Fix the current parsing of subframeworks in modulemaps to lookup for
headers based on whether they are frameworks.
rdar://problem/30563982
llvm-svn: 298391
This reverts commit r298185, effectively reapplying r298165, after fixing the
new unit tests (PR32338). The memory buffer generator doesn't null-terminate
the MemoryBuffer it creates; this version of the commit informs getMemBuffer
about that to avoid the assert.
Original commit message follows:
----
Clang's internal build system for implicit modules uses lock files to
ensure that after a process writes a PCM it will read the same one back
in (without contention from other -cc1 commands). Since PCMs are read
from disk repeatedly while invalidating, building, and importing, the
lock is not released quickly. Furthermore, the LockFileManager is not
robust in every environment. Other -cc1 commands can stall until
timeout (after about eight minutes).
This commit changes the lock file from being necessary for correctness
to a (possibly dubious) performance hack. The remaining benefit is to
reduce duplicate work in competing -cc1 commands which depend on the
same module. Follow-up commits will change the internal build system to
continue after a timeout, and reduce the timeout. Perhaps we should
reconsider blocking at all.
This also fixes a use-after-free, when one part of a compilation
validates a PCM and starts using it, and another tries to swap out the
PCM for something new.
The PCMCache is a new type called MemoryBufferCache, which saves memory
buffers based on their filename. Its ownership is shared by the
CompilerInstance and ModuleManager.
- The ModuleManager stores PCMs there that it loads from disk, never
touching the disk if the cache is hot.
- When modules fail to validate, they're removed from the cache.
- When a CompilerInstance is spawned to build a new module, each
already-loaded PCM is assumed to be valid, and is frozen to avoid
the use-after-free.
- Any newly-built module is written directly to the cache to avoid the
round-trip to the filesystem, making lock files unnecessary for
correctness.
Original patch by Manman Ren; most testcases by Adrian Prantl!
llvm-svn: 298278
Clang's internal build system for implicit modules uses lock files to
ensure that after a process writes a PCM it will read the same one back
in (without contention from other -cc1 commands). Since PCMs are read
from disk repeatedly while invalidating, building, and importing, the
lock is not released quickly. Furthermore, the LockFileManager is not
robust in every environment. Other -cc1 commands can stall until
timeout (after about eight minutes).
This commit changes the lock file from being necessary for correctness
to a (possibly dubious) performance hack. The remaining benefit is to
reduce duplicate work in competing -cc1 commands which depend on the
same module. Follow-up commits will change the internal build system to
continue after a timeout, and reduce the timeout. Perhaps we should
reconsider blocking at all.
This also fixes a use-after-free, when one part of a compilation
validates a PCM and starts using it, and another tries to swap out the
PCM for something new.
The PCMCache is a new type called MemoryBufferCache, which saves memory
buffers based on their filename. Its ownership is shared by the
CompilerInstance and ModuleManager.
- The ModuleManager stores PCMs there that it loads from disk, never
touching the disk if the cache is hot.
- When modules fail to validate, they're removed from the cache.
- When a CompilerInstance is spawned to build a new module, each
already-loaded PCM is assumed to be valid, and is frozen to avoid
the use-after-free.
- Any newly-built module is written directly to the cache to avoid the
round-trip to the filesystem, making lock files unnecessary for
correctness.
Original patch by Manman Ren; most testcases by Adrian Prantl!
llvm-svn: 298165
in macro argument pre-expansion mode when skipping a function body
This commit fixes a token caching problem that currently occurs when clang is
skipping a function body (e.g. when looking for a code completion token) and at
the same time caching the tokens for _Pragma when lexing it in macro argument
pre-expansion mode.
