Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith be7ea19b58 IR: Make metadata typeless in assembly
Now that `Metadata` is typeless, reflect that in the assembly.  These
are the matching assembly changes for the metadata/value split in
r223802.

  - Only use the `metadata` type when referencing metadata from a call
    intrinsic -- i.e., only when it's used as a `Value`.

  - Stop pretending that `ValueAsMetadata` is wrapped in an `MDNode`
    when referencing it from call intrinsics.

So, assembly like this:

    define @foo(i32 %v) {
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 %v}, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 7}, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !1, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{metadata !3}, metadata !0)
      ret void, !bar !2
    }
    !0 = metadata !{metadata !2}
    !1 = metadata !{i32* @global}
    !2 = metadata !{metadata !3}
    !3 = metadata !{}

turns into this:

    define @foo(i32 %v) {
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 %v, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 7, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32* @global, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{!3}, metadata !0)
      ret void, !bar !2
    }
    !0 = !{!2}
    !1 = !{i32* @global}
    !2 = !{!3}
    !3 = !{}

I wrote an upgrade script that handled almost all of the tests in llvm
and many of the tests in cfe (even handling many `CHECK` lines).  I've
attached it (or will attach it in a moment if you're speedy) to PR21532
to help everyone update their out-of-tree testcases.

This is part of PR21532.

llvm-svn: 224257
2014-12-15 19:07:53 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith 176b691d32 Revert "Revert "DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString""
This reverts commit r218918, effectively reapplying r218914 after fixing
an Ocaml bindings test and an Asan crash.  The root cause of the latter
was a tightened-up check in `DILexicalBlock::Verify()`, so I'll file a
PR to investigate who requires the loose check (and why).

Original commit message follows.

--

This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant
arguments together into a single MDString.  Integers are stringified and
a `\0` character is used as a separator.

Part of PR17891.

Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR.  If I've
just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help.

llvm-svn: 219010
2014-10-03 20:01:09 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith 786cd049fc Revert "DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString"
This reverts commit r218914 while I investigate some bots.

llvm-svn: 218918
2014-10-02 22:15:31 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith 571f97bd90 DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString
This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant
arguments together into a single MDString.  Integers are stringified and
a `\0` character is used as a separator.

Part of PR17891.

Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR.  If I've
just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help.

llvm-svn: 218914
2014-10-02 21:56:57 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 87b7eb9d0f Move the complex address expression out of DIVariable and into an extra
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.

Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.

By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.

The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)

This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.

What this patch doesn't do:

This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491

Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!

Note: I accidentally committed a bogus older version of this patch previously.
llvm-svn: 218787
2014-10-01 18:55:02 +00:00
Adrian Prantl b458dc2eee Revert r218778 while investigating buldbot breakage.
"Move the complex address expression out of DIVariable and into an extra"

llvm-svn: 218782
2014-10-01 18:10:54 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 25a7174e7a Move the complex address expression out of DIVariable and into an extra
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.

Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.

By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.

The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)

This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.

What this patch doesn't do:

This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491

Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!

llvm-svn: 218778
2014-10-01 17:55:39 +00:00
Eric Christopher 384f3feb2d Reapply DW_AT_low/high_pc patch:
Use the range machinery for DW_AT_ranges and DW_AT_high/lo_pc.

    This commit moves us from a single range per subprogram to extending
    ranges if we are:

    a) In the same section, and
    b) In the same enclosing CU.

    This means we have more fine grained ranges for compile units, and fewer
    ranges overall when we have multiple functions in the same CU
    adjacent to each other in the object file.

    Also remove all of the earlier hacks around this functionality for
    function sections etc. Also update all of the testcases to take into
    account the merging functionality.

with a fix for location entries in the debug_loc section:

Make sure that debug loc entries are relative to the low_pc
of the compile unit. This means that when we only have a single
range that the offset should be just relative to the low_pc
of the unit, for multiple ranges for a CU this means that we'll be
relative to 0 which we emit along with DW_AT_ranges.

This mostly shows up with linked binaries, so add a testcase with
multiple CUs so that our location is going to be offset of a CU
with a non-zero low_pc.

llvm-svn: 204377
2014-03-20 19:16:16 +00:00
Eric Christopher e9551ec1a0 Revert "Use the range machinery for DW_AT_ranges and DW_AT_high/lo_pc."
This appears to trigger failures with optimization and function arguments somehow.

This reverts commit r204277.

llvm-svn: 204286
2014-03-20 00:12:06 +00:00
Eric Christopher e33c990616 Use the range machinery for DW_AT_ranges and DW_AT_high/lo_pc.
This commit moves us from a single range per subprogram to extending
ranges if we are:

a) In the same section, and
b) In the same enclosing CU.

This means we have more fine grained ranges for compile units, and fewer
ranges overall when we have multiple functions in the same CU
adjacent to each other in the object file.

Also remove all of the earlier hacks around this functionality for
function sections etc. Also update all of the testcases to take into
account the merging functionality.

llvm-svn: 204277
2014-03-19 22:42:36 +00:00
Eric Christopher 4dd947aa02 If we see that we're emitting code for a function that doesn't have
any lexical scopes then go ahead and turn on DW_AT_ranges for the
compile unit since we would be claiming to describe in the CU
a range for which we don't have information in the CU otherwise.

llvm-svn: 203969
2014-03-14 20:53:49 +00:00