Commit Graph

82 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Roman Lebedev 3dd5a298bf
[clang] Annotating C++'s `operator new` with more attributes
Summary:
Right now we annotate C++'s `operator new` with `noalias` attribute,
which very much is healthy for optimizations.

However as per [[ http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.stc.dynamic.allocation | `[basic.stc.dynamic.allocation]` ]],
there are more promises on global `operator new`, namely:
* non-`std::nothrow_t` `operator new` *never* returns `nullptr`
* If `std::align_val_t align` parameter is taken, the pointer will also be `align`-aligned
* ~~global `operator new`-returned pointer is `__STDCPP_DEFAULT_NEW_ALIGNMENT__`-aligned ~~ It's more caveated than that.

Supplying this information may not cause immediate landslide effects
on any specific benchmarks, but it for sure will be healthy for optimizer
in the sense that the IR will better reflect the guarantees provided in the source code.

The caveat is `-fno-assume-sane-operator-new`, which currently prevents emitting `noalias`
attribute, and is automatically passed by Sanitizers ([[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16386 | PR16386 ]]) - should it also cover these attributes?
The problem is that the flag is back-end-specific, as seen in `test/Modules/explicit-build-flags.cpp`.
But while it is okay to add `noalias` metadata in backend, we really should be adding at least
the alignment metadata to the AST, since that allows us to perform sema checks on it.

Reviewers: erichkeane, rjmccall, jdoerfert, eugenis, rsmith

Reviewed By: rsmith

Subscribers: xbolva00, jrtc27, atanasyan, nlopes, cfe-commits

Tags: #llvm, #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73380
2020-02-26 01:37:17 +03:00
Richard Smith b9fb121a62 [c++20] Implement P1009R2: allow omitting the array bound in an array
new expression.

This was voted into C++20 as a defect report resolution, so we
retroactively apply it to all prior language modes (though it can never
actually be used before C++11 mode).

llvm-svn: 360006
2019-05-06 03:47:15 +00:00
Tim Northover 36bb6d5d46 Switch to gnu++14 as the default dialect.
This is C++14 with conforming GNU extensions.

llvm-svn: 320250
2017-12-09 12:09:54 +00:00
Charles Li 9ea0817c5a [Test] Make Lit tests C++11 compatible #9
[Test] Make Lit tests C++11 compatible #9

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20710

llvm-svn: 296184
2017-02-24 22:22:05 +00:00
Nick Lewycky 2eeddfb1ef Warn when a reference is bound to an empty l-value (dereferenced null pointer).
llvm-svn: 269572
2016-05-14 17:44:14 +00:00
Nico Weber c60aa71aa2 For variables with dependent type, don't crash on `var->::new` or `var->__super`
ParsePostfixExpressionSuffix() for '->' (or '.') postfixes first calls
ActOnStartCXXMemberReference() to inform sema that a member reference is about
to start, and that function lets the parser know if sema thinks that the
base expression's type could allow a pseudo destructor from a semantic point of
view (for example, if the the base expression has a dependent type).

ParsePostfixExpressionSuffix() then calls ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpecifier() and
passes MayBePseudoDestructor on to that function, expecting the function to
set it to false if a pseudo destructor is impossible from a syntactic point of
view (due to a lack of '~' sigil).  However, ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpecifier()
had early-outs for ::new and __super, so MayBePseudoDestructor stayed true,
so we tried to parse a pseudo dtor, and then became confused since we couldn't
find a '~'.  Move the snippet in ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpecifier() that sets
MayBePseudoDestructor to false above the early exits.

Parts of this found by SLi's bot.

llvm-svn: 229449
2015-02-16 22:32:46 +00:00
Nick Lewycky 6fb99b90bc Fix crash declaring global allocation function with zero parameters. Fixes PR19968!
llvm-svn: 210388
2014-06-07 00:43:57 +00:00
Richard Smith f600441a04 PR18544: don't assert that 'operator new' is not declared inside a namespace;
such an assert will fail in invalid code that does so!

llvm-svn: 199617
2014-01-19 23:25:37 +00:00
Richard Smith 2c6b449098 Issue a warning if a throwing operator new or operator new[] returns a null
pointer, since this invokes undefined behavior. Based on a patch by Artyom
Skrobov! Handling of dependent exception specifications and some additional
testcases by me.

