This does *not* link with libLLVM, but with static archives instead. Not
super-great, but at least the build works, which is probably better than
failing.
Related to #57551
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134434
A simple sed doing these substitutions:
- `${LLVM_BINARY_DIR}/(\$\{CMAKE_CFG_INTDIR}/)?lib(${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX})?\>` -> `${LLVM_LIBRARY_DIR}`
- `${LLVM_BINARY_DIR}/(\$\{CMAKE_CFG_INTDIR}/)?bin\>` -> `${LLVM_TOOLS_BINARY_DIR}`
where `\>` means "word boundary".
The only manual modifications were reverting changes in
- `compiler-rt/cmake/Modules/CompilerRTUtils.cmake
- `runtimes/CMakeLists.txt`
because these were "entry points" where we wanted to tread carefully not not introduce a "loop" which would end with an undefined variable being expanded to nothing.
This hopefully increases readability overall, and also decreases the usages of `LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX`, preparing us for D130586.
Reviewed By: sebastian-ne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132316
The latest perf tool can return non-empty buffer when executing
buildid-list command, even when perf.data was recorded with -B flag.
Some binaries will be listed without the ID, while others may have a
recorded ID. Allow invalid entires on the input, while checking the
valid ones for the match.
Reviewed By: Amir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130223
When processing profile data for shared object or PIE, perf2bolt needs
to calculate base address of the binary based on the map info reported
by the perf tool. When the mapping data provided is for the second
(or any other than the first) segment and the segment's file offset
does not match its memory offset, perf2bolt uses wrong assumption
about the binary base address.
Add a function to calculate binary base address using the reported
memory mapping and use the returned base for further address
adjustments.
Reviewed By: yota9
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123755
Reassigning the operand didn't update the operand type which resulted in an
assertion (`Assertion `isReg() && "This is not a register operand!"' failed.`)
Reset the instruction instead.
Test Plan:
```
ninja check-bolt
...
PASS: BOLT-Unit :: Core/./CoreTests/X86/MCPlusBuilderTester.ReplaceRegWithImm/0 (90 of 136)
```
Reviewed By: rafauler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120263
Refactor createBinaryContext and RewriteInstance/MachORewriteInstance
constructors to report an error in a library and fuzzer-friendly way instead of
returning a nullptr or exiting.
Reviewed By: rafauler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119658
The aarch64 platform has special registers like X0_X1_X2_X3_X4_X5_X6_X7.
Using the downwards propagation this register will become a super
register for all X0..X7 and its super registers which is not right. This
patch replaces the downwards propagation with caching all the aliases using MCRegAliasIterator.
Vladislav Khmelevsky,
Advanced Software Technology Lab, Huawei
Reviewed By: maksfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117394
This patch adds unit testing support for BOLT. In order to do this we will need at least do this changes on the code level:
* Make createMCPlusBuilder accessible externally
* Remove positional InputFilename argument to bolt utlity sources
And prepare the cmake and lit for the new tests.
Vladislav Khmelevsky,
Advanced Software Technology Lab, Huawei
Reviewed By: maksfb, Amir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118271