We wouldn't properly save and restore the pending local instantiations
we had built up prior to instantiation of a variable definition. This
would lead to us instantiating too much causing crashes and other
general badness.
This fixes PR14374.
llvm-svn: 195887
We would fail to instantiate them when the surrounding function was
instantiated. Instantiate the class and add it's members to the list of
pending instantiations, they should be resolved when we are finished
with the function's body.
This fixes PR9685.
llvm-svn: 195827
We only considered FieldDecl and CXXMethodDecl as appropriate which
would cause us to believe the IndirectFieldDecl corresponded to an
argument of it's field type instead of a pointer-to-member type.
This fixes PR17696.
llvm-svn: 193461
We would not identify pointer-to-member construction in a non-type
template argument if it was either a FieldDecl or a CXXMethodDecl.
However, this would incorrectly reject declarations that were injected
via an IndirectFieldDecl (e.g. a field inside of an anonymous union).
This fixes PR17657.
llvm-svn: 193203
Summary:
Enforce the rule in C++11 [temp.mem]p2 that local classes cannot have
member templates.
This fixes PR16947.
N.B. C++14 has slightly different wording to afford generic lambdas
declared inside of functions.
Fun fact: Some formulations of local classes with member templates
would cause clang to crash during Itanium mangling, such as the
following:
void outer_mem() {
struct Inner {
template <typename = void>
struct InnerTemplateClass {
static void itc_mem() {}
};
};
Inner::InnerTemplateClass<>::itc_mem();
}
Reviewers: eli.friedman, rsmith, doug.gregor, faisalv
Reviewed By: doug.gregor
CC: cfe-commits, ygao
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1866
llvm-svn: 193144
Now that CorrectTypo knows how to correctly search classes for typo
correction candidates, there is no good reason to only replace an
existing CXXScopeSpecifier if it refers to a namespace. While the actual
enablement was a matter of changing a single comparison, the fallout
from enabling the functionality required a lot more code changes
(including my two previous commits).
llvm-svn: 193020
Delayed exception specification checking for defaulted members and virtual
destructors are both susceptible to mutation during iteration so we need to
swap and process the worklists.
This resolves both accepts-invalid and rejects-valid issues and moreover fixes
potential invalid memory access as the contents of the vectors change during
iteration and recursive template instantiation.
Checking can be further delayed where parent classes aren't yet fully defined.
This patch adds two assertions at end of TU to ensure no specs are left
unchecked as was happenning before the fix, plus a test case from Marshall Clow
for the defaulted member crash extracted from the libcxx headers.
Reviewed by Richard Smith.
llvm-svn: 192947
Delayed exception specification checking for defaulted members and virtual
destructors are both susceptible to mutation during iteration so we need to
process the worklists fully.
This resolves both accepts-invalid and rejects-valid issues and moreover fixes
potential invalid memory access as the contents of the vectors change during
iteration and recursive template instantiation.
This patch also adds two assertions at end of TU to ensure no specs are left
unchecked as was happenning before the fix, plus a test case from Marshall Clow
for the defaulted member crash extracted from the libcxx headers.
Reviewed by Richard Smith.
llvm-svn: 192914
If unqualified id lookup fails while parsing a class template with a
dependent base, clang with -fms-compatibility will pretend the user
prefixed the name with 'this->' in order to delay the lookup. However,
if there was a unary ampersand, Sema::ActOnDependentIdExpression() will
create a DependentDeclRefExpr, which is not what we wanted at all. Fix
this by building the CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr directly instead.
In order to be fully MSVC compatible, we would have to defer all
attempts at name lookup to instantiation time. However, until we have
real problems with system headers that can't be parsed, we'll put off
implementing that.
Fixes PR16014.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1892
llvm-svn: 192727
that looks like a function declaration, except that it's missing a return type,
try typo-correcting it to the relevant constructor name.
In passing, fix a bug where the missing-type-specifier recovery codepath would
drop a preceding scope specifier on the floor, leading to follow-on diagnostics
and incorrect recovery for the auto-in-c++98 hack.
llvm-svn: 192644
template and defined outside it, don't instantiate it twice when instantiating
the surrounding class template specialization. That would cause us to reject
the code because we think two partial specializations instantiated to produce
the same signature.
llvm-svn: 191418
We don't really need to perform semantic analysis on the dependent expression
anyway, so just call the cast dependent.
<rdar://problem/15012610>
llvm-svn: 190981
As requested when applying the same logic to calling conventions.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1634
llvm-svn: 190441
Summary:
We would not perform substitution at an appropriate point, allowing strange
results to appear. We would accepts things that we shouldn't or mangle things incorrectly. Note that this hasn't fixed the other cases like
template-template parameters or non-type template parameters.
