SmallVector<T> with default size is now the recommended version (D92522).
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92788
This reverts commit a2ce807eb7.
Buildbot failures on GCC due to SelectionTree not being copyable, and
instantiating vector<Selection> in the tweak-handling in ClangdServer.
This reverts commit b60896fad9.
Breaks building with gcc:
/usr/include/c++/7/bits/stl_construct.h:75:7: error: use of deleted function ‘clang::clangd::Tweak::Selection::Selection(const clang::clangd::Tweak::Selection&)’
{ ::new(static_cast<void*>(__p)) _T1(std::forward<_Args>(__args)...); }
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon/llvm/clang-tools-extra/clangd/ClangdServer.h:28:0,
from /home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon/llvm/clang-tools-extra/clangd/ClangdServer.cpp:9:
/home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon/llvm/clang-tools-extra/clangd/refactor/Tweak.h:49:10: note: ‘clang::clangd::Tweak::Selection::Selection(const clang::clangd::Tweak::Selection&)’ is implicitly deleted because the default definition would be ill-formed:
struct Selection {
^~~~~~~~~
/home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon/llvm/clang-tools-extra/clangd/refactor/Tweak.h:49:10: error: use of deleted function ‘clang::clangd::SelectionTree::SelectionTree(const clang::clangd::SelectionTree&)’
In file included from /home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon/llvm/clang-tools-extra/clangd/refactor/Tweak.h:25:0,
from /home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon/llvm/clang-tools-extra/clangd/ClangdServer.h:28,
from /home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon/llvm/clang-tools-extra/clangd/ClangdServer.cpp:9:
/home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon/llvm/clang-tools-extra/clangd/Selection.h:96:3: note: declared here
SelectionTree(const SelectionTree &) = delete;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
e.g. here:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon/builds/2714http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux/builds/41866
Summary:
The problem:
LSP specifies that Positions are between characters. Therefore when a position
(or an empty range) is used to target elements of the source code, there is an
ambiguity - should we look left or right of the cursor?
Until now, SelectionTree resolved this to the right except in trivial cases
(where there's whitespace, semicolon, or eof on the right).
This meant that it's unable to e.g. out-line `int foo^()` today.
Complicating this, LSP notwithstanding the cursor is *on* a character in many
editors (mostly terminal-based). In these cases there's no ambiguity - we must
"look right" - but there's also no way to tell in LSP.
(Several features currently resolve this by using getBeginningOfIdentifier,
which tries to rewind and supports end-of-identifier. But this relies on
raw lexing and is limited and buggy).
Precedent: well - most other languages aren't so full of densely packed symbols
that we might want to target. Bias-towards-identifier works well enough.
MS C++ for vscode seems to mostly use bias-toward-identifier too.
The problem with this solution is it doesn't provide any way to target some
things such as the constructor call in Foo^(bar());
Presented solution:
When an ambiguous selection is found, we generate *both* possible selection
trees. We try to run the feature on the rightward tree first, and then on the
leftward tree if it fails.
This is basically do-what-I-mean, the main downside is the need to do this on
a feature-by-feature basis (because each feature knows what "fail" means).
The most complicated instance of this is Tweaks, where the preferred selection
may vary tweak-by-tweak.
Wrinkles:
While production behavior is pretty consistent, this introduces some
inconsistency in testing, depending whether the interface we're testing is
inside or outside the "retry" wrapper.
In particular, for many features like Hover, the unit tests will show production
behavior, while for Tweaks the harness would have to run the loop itself if
we want this.
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71345
Summary:
The exclusive-claim model is successful at resolving conflicts over tokens
between parent/child or siblings. However claims at the spelled-token
level do the wrong thing for macro expansions, where siblings can be
equally associated with the macro invocation.
Moreover, any model that only uses the endpoints in a range can fail when
a macro invocation occurs inside the node.
To address this, we use the existing TokenBuffer in more depth.
Claims are expressed in terms of expanded tokens, so there is no need to worry
about macros, includes etc.
Once we know which expanded tokens were claimed, they are mapped onto
spelled tokens for hit-testing.
This mapping is fairly flexible, currently the handling of macros is
pretty simple (map macro args onto spellings, other macro expansions onto the
macro name token).
This mapping is in principle token-by-token for correctness (though
there's some batching for performance).
The aggregation of the selection enum is now more principled as we need to be
able to aggregate several hit-test results together.
For simplicity i removed the ability to determine selectedness of TUDecl.
(That was originally implemented in 90a5bf92ff97b1, but doesn't seem to be very
important or worth the complexity any longer).
The expandedTokens(SourceLocation) helper could be added locally, but seems to
make sense on TokenBuffer.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/202
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/126
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits, ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70512
Summary:
I split out the "extract parent instead of this" logic from the "this isn't
worth extracting" logic (now in eligibleForExtraction()), because I found it
hard to reason about.
While here, handle overloaded as well as builtin assignment operators.
Also this uncovered a bug in getCallExpr() which I fixed.
Reviewers: SureYeaah
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65337
llvm-svn: 368500
Summary:
Whitespace and comments are a clear bugfix: selecting some
comments/space near a statement doesn't mean you're selecting the
surrounding block.
