This is part of a set of changes to allow InstCombine in the backend to optimize variable shifts without having to know about masking.
llvm-svn: 286757
Summary: Inverting the mask argument does not reflect the intended semantics of the intrinsic.
Reviewers: igorb, delena
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26019
llvm-svn: 286733
If initializer contains parentheses around braced list where it is not allowed,
as in construct int({0}), clang issued message like `functional-style cast
from 'void' to 'int' is not allowed`, which does not help much. Both gcc and
msvc issue message `list-initializer for non-class type must not be
parenthesized`, which is more descriptive. This change implements similar
message for clang.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25816
llvm-svn: 286721
The name of the NullableReturnedFromNonnullChecker in Checkers.td
was accidentally "NullablePassedToNonnull", which made it impossible
to explicitly turn the checker on.
rdar://problem/28354459
llvm-svn: 286697
ExpectedFunctionGlobalVarMethodOrProperty
would previously say "functions and global variables"
instead of "functions, methods, properties, and global variables"
The newly added ExpectedFunctionOrGlobalVariable
says "functions and global variables"
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26459
llvm-svn: 286599
Clang emits error message for the following code:
```
template <class F> void parallel_loop(F &&f) { f(0); }
int main() {
int x;
parallel_loop([&](auto y) {
{
x = y;
};
});
}
```
$ clang++ --std=gnu++14 clang_test.cc -o clang_test
clang_test.cc:9:7: error: reference to local variable 'x' declared in enclosing function 'main'
x = y;
^
clang_test.cc:2:48: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'main()::(anonymous class)::operator()<int>' requested here
template <class F> void parallel_loop(F &&f) { f(0); }
^
clang_test.cc:6:3: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'parallel_loop<(lambda at clang_test.cc:6:17)>' requested here parallel_loop([&](auto y) {
^
clang_test.cc:5:7: note: 'x' declared here
int x;
^
1 error generated.
Patch fixes this issue.
llvm-svn: 286584
...or within a reference. Both of these add an extra level of
indirection that make us less certain that the pointer really was
supposed to be non-nullable. However, changing the default behavior
would be a breaking change, so we'll just make it a warning instead.
Part of rdar://problem/25846421
llvm-svn: 286521
This is an addition to (and sub-warning of) -Wnullability-completeness
that warns when an array parameter is missing nullability. When the
specific warning is switched off, the compiler falls back to only
warning on pointer types written as pointer types.
Note that use of nullability /within/ an array triggers the
completeness checks regardless of whether or not the array-specific
warning is enabled; the intent there is simply to determine whether a
particular header is trying to be nullability-aware at all.
Part of rdar://problem/25846421.
llvm-svn: 286520
Since array parameters decay to pointers, '_Nullable' and friends
should be available for use there as well. This is especially
important for parameters that are typedefs of arrays. The unsugared
syntax for this follows the syntax for 'static'-sized arrays in C:
void test(int values[_Nullable]);
This syntax was previously accepted but the '_Nullable' (and any other
attributes) were silently discarded. However, applying '_Nullable' to
a typedef was previously rejected and is now accepted; therefore, it
may be necessary to test for the presence of this feature:
#if __has_feature(nullability_on_arrays)
One important change here is that DecayedTypes don't always
immediately contain PointerTypes anymore; they may contain an
AttributedType instead. This only affected one place in-tree, so I
would guess it's not likely to cause problems elsewhere.
This commit does not change -Wnullability-completeness just yet. I
want to think about whether it's worth doing something special to
avoid breaking existing clients that compile with -Werror. It also
doesn't change '#pragma clang assume_nonnull' behavior, which
currently treats the following two declarations as equivalent:
#pragma clang assume_nonnull begin
void test(void *pointers[]);
#pragma clang assume_nonnull end
void test(void * _Nonnull pointers[]);
This is not the desired behavior, but changing it would break
backwards-compatibility. Most likely the best answer is going to be
adding a new warning.
Part of rdar://problem/25846421
llvm-svn: 286519
Expose a warning flag for warn_duplicate_protocol_def. This allows control
over the severity of duplicate protocol definitions.
For example -Werror=duplicate-protocol or
#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wduplicate-protocol".
Patch provided by Dave Lee!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26406
llvm-svn: 286487
aren't captured by lambdas with a default capture specifier
This commit is a follow-up to r286354. It avoids the -Wshadow warning for
variables which shadow variables that aren't captured by lambdas with a default
capture specifier. It provides an additional note that points to location of
the capture.
The old behaviour is preserved with -Wshadow-all or -Wshadow-uncaptured-local.
rdar://14984176
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26448
llvm-svn: 286465
by lambdas with an explicit capture list
This commit avoids the -Wshadow warning for variables which shadow variables
that aren't captured by lambdas with an explicit capture list. It provides an
additional note that points to location of the explicit capture.
The old behaviour is preserved with -Wshadow-all or -Wshadow-uncaptured-local.
rdar://17135966
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26278
llvm-svn: 286354
The ObjC class protocol list assumes there is an associated location for each protocol but no location is provided
when the protocol list comes from a typedef, and we end up with a buffer overflow when trying to get locations for the protocol names.