Reviewers: doug.gregor, rjmccall, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1507
llvm-svn: 189540
Summary:
Instead of calling getAsTemplate(), call
getAsTemplateOrTemplatePattern() because it handles the
TemplateExpansion case too.
This fixes PR16997.
Reviewers: doug.gregor, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1512
llvm-svn: 189422
We previously mishandled UnresolvedUsingValueDecls in
NamedDecl::declarationReplaces, which caused us to forget decls
when there are multiple dependent using decls for the same name.
Fixes PR16936.
llvm-svn: 188737
When we are parsing a type for an alias template, we are not entering
the context, so we can't look into dependent classes. Make sure the
parser handles this correctly.
PR16904.
llvm-svn: 188510
In addition to storing more useful information in the AST, this
fixes a semantic check in template instantiation which checks whether
the l-paren location is valid.
Fixes PR16903.
llvm-svn: 188495
This change unifies the logic for template instantiation of methods and
functions declared with typedefs.
It ensures that SubstFunctionType() always fills the Params out param
with non-null ParmVarDecls or returns null.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1135
llvm-svn: 187528
This patch essentially removes all the FIXMEs following calls to DeduceTemplateArguments() that want to keep track of deduction failure info.
llvm-svn: 186730
Canonical types are unchanged. The type printer had to be changed to
avoid printing any non-default implicit calling convention as well as
the calling convention attribute.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1132
llvm-svn: 186714
When we see a pack, and replace it with a template argument which is
also a pack, we want to use the pack pattern, not the expanded pack.
The caller should take care of expanding the pack afterwards.
Fixes PR16646.
llvm-svn: 186713
Sema::MergeFunctionDecl attempts merging two decls even if the old decl
is invalid. This can lead to interesting circumstances where we
successfully merge the decls but the result makes no sense.
Take the following for example:
template <typename T>
int main(void);
int main(void);
Sema will not consider these to be overloads of the same name because
main can't be overloaded, which means that this must be a redeclaration.
In this case the templated decl is compatible with the non-templated
decl allowing the Sema::CheckFunctionDeclaration machinery to move on
and do bizarre things like setting the previous decl of a non-templated
decl to a templated decl!
The way I see it, we should just bail from MergeFunctionDecl if the old
decl is invalid.
This fixes PR16531.
llvm-svn: 185779
substitution failed, report that as a substitution failure rather than
pretending that there was no default argument.
The test cases in PR15673 have exposed some pre-existing poor diagnostics here.
llvm-svn: 185604
Armed with a much better understanding of what
TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc::initializeArgLocs actually does, I now
understand that it's fine to just use an empty TemplateArgumentLocInfo
for Integral, Declaration, and NullPtr TemplateArguments.
Fixes PR14281. (The testcases are actually derived from libcxx_test in
deduction-crash.cpp because the original testcase was impossible to reduce.)
llvm-svn: 185038
This is a slight tweak of r180708; It avoids incrementing depth when non-template local classes nested within member templates of local classes are encountered.
This patch was LGTM'd by Doug http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130506/079656.html and passed the regression tests that normally pass (i.e. excluding many Module and Index tests on Windows that fail regardless)
llvm-svn: 183620
I ran clang-format on my patch but it seemed to have wreaked havoc with new lines - might have to do with using it on windows :( will resubmit once i've cleaned this issue up. sorry.
llvm-svn: 183619
When processing ArrayToPointerDecay, we expect the array to be a location, not a LazyCompoundVal.
Special case the rvalue arrays by using a location to represent them. This case is handled similarly
elsewhere in the code.
Fixes PR16206.
llvm-svn: 183359
Still missing cases for templates, but this is a step in the right
direction. Also omits suggestions that would be ambiguous (eg: void
func(int = 0); + void func(float = 0); func;)
llvm-svn: 183173
This change partly addresses a heinous problem we have with the
parsing of attribute arguments that are a lone identifier. Previously,
we would end up parsing the 'align' attribute of this as an expression
"(Align)":
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align((Align)))) char storage[Size];
};
while this would parse as a "parameter name" 'Align':
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align(Align))) char storage[Size];
};
The code that handles the alignment attribute would completely ignore
the parameter name, so the while the first of these would do what's
expected, the second would silently be equivalent to
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align)) char storage[Size];
};
i.e., use the maximal alignment rather than the specified alignment.
