This prevents generating stm r1!, {r0, r1} on Thumb1, where value
stored for r1 is UNKONWN.
Patch by Zhaoshi Zheng.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27910
llvm-svn: 296538
Summary:
Currently, our post-dom tree tries to ignore and remove the effects of
infinite loops. It fails miserably at this, because it tries to do it
ahead of time, and thus can only detect self-loops, and any other type
of infinite loop, it pretends doesn't exist at all.
This can, in a bunch of cases, lead to wrong answers and a completely
empty post-dom tree.
Wrong answer:
```
declare void foo()
define internal void @f() {
entry:
br i1 undef, label %bb35, label %bb3.i
bb3.i:
call void @foo()
br label %bb3.i
bb35.loopexit3:
br label %bb35
bb35:
ret void
}
```
We get:
```
Inorder PostDominator Tree:
[1] <<exit node>> {0,7}
[2] %bb35 {1,6}
[3] %bb35.loopexit3 {2,3}
[3] %entry {4,5}
```
This is a trivial modification of the testcase for PR 6047
Note that we pretend bb3.i doesn't exist.
We also pretend that bb35 post-dominates entry.
While it's true that it does not exit in a theoretical sense, it's not
really helpful to try to ignore the effect and pretend that bb35
post-dominates entry. Worse, we pretend the infinite loop does
nothing (it's usually considered a side-effect), and doesn't even
exist, even when it calls a function. Sadly, this makes it impossible
to use when you are trying to move code safely. All compilers also
create virtual or real single exit nodes (including us), and connect
infinite loops there (which this patch does). In fact, others have
worked around our behavior here, to the point of building their own
post-dom trees:
https://zneak.github.io/fcd/2016/02/17/structuring.html and pointing
out the region infrastructure is near-useless for them with postdom in
this state :(
Completely empty post-dom tree:
```
define void @spam() #0 {
bb:
br label %bb1
bb1: ; preds = %bb1, %bb
br label %bb1
bb2: ; No predecessors!
ret void
}
```
Printing analysis 'Post-Dominator Tree Construction' for function 'foo':
=============================--------------------------------
Inorder PostDominator Tree:
[1] <<exit node>> {0,1}
:(
(note that even if you ignore the effects of infinite loops, bb2
should be present as an exit node that post-dominates nothing).
This patch changes post-dom to properly handle infinite loops and does
root finding during calculation to prevent empty tress in such cases.
We match gcc's (and the canonical theoretical) behavior for infinite
loops (find the backedge, connect it to the exit block).
Testcases coming as soon as i finish running this on a ton of random graphs :)
Reviewers: chandlerc, davide
Subscribers: bryant, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29705
llvm-svn: 296535
other tables. Providing a helpful error message to what the error is and
where the error occurred based on which opcode it was associated with.
There have been handful of bug fixes dealing with bad bind info in
object files, r294021 and r249845, which only put a band aid on the
problem after a bad bind table was created after unpacking from
its compact info. In these cases a bind table should have never been
created and an error should have simply been generated.
This change puts in place the plumbing to allow checking and returning
of an error when the compact info is unpacked. This follows the model
of iterators that can fail that Lang Hanes designed when fixing the problem
for bad archives r275316 (or r275361).
This change uses one of the existing test cases that now causes an
error instead of printing <<bad library ordinal>> after a bad bind table
is created. The error uses the offset into the opcode table as shown with
the macOS dyldinfo(1) tool to indicate where the error is and which
opcode and which parameter is in error.
For example the exiting test case has this lazy binding opcode table:
% dyldinfo -opcodes test/tools/llvm-objdump/Inputs/bad-ordinal.macho-x86_64
…
lazy binding opcodes:
0x0000 BIND_OPCODE_SET_SEGMENT_AND_OFFSET_ULEB(0x02, 0x00000010)
0x0002 BIND_OPCODE_SET_DYLIB_ORDINAL_IMM(2)
In the test case the binary only has one library so setting the library
ordinal to the value of 2 in the BIND_OPCODE_SET_DYLIB_ORDINAL_IMM
opcode at 0x0002 above is an error. This now produces this error message:
% llvm-objdump -lazy-bind bad-ordinal.macho-x86_64
…
llvm-objdump: 'bad-ordinal.macho-x86_64': truncated or malformed object (for BIND_OPCODE_SET_DYLIB_ORDINAL_ULEB bad library ordinal: 2 (max 1) for opcode at: 0x2)
This change provides the plumbing for the error handling and one example
of an error message. Other error checks and test cases will be added in follow
on commits.
