... when the variable's type is a typedef of a ConstantArrayType. Just
look through the typedef (and any other sugar). We only use the
constant array type here to get the element count.
llvm-svn: 227115
clang currently calls MarkVTableUsed() for classes that get their virtual
methods called or that participate in a dynamic_cast. This is unnecessary,
since CodeGen only emits vtables when it generates constructor, destructor, and
vtt code. (*)
Note that Sema::MarkVTableUsed() doesn't cause the emission of a vtable.
Its main user-visible effect is that it instantiates virtual member functions
of template classes, to make sure that if codegen decides to write a vtable
all the entries in the vtable are defined.
While this shouldn't change the behavior of codegen (other than being faster),
it does make clang more permissive: virtual methods of templates (in particular
destructors) end up being instantiated less often. In particular, classes that
have members that are smart pointers to incomplete types will now get their
implicit virtual destructor instantiated less frequently. For example, this
used to not compile but does now compile:
template <typename T> struct OwnPtr {
~OwnPtr() { static_assert((sizeof(T) > 0), "TypeMustBeComplete"); }
};
class ScriptLoader;
struct Base { virtual ~Base(); };
struct Sub : public Base {
virtual void someFun() const {}
OwnPtr<ScriptLoader> m_loader;
};
void f(Sub *s) { s->someFun(); }
The more permissive behavior matches both gcc (where this is not often
observable, since in practice most things with virtual methods have a key
function, and Sema::DefineUsedVTables() skips vtables for classes with key
functions) and cl (which is my motivation for this change) – this fixes
PR20337. See this issue and the review thread for some discussions about
optimizations.
This is similar to r213109 in spirit. r225761 was a prerequisite for this
change.
Various tests relied on "a->f()" marking a's vtable as used (in the sema
sense), switch these to just construct a on the stack. This forces
instantiation of the implicit constructor, which will mark the vtable as used.
(*) The exception is -fapple-kext mode: In this mode, qualified calls to
virtual functions (`a->Base::f()`) still go through the vtable, and since the
vtable pointer off this doesn't point to Base's vtable, this needs to reference
Base's vtable directly. To keep this working, keep referencing the vtable for
virtual calls in apple kext mode.
llvm-svn: 227073
and only update the orginal list on a valid arugment list. When checking an
individual expression template argument, and conversions are required, update
the expression in the template argument. Since template arguments are
speculatively checked, the copying of the template argument list prevents
updating the template arguments when the list does not match the template.
Additionally, clean up the integer checking code in the template diffing code.
The code performs unneccessary conversions from APSInt to APInt.
Fixes PR21758.
This essentially reverts r224770 to recommits r224667 and r224668 with extra
changes to prevent the template instantiation problems seen in PR22006.
A test to catch the discovered problem is also added.
llvm-svn: 226983
Previously if an enumeration was used in a nested name specifier in pre-C++11
language dialect, error message was 'XXX is not a class, namespace, or scoped
enumeration'. This patch removes the word 'scoped' as in C++11 any enumeration
may be used in this context.
llvm-svn: 226410
There are two things in a C++ program that need to read the vtable pointer:
Constructors and destructors. (A few other operations -- virtual calls,
dynamic cast, rtti -- read the vtable pointer off a this pointer, but for
this they don't need the vtable symbol.) Implicit constructors and destructors
and explicit constructors already marked the vtable as used, but explicit
destructors didn't.
Note that the only thing sema's "mark a class's vtable used" does is to mark all
final overriders of the class as referenced, it does _not_ cause emission of
the vtable itself. This is done on demand by codegen, independent of sema,
since sema might emit functions that are not referenced. (The exception are
vtables that are forced via key functions -- these are forced onto codegen
by sema.)
This bug went unnoticed for years because it doesn't have observable effects
(yet -- I want to change this in PR20337, which is why I noticed this).
r213109 made it so that _calls_ to constructors don't mark the vtable used.
Currently, _calls_ to destructors still mark the vtable used. If that
wasn't the case, this program would tickle the problem:
test.h:
template <typename T>
struct B {
int* p;
virtual ~B() { delete p; }
virtual void f() {}
};
struct __attribute__((visibility("default"))) C {
C();
B<int> m;
};
test2.cc:
#include "test.h"
int main() {
C* c = new C;
delete c;
}
test3.cc:
#include "test.h"
C::C() {}
# This bin/clang++ binary doesn't MarkVTableUsed() for virtual dtor calls:
$ bin/clang++ -shared test3.cc -std=c++11 -O2 -fvisibility=hidden \
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden -o libtest3.dylib
$ bin/clang++ test2.cc -std=c++11 -O2 -fvisibility=hidden \
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden libtest3.dylib
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"B<int>::f()", referenced from:
vtable for B<int> in test2-af8f4f.o
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
What's happening here is that there's a copy of B's vtable hidden in
libtest3.dylib, because C's constructor caused an implicit instantiation of that
(and implicit constructors generate vtables).
test2.cc calls C's destructDr, which destroys the B<int> member,
which wants to overwrite the vtable back to B (think of B as the base of a class
hierarchy, and of hierarchical destruction -- maybe we shouldn't do the vtable
writing in destructors of final classes), but there's nothing in test2.cc that
marks B's vtable used. So codegen writes out the vtable, but since it wasn't
marked used, sema didn't mark all the virtual functions (in particular f())
as used.
Note that this change makes us reject programs we didn't reject before (see
the included Sema test case), but both gcc and cl also reject this code, and
clang used to reject it before r213109.
llvm-svn: 225761
Templates don't have key functions (cf computeKeyFunction() in
RecordLayoutBuilder.cpp), so don't have something that looks like one.
Also, instead of a vcall to force generation of the vtable, just construct
the object. This is how the repro on PR5557 (what the test is for) worked too.
llvm-svn: 225741
We assumed that class-scope specializations would result in a
CXXMethodDecl for that class. However, globally qualified functions
will result in normal FunctionDecls.
llvm-svn: 225508
The FIXME in the test is caused by TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitCXXRecordDecl
returning a nullptr instead of creating an invalid decl. This is a common
pattern across all of TemplateDeclInstantiator, so I'm not comfortable changing
it. The reason it's not invalid in the class template is due to support for an
MSVC extension, see r137573.
llvm-svn: 225071
Consider a template class with attributes on a method, and an explicit
specialization of that method:
template <int>
struct A {
void foo() final;
};
template <>
void A<0>::foo() {}
In this example, the attribute is `final`, but it might also be an
__attribute__((visibility("foo"))), noreturn, inline, etc. clang's current
behavior is to strip all attributes, which for some attributes is wrong
(the snippet above allows a subclass of A<0> to override the final method, for
example) and for others disagrees with gcc.
So stop dropping attributes. r95845 added this code without a test case, and
r176728 added the code for dropping attributes on parameters (with tests, but
they still pass).
As an additional wrinkle, do drop dllimport and dllexport, since that's how
these two attributes work. (This is covered by existing tests.)
Fixes PR21942.
The approach is by Richard Smith, initial analysis and typing was done by me.
With this, clang also matches GCC and EDG on all attributes Richard tested.
llvm-svn: 224651
This reverts commit r224451. It caused us to reject some valid existing
code.
This code appears to run in non-error cases as well as error cases. If
the scope of a DependentScopeDeclRefExpr is still incomplete it probably
means we still have more instantiation to do.
llvm-svn: 224526
exact type match for deduced template arguments, and be sure to produce correct
canonical TemplateArgument representations to enable correct redeclaration
matching.
llvm-svn: 224456
A DependentScopeDeclRefExpr should always have a nested name specifier.
During template instantiation, if we found that the named context was
incomplete, we would previously build a DependentScopeDeclRefExpr with
an empty qualifier.
This error recovery path has been asserting for some time. The other
error codepaths use ExprError, so we can do the same.
Fixes PR21864.
llvm-svn: 224451
ignore it during overload resolution when initializing
X from a value of type cv X.
Previously, our rule here only ignored specializations
of constructor templates. That's probably because the
standard says that constructors are outright ill-formed
if their first parameter is literally X and they're
callable with one argument. However, Clang only
enforces that prohibition against non-implicit
instantiations; I'm not sure why, but it seems to be
deliberate. Given that, the most sensible thing to
do is to just ignore the "illegal" constructor
regardless of where it came from.
Also, stop ignoring such constructors silently:
print a note explaining why they're being ignored.
Fixes <rdar://19199836>.
llvm-svn: 224205
We don't yet support pointer-to-member template arguments that have undergone
pointer-to-member conversions, mostly because we don't have a mangling for them yet.
llvm-svn: 222807
If there is more than one TypoExpr within the expr being transformed and
any but the last TypoExpr seen don't have any viable candidates, the
tree transform will be aborted early and the remaining TypoExprs are
never seen and hence never diagnosed. This adds a simple
RecursiveASTVisitor to find all of the TypoExprs to be diagnosed in the
case where typo correction of the entire expr fails (and the result of
the tree transform is an ExprError).
llvm-svn: 222465
Sema::ActOnIdExpression to use the new functionality.
Among other things, this allows recovery in several cases where it
wasn't possible before (e.g. correcting a mistyped static_cast<>).
llvm-svn: 222464
Specifically, when we have this situation:
struct A {
template <typename T> struct B {
int m1 = sizeof(A);
};
B<int> m2;
};
We can't parse m1's initializer eagerly because we need A to be
complete. Therefore we wait until the end of A's class scope to parse
it. However, we can trigger instantiation of B before the end of A,
which will attempt to instantiate the field decls eagerly, and it would
build a bad field decl instantiation that said it had an initializer but
actually lacked one.
Fixed by deferring instantiation of default member initializers until
they are needed during constructor analysis. This addresses a long
standing FIXME in the code.
