Summary:
Adds a `TypenameMacros` configuration option that causes certain identifiