for CodeGen passes to append to the
llvm.dbg.mir named md node.
See also PR22780, for making DIExpression not be an MDNode.
Reviewers: aprantl, dexonsmith, dblaikie
Subscribers: qcolombet, javed.absar, eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37075
llvm-svn: 311594
This should enable us to test the generation of target-specific constant
pools, e.g. for ARM:
constants:
- id: 0
value: 'g(GOT_PREL)-(LPC0+8-.)'
alignment: 4
isTargetSpecific: true
I intend to use this to test PIC support in GlobalISel for ARM.
This is difficult to test outside of that context, since the existing
MIR tests usually rely on parser support as well, and that seems a bit
trickier to add. We could try to add a unit test, but the setup for that
seems rather convoluted and overkill.
We do test however that the parser reports a nice error when
encountering a target-specific constant pool.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36092
llvm-svn: 309806
On AMDGPU SGPR spills are really spilled to another register.
The spiller creates the spills to new frame index objects,
which is used as a placeholder.
This will eventually be replaced with a reference to a position
in a VGPR to write to and the frame index deleted. It is
most likely not a real stack location that can be shared
with another stack object.
This is a problem when StackSlotColoring decides it should
combine a frame index used for a normal VGPR spill with
a real stack location and a frame index used for an SGPR.
Add an ID field so that StackSlotColoring has a way
of knowing the different frame index types are
incompatible.
llvm-svn: 308673
Summary:
When an immediate is folded by constant folding, we re-scan the entire
use list for two reasons:
1. The constant folding may have created a new use of the same reg.
2. The constant folding may have removed an additional use in the list
we're currently traversing (e.g., constant folding an S_ADD_I32 c, c).
However, this could previously lead to a crash when an unrelated use was
added twice into the FoldList. Since we re-scan the whole list anyway, we
might as well just clear the FoldList again before we do so.
Using a MIR test to show this because real code seems to trigger the issue
only in connection with some really subtle control flow structures.
Fixes GL45-CTS.shading_language_420pack.binding_images on gfx9.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, llvm-commits, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35416
llvm-svn: 308314
Summary:
This patch is the first step in reducing HW prefetcher instruction tag
collisions in inner loops for Falkor. It adds a pass that annotates IR
loads with metadata to indicate that they are known to be strided loads,
and adds a target lowering hook that translates this metadata to a
target-specific MachineMemOperand flag.
A follow on change will use this MachineMemOperand flag to re-write
instructions to reduce tag collisions.
Reviewers: mcrosier, t.p.northover
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34963
llvm-svn: 308059
Summary: Add target hooks for printing and parsing target MMO flags.
Targets may override getSerializableMachineMemOperandTargetFlags() to
return a mapping from string to flag value for target MMO values that
should be serialized/parsed in MIR output.
Add implementation of this hook for AArch64 SuppressPair MMO flag.
Reviewers: bogner, hfinkel, qcolombet, MatzeB
Subscribers: mcrosier, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34962
llvm-svn: 307877
OpenCL 2.0 introduces the notion of memory scopes in atomic operations to
global and local memory. These scopes restrict how synchronization is
achieved, which can result in improved performance.
This change extends existing notion of synchronization scopes in LLVM to
support arbitrary scopes expressed as target-specific strings, in addition to
the already defined scopes (single thread, system).
The LLVM IR and MIR syntax for expressing synchronization scopes has changed
to use *syncscope("<scope>")*, where <scope> can be "singlethread" (this
replaces *singlethread* keyword), or a target-specific name. As before, if
the scope is not specified, it defaults to CrossThread/System scope.
Implementation details:
- Mapping from synchronization scope name/string to synchronization scope id
is stored in LLVM context;
- CrossThread/System and SingleThread scopes are pre-defined to efficiently
check for known scopes without comparing strings;
- Synchronization scope names are stored in SYNC_SCOPE_NAMES_BLOCK in
the bitcode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21723
llvm-svn: 307722
Summary: Added MachineVerifier code to check register ties more thoroughly, especially so that physical registers that are tied are the same. This may help e.g. when creating MIR files.
Original patch by Jesper Antonsson
Reviewers: stoklund, sanjoy, qcolombet
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: qcolombet, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34394
llvm-svn: 307259
- Add -x <language> option to switch between IR and MIR inputs.
- Change MIR parser to read from stdin when filename is '-'.
- Add a simple mir roundtrip test.
llvm-svn: 304825
CodeGen uses MO_ExternalSymbol to represent the inline assembly strings.
Empty strings for symbol names appear to be invalid. For now just
special case the output code to avoid hitting an `assert()` in
`printLLVMNameWithoutPrefix()`.
This fixes https://llvm.org/PR33317
llvm-svn: 304815
If -simplify-mir option is passed then MIRPrinter will not print such fields.
This change also required some lit test cases in CodeGen directory to be changed.
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32304
llvm-svn: 304779
When parsing .mir files immediately construct the MachineFunctions and
put them into MachineModuleInfo.
This allows us to get rid of the delayed construction (and delayed error
reporting) through the MachineFunctionInitialzier interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33809
llvm-svn: 304758
Use the initializeXXX method to initialize the RABasic pass in the
pipeline. This enables us to take advantage of the .mir infrastructure.
llvm-svn: 304602
This adds a callback to the LLVMTargetMachine that lets target indicate
that they do not pass the machine verifier checks in all cases yet.