llvm-svn: 199452
2014-01-17 02:09:33 +00:00
Richard Smith fa27bc4c7b If a replaceable global operator new/delete is marked inline, don't warn if
it's also __attribute__((used)), since that undoes the problematic part of
'inline'.

llvm-svn: 194916
2013-11-16 01:57:09 +00:00
Richard Smith 13dfdc88a9 Downgrade the Error on an 'inline' operator new or delete to an ExtWarn. Some
projects are relying on such (questionable) practices, so we should give them
a way to opt out of this diagnostic.

llvm-svn: 194905
2013-11-16 00:47:38 +00:00
David Majnemer e29296e48c Be more precise when diagnosing 'inline' on global replacement functions
llvm-svn: 193061
2013-10-21 00:22:03 +00:00
David Majnemer ad51f1bc70 Sema: Diagnose global replacement functions declared as inline
This fixes PR17591.

N.B. This actually goes beyond what the standard mandates by requiring
the restriction to hold for declarations instead of definitions.  This
is believed to be a defect in the standard and an LWG issue has been
submitted.

llvm-svn: 193044
2013-10-20 05:40:29 +00:00
Richard Smith f24e6e747b Fix some confusing diagnostic wording. s/implicit default/implicit/ if we're
not actually talking about a default constructor.

llvm-svn: 183885
2013-06-13 03:34:55 +00:00
Richard Smith ccc1181105 Refactor places which perform contextual implicit conversions to go through a
common function. The C++1y contextual implicit conversion rules themselves are
not yet implemented, however.

This also fixes a subtle bug where template instantiation context notes were
dropped for diagnostics coming from conversions for integral constant
expressions -- we were implicitly slicing a SemaDiagnosticBuilder into a
DiagnosticBuilder when producing these diagnostics, and losing their context
notes in the process.

llvm-svn: 182406
2013-05-21 19:05:48 +00:00
Eli Friedman 89a4a2cd3d Add missing check for error return from DefaultLvalueConversion. Fixes <rdar://problem/12857416>.
llvm-svn: 170056
2012-12-13 00:37:17 +00:00
Richard Smith 7bdcc4a9da Disambiguation of '[[':
* In C++11, '[[' is ill-formed unless it starts an attribute-specifier. Reject
   array sizes and array indexes which begin with a lambda-expression. Recover by
   parsing the lambda as a lambda.
 * In Objective-C++11, either '[' could be the start of a message-send.
   Fully disambiguate this case: it turns out that the grammars of message-sends,
   lambdas and attributes do not actually overlap. Accept any occurrence of '[['
   where either '[' starts a message send, but reject a lambda in an array index
   just like in C++11 mode.

Implement a couple of changes to the attribute wording which occurred after our
attributes implementation landed:
 * In a function-declaration, the attributes go after the exception specification,
   not after the right paren.
 * A reference type can have attributes applied.
 * An 'identifier' in an attribute can also be a keyword. Support for alternative
   tokens (iso646 keywords) in attributes to follow.

And some bug fixes:
 * Parse attributes after declarator-ids, even if they are not simple identifiers.
 * Do not accept attributes after a parenthesized declarator.
 * Accept attributes after an array size in a new-type-id.
 * Partially disamiguate 'delete' followed by a lambda. More work is required
   here for the case where the lambda-introducer is '[]'.

llvm-svn: 154369
2012-04-10 01:32:12 +00:00
Richard Smith c5b0552055 Fix parsing of type-specifier-seq's. Types are syntactically allowed to be
defined here, but not semantically, so

  new struct S {};

is always ill-formed, even if there is a struct S in scope.

We also had a couple of bugs in ParseOptionalTypeSpecifier caused by it being
under-loved (due to it only being used in a few places) so merge it into
ParseDeclarationSpecifiers with a new DeclSpecContext. To avoid regressing, this
required improving ParseDeclarationSpecifiers' diagnostics in some cases. This
also required teaching ParseSpecifierQualifierList about constexpr... which
incidentally fixes an issue where we'd allow the constexpr specifier in other
bad places.

llvm-svn: 152549
2012-03-12 07:56:15 +00:00
Sebastian Redl e7c31a9a22 Throw away stray CXXDefaultArgExprs. Fixes PR12061.
I think there's a deeper problem here in the way TransformCXXConstructExpr works, but I won't tackle it now.

llvm-svn: 151146
2012-02-22 09:07:21 +00:00
Sebastian Redl eb54f08aee Don't allow non-empty ParenListExprs as array-new initializers.
Don't know what I was thinking there. Fixes PR12023.

llvm-svn: 150804
2012-02-17 08:42:32 +00:00
Sebastian Redl 6047f07e81 Revert "Revert "Make CXXNewExpr contain only a single initialier, and not hold the used constructor itself.""
This reintroduces commit r150682 with a fix for the Bullet benchmark crash.

llvm-svn: 150685
2012-02-16 12:22:20 +00:00
Richard Smith f4c51d9d76 In C++11 mode, when an integral constant expression is desired and we have a
value of class type, look for a unique conversion operator converting to
integral or unscoped enumeration type and use that. Implements [expr.const]p5.