When _Pragma is being lexed in macro argument pre-expansion mode, it caches the
tokens so that it can avoid interpreting the pragma immediately (as the macro
argument may not be used in the macro body), and then either backtracks over or
commits these tokens. The problem is that, when we're backtracking/committing in
such a scenario, there's already a previous backtracking position stored in
BacktrackPositions (as we're skipping the function body), and this leads to a
situation where the cached tokens from the pragma (like '(' 'string_literal'
and ')') will remain in the cached tokens array incorrectly even after they're
consumed (in the case of backtracking) or just ignored (in the case when they're
committed). Furthermore, what makes it even worse, is that because of a previous
backtracking position, the logic that deals with when should we call
ExitCachingLexMode in CachingLex no longer works for us in this situation, and
more tokens in the macro argument get cached, to the point where the EOF token
that corresponds to the macro argument EOF is cached. This problem leads to all
sorts of issues in code completion mode, where incorrect errors get presented
and code completion completely fails to produce completion results.
rdar://28523863
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28772
llvm-svn: 296140
Summary: This is a patch for PR31836. As the bug replaces the path separators in the included file name with the characters following them, the test script makes sure that there's no "Ccase-insensitive-include-pr31836.h" in the warning message.
Reviewers: rsmith, eric_niebler
Reviewed By: eric_niebler
Subscribers: karies, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30000
llvm-svn: 295779
The Module::WithCodegen flag was only being set when the module was
parsed from a ModuleMap. Instead set it late, in the ASTWriter to match
the layer where the MODULAR_CODEGEN_DECLs list is determined (the
WithCodegen flag essentially means "are this module's decls in
MODULAR_CODEGEN_DECLs").
When simultaneous emission of AST file and modular object is implemented
this may need to change - the Module::WithCodegen flag will need to be
set earlier, and ideally the MODULAR_CODEGEN_DECLs gathering will
consult this flag (that's not possible right now since Decls destined
for an AST File don't have a Module - only if they're /read/ from a
Module is that true - I expect that would need to change as well).
llvm-svn: 293692
First pass at generating weak definitions of inline functions from module files
(& skipping (-O0) or emitting available_externally (optimizations)
definitions where those modules are used).
External functions defined in modules are emitted into the modular
object file as well (this may turn an existing ODR violation (if that
module were imported into multiple translations) into valid/linkable
code).
Internal symbols (static functions, for example) are not correctly
supported yet. The symbol will be produced, internal, in the modular
object - unreferenceable from the users.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28845
llvm-svn: 293456
by providing a memchr builtin that returns char* instead of void*.
Also add a __has_feature flag to indicate the presence of constexpr forms of
the relevant <string> functions.
llvm-svn: 292555
When a textual header is present inside a umbrella dir but not in the
header, we get the misleading warning:
warning: umbrella header for module 'FooFramework' does not include
header 'Baz_Private.h'
The module map in question:
framework module FooFramework {
umbrella header "FooUmbrella.h"
export *
module * { export * }
module Private {
textual header "Baz_Private.h"
}
}
Fix this by taking textual headers into account.
llvm-svn: 291794
Textual headers and builtins that are #import'd from different
modules should get re-entered when these modules are independent
from each other.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26267
rdar://problem/25881934
llvm-svn: 291644
In r276159, we started to say that a module X is defined in a pch if we specify
-fmodule-name when building the pch. This caused a regression that reports
module X is defined in both pch and pcm if we generate the pch with
-fmodule-name=X and then in a separate clang invocation, we include the pch and
also import X.pcm.
This patch adds an option CompilingPCH similar to CompilingModule. When we use
-fmodule-name=X while building a pch, modular headers in X will be textually
included and the compiler knows that we are not building module X, so we don't
put module X in SUBMODULE_DEFINITION of the pch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D28415
llvm-svn: 291465
Summary:
The module system supports accompanying a primary module (say Foo) with
an auxiliary "private" module (defined in an adjacent module.private.modulemap
file) that augments the primary module when associated private headers are
available. The feature is intended to be used to augment the primary
module with a submodule (say Foo.Private), however some users in the wild
are choosing to augment the primary module with an additional top-level module
with a "similar" name (in all cases so far: FooPrivate).
This "works" when a user of the module initially imports a private header,
such as '#import "Foo/something_private.h"' since the Foo import winds up
importing FooPrivate in passing. But if the import is subsequently recorded
in a PCH file, reloading the PCH will fail to validate because of a cross-check
that attempts to find the module.modulemap (or module.private.modulemap) using
HeaderSearch algorithm, applied to the "FooPrivate" name. Since it's stored in
Foo.framework/Modules, not FooPrivate.framework/Modules, the check fails and
the PCH is rejected.
This patch adds a compensatory workaround in the HeaderSearch algorithm
when searching (and failing to find) a module of the form FooPrivate: the
name used to derive filesystem paths is decoupled from the module name
being searched for, and if the initial search fails and the module is
named "FooPrivate", the filesystem search name is altered to remove the
"Private" suffix, and the algorithm is run a second time (still looking for
a module named FooPrivate, but looking in directories derived from Foo).
Accompanying this change is a new warning that triggers when a user loads
a module.private.modulemap that defines a top-level module with a different
name from the top-level module defined in its adjacent module.modulemap.
Reviewers: doug.gregor, manmanren, bruno
Subscribers: bruno, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27852
llvm-svn: 290219
Include headermaps (.hmap files) in the .cache directory and
add VFS entries. All headermaps are known after HeaderSearch
setup, collect them right after.
rdar://problem/27913709
llvm-svn: 289360
PCH files store the macro history for a given macro, and the whole history list
for one identifier is given to the Preprocessor at once via
Preprocessor::setLoadedMacroDirective(). This contained an assert that no macro
history exists yet for that identifier. That's usually true, but it's not true
for builtin macros, which are created in Preprocessor() before flags and pchs
are processed. Luckily, ASTWriter stops writing macro history lists at builtins
(see shouldIgnoreMacro() in ASTWriter.cpp), so the head of the history list was
missing for builtin macros. So make the assert weaker, and splice the history
list to the existing single define for builtins.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27545
llvm-svn: 289228
Recover better from an incompatible .pcm file being provided by -fmodule-file=. We try to include the headers of the module textually in this case, still enforcing the modules semantic rules. In order to make that work, we need to still track that we're entering and leaving the module. Also, if the module was also marked as unavailable (perhaps because it was missing a file), we shouldn't mark the module unavailable -- we don't need the module to be complete if we're going to enter it textually.
llvm-svn: 288741
This reverts commit r288449.
I believe that this is currently faulty wrt. modules being imported
inside namespaces. Adding these lines to the new test:
namespace n {
#include "foo.h"
}
Makes it break with
fatal error: import of module 'M' appears within namespace 'n'
However, I believe it should fail with
error: redundant #include of module 'M' appears within namespace 'n'
I have tracked this down to us now inserting a tok::annot_module_begin
instead of a tok::annot_module_include in
Preprocessor::HandleIncludeDirective() and then later in
Parser::parseMisplacedModuleImport(), we hit the code path for
tok::annot_module_begin, which doesn't set FromInclude of
checkModuleImportContext to true (thus leading to the "wrong"
diagnostic).
llvm-svn: 288626
We try to include the headers of the module textually in this case, still
enforcing the modules semantic rules. In order to make that work, we need to
still track that we're entering and leaving the module. Also, if the module was
also marked as unavailable (perhaps because it was missing a file), we
shouldn't mark the module unavailable -- we don't need the module to be
complete if we're going to enter it textually.
llvm-svn: 288449
Since array parameters decay to pointers, '_Nullable' and friends
should be available for use there as well. This is especially
important for parameters that are typedefs of arrays. The unsugared
syntax for this follows the syntax for 'static'-sized arrays in C:
void test(int values[_Nullable]);
This syntax was previously accepted but the '_Nullable' (and any other
attributes) were silently discarded. However, applying '_Nullable' to
a typedef was previously rejected and is now accepted; therefore, it
may be necessary to test for the presence of this feature:
#if __has_feature(nullability_on_arrays)
One important change here is that DecayedTypes don't always
immediately contain PointerTypes anymore; they may contain an
AttributedType instead. This only affected one place in-tree, so I
would guess it's not likely to cause problems elsewhere.