Address this by sniffing the "Args" provided in the TableGen
description of attributes. If the first argument is "obviously"
something that should be treated as an expression (rather than an
identifier to be matched later), parse it as an expression.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13700933>.
llvm-svn: 180973
This change partly addresses a heinous problem we have with the
parsing of attribute arguments that are a lone identifier. Previously,
we would end up parsing the 'align' attribute of this as an expression
"(Align)":
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align((Align)))) char storage[Size];
};
while this would parse as a "parameter name" 'Align':
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align(Align))) char storage[Size];
};
The code that handles the alignment attribute would completely ignore
the parameter name, so the while the first of these would do what's
expected, the second would silently be equivalent to
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align)) char storage[Size];
};
i.e., use the maximal alignment rather than the specified alignment.
Address this by sniffing the "Args" provided in the TableGen
description of attributes. If the first argument is "obviously"
something that should be treated as an expression (rather than an
identifier to be matched later), parse it as an expression.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13700933>.
llvm-svn: 180970
are now two distinct canonical 'AutoType's: one is the undeduced 'auto'
placeholder type, and the other is a deduced-but-dependent type. All
deduced-to-a-non-dependent-type cases are still non-canonical.
llvm-svn: 180789
a dependent-scope id expression when a templated member function of a
non-templated class references an unknown identifier, since instantiation won't
rebuild it (and we can tell at parse time that it'll never work). Based on a
patch by Faisal Vali!
llvm-svn: 180701
When two template decls with the same name are used in this diagnostic,
force them to print their qualified names. This changes the bad message of:
candidate template ignored: could not match 'array' against 'array'
to the better message of:
candidate template ignored: could not match 'NS2::array' against 'NS1::array'
llvm-svn: 179056
* Give the right diagnostic for 'restrict' applied to a non-pointer, non-reference type.
* Don't reject 'restrict' applied indirectly to an Objective-C object pointer type (eg, through template instantiation).
llvm-svn: 178200
When Sema::RequireCompleteType() is given a class template
specialization type that then fails to instantiate, it returns
'true'. On subsequent invocations, it can return false. Make sure that
this difference doesn't change the result of
Sema::CompareReferenceRelationship, which is expected to remain stable
while we're checking an initialization sequence.
llvm-svn: 178088
template instantiation will still consider them to be definitions
if we instantiate the containing class before we get around
to parsing the friend.
This seems like a legitimate use of "late template parsed" to me,
but I'd appreciate it if someone responsible for the MS feature
would look over this.
This file already appears to access AST nodes directly, which
is arguably not kosher in the parser, but the performance of this
path matters enough that perpetuating the sin is justifiable.
Probably we ought to reconsider this policy for very simple
manipulations like this.
The reason this entire thing is necessary is that
function template instantiation plays some very gross games
in order to not associate an instantiated function template
with the class it came from unless it's a definition, and
the reason *that's* necessary is that the AST currently
cannot represent the instantiation history of individual
function template declarations, but instead tracks it in
common for the entire function template. That probably
prevents us from correctly reporting ill-formed calls to
ambiguously instantiated friend function templates.
rdar://12350696
llvm-svn: 177003
We were transforming the scope type of a pseudo-destructor expression
(e.g., the first T in x->T::~T()) as a freestanding type, which meant
that dependent template specialization types here would stay dependent
even when no template parameters were named. This would eventually
mean that a dependent expression would end up in what should be
fully-instantiated ASTs, causing IRgen to assert.
llvm-svn: 176723
designator" diagnostic with more correct and more human-friendly "cannot take
address of rvalue of type 'T'".
For the case of & &T::f, provide a custom diagnostic, rather than unhelpfully
saying "cannot take address of rvalue of type '<overloaded function type>'".
For the case of &array_temporary, treat it just like a class temporary
(including allowing it as an extension); the existing diagnostic wording
for the class temporary case works fine.
llvm-svn: 174262
have a direct mismatch between some component of the template and some
component of the argument. The diagnostic now says what the mismatch was, but
doesn't yet say which part of the template doesn't match.
llvm-svn: 174039
parameters (per C++ [temp.param]p8) when computing the type of a
reference to a non-type template parameter. Fixes <rdar://problem/13000548>.
llvm-svn: 172585
CXXScalarValueInitExpr (or an ImplicitValueInitExpr), strip it back down to an
empty pair of parentheses so that the initialization code can tell that we're
performing value-initialization.
llvm-svn: 170867
too). When instantiating a direct-initializer, if we find it has zero
arguments, produce an empty ParenListExpr rather than returning a null
expression.
llvm-svn: 170490
determine which member function would be the callee from within the template
definition, don't pass that function as a "non-member function" to
CreateOverloadedBinOp. Instead, just rely on it to select the member function
for itself.
llvm-svn: 168818
initialization, don't rebuild it. Remove a couple of hacks which were trying to
work around this. Fix the special case for one-argument CXXConstructExprs to
not apply if the one argument is a default argument.
llvm-svn: 168582
and we resolve it to a specific function based on the type which it's used as,
don't forget to mark it as referenced.
