This probably shouldn't be generated in the .dwo file for CUs, only for
TUs, but it's in the sample .dwos (generated by clang) so dwp should
reflect that.
Arguably the DWP tool could be smart enough to know that the CUs
shouldn't need a debug_line.dwo section and skip that even when it's
legitimately generated for TUs, but that's a bit more off-book.
llvm-svn: 254767
Summary: The command prints out list of functions that were not entered.
To do this, addresses are first converted to function locations. Set
operations are used for function locations.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14889
review
llvm-svn: 254742
This change adds support for an optional weight when merging profile data with the llvm-profdata tool.
Weights are specified by adding an option ':<weight>' suffix to the input file names.
Adding support for arbitrary weighting of input profile data allows for relative importance to be placed on the
input data from multiple training runs.
Both sampled and instrumented profiles are supported.
Reviewers: dnovillo, bogner, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14547
llvm-svn: 254669
Summary: This changes overflow handling during instrumentation profile merge. Rathar than throwing away records that would result in counter overflow, merged counts are instead clamped to the maximum representable value. A warning about counter overflow is still surfaced to the user as before.
Reviewers: dnovillo, davidxl, silvas
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14893
llvm-svn: 254525
This is very rudimentary support for debug_cu_index, but it is enough to
allow llvm-dwarfdump to find the offsets for contributions and
correctly dump debug_info.
It will need to actually find the real signature of the unit and build
the real hash table with the right number of buckets, as per the DWP
specification.
It will also need to be expanded to cover the tu_index as well.
llvm-svn: 254489
This doesn't deduplicate strings in the debug_str section, nor does it
properly wire up the index so that debug_info can /find/ these strings,
but it does correct the str_offsets specifically.
Follow up patches to address those related/next issues.
llvm-svn: 254431
This just concatenates the common DWP sections without doing any of the
fancy DWP things like:
1) update str_offsets
2) deduplicating strings
3) merging/creating cu/tu_index
Patches for these will follow shortly.
(also not sure about target triple/object file type for this tool - do I
really need a whole triple just to write an object file that contains
purely static/hardcoded bytes in each section? & I guess I should just
pick it based on the first input, maybe, rather than hardcoding for now
- but we only produce .dwo on ELF platforms with objcopy for now anyway)
llvm-svn: 254355
I found these while trying to get a prototype to bootstrap.
They cover things like
* Handling of non linker visible stuff (append, available_externally)
* Type merging
* Alias to dropped globals
* Dropping linkage when converting to a declaration.
These should hopefully be generally useful for anyone refactoring the
plugin.
llvm-svn: 254174
This tests that a declaration can resolve to an alias.
I broke this locally while prototyping a change and it looks like a nice
test to have.
llvm-svn: 253984
The new option is similar to the SampleProfile dump option.
- dump raw/indexed format into text profile format
- merge the profile and output into text profile format.
Note that Value Profiling data text format is not yet designed.
That functionality will be added later.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14894
llvm-svn: 253913
We had two code paths. One would create names like "foo.1" and the other
names like "foo1".
For globals it is important to use "foo.1" to help C++ name demangling.
For locals there is no strong reason to go one way or the other so I
kept the most common mangling (foo1).
llvm-svn: 253804
Summary:
Several fixes to the handling of bitcode files without function summary
sections so that they are skipped during ThinLTO processing in llvm-lto
and the gold plugin when appropriate instead of aborting.
1 Don't assert when trying to add a FunctionInfo that doesn't have
a summary attached.
2 Skip FunctionInfo structures that don't have attached function summary
sections when trying to create the combined function summary.
3 In both llvm-lto and gold-plugin, check whether a bitcode file has
a function summary section before trying to parse the index, and skip
the bitcode file if it does not.
4 Fix hasFunctionSummaryInMemBuffer in BitcodeReader, which had a bug
where we returned to early while looking for the summary section.
Also added llvm-lto and gold-plugin based tests for cases where we
don't have function summaries in the bitcode file. I verified that
either the first couple fixes described above are enough to avoid the
crashes, or fixes 1,3,4. But have combined them all here for added
robustness.