Sema::VerifyIntegerConstantExpression now performs the conversion and returns
the converted result. Some important callers of Expr::isIntegralConstantExpr
have been switched over to using it (including all of those required for C++11
conformance); this switch brings a side-benefit of improved diagnostics and, in
several cases, simpler code. However, some language extensions and attributes
have not been moved across and will not perform implicit conversions on
constant expressions of literal class type where an ICE is required.

In passing, fix static_assert to perform a contextual conversion to bool on its
argument.

llvm-svn: 149776
2012-02-04 09:53:13 +00:00
Richard Smith 8dd3425077 Don't allow a value of a scoped enumeration to be used as the first bound for an
array new expression. This lays some groundwork for the implicit conversion to
integral or unscoped enumeration which C++11 ICEs undergo.

llvm-svn: 149772
2012-02-04 07:07:42 +00:00
Richard Smith bcc9bcb65f Fix a rejects-valid in C++11: array new of a negative size, or overflowing array
new, is well-formed with defined semantics of throwing (a type which can be
caught by a handler for) std::bad_array_new_length, unlike in C++98 where it is
somewhere nebulous between undefined behavior and ill-formed.

If the array size is an integral constant expression and satisfies one of these
criteria, we would previous the array new expression, but now in C++11 mode, we
merely issue a warning (the code is still rejected in C++98 mode, naturally).

We don't yet implement new C++11 semantics correctly (see PR11644), but we do
implement the overflow checking, and (for the default operator new) convert such
expressions to an exception, so accepting such code now does not seem especially
unsafe.

llvm-svn: 149767
2012-02-04 05:35:53 +00:00
Eli Friedman 1b71a22b28 Re-fix r136172 so it isn't an error; apparently, some people are fond of their undefined behavior.
llvm-svn: 136183
2011-07-26 23:27:24 +00:00
Eli Friedman 1260f59f5e Diagnose trying to delete a pointer to an abstract class with a non-virtual destructor. PR10504.
I'm not completely sure the standard allows us to reject this, but if it doesn't, it should. :)

llvm-svn: 136172
2011-07-26 22:50:18 +00:00
Eli Friedman ae4280f721 A couple minor issues with Sema for delete:
1. Attempting to delete an expression of incomplete class type should be an error, not a warning.

2. If someone tries to delete a pointer to an incomplete class type, make sure we actually emit
the delete expression after we warn.

llvm-svn: 136161
2011-07-26 22:25:31 +00:00
John McCall 928a25714e Enforce access control for the destructor in a new[] expression and mark
it as used.  Otherwise, we can fail to instantiate or validate the destructor,
which can lead to crashes in IR gen like PR10351.

llvm-svn: 135073
2011-07-13 20:12:57 +00:00
Douglas Gregor fa7781384e Implement access checking for the "delete" operator. Fixes PR9050,
from Alex Miller!

llvm-svn: 124663
2011-02-01 15:50:11 +00:00
Nick Lewycky 07e97c594d Make this error less specific but also less likely to cause confusion. Fixes
PR7702.

llvm-svn: 118181
2010-11-03 17:52:57 +00:00
John McCall d3be2c83d5 The paired 'operator delete' for a placement 'operator new' is always a
placement 'operator delete', even if there are no placement args (i.e.
overload resolution selected an operator new with default arguments).

llvm-svn: 113861
2010-09-14 21:34:24 +00:00
Chris Lattner 53fa04909c make clang print types as "const int *" instead of "int const*",
which is should have done from the beginning.  As usual, the most
fun with this sort of change is updating all the testcases.

