sequences, where we would occasionally determine (incorrectly) that
one standard conversion sequence was a proper subset of another when,
in fact, they contained completely incomparable conversions.
This change records the types in each step within a standard
conversion sequence, so that we can check the specific comparison
types to determine when one sequence is a proper subset of the
other. Fixes this testcase (thanks, Anders!), which was distilled from
PR6095 (also thanks to Anders).
llvm-svn: 94660
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
cope with the case where a user-defined conversion is actually a copy
construction, and therefore can be compared against other standard
conversion sequences. While I called this a hack before, now I'm
convinced that it's the right way to go.
Compare overloads based on derived-to-base conversions that invoke
copy constructors.
Suppress user-defined conversions when attempting to call a
user-defined conversion.
llvm-svn: 58629
when appropriate.
Conversions for class types now make use of copy constructors. I've
replaced the egregious hack allowing class-to-class conversions with a
slightly less egregious hack calling these conversions standard
conversions (for overloading reasons).
llvm-svn: 58622
Douglas Gregor