Fixes PR19195.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5690
llvm-svn: 222192
expansion into a parameter pack; we know that we're still filling in that
parameter's arguments. Previously, if we hit this case for an alias template,
we'd try to substitute using non-canonical template arguments.
llvm-svn: 221832
than the type of a function declaration). We previously didn't instantiate
these at all! This also covers the pathological case where the only mention of
a parameter pack is within the exception specification; this gives us a second
way (other than alias templates) to reach the horrible state where a type
contains an unexpanded pack, but its canonical type does not.
This is a re-commit of r219977:
r219977 was reverted in r220038 because it hit a wrong-code bug in GCC 4.7.2.
(That's gcc.gnu.org/PR56135, and affects any implicit lambda-capture of
'this' within a template.)
r219977 was a re-commit of r217995, r218011, and r218053:
r217995 was reverted in r218058 because it hit a rejects-valid bug in MSVC.
(Incorrect overload resolution in the presence of using-declarations.)
It was re-committed in r219977 with a workaround for the MSVC rejects-valid.
r218011 was a workaround for an MSVC parser bug. (Incorrect desugaring of
unbraced range-based for loop).
llvm-svn: 221750
penultimate parameter of a template parameter list, where the last parameter is
itself a pack, and build a bogus empty final pack argument.
llvm-svn: 221748
This is a new form of expression of the form:
(expr op ... op expr)
where one of the exprs is a parameter pack. It expands into
(expr1 op (expr2onwards op ... op expr))
(and likewise if the pack is on the right). The non-pack operand can be
omitted; in that case, an empty pack gives a fallback value or an error,
depending on the operator.
llvm-svn: 221573
According to C++ standard if an exception-specification is specified in an explicit instantiation directive, it shall be compatible with the exception-specifications of other declarations of that function. This patch adds checks for this.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5822
llvm-svn: 221448
template specialization type dependent, even if it has no dependent template
arguments. I've filed a corresponding bug against the C++ standard.
llvm-svn: 220088
of a member function of a class template that is defined outside the template.
This substitution can actually fail in some weird cases.
llvm-svn: 220085
It broke some builders. I guess it'd be reproducible with --vg.
Failing Tests (3):
Clang :: CXX/except/except.spec/p1.cpp
Clang :: SemaTemplate/instantiate-exception-spec-cxx11.cpp
Clang :: SemaTemplate/instantiate-exception-spec.cpp
llvm-svn: 220038
reverted in r218058 because they triggered a rejects-valid bug in MSVC.
Original commit message from r217995:
Instantiate exception specifications when instantiating function types (other
than the type of a function declaration). We previously didn't instantiate
these at all! This also covers the pathological case where the only mention of
a parameter pack is within the exception specification; this gives us a second
way (other than alias templates) to reach the horrible state where a type
contains an unexpanded pack, but its canonical type does not.
llvm-svn: 219977
Fix for clang crash when instantiating a template with qualified lookup for members in non-class types.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5769
llvm-svn: 219897
r218053: Use exceptions() instead of getNumExceptions()/getExceptionType() to avoid
r218011: Work around MSVC parser bug by putting redundant braces around the body of
r217997: Skip parens when detecting whether we're instantiating a function declaration.
r217995: Instantiate exception specifications when instantiating function types (other
The Windows build was broken for 16 hours and no one had any good ideas of how to
fix it. Reverting for now to make the builders green. See the cfe-commits thread [1] for
more info.
This was the build error (from [2]):
C:\bb-win7\ninja-clang-i686-msc17-R\llvm-project\clang\lib\Sema\SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp(1590) : error C2668: '`anonymous-namespace'::TemplateInstantiator::TransformFunctionProtoType' : ambiguous call to overloaded function
C:\bb-win7\ninja-clang-i686-msc17-R\llvm-project\clang\lib\Sema\SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp(1313): could be 'clang::QualType `anonymous-namespace'::TemplateInstantiator::TransformFunctionProtoType<clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>>(clang::TypeLocBuilder &,clang::FunctionProtoTypeLoc,clang::CXXRecordDecl *,unsigned int,Fn)'
with
[
Fn=clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>
]
c:\bb-win7\ninja-clang-i686-msc17-r\llvm-project\clang\lib\sema\TreeTransform.h(4532): or 'clang::QualType clang::TreeTransform<Derived>::TransformFunctionProtoType<clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>>(clang::TypeLocBuilder &,clang::FunctionProtoTypeLoc,clang::CXXRecordDecl *,unsigned int,Fn)'
with
[
Derived=`anonymous-namespace'::TemplateInstantiator,
Fn=clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>
]
while trying to match the argument list '(clang::TypeLocBuilder, clang::FunctionProtoTypeLoc, clang::CXXRecordDecl *, unsigned int, clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>)'
1. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140915/115011.html
2. http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/ninja-clang-i686-msc17-R/builds/10515/steps/build_clang_tools_1/logs/stdio
llvm-svn: 218058
than the type of a function declaration). We previously didn't instantiate
these at all! This also covers the pathological case where the only mention of
a parameter pack is within the exception specification; this gives us a second
way (other than alias templates) to reach the horrible state where a type
contains an unexpanded pack, but its canonical type does not.
llvm-svn: 217995
Nico Weber