llvm-svn: 113090
2010-09-05 00:04:01 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 7bddb3cac3 Improve wording of diagnostic complaining about a non-void* pointer as the first parameter of operator delete
llvm-svn: 112298
2010-08-27 21:39:15 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 9b41823177 Fix a crash on template delete operators.
llvm-svn: 110542
2010-08-08 07:04:00 +00:00
Sebastian Redl e0351b970d Remove a redundant and broken check. Fixes PR7810.
llvm-svn: 110294
2010-08-05 00:45:34 +00:00
Douglas Gregor f65f490ae9 When deleting a value of class type, make sure that type is complete
before looking for conversions to pointer type. Fixes <rdar://problem/8248780>.

llvm-svn: 109749
2010-07-29 14:44:35 +00:00
Douglas Gregor f2753b3b4e Downgrade the "when type is in parentheses, array cannot have dynamic
size" error for code like 

  new (int [size])

to a warning, add a Fix-It to remove the parentheses, and make this
diagnostic work properly when it occurs in a template
instantiation. <rdar://problem/8018245>.

llvm-svn: 108242
2010-07-13 15:54:32 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 4799d03ce8 Implement C++ DR299, which allows an implicit conversion from a class
type to an integral or enumeration type in the size of an array new
expression, e.g.,

  new int[ConvertibleToInt(10)];

This is a GNU and C++0x extension.

llvm-svn: 107229
2010-06-30 00:20:43 +00:00
Chandler Carruth b6f991787b Suppress diagnosing access violations while looking up deallocation functions
much as we already do for allocation function lookup. Explicitly check access
for the function we actually select in one case that was previously missing,
but being caught behind the blanket diagnostics for all overload candidates.
This fixs PR7436.

llvm-svn: 106986
2010-06-28 00:30:51 +00:00
Douglas Gregor bb3348ed33 Downgrade deletion of a void* from an error (which is should be) to an
extension warning (which other compilers seem to use). Works around a
known bug in Xalan.

llvm-svn: 104509
2010-05-24 17:01:56 +00:00
Anders Carlsson e6ae81b0a2 Correctly diagnose array 'new' with initialization arguments when the new type is a typedef to an array type.
llvm-svn: 103909
2010-05-16 16:24:20 +00:00
Douglas Gregor cda95f47e5 When the type-id or new-type-id of a C++ "new" expression is a typedef
of an array type, use the outermost array bound as the number of
elements to allocate. Fixes PR7147.

llvm-svn: 103908
2010-05-16 16:01:03 +00:00
Anders Carlsson c6bb0e117f The array form of 'new' can never have initializers.
llvm-svn: 102917
2010-05-03 15:45:23 +00:00
John McCall 3155f573f5 Turn access control on by default in -cc1.
Remove -faccess-control from -cc1; add -fno-access-control.
Make the driver pass -fno-access-control by default.
Update a bunch of tests to be correct under access control.

llvm-svn: 100880
2010-04-09 19:03:51 +00:00
John McCall 85f9055955 When pretty-printing tag types, only print the tag if we're in C (and
therefore not creating ElaboratedTypes, which are still pretty-printed
with the written tag).

Most of these testcase changes were done by script, so don't feel too
sorry for my fingers.

llvm-svn: 98149
2010-03-10 11:27:22 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 71ad477ab3 Do not try to instantiate invalid declarations. It's a recipe for
disaster. Fixes PR6161.

llvm-svn: 96371
2010-02-16 19:28:15 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 75cc359fdc Ensure that a operator delete overload is rocognized regardless of cv-quals.
llvm-svn: 95553
2010-02-08 18:54:05 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 935384217d Teach the allocation function overload handling to deal with templates, and
prevent a crash on templates when looking for an existing declaration of the
predefined global operators. This fixes PR5918.

Added an easy test case for the overload handling, but testing the crash is
a bit trickier. Created a new test that can use multiple runs with a define to
trigger which test case is used so we can test this type of issue.

llvm-svn: 95220
2010-02-03 11:02:14 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 8e01dcf6f6 Fix the EntityKind order so that all entity kinds that can be copied (using copy constructors) come first. Also, fix a bug where EK_New was left out of the err_init_conversion_failed diagnostic (It is now reported as 'new value'). Please review Doug :)
llvm-svn: 94289
2010-01-23 05:47:27 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 684d7bdc43 Allow the first parameter of operator new to be a cv-qualified
size_t. Also, fix an issue with initialization of parameters in calls,
where we weren't removing the cv-qualifiers on the parameter type
itself. Fixes PR5823.

llvm-svn: 91941
2009-12-22 23:42:49 +00:00