Fixes a regression introduced in r167514.
llvm-svn: 167918
would have diagnosed this at instantiation time anyway, if only we
didn't hang on all of these test cases. Fixes <rdar://problem/12629723>
llvm-svn: 167651
the base class. If the base class deduction succeeds, use those results. If
it fails, keep using the results from the derived class template deduction.
This prevents an assertion later where the type of deduction failure doesn't
match up with the template deduction info.
llvm-svn: 167550
instantiate it if it can be instantiated and implicitly define it if it can be
implicitly defined. This matches g++'s approach. Remove some cases from
SemaOverload which were marking functions as referenced when just planning how
overload resolution would proceed; such cases are not actually references.
llvm-svn: 167514
found: if an overloaded operator& is present before a template definition,
the expression &T::foo is represented as a CXXOperatorCallExpr, not as a
UnaryOperator, so we didn't notice that it's permitted to reference a non-static
data member of an unrelated class.
While investigating this, I discovered another problem in this area: we are
treating template default arguments as unevaluated contexts during substitution,
resulting in performing incorrect checks for uses of non-static data members in
C++11. That is not fixed by this patch (I'll look into this soon; it's related
to the failure to correctly instantiate constexpr function templates), but was
resulting in this bug not firing in C++11 mode (except with -Wc++98-compat).
Original message:
PR14124: When performing template instantiation of a qualified-id outside of a
class, diagnose if the qualified-id instantiates to a non-static class member.
llvm-svn: 166385
fatal error. Previously, if a fatal error was followed by a diagnostic which
was suppressed due to a SFINAETrap, we'd forget that we'd seen a fatal error.
llvm-svn: 164437
nested names as id-expressions, using the annot_primary_expr annotation, where
possible. This removes some redundant lookups, and also allows us to
typo-correct within tentative parsing, and to carry on disambiguating past an
identifier which we can determine will fail lookup as both a type and as a
non-type, allowing us to disambiguate more declarations (and thus offer
improved error recovery for such cases).
This also introduces to the parser the notion of a tentatively-declared name,
which is an identifier which we *might* have seen a declaration for in a
tentative parse (but only if we end up disambiguating the tokens as a
declaration). This is necessary to correctly disambiguate cases where a
variable is used within its own initializer.
llvm-svn: 162159
This is effectively a warning for code that violates core issue 903 & thus will
become standard error in the future, hopefully. It catches strange null
pointers such as: '\0', 1 - 1, const int null = 0; etc...
There's currently a flaw in this warning (& the warning for 'false' as a null
pointer literal as well) where it doesn't trigger on comparisons (ptr == '\0'
for example). Fix to come in a future patch.
Also, due to this only being a warning, not an error, it triggers quite
frequently on gtest code which tests expressions for null-pointer-ness in a
SFINAE context (so it wouldn't be a problem if this was an error as in an
actual implementation of core issue 903). To workaround this for now, the
diagnostic does not fire in unevaluated contexts.
Review by Sean Silva and Richard Smith.
llvm-svn: 161501
accurate by asking the parser whether there was an ambiguity rather than trying
to reverse-engineer it from the DeclSpec. Make the with-parameters case have
better diagnostics by using semantic information to drive the warning,
improving the diagnostics and adding a fixit.
Patch by Nikola Smiljanic. Some minor changes by me to suppress diagnostics for
declarations of the form 'T (*x)(...)', which seem to have a very high false
positive rate, and to reduce indentation in 'warnAboutAmbiguousFunction'.
llvm-svn: 160998
a defaulted special member function until the exception specification is needed
(using the same criteria used for the delayed instantiation of exception
specifications for function temploids).
EST_Delayed is now EST_Unevaluated (using 1330's terminology), and, like
EST_Uninstantiated, carries a pointer to the FunctionDecl which will be used to
resolve the exception specification.
This is enabled for all C++ modes: it's a little faster in the case where the
exception specification isn't used, allows our C++11-in-C++98 extensions to
work, and is still correct for C++98, since in that mode the computation of the
exception specification can't fail.
The diagnostics here aren't great (in particular, we should include implicit
evaluation of exception specifications for defaulted special members in the
template instantiation backtraces), but they're not much worse than before.
