introduced. Specifically, there are cost reductions for all
constant-operand icmp instructions against an alloca, regardless of
whether the alloca will in fact be elligible for SROA. That means we
don't want to abort the icmp reduction computation when we abort the
SROA reduction computation. That in turn frees us from the need to keep
a separate worklist and defer the ICmp calculations.
Use this new-found freedom and some judicious function boundaries to
factor the innards of computing the cost factor of any given instruction
out of the loop over the instructions and into static helper functions.
This greatly simplifies the code, and hopefully makes it more clear what
is happening here.
Reviewed by Eric Christopher. There is some concern that we'd like to
ensure this doesn't get out of hand, and I plan to benchmark the effects
of this change over the next few days along with some further fixes to
the inline cost.
llvm-svn: 152368
analysis to be methods on the cost analysis's function info object
instead of the code metrics object. These really are just users of the
code metrics, they're building the information for the function's
analysis.
This is the first step of growing the amount of information we collect
about a function in order to cope with pair-wise simplifications due to
allocas.
llvm-svn: 152283
savings from a pointer argument becoming an alloca. Sometimes callees will even
compare a pointer to null and then branch to an otherwise unreachable block!
Detect these cases and compute the number of saved instructions, instead of
bailing out and reporting no savings.
llvm-svn: 148941
can't handle. Also don't produce non-zero results for things which won't be
transformed by SROA at all just because we saw the loads/stores before we saw
the use of the address.
llvm-svn: 148536
call site of an intrinsic is also not an inline candidate. While here, make it
more obvious that this code ignores all intrinsics. Noticed by inspection!
llvm-svn: 147037
Some code want to check that *any* call within a function has the 'returns
twice' attribute, not just that the current function has one.
llvm-svn: 142221
We want heuristics to be based on accurate data, but more importantly
we don't want llvm to behave randomly. A benign trunc inserted by an
upstream pass should not cause a wild swings in optimization
level. See PR11034. It's a general problem with threshold-based
heuristics, but we can make it less bad.
llvm-svn: 140919
a) Making it a per call site bonus for functions that we can move from
indirect to direct calls.
b) Reduces the bonus from 500 to 100 per call site.
c) Subtracts the size of the possible newly inlineable call from the
bonus to only add a bonus if we can inline a small function to devirtualize
it.
Also changes the bonus from a positive that's subtracted to a negative
that's added.
Fixes the remainder of rdar://8546196 by reducing the object file size
after inlining by 84%.
llvm-svn: 124916
a few loops accordingly. Should be no functional change.
This is a step for more accurate cost/benefit analysis of devirt/inlining
bonuses.
llvm-svn: 124275
not unrolling loops that contain calls that would be better off getting inlined. This mostly
comes up when an interleaved devirtualization pass has devirtualized a call which the inliner
will inline on a future pass. Thus, rather than blocking all loops containing calls, add
a metric for "inline candidate calls" and block loops containing those instead.
llvm-svn: 113535
don't use any InlineCostAnalyzer state, and are useful for other clients who don't necessarily want to use
all of InlineCostAnalyzer's logic, some of which is fairly inlining-specific.
No intended functionality change.
llvm-svn: 113499
on RAUW of functions, this is a correctness issue instead of a mere memory
usage problem.
No testcase until the new MergeFunctions can land.
llvm-svn: 103653
were still inlining self-recursive functions into other functions.
Inlining a recursive function into itself has the potential to
reduce recursion depth by a factor of 2, inlining a recursive
function into something else reduces recursion depth by exactly
1. Since inlining a recursive function into something else is a
weird form of loop peeling, turn this off.
The deleted testcase was added by Dale in r62107, since then
we're leaning towards not inlining recursive stuff ever. In any
case, if we like inlining recursive stuff, it should be done
within the recursive function itself to get the algorithm
recursion depth win.
llvm-svn: 102798
recursive callsites, inlining can reduce the number of calls by
exponential factors, as it does in
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/treeadd. More involved heuristics
will be needed.
llvm-svn: 101969
by switching CachedFunctionInfo from a std::map to a
ValueMap (which is implemented in terms of a DenseMap).
DenseMap has different iterator invalidation semantics
than std::map.
This should hopefully fix the dragonegg builder.
llvm-svn: 101658
Chandler Carruth