nested-name-specifier, e.g.,
T::template apply<U>::
represent the dependent template name specialization as a
DependentTemplateSpecializationType, rather than a
TemplateSpecializationType with a dependent TemplateName.
llvm-svn: 126593
specifiers such as
typename T::template apply<U>
Previously, we would turn T::template apply<U> into a
TemplateSpecializationType. Then, we'd reprocess that
TemplateSpecializationType and turn it into either a
TemplateSpecializationType wrapped in an ElaboratedType (when we could
resolve "apply" to a template declaration) or a
DependentTemplateSpecializationType. We now produce the same ASTs but
without generating the intermediate TemplateSpecializationType.
The end goal here is to avoid generating TemplateSpecializationTypes
with dependent template-names, ever. We're not there yet.
llvm-svn: 126589
This successfully performs constructor lookup and verifies that a
delegating initializer is the only initializer present.
This does not perform loop detection in the initialization, but it also
doesn't codegen delegating constructors at all, so this won't cause
runtime infinite loops yet.
llvm-svn: 126552
don't let calls to such functions go down the normal type-checking path.
Test this out with __builtin_classify_type and __builtin_constant_p.
llvm-svn: 126539
marking selected overloads into the callers. This allows a few callers
to skip it altogether (they would have anyways because they weren't
interested in successful overloads) or defer until after further checks
take place much like the check required for PR9323 to avoid marking
unused copy constructors.
llvm-svn: 126503
declarations as referenced when in fact we're not going to even form
a call in the AST. This is significant because we attempt to allow as an
extension classes with intentionally private and undefined copy
constructors to have temporaries bound to references, and so shouldn't
warn about the lack of definition for that copy constructor when the
class is internal.
Doug, John wasn't really satisfied with the presence of overloading at
all. This is a stop-gap and there may be a better solution. If you can
give me some hints for how you'd prefer to see this solved, I'll happily
switch things over.
llvm-svn: 126480
UnresolvedUsingValueDecl to use NestedNameSpecifierLoc rather than the
extremely-lossy NestedNameSpecifier/SourceRange pair it used to use,
improving source-location information.
Various infrastructure updates to support NestedNameSpecifierLoc:
- AST/PCH (de-)serialization
- Recursive AST visitor
- libclang traversal (including the first tests of this
functionality)
llvm-svn: 126459
nested-name-specifiers throughout the parser, and provide a new class
(NestedNameSpecifierLoc) that contains a nested-name-specifier along
with its type-source information.
Right now, this information is completely useless, because we don't
actually store the source-location information anywhere in the
AST. Call this Step 1/N.
llvm-svn: 126391
Add an interface for last resort, unqualified lookup. It can provide results for unqualified lookup when Sema fails to find anything itself.
llvm-svn: 126387
way it keeps track of namespaces. Previously, we would map from the
namespace alias to its underlying namespace when building a
nested-name-specifier, losing source information in the process.
llvm-svn: 126358
with another component in the nested-name-specifiers, updating its
representation (a NestedNameSpecifier) and source-location information
(currently a SourceRange) simultaneously. This is groundwork for
adding source-location information to nested-name-specifiers.
llvm-svn: 126346
expressions. Consider the code:
int64_t i = 10 << 30;
This compiles fine, but most developers expect it to produce the value
for 10 gigs, not -2 gigs. This is actually undefined behavior because
the LHS is a signed integer type.
The warning is currently gated behind -Wshift-overflow.
There is a special case where only the sign bit is overridden that gets
a custom error message and is by default ignored. This case is much less
likely to cause observed buggy behavior, it's just undefined behavior
according to the spec. This warning can be enabled with
-Wshift-sign-overflow.
Original patch by Oleg Slezberg, with style tweaks and some correctness
fixes by me.
llvm-svn: 126342
-Introduce EndOfFunctionNodeBuilder::withCheckerTag to allow it be "specialized" with a
checker tag and not require the checkers to pass a tag.
-For EndOfFunctionNodeBuilder::generateNode, reverse the order of tag/P parameters since
there are actual calls that assume the second parameter is ExplodedNode.
llvm-svn: 126332
several ways. We now warn for more of the return types, and correctly
locate the ignored ones. Also adds fix-it hints to remove the ignored
qualifiers. Fixes much of PR9058, although not all of it.
Patch by Hans Wennborg, a couple of minor style tweaks from me.
llvm-svn: 126321
diagnostics that occur in unreachable code (e.g., -Warray-bound).
We only pay the cost of doing the reachability analysis when we issue one of these diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 126290
Chris Lattner