llvm-svn: 296527
Requesting DWARF v5 will now get you the new compile-unit and
type-unit headers. llvm-dwarfdump will also recognize them.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D30206
llvm-svn: 296514
It's not clear to me if this is always better than
doing ds_write2_b64 This adds the constraint of
a 128-bit register input instead of a pair of
64-bit.
llvm-svn: 296512
Summary: For SamplePGO, the profile may contain cross-module inline stacks. As we need to make sure the profile annotation happens when all the hot inline stacks are expanded, we need to pass this info to the module importer so that it can import proper functions if necessary. This patch implemented this feature by emitting cross-module targets as part of function entry metadata. In the module-summary phase, the metadata is used to build call edges that points to functions need to be imported.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30053
llvm-svn: 296498
The LLVM backend cannot produce any debug info for an llvm::Function
without a DISubprogram attachment. When inlining a debug-info-carrying
function into a nodebug function, there is therefore no reason to keep
any debug info intrinsic calls or debug locations on the instructions.
This fixes a problem discovered in PR32042.
rdar://problem/30679307
llvm-svn: 296488
This recovers a test case that was severely broken by r296476, my making sure we don't create ADD/ADC that loads and stores when there is also a flag dependency.
llvm-svn: 296486
Stack Smash Protection is not completely free, so in hot code, the overhead it causes can cause performance issues. By adding diagnostic information for which functions have SSP and why, a user can quickly determine what they can do to stop SSP being applied to a specific hot function.
This change adds a remark that is reported by the stack protection code when an instruction or attribute is encountered that causes SSP to be applied.
Patch by: James Henderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29023
llvm-svn: 296483
Recommiting after fixup of 32-bit aliasing sign offset bug in DAGCombiner.
* Simplify Consecutive Merge Store Candidate Search
Now that address aliasing is much less conservative, push through
simplified store merging search and chain alias analysis which only
checks for parallel stores through the chain subgraph. This is cleaner
as the separation of non-interfering loads/stores from the
store-merging logic.
When merging stores search up the chain through a single load, and
finds all possible stores by looking down from through a load and a
TokenFactor to all stores visited.
This improves the quality of the output SelectionDAG and the output
Codegen (save perhaps for some ARM cases where we correctly constructs
wider loads, but then promotes them to float operations which appear
but requires more expensive constant generation).
Some minor peephole optimizations to deal with improved SubDAG shapes (listed below)
Additional Minor Changes:
1. Finishes removing unused AliasLoad code
2. Unifies the chain aggregation in the merged stores across code
paths
3. Re-add the Store node to the worklist after calling
SimplifyDemandedBits.
4. Increase GatherAllAliasesMaxDepth from 6 to 18. That number is
arbitrary, but seems sufficient to not cause regressions in
tests.
5. Remove Chain dependencies of Memory operations on CopyfromReg
nodes as these are captured by data dependence
6. Forward loads-store values through tokenfactors containing
{CopyToReg,CopyFromReg} Values.
7. Peephole to convert buildvector of extract_vector_elt to
extract_subvector if possible (see
CodeGen/AArch64/store-merge.ll)
8. Store merging for the ARM target is restricted to 32-bit as
some in some contexts invalid 64-bit operations are being
generated. This can be removed once appropriate checks are
added.
This finishes the change Matt Arsenault started in r246307 and
jyknight's original patch.
Many tests required some changes as memory operations are now
reorderable, improving load-store forwarding. One test in
particular is worth noting:
CodeGen/PowerPC/ppc64-align-long-double.ll - Improved load-store
forwarding converts a load-store pair into a parallel store and
a memory-realized bitcast of the same value. However, because we
lose the sharing of the explicit and implicit store values we
must create another local store. A similar transformation
happens before SelectionDAG as well.