Reviewers: joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14903
llvm-svn: 253796
When dumping function samples or writing them out as text format, it
helps if the samples are emitted sorted by source location. The sorting
of the maps is a bit slow, so we only do it on demand.
llvm-svn: 253568
This change introduces an instrumentation intrinsic instruction for
value profiling purposes, the lowering of the instrumentation intrinsic
and raw reader updates. The raw profile data files for llvm-profdata
testing are updated.
llvm-svn: 253484
This time I've found a linux box and checked it there. This test now passes.
Because I'd introduced an undefined reference in @bar, gold now returns an error. This doesn't matter for the test itself, because it also emits the remarks the test is checking for. But it does cause LIT to notice a nonzero return code which it faults on.
llvm-svn: 253454
It needs the same fixes as in test/LTO/X86/remarks.ll, but this test appears not to get run on my system (but does on the buildbot). Strange.
llvm-svn: 253452
Most linked executables do not have a symbol table in COFF.
However, it is pretty typical to have some export entries. Use those
entries to inform the disassembler about potential function definitions
and call targets.
llvm-svn: 253429
Summary:
This change tries to make the root cause of instrumented profile data merge failures clearer.
Previous:
$ llvm-profdata merge test_0.profraw test_1.profraw -o test_merged.profdata
test_1.profraw: foo: Function count mismatch
test_1.profraw: bar: Function count mismatch
test_1.profraw: baz: Function count mismatch
...
Changed:
$ llvm-profdata merge test_0.profraw test_1.profraw -o test_merged.profdata
test_1.profraw: foo: Function basic block count change detected (counter mismatch)
Make sure that all profile data to be merged is generated from the same binary.
test_1.profraw: bar: Function basic block count change detected (counter mismatch)
test_1.profraw: baz: Function basic block count change detected (counter mismatch)
...
Reviewers: dnovillo, davidxl, bogner
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14739
llvm-svn: 253384
Summary:
This change addresses two possible instances of user error / confusion when
merging sampled profile data.
Previously any input that didn't match the raw or processed instrumented format
would automatically be interpreted as instrumented profile text format data.
No error would be reported during the merge.
Example:
If foo-sampled.profdata and bar-sampled.profdata are binary sampled profiles:
Old behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -output foobar-sampled.profdata
$ llvm-profdata show -sample foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foobar-sampled.profdata:1: Expected 'mangled_name:NUM:NUM', found lprofi
This change adds basic checks for valid input data when assuming text input.
It also makes error messages related to file format validity more specific about
the assumbed profile data type.
New behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -o foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foo.profdata: Unrecognized instrumentation profile encoding format
Perhaps you forgot to use the -sample option?
Reviewers: bogner, davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14558
llvm-svn: 253009
Summary:
This change addresses two possible instances of user error / confusion when
merging sampled profile data.
Previously any input that didn't match the raw or processed instrumented format
would automatically be interpreted as instrumented profile text format data.
No error would be reported during the merge.
Example:
If foo-sampled.profdata and bar-sampled.profdata are binary sampled profiles:
Old behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -output foobar-sampled.profdata
$ llvm-profdata show -sample foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foobar-sampled.profdata:1: Expected 'mangled_name:NUM:NUM', found lprofi
This change adds basic checks for valid input data when assuming text input.
It also makes error messages related to file format validity more specific about
the assumbed profile data type.
New behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -o foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foo.profdata: Unrecognized instrumentation profile encoding format
Perhaps you forgot to use the -sample option?
Reviewers: bogner, davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14558
llvm-svn: 252916
In `MachOObjectFile::getSymbolType` we currently always return `SymbolRef::ST_Function` for symbols from any section. In order for llvm-symbolizer to correctly symbolize Mach-O globals, symbols from data and BSS sections should return `SymbolRef::ST_Data`.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14576
llvm-svn: 252867
David Blaikie