This is a re-application of dc67299 which was reverted in f63adf5b because
it broke the build. The issue should now be fixed.
Attribution note: The original author of this patch is Erik Pilkington.
I'm only trying to land it after rebasing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91630
This inheritance list style has been widely adopted by Symantec,
a division of Broadcom Inc. It breaks after the commas that
separate the base-specifiers:
class Derived : public Base1,
private Base2
{
};
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103204
Like other sanitizers, enable __has_feature(coverage_sanitizer) if clang
has enabled at least one SanitizerCoverage instrumentation type.
Because coverage instrumentation selection is not handled via normal
-fsanitize= (and thus not in SanitizeSet), passing this information
through to LangOptions required propagating the already parsed
-fsanitize-coverage= options from CodeGenOptions through to LangOptions
in FixupInvocation().
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103159
The original version of this was reverted, and @rjmcall provided some
advice to architect a new solution. This is that solution.
This implements a builtin to provide a unique name that is stable across
compilations of this TU for the purposes of implementing the library
component of the unnamed kernel feature of SYCL. It does this by
running the Itanium mangler with a few modifications.
Because it is somewhat common to wrap non-kernel-related lambdas in
macros that aren't present on the device (such as for logging), this
uniquely generates an ID for all lambdas involved in the naming of a
kernel. It uses the lambda-mangling number to do this, except replaces
this with its own number (starting at 10000 for readabililty reasons)
for lambdas used to name a kernel.
Additionally, this implements itself as constexpr with a slight catch:
if a name would be invalidated by the use of this lambda in a later
kernel invocation, it is diagnosed as an error (see the Sema tests).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103112
We really ought to support no_sanitize("coverage") in line with other
sanitizers. This came up again in discussions on the Linux-kernel
mailing lists, because we currently do workarounds using objtool to
remove coverage instrumentation. Since that support is only on x86, to
continue support coverage instrumentation on other architectures, we
must support selectively disabling coverage instrumentation via function
attributes.
Unfortunately, for SanitizeCoverage, it has not been implemented as a
sanitizer via fsanitize= and associated options in Sanitizers.def, but
rolls its own option fsanitize-coverage. This meant that we never got
"automatic" no_sanitize attribute support.
Implement no_sanitize attribute support by special-casing the string
"coverage" in the NoSanitizeAttr implementation. To keep the feature as
unintrusive to existing IR generation as possible, define a new negative
function attribute NoSanitizeCoverage to propagate the information
through to the instrumentation pass.
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49035
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, morehouse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102772
Allow use of bit-fields as a clang extension
in OpenCL. The extension can be enabled using
pragma directives.
This fixes PR45339!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101843
There already exists cl_khr_fp64 extension. So OpenCL C 3.0
and higher should use the feature, earlier versions still
use the extension. OpenCL C 3.0 API spec states that extension
will be not described in the option string if corresponding
optional functionality is not supported (see 4.2. Querying Devices).
Due to that fact the usage of features for OpenCL C 3.0 must
be as follows:
```
$ clang -Xclang -cl-ext=+cl_khr_fp64,+__opencl_c_fp64 ...
$ clang -Xclang -cl-ext=-cl_khr_fp64,-__opencl_c_fp64 ...
```
e.g. the feature and the equivalent extension (if exists)
must be set to the same values
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96524
This patch adds support for GCC's -fstack-usage flag. With this flag, a stack
usage file (i.e., .su file) is generated for each input source file. The format
of the stack usage file is also similar to what is used by GCC. For each
function defined in the source file, a line with the following information is
produced in the .su file.
<source_file>:<line_number>:<function_name> <size_in_byte> <static/dynamic>
"Static" means that the function's frame size is static and the size info is an
accurate reflection of the frame size. While "dynamic" means the function's
frame size can only be determined at run-time because the function manipulates
the stack dynamically (e.g., due to variable size objects). The size info only
reflects the size of the fixed size frame objects in this case and therefore is
not a reliable measure of the total frame size.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100509
The new matcher additionally covers blocks and Objective-C methods.
This matcher actually makes sure that the statement truly belongs
to that declaration's body. forFunction() incorrectly reported that
a statement in a nested block belonged to the surrounding function.
forFunction() is now deprecated due to the above footgun, in favor of
forCallable(functionDecl()) when only functions need to be considered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102213
This fixes PR46992.
Git stores symlinks as text files and we should not format them even if
they have one of the requested extensions.
(Move the call to `cd_to_toplevel()` up a few lines so we can also print
the skipped symlinks during verbose output.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101878
Added __cl_clang_non_portable_kernel_param_types extension that
allows using non-portable types as kernel parameters. This allows
bypassing the portability guarantees from the restrictions specified
in C++ for OpenCL v1.0 s2.4.
Currently this only disables the restrictions related to the data
layout. The programmer should ensure the compiler generates the same
layout for host and device or otherwise the argument should only be
accessed on the device side. This extension could be extended to other
case (e.g. permitting size_t) if desired in the future.
Patch by olestrohm (Ole Strohm)!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D101168
Warn when a declaration uses an identifier that doesn't obey the reserved
identifier rule from C and/or C++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93095
Renaming the option is based on discussions in https://reviews.llvm.org/D101122.
It is normally not a good idea to rename driver flags but this flag is
new enough and obscure enough that it is very unlikely to have adopters.
While we're here also drop the `<kind>` metavar. It's not necessary and
is actually inconsistent with the documentation in
`clang/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.rst`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101491
This extension is primarily targeting SPIR-V compilations flow
as the IR translation is the same between 1.x and 2.x atomics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101089
A need for such an option came up in a few libc++ reviews. That's because libc++ has both code in C++03 and newer standards.
Currently, it uses `Standard: C++03` setting for clang-format, but this breaks e.g. u8"string" literals.
Also, angle brackets are the only place where C++03-specific formatting needs to be applied.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101344
The profiling runtime was designed to work without static initializers
or a a filesystem (see 117cf2bd1f and
others). The no-static-initializers part was already documented but this
part got missed before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101000
The code example for "RecursiveASTVisitor based ASTFrontendActions"
was using unique_ptr<X>(new X) when creating the AST consumer; change
it to use make_unique instead. The main function of the same example
already used make_unique.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93185
Fixes https://llvm.org/PR41870.
Checks for newlines in option Style.EmptyLineBeforeAccessModifier are now based on the formatted new lines and not on the new lines in the file.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99503
This is a Clang-only change and depends on the existing "musttail"
support already implemented in LLVM.
The [[clang::musttail]] attribute goes on a return statement, not
a function definition. There are several constraints that the user
must follow when using [[clang::musttail]], and these constraints
are verified by Sema.
Tail calls are supported on regular function calls, calls through a
function pointer, member function calls, and even pointer to member.
Future work would be to throw a warning if a users tries to pass
a pointer or reference to a local variable through a musttail call.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99517
The current logic for access modifiers in classes ignores the option 'MaxEmptyLinesToKeep=1'. It is therefore impossible to have a coding style that requests one empty line after an access modifier. The patch allows the user to configure how many empty lines clang-format should add after an access modifier. This will remove lines if there are to many and will add them if there are missing.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98237
I'm working on the implementation of OpenMP 5.1 feature `atomic compare`.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100507
Adds the __clang_literal_encoding__ and __clang_wide_literal_encoding__
predefined macros to expose the encoding used for string literals to
the preprocessor.
Louis Dionne