Our approach to the problem of cycles between in-class initializers and the
exception specification for a defaulted default constructor is modified a
little by this change -- we now reject any odr-use of a defaulted default
constructor if that constructor uses an in-class initializer and the use is in
an in-class initialzer which is declared lexically earlier. This is a closer
approximation to the current draft solution in core issue 1351, but isn't an
exact match (but the current draft wording isn't reasonable, so that's to be
expected).
llvm-svn: 160847
as an array of its base class TemplateArgument. Switch the const
TemplateArgument* parameters of InstantiatingTemplate's constructors to
ArrayRef<TemplateArgument> to prevent this from happening again in the future.
llvm-svn: 160245
being a property of a canonical type to being a property of the fully-sugared
type. This should only make a difference in the case where an alias template
ignores one of its parameters, and that parameter is an unexpanded parameter
pack.
llvm-svn: 160244
to the same signature. Fix a bug in the type printer which would cause this
diagnostic to print wonderful types like 'const const int *'.
llvm-svn: 160161
* When substituting a reference to a non-type template parameter pack where the
corresponding argument is a pack expansion, transform into an expression
which contains an unexpanded parameter pack rather than into an expression
which contains a pack expansion. This causes the SubstNonTypeTemplateParmExpr
to be inside the PackExpansionExpr, rather than outside, so the expression
still looks like a pack expansion and can be deduced.
* Teach MarkUsedTemplateParameters that we can deduce a reference to a template
parameter if it's wrapped in a SubstNonTypeTemplateParmExpr (such nodes are
added during alias template substitution).
llvm-svn: 159922
expression, skip over any SubstNonTypeTemplateParmExprs which alias templates
may have inserted before checking for a DeclRefExpr referring to a non-type
template parameter declaration.
llvm-svn: 159909
-ftemplate-depth limit. There are various ways to get an infinite (or merely
huge) stack of substitutions with no intervening instantiations. This is also
consistent with gcc's behavior.
llvm-svn: 159907
which will appear in the vtable as used, not just those ones which were
declared within the class itself. Fixes an issue reported as comment#3 in
PR12763 -- we sometimes assert in codegen if we try to emit a reference to a
function declaration which we've not marked as referenced. This also matches
gcc's observed behavior.
llvm-svn: 159895
in microsoft mode. Fixes PR12701.
The code for this was already in 2 of the 3 branches of a
conditional and missing in the 3rd branch, so lift it above
the conditional.
llvm-svn: 158842
Moves the bool bail-out down a little in SemaChecking - so now
-Wnull-conversion and -Wliteral-conversion can fire when the target type is
bool.
Also improve the wording/details in the -Wliteral-conversion warning to match
the -Wconstant-conversion.
llvm-svn: 156826
candidate template ignored: substitution failed [with T = int]: no type named 'type' in 'std::enable_if<false, void>'
Instead, just say:
candidate template ignored: disabled by 'enable_if' [with T = int]
... and point at the enable_if condition which (we assume) failed.
This is applied to all cases where the user writes 'typename enable_if<...>::type' (optionally prefixed with a nested name specifier), and 'enable_if<...>' names a complete class type which does not have a member named 'type', and this results in a candidate function being ignored in a SFINAE context. Thus it catches 'std::enable_if', 'std::__1::enable_if', 'boost::enable_if' and 'llvm::enable_if'.
llvm-svn: 156463
overload candidate, and include its message in any subsequent 'candidate not
viable due to substitution failure' note we may produce.
To keep the note small (since the 'overload resolution failed' diagnostics are
often already very verbose), the text of the SFINAE diagnostic is included as
part of the text of the note, and any notes which were attached to it are
discarded.
There happened to be spare space in OverloadCandidate into which a
PartialDiagnosticAt could be squeezed, and this patch goes to lengths to avoid
unnecessary PartialDiagnostic copies, resulting in no slowdown that I could
measure. (Removal in passing of some PartialDiagnostic copies has resulted in a
slightly smaller clang binary overall.) Even on a torture test, I was unable to
measure a memory increase of above 0.2%.
llvm-svn: 156297
pretend there was no previous declaration -- that can lead us to injecting
a class template (with no access specifier) into a class scope. Instead,
just avoid the problematic checks.
llvm-svn: 155303
up an elaborated type specifier in a friend declaration, only look for type
declarations, per [basic.lookup.elab]p2. If we know that the redeclaration
lookup for a friend class template in a dependent context finds a non-template,
don't delay the diagnostic to instantiation time.
llvm-svn: 155187
David Majnemer