inlined function.
This resolves retain count checker false positives that are caused by
inlining ObjC and other methods. Essentially, if we are passing an
object to a method with "delegate" in the selector or a function pointer
as another argument, we should stop tracking the other parameters/return
value as far as the retain count checker is concerned.
llvm-svn: 162876
This heuristic addresses the case when a pointer (or ref) is passed
to a function, which initializes the variable (or sets it to something
other than '0'). On the branch where the inlined function does not
set the value, we report use of undefined value (or NULL pointer
dereference). The access happens in the caller and the path
through the callee would get pruned away with regular path pruning. To
solve this issue, we previously disabled diagnostic pruning completely
on undefined and null pointer dereference checks, which entailed very
verbose diagnostics in most cases. Furthermore, not all of the
undef value checks had the diagnostic pruning disabled.
This patch implements the following heuristic: if we pass a pointer (or
ref) to the region (on which the error is reported) into a function and
it's value is either undef or 'NULL' (and is a pointer), do not prune
the function.
llvm-svn: 162863
CheckLValueConstantExpression.
Richard pointed out that using the address of a TLS variable is ok in a
core C++11 constant expression, as long as it isn't part of the eventual
result of constant expression evaluation. Having the check in
CheckLValueConstantExpression accomplishes this.
llvm-svn: 162850
Summary:
The problem was with the following sequence:
#pragma push_macro("long")
#undef long
#pragma pop_macro("long")
in case when "long" didn't represent a macro.
Fixed crash and removed code duplication for #undef/pop_macro case. Added regression tests.
Reviewers: doug.gregor, klimek
Reviewed By: doug.gregor
CC: cfe-commits, chapuni
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D31
llvm-svn: 162845
This makes Clang produce an error for code such as:
__thread int x;
int *p = &x;
The lvalue of a thread-local variable cannot be evaluated at compile
time.
llvm-svn: 162835
In C++, objects being returned on the stack are actually copy-constructed into
the return value. That means that when a temporary is returned, it still has
to be destroyed, i.e. the returned expression will be wrapped in an
ExprWithCleanups node. Our "returning stack memory" checker needs to look
through this node to see if we really are returning an object by value.
PR13722
llvm-svn: 162817
and when used in property type declaration, is handled as type
attribute. Do not issue the warning when declaraing the property.
// rdar://12173491
llvm-svn: 162801
Specifically, CallEventManager::getCaller was looking at the call site for
an inlined call and trying to see what kind of call it was, but it only
checked for CXXConstructExprClass. (It's not using an isa<> here to avoid
doing three more checks on the the statement class.)
This caused an unreachable when we actually did inline the constructor of a
temporary object.
PR13717
llvm-svn: 162792
When exiting a function, the analyzer looks for the last statement in the
function to see if it's a return statement (and thus bind the return value).
However, the search for "the last statement" was accepting statements that
were in implicitly-generated inlined functions (i.e. destructors). So we'd
go and get the statement from the destructor, and then say "oh look, this
function had no explicit return...guess there's no return value". And /that/
led to the value being returned being declared dead, and all our leak
checkers complaining.
llvm-svn: 162791
variables without a storage class within a function, to implement
CUDA B.2.5: "__shared__ and __constant__ variables have implied static
storage [duration]."
llvm-svn: 162788
This warns in two specific situations:
1) For potentially swapped function arguments, e.g.
void foo(bool, float);
foo(1.7, false);
2) Misplaced brackets around function call arguments, e.g.
bool InRange = fabs(a - b < delta);
Where the last argument in a function call is implicitly converted
from bool to float, and the function returns a float which gets
implicitly converted to bool.
Patch by Andreas Eckleder!
llvm-svn: 162763
Previously, if we were tracking stores to a variable 'x', and came across this:
x = foo();
...we would simply emit a note here and stop. Now, we'll step into 'foo' and
continue tracking the returned value from there.
<rdar://problem/12114689>
llvm-svn: 162718
if we have something like:
@synthesize prop = _prop;
and '_prop' is not declared, we will encounter a '_prop' ivar before
encountering the 'prop' synthesize declaration and we will think that
we passed the region-of-interest, missing the cursor for 'prop'.
rdar://12172700
llvm-svn: 162715
Because the CXXNewExpr appears after the CXXConstructExpr in the CFG, we don't
actually have the correct region to construct into at the time we decide
whether or not to inline. The long-term fix (discussed in PR12014) might be to
introduce a new CFG node (CFGAllocator) that appears before the constructor.
Tracking the short-term fix in <rdar://problem/12180598>.
llvm-svn: 162689
This allows us to better reason about status objects, like Clang's own
llvm::Optional (when its contents are trivially destructible), which are
often intended to be passed around by value.
We still don't inline constructors for temporaries in the general case.
<rdar://problem/11986434>
llvm-svn: 162681
This allows checkers (like the MallocChecker) to process the effects of the
bind. Previously, using a memory-allocating function (like strdup()) in an
initializer would result in a leak warning.
This does bend the expectations of checkBind a bit; since there is no
assignment expression, the statement being used is the initializer value.
In most cases this shouldn't matter because we'll use a PostInitializer
program point (rather than PostStmt) for any checker-generated nodes, though
we /will/ generate a PostStore node referencing the internal statement.
(In theory this could have funny effects if someone actually does an
assignment within an initializer; in practice, that seems like it would be
very rare.)
<rdar://problem/12171711>
llvm-svn: 162637
by this mode, and also check for signed left shift overflow. The rules for the
latter are a little subtle:
* neither C89 nor C++98 specify the behavior of a signed left shift at all
* in C99 and C11, shifting a 1 bit into the sign bit has undefined behavior
* in C++11, with core issue 1457, shifting a 1 bit *out* of the sign bit has
undefined behavior
As of this change, we use the C99 rules for all C language variants, and the
C++11 rules for all C++ language variants. Once we have individual
-fcatch-undefined-behavior= flags, this should be revisited.
llvm-svn: 162634
Eli Friedman