In the near future llvm-mc will resolve the fixups that generate
R_ARM_THUMB_PC8 and R_ARM_THUMB_PC12 at assembly time (see comments in
D72892), and forbid inter-section references. Change the LLD tests for
these relocations to use .inst and .reloc to avoid LLD tests failing when
this happens. The tests generate the same instructions, relocations
and symbols.
I will need to make equivalent changes for D75349 Arm equivalent
relocations, but this is still in review so these don't need changing
before llvm-mc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77200
Summary: I think it would be better to require the alignment to be >= 1. It is currently confusing to allow both values.
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77372
This pass replaces each indirect call/jump with a direct call to a thunk that looks like:
lfence
jmpq *%r11
This ensures that if the value in register %r11 was loaded from memory, then
the value in %r11 is (architecturally) correct prior to the jump.
Also adds a new target feature to X86: +lvi-cfi
("cfi" meaning control-flow integrity)
The feature can be added via clang CLI using -mlvi-cfi.
This is an alternate implementation to https://reviews.llvm.org/D75934 That merges the thunk insertion functionality with the existing X86 retpoline code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76812
The old name was a bit misleading because the functions actually return
contributions to the corresponding sections.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77302
Summary:
This patch adds parsing and dumping DWARFv5 .debug_macro section in llvm-dwarfdump,
it does not introduce any new switch. Existing switch "--debug-macro"
should be used to dump macinfo or macro section.
Reviewed By: dblaikie, ikudrin, jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73086
isGCValue should detect whether the deopt value is a GC pointer.
Currently it checks by finding the value in SI.Bases and SI.Ptrs.
However these data structures contain only those values which
have corresponding gc.relocate call. So we can miss GC value if it
does not have gc.relocate call (dead after the call).
Check GC strategy whether pointer is GC one or consider any pointer
to be GC one conservatively.
Reviewers: reames, dantrushin
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77130
D49116 was using clang-format-diff because at the time of its writing,
it needed to handle the subversion repo as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77363
Summary:
Add mapping from exp2 math functions
to corresponding SVML calls.
This is a follow up and extension for llvm diff
https://reviews.llvm.org/D19544
Test Plan:
- update test case and run ninja check.
- run tests locally
Reviewers: wenlei, hoyFB, mmasten, mzolotukhin, spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77114
Summary:
A recent change in the instruction simplifier enables a call to a function that just returns one of its parameter to be simplified as simply loading the parameter. This exposes a bug in the inliner where double inlining may be involved which in turn may cause compiler ICE when an already-inlined callsite is reused for further inlining.
To put it simply, in the following-like C program, when the function call second(t) is inlined, its code t = third(t) will be reduced to just loading the return value of the callsite first(). This causes the inliner internal data structure to register the first() callsite for the call edge representing the third() call, therefore incurs a double inlining when both call edges are considered an inline candidate. I'm making a fix to break the inliner from reusing a callsite for new call edges.
```
void top()
{
int t = first();
second(t);
}
void second(int t)
{
t = third(t);
fourth(t);
}
void third(int t)
{
return t;
}
```
The actual failing case is much trickier than the example here and is only reproducible with the legacy inliner. The way the legacy inliner works is to process each SCC in a bottom-up order. That means in reality function first may be already inlined into top, or function third is either inlined to second or is folded into nothing. To repro the failure seen from building a large application, we need to figure out a way to confuse the inliner so that the bottom-up inlining is not fulfilled. I'm doing this by making the second call indirect so that the alias analyzer fails to figure out the right call graph edge from top to second and top can be processed before second during the bottom-up. We also need to tweak the test code so that when the inlining of top happens, the function body of second is not that optimized, by delaying the pass of function attribute deducer (i.e, which tells function third has no side effect and just returns its parameter). Since the CGSCC pass is iterative, additional calls are added to top to postpone the inlining of second to the second round right after the first function attribute deducing pass is done. I haven't been able to repro the failure with the new pass manager since the processing order of ininlined callsites is a bit different, but in theory the issue could happen there too.
Note that this fix could introduce a side effect that blocks the simplification of inlined code, specifically for a call site that can be folded to another call site. I hope this can probably be complemented by subsequent inlining or folding, as shown in the attached unit test. The ideal fix should be to separate the use of VMap. However, in reality this failing pattern shouldn't happen often. And even if it happens, there should be a good chance that the non-folded call site will be refolded by iterative inlining or subsequent simplification.
Reviewers: wenlei, davidxl, tejohnson
Reviewed By: wenlei, davidxl
Subscribers: eraman, nikic, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76248
Summary:
This patch comes from H.J.'s 2bd54ce7fa
**This patch fix the failed llvm unit tests which running on CET machine. **(e.g. ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/MCJITTests)
The reason we enable IBT at "JIT compiled with CET" is mainly that: the JIT don't know the its caller program is CET enable or not.