This commit does not change -Wnullability-completeness just yet. I
want to think about whether it's worth doing something special to
avoid breaking existing clients that compile with -Werror. It also
doesn't change '#pragma clang assume_nonnull' behavior, which
currently treats the following two declarations as equivalent:
#pragma clang assume_nonnull begin
void test(void *pointers[]);
#pragma clang assume_nonnull end
void test(void * _Nonnull pointers[]);
This is not the desired behavior, but changing it would break
backwards-compatibility. Most likely the best answer is going to be
adding a new warning.
Part of rdar://problem/25846421
llvm-svn: 286519
which guarantee pointers are not null. These all seem to have useful
properties and correlations to document, in one case we even had it in
a comment but now it will also be an assert.
This should prevent PVS-Studio from incorrectly claiming that there are
a bunch of potential bugs here. But I feel really strongly that the
PVS-Studio warnings that pointed at this code have a far too high
false-positive rate to be entirely useful. These are just places where
there did seem to be a useful invariant to document and verify with an
assert. Several other places in the code were already correct and
already have perfectly clear code documenting and validating their
invariants, but still ran afoul of PVS-Studio.
llvm-svn: 285985
r276653 suppressed the pragma once warning when generating a PCH file.
This patch extends that to any main file for which clang is told (with
the -x option) that it's a header file. It will also suppress the
warning "#include_next in primary source file".
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D25989
llvm-svn: 285295
While in the area, also change some unsigned variables to size_t, and
introduce an LLVM_FALLTHROUGH instead of a comment stating that.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D25982
llvm-svn: 285193
All values are returned by a method as size_t, and subsequently passed
to functions taking a size_t, or used where a size_t is also valid.
Better still, two loops (which had an unsigned), can be replaced by
a range-based for loop.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D25939
llvm-svn: 285182
headers. We previously got this check backwards and treated the wrapper header
as being textual.
This is important because our wrapper headers sometimes inject macros into the
system headers that they #include_next, and sometimes replace them entirely.
llvm-svn: 285152
The 'no_undeclared_includes' attribute should be used in a module to
tell that only non-modular headers and headers from used modules are
accepted.
The main motivation behind this is to prevent dep cycles between system
libraries (such as darwin) and libc++.
Patch by Richard Smith!
llvm-svn: 284797
This assert is intended to defend against backtracking into the middle
of a sequence of tokens that is being replaced with an annotation, but
it's OK if we backtrack to the exact position of the start of the
annotation sequence. Use a <= comparison instead of <.
Fixes PR25946
llvm-svn: 284777
Summary:
This lets people link against LLVM and their own version of the UTF
library.
I determined this only affects llvm, clang, lld, and lldb by running
$ git grep -wl 'UTF[0-9]\+\|\bConvertUTF\bisLegalUTF\|getNumBytesFor' | cut -f 1 -d '/' | sort | uniq
clang
lld
lldb
llvm
Tested with
ninja lldb
ninja check-clang check-llvm check-lld
(ninja check-lldb doesn't complete for me with or without this patch.)
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: klimek, beanz, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24996
llvm-svn: 282822
This is triggered when we are compiling an implementation of a module,
it has relative includes to a VFS-mapped module with umbrella headers.
Currently we will find the real path to headers under the umbrella directory,
but the umbrella directories are using virtual path.
rdar://27951255
Thanks Ben and Richard for reviewing the patch!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23858
llvm-svn: 279838
This diff reorders the fields and removes excessive padding.
This fixes the following warning:
PTHLexer.cpp:629:7: warning: Excessive padding in 'class (anonymous namespace)::PTHStatData' (14 padding bytes, where 6 is optimal). Optimal fields order: Size, ModTime, UniqueID, HasData, IsDirectory, consider reordering the fields or adding explicit padding members.
Patch by: Alexander Shaposhnikov <shal1t712@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23826
llvm-svn: 279607
Bruno Cardoso Lopes