Semicolons are less obvious, but for similar reasons: these tokens
aren't actually claimed by any AST node (usually), so an AST-based model
like SelectionTree shouldn't take them into account.
Callers may still sometimes care about semis of course:
- when the selection is an expr with a non-expr parent, selection of
the semicolon indicates intent to select the statement.
- when a statement with a trailing semi is selected, we need to know
its range to ensure it can be removed.
SelectionTree may or may not play a role here, but these are separate questions
from its core function of describing which AST nodes were selected.
The mechanism here is the TokenBuffer from syntax-trees. We use it in a
fairly low-level way (just to get boundaries of raw spelled tokens). The
actual mapping of AST nodes to coordinates continues to use the (fairly
mature) SourceLocation based logic. TokenBuffer/Syntax trees
don't currently offer an alternative to getFileRange(), I think.
Reviewers: SureYeaah, kadircet
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits, ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65486
llvm-svn: 367453
Summary:
These aren't formally subexpressions in C++, in this case + is left-associative.
However informally +, *, etc are usually (mathematically) associative and users
consider these subexpressions.
We detect these and in simple cases support extracting the partial expression.
As well as builtin associative operators, we assume that overloads of them
are associative and support those too.
Reviewers: SureYeaah
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65139
llvm-svn: 367121
Summary:
Previously TranslationUnitDecl would never be selected.
This means root() is never null, and returns a reference.
commonAncestor() is in principle never null also, but returning TUDecl
here requires tweaks to be careful not to traverse it (this was already
possible when selecting multiple top-level decls, and there are associated bugs!)
Instead, never allow commonAncestor() to return TUDecl, return null instead.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65101
llvm-svn: 366893
Summary:
QualifiedTypeLoc isn't treated like a regular citizen by RecursiveASTVisitor.
This meant we weren't intercepting the traversal of its inner TypeLoc.
Most of the changes here are about exposing kind() so we can improve the
precision of our tests.
This should fix the issue raised in D65067.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65100
llvm-svn: 366882
Summary:
SelectionTree is a RecursiveASTVisitor which processes getSourceRange() for
every node. This is a lot of surface area with the AST, as getSourceRange()
is specialized for *many* node types.
And the resulting SelectionTree depends on the source ranges of many
visited nodes, and the order of traversal.
Put together, this means we really need a traversal log to debug when we
get an unexpected SelectionTree. I've built this ad-hoc a few times, now
it's time to check it in.
Example output:
```
D[14:07:44.184] Computing selection for </usr/local/google/home/sammccall/test.cc:1:7, col:8>
D[14:07:44.184] push: VarDecl const auto x = 42
D[14:07:44.184] claimRange: </usr/local/google/home/sammccall/test.cc:1:12, col:13>
D[14:07:44.184] push: NestedNameSpecifierLoc (empty NestedNameSpecifierLoc)
D[14:07:44.184] pop: NestedNameSpecifierLoc (empty NestedNameSpecifierLoc)
D[14:07:44.184] push: QualifiedTypeLoc const auto
D[14:07:44.184] pop: QualifiedTypeLoc const auto
D[14:07:44.184] claimRange: </usr/local/google/home/sammccall/test.cc:1:7, col:11>
D[14:07:44.184] hit selection: </usr/local/google/home/sammccall/test.cc:1:7, col:8>
D[14:07:44.184] skip: IntegerLiteral 42
D[14:07:44.184] skipped range = </usr/local/google/home/sammccall/test.cc:1:16>
D[14:07:44.184] pop: VarDecl const auto x = 42
D[14:07:44.184] claimRange: </usr/local/google/home/sammccall/test.cc:1:1, col:18>
D[14:07:44.184] skip: VarDecl int y = 43
D[14:07:44.184] skipped range = </usr/local/google/home/sammccall/test.cc:2:1, col:9>
D[14:07:44.184] Built selection tree
TranslationUnitDecl
VarDecl const auto x = 42
.QualifiedTypeLoc const auto
```
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65073
llvm-svn: 366698
Add a tweak for clangd to replace an auto keyword to the deduced type.
This way a user can declare something with auto and then have the
IDE/clangd replace auto with whatever type clangd thinks it is. In case
of long/complext types this makes is reduces writing effort for the
user.
The functionality is similar to the hover over the auto keyword.
Example (from the header):
```
/// Before:
/// auto x = Something();
/// ^^^^
/// After:
/// MyClass x = Something();
/// ^^^^^^^
```
Patch by kuhnel! (Christian Kühnel)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62855
llvm-svn: 365792
Summary:
The primary problem this solves is to expose the codeAction selection to
AST-based refactorings in a way that makes it easy and efficient for them to
bind to the right parts of the AST.
It should also allow us to make XRefs based features (textDocument/definition)
more robust, more easily implement textDocument/typeDefinition etc.
As an example, template parameter references can be identified without special
handling.
There should be slight speedup too: we can prune most of the AST traversal
in most cases.
Elephant in the room: this is similar-but-different to Tooling/Refactoring/ASTSelection.
That captures a smaller set of AST nodes, has a slightly different way of
representing selections, and generally has mare features and does more work.
The overall shape is pretty similar, and yet I can't quite get to behave as I
expect.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, kadircet
Subscribers: mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57562
llvm-svn: 352874
Alexander Kornienko