This is intended to be a temporary measure while the targets are fixed
allowing us to enable the machine verifier by default with
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS enabled!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33696
llvm-svn: 304320
The reverted change introdued assertions ala:
"MachineBasicBlock::succ_iterator
llvm::MachineBasicBlock::removeSuccessor(succ_iterator, bool): Assertion
`I != Successors.end() && "Not a current successor!"'
Mikael, the original committer, wrote me that he is working on a fix, but that
it likely will take some time to get this resolved. As this bug is one of the
last two issues that keep the AOSP buildbot from turning green, I revert the
original commit r302876.
I am looking forward to see this recommitted after the assertion has been
resolved.
llvm-svn: 304128
Summary:
This is a fix for PR32538. MachineCSE first looks at MO.isDead(), but
if it is not marked dead, MachineCSE still wants to do its own check
to see if it is trivially dead. This check for the trivial case
assumed that physical registers cannot be live out of a block.
Patch by Mattias Eriksson.
Reviewers: qcolombet, jbhateja
Reviewed By: qcolombet, jbhateja
Subscribers: jbhateja, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33408
llvm-svn: 303731
Summary:
Instead of using RemoveExtraEdges (which uses analyzeBranch, which cannot
always be trusted) at the end to fixup the CFG we keep the CFG updated as
we go along and remove or add branches and merge blocks.
This way we won't have any problems if the involved MBBs contain
unanalyzable instructions.
This fixes PR32721.
In that case we had a triangle
EBB
| \
| |
| TBB
| /
FBB
where FBB didn't have any successors at all since it ended with an
unconditional return. Then TBB and FBB were be merged into EBB, but EBB
would still keep its successors, and the use of analyzeBranch and
CorrectExtraCFGEdges wouldn't help to remove them since the return
instruction is not analyzable (at least not on ARM).
Reviewers: kparzysz, iteratee, MatzeB
Reviewed By: iteratee
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33037
llvm-svn: 302876
Summary:
When trying to figure out if MBB could fallthrough to ToMBB (possibly by
falling through a bunch of other MBBs) we didn't actually check if there
was fallthrough between the last two blocks in the chain.
Reviewers: kparzysz, iteratee, MatzeB
Reviewed By: kparzysz, iteratee
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32996
llvm-svn: 302650
Using arguments with attribute inalloca creates problems for verification
of machine representation. This attribute instructs the backend that the
argument is prepared in stack prior to CALLSEQ_START..CALLSEQ_END
sequence (see http://llvm.org/docs/InAlloca.htm for details). Frame size
stored in CALLSEQ_START in this case does not count the size of this
argument. However CALLSEQ_END still keeps total frame size, as caller can
be responsible for cleanup of entire frame. So CALLSEQ_START and
CALLSEQ_END keep different frame size and the difference is treated by
MachineVerifier as stack error. Currently there is no way to distinguish
this case from actual errors.
This patch adds additional argument to CALLSEQ_START and its
target-specific counterparts to keep size of stack that is set up prior to
the call frame sequence. This argument allows MachineVerifier to calculate
actual frame size associated with frame setup instruction and correctly
process the case of inalloca arguments.
The changes made by the patch are:
- Frame setup instructions get the second mandatory argument. It
affects all targets that use frame pseudo instructions and touched many
files although the changes are uniform.
- Access to frame properties are implemented using special instructions
rather than calls getOperand(N).getImm(). For X86 and ARM such
replacement was made previously.
- Changes that reflect appearance of additional argument of frame setup
instruction. These involve proper instruction initialization and
methods that access instruction arguments.
- MachineVerifier retrieves frame size using method, which reports sum of
frame parts initialized inside frame instruction pair and outside it.
The patch implements approach proposed by Quentin Colombet in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27481#c1.
It fixes 9 tests failed with machine verifier enabled and listed
in PR27481.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32394
llvm-svn: 302527
- MIParser: If the successor list is not specified successors will be
added based on basic block operands in the block and possible
fallthrough.
- MIRPrinter: Adds a new `simplify-mir` option, with that option set:
Skip printing of block successor lists in cases where the
parser is guaranteed to reconstruct it. This means we still print the
list if some successor cannot be determined (happens for example for
jump tables), if the successor order changes or branch probabilities
being unequal.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31262
llvm-svn: 302289
This tracks whether MaxCallFrameSize is computed yet. Ideally we would
assert and fail when the value is queried before it is computed, however
this fails various targets that need to be fixed first.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32570
llvm-svn: 301851
If you run llc -stop-after=codegenprepare and feed the resulting MIR
to llc -start-after=codegenprepare, you'll have an empty machine
function since we haven't run any isel yet. Of course, this only works
if the MIRParser believes you that this is okay.
This is essentially a revert of r241862 with a fix for the problem it
was papering over.
llvm-svn: 299975
Currently the default C calling convention functions are treated
the same as compute kernels. Make this explicit so the default
calling convention can be changed to a non-kernel.
Converted with perl -pi -e 's/define void/define amdgpu_kernel void/'
on the relevant test directories (and undoing in one place that actually
wanted a non-kernel).
llvm-svn: 298444
The MIR printer dumps a string that describe the register mask of a function.
A static predefined list of register masks matches a static list of strings.
However when the register mask is not from the static predefined list, there is no descriptor string and the printer fails.
This patch adds support to custom register mask printing and dumping.
Also the list of callee saved registers (describing the registers that must be preserved for the caller) might be dynamic.
As such this data needs to be dumped and parsed back to the Machine Register Info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30971
llvm-svn: 298207
Mikael Holmen