Reviewers: arsenm, hfinkel, tstellarAMD, jyknight, nhaehnle
llvm-svn: 296476
Lower i32, float and double parameters that need to live on the stack. This
boils down to creating some G_GEPs starting from the stack pointer and storing
the values there. During the process we also keep track of the stack size and
use the final value in the ADJCALLSTACKDOWN/UP instructions.
We currently assert for smaller types, since they usually require extensions.
They will be handled in a separate patch.
llvm-svn: 296473
Summary:
clang adds !srcloc metadata to inline assembly in LLVM bitcode generated
for inline assembly in C. The value of this !srcloc is passed to the
diagnostics handler if the inline assembly generates a diagnostic.
clang is able to turn this cookie back to a location in the C source
file.
To test this functionality without a dependency, make llc print the
!srcloc metadata if it is present. The added test uses this mechanism
to test that the correct !srclocs are passed to the diag handler.
Reviewers: rengolin, rnk, echristo, grosbach, mehdi_amini
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30167
llvm-svn: 296465
In Thumb2, instructions which write to the PC are UNPREDICTABLE if they are in
an IT block but not the last instruction in the block.
Previously, we only diagnosed this for LDM instructions, this patch extends the
diagnostic to cover all of the relevant instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30398
llvm-svn: 296459
Summary:
With this change ImplicitNullCheck optimization uses alias analysis
and can use load/store memory access for implicit null check if there
are other load/store before but memory accesses do not alias.
Patch by Serguei Katkov!
Reviewers: sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30331
llvm-svn: 296440
This is a patch for the outliner described in the RFC at:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-August/104170.html
The outliner is a code-size reduction pass which works by finding
repeated sequences of instructions in a program, and replacing them with
calls to functions. This is useful to people working in low-memory
environments, where sacrificing performance for space is acceptable.
This adds an interprocedural outliner directly before printing assembly.
For reference on how this would work, this patch also includes X86
target hooks and an X86 test.
The outliner is run like so:
clang -mno-red-zone -mllvm -enable-machine-outliner file.c
Patch by Jessica Paquette<jpaquette@apple.com>!
rdar://29166825
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26872
llvm-svn: 296418
Splitting critical edges when one of the source edges is an indirectbr
is hard in general (because it requires changing the memory the indirectbr
reads). But if a block only has a single indirectbr predecessor (which is
the common case), we can simulate splitting that edge by splitting
the destination block, and retargeting the *direct* branches.
This is motivated by the use of computed gotos in python 2.7: PyEval_EvalFrame()
ends up using an indirect branch with ~100 successors, and passing a constant to
each of those. Since MachineSink can't break indirect critical edges on demand
(and doing this in MIR doesn't look feasible), this causes us to emit about ~100
defs of registers containing constants, which we in the predecessor block, where
only one of those constants is used in each successor. So, at each computed goto,
we needlessly spill about a 100 constants to stack. The end result is that a
clang-compiled python interpreter can be about ~2.5x slower on a simple python
reduction loop than a gcc-compiled interpreter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29916
llvm-svn: 296416
The transform in question claims to be doing:
// fold (add (select cc, 0, c), x) -> (select cc, x, (add, x, c))
...starting in PerformADDCombineWithOperands(), but it wasn't actually checking for a setcc node
for the sext/zext patterns.
This is exactly the opposite of a transform I'd like to add to DAGCombiner's foldSelectOfConstants(),
so I was seeing infinite loops with my draft of a patch applied.
The changes in select_const.ll look positive (less instructions). The change in arm-and-tst-peephole.ll
is unrelated. We're changing the input IR in that test to preserve the intent of the test, but that's
not affected by this code change.
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D30355
llvm-svn: 296389
DAGCombiner already supports peeking thorough shuffles to improve vector element extraction, but legalization often leaves us in situations where we need to extract vector elements after shuffles have already been lowered.
This patch adds support for VECTOR_EXTRACT_ELEMENT/PEXTRW/PEXTRB instructions to attempt to handle target shuffles as well. I've covered some basic scenarios including handling shuffle mask scaling and the implicit zero-extension of PEXTRW/PEXTRB, there is more that could be done here (that I've mentioned in TODOs) but I haven't found many cases where its worth it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30176
llvm-svn: 296381
Daniel Berlin