If JIT's caller program is non-CET, it is no problem JIT generate CET code or not.
But if JIT's caller program is CET enabled, JIT must generate CET code or it will cause Control protection exceptions.
I have test the patch at llvm-unit-test and llvm-test-suite at CET machine. It passed.
and H.J. also test it at building and running VNCserver(Virtual Network Console), it works too.
(if not apply this patch, VNCserver will crash at CET machine.)
Reviewers: hjl.tools, craig.topper, LuoYuanke, annita.zhang, pengfei
Subscribers: tstellar, efriedma, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76900
This was causing a machine verifier failure on the test suite.
Make sure that we don't end up with a weird register class here.
Failure for reference:
*** Bad machine code: Illegal virtual register for instruction ***
- function: check_constrain
- basic block: %bb.1 (0x7f8b70839f80)
- instruction: early-clobber %6:gpr64, early-clobber %7:gpr64sp =
JumpTableDest32 %5:gpr64, %1:gpr64sp, %jump-table.0
- operand 3: %1:gpr64sp
Expected a GPR64 register, but got a GPR64sp register
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77349
MI peephole will remove unnecessary FRSP instructions. This patch
removes such unnecessary XSRSP.
Reviewed By: steven.zhang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77208
Summary:
In the case of a coroutine that takes no arguments,
`Sema::buildCoroutinePromise` constructs a list-initialization
(`clang::InitializationKind::InitKind::IK_DirectList`) of the
promise variable, using a list of empty arguments. So, if one were to
dump the promise `VarDecl` immediately after `Sema::ActOnCoroutineBodyStart`
calls `checkCoroutineContext`, for a coroutine function that takes no
arguments, they'd see the following:
```
VarDecl 0xb514490 <test.cpp:26:3> col:3 __promise '<dependent type>' callinit
`-ParenListExpr 0xb514510 <col:3> 'NULL TYPE'
```
But after this patch, the `ParenListExpr` is no longer constructed, and
the promise variable uses default initialization
(`clang::InitializationKind::InitKind::IK_Default`):
```
VarDecl 0x63100012dae0 <test.cpp:26:3> col:3 __promise '<dependent type>'
```
As far as I know, there's no case in which list-initialization with no
arguments differs from default initialization, but if I'm wrong please
let me know (and I'll add a test case that demonstrates the change --
but as-is I can't think of a functional test case for this). I think both
comply with the wording of C++20 `[dcl.fct.def.coroutine]p5`:
> _promise-constructor-arguments_ is determined as follows: overload
resolution is performed on a promise constructor call created by
assembling an argument list with lvalues `p1 ... pn`. If a viable
constructor is found (12.4.2), then _promise-constructor-arguments_
is `(p1, ... , pn)`, otherwise _promise-constructor-arguments_ is
empty.
Still, I think this patch is an improvement regardless, because it
reduces the size of the AST.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, rsmith, lewissbaker
Subscribers: EricWF, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70555
Two back-to-back transpose operations are combined into a single transpose, which uses a combination of their permutation vectors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77331
Summary: The IDE has no packets that are sent to lldb-vscode that say which thread and frame are selected. The only way we know is we get a request for variables for a stack frame via a "scopes" request. When we receive this packet we make that thread and frame the selected thread and frame in lldb. This way when people execute lldb commands in the debug console by prefixing the expression with the backtick character, we will have the right thread and frame selected. Previously this was not updated as new stack frames were selected.
Reviewers: labath, aadsm, wallace, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77347
A certain number of EDSCs have a named form (e.g. `linalg.matmul`) and a generic form (e.g. `linalg.generic` with matmul traits).
Despite living in different namespaces, using the same name is confusiong in clients.
Rename them as `linalg_matmul` and `linalg_generic_matmul` respectively.
Summary:
This fixes a few issues related to SMRD offsets. On gfx9 and gfx10 we have a
signed byte offset immediate, however we can overflow into a negative since we
treat it as unsigned.
Also, the SMRD SOFFSET sgpr is an unsigned offset on all subtargets. We
sometimes tried to use negative values here.
Third, S_BUFFER instructions should never use a signed offset immediate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77082
Summary:
This patch addresses, for the interfaces implemented by `COFFDump.cpp`,
multiple issues identified with the current structure of
`llvm-objdump.h` in the review of D72973.
This patch moves implementation details of the tool into an
`llvm::objdump` namespace for external linkage names, splits the
implementation details into separate headers for each implementation
file, and uses qualified names when declaring members of the
`llvm::objdump` namespace in place of leaving the namespace definition
open.
Reviewers: jhenderson, DiggerLin, jasonliu, daltenty, MaskRay
Reviewed By: jhenderson, MaskRay
Subscribers: MaskRay, rupprecht, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77285
On shutdown, the result complete handler is not racing with the main
thread anymore because we are now always waiting for process pool
termination via
```
finally:
pool.join()
```
Denis Khalikov