Fixes crash of rdar://28980278.
llvm-svn: 286331
In Format, remove the reformat() and clean() functions taking a SourceManager
and a FileID. Keep the versions taking StringRef Code.
- there was duplicated functionality
- the FileID versions were harder to use
- the clean() version is dead code anyways
Patch by Krasimir Georgiev. Thank you.
llvm-svn: 286243
Summary:
This provides a better interface for clang-tidy and encapsulates the knowledge
about experimental checkers instead of leaving this to the clients.
Reviewers: zaks.anna
Subscribers: a.sidorin, NoQ, dcoughlin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26310
llvm-svn: 286218
As proposed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-October/106630.html
Move block info block state to a new class, BitstreamBlockInfo.
Clients may set the block info for a particular cursor with the
BitstreamCursor::setBlockInfo() method.
At this point BitstreamReader is not much more than a container for an
ArrayRef<uint8_t>, so remove it and replace all uses with direct uses
of memory buffers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26259
llvm-svn: 286207
Summary:
The current version does not deduplicate equivalent file paths correctly.
For example, a relative path and an absolute path are considered inequivalent.
Comparing FileEnry addresses these issues.
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: alexshap, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26288
llvm-svn: 286096
* if the base is produced by a series of derived-to-base conversions, check
the expression inside them when looking for an expression with a known
dynamic type
* step past MaterializeTemporaryExprs when checking for a known dynamic type
* when checking for a known dynamic type, treat all class prvalues as having
a known dynamic type after skipping all relevant rvalue subobject
adjustments
* treat callees formed by pointer-to-member access for a non-reference member
type like callees formed by member access.
llvm-svn: 285954
Summary:
[expr.cast.static] states:
> 3. A glvalue of type “cv1 T1” can be cast to type “rvalue reference to cv2 T2” if “cv2 T2” is reference-compatible
> with “cv1 T1”. The result refers to the object or the specified base class subobject thereof. If T2 is
> an inaccessible or ambiguous base class of T1, a program that necessitates such a cast is
> ill-formed.
>
> 4. Otherwise, an expression e can be explicitly converted to a type T using a static_cast of the form static_-
> cast<T>(e) if the declaration T t(e); is well-formed, for some invented temporary variable t. [...]
Currently when checking p3 Clang will diagnose `static_cast<T&&>(e)` as invalid if the argument is not reference compatible with `T`. However I believe the correct behavior is to also check p4 in those cases. For example:
```
double y = 42;
static_cast<int&&>(y); // this should be OK. 'int&& t(y)' is well formed
```
Note that we still don't check p4 for non-reference-compatible types which are reference-related since `T&& t(e);` should never be well formed in those cases.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26231
llvm-svn: 285872
This patch implements the register call calling convention, which ensures
as many values as possible are passed in registers. CodeGen changes
were committed in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL284108.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25204
llvm-svn: 285849
This commit improves the "must have C++ linkage" error diagnostics that are
emitted for C++ declarations like templates and literal operators by adding an
additional note that points to the appropriate extern "C" linkage specifier.
rdar://19021120
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26189
llvm-svn: 285823
Certain OpenCL builtin functions are supposed to be executed by all threads in a work group or sub group. Such functions should not be made divergent during transformation. It makes sense to mark them with convergent attribute.
The adding of convergent attribute is based on Ettore Speziale's work and the original proposal and patch can be found at https://www.mail-archive.com/cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org/msg22271.html.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25343
llvm-svn: 285725
Summary:
This patch adds a command line option '-cl-ext' to control a set of
supported OpenCL extensions. Option accepts a comma-separated list
of extensions prefixed with '+' or '-'.
It can be used together with a target triple to override support for some
extensions:
// spir target supports all extensions, but we want to disable fp64
clang -cc1 -triple spir-unknown-unknown -cl-ext=-cl_khr_fp64
Special 'all' extension allows to enable or disable all possible
extensions:
// only fp64 will be supported
clang -cc1 -triple spir-unknown-unknown -cl-ext=-all,+cl_khr_fp64
Patch by asavonic (Andrew Savonichev).
Reviewers: joey, yaxunl
Subscribers: yaxunl, bader, Anastasia, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23712
llvm-svn: 285700
Unfortunately, the backend currently doesn't fold masks into the instructions correctly when they come from these shufflevectors. I'll work on that in a future commit.
llvm-svn: 285667
on cxx-abi-dev (thread starting 2016-10-11). This is currently hidden behind a
cc1-only -m flag, pending discussion of how best to deal with language changes
that require use of new symbols from the ABI library.
llvm-svn: 285664
The second argument to __builtin_alloca_with_align is supposed to be in
bits, not bytes. Using alignof there would be indicative of a bug.
llvm-svn: 285609
__builtin_alloca always uses __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__ for the alignment of
the allocation. __builtin_alloca_with_align allows the programmer to
specify the alignment of the allocation.
This fixes PR30658.
llvm-svn: 285544
Roger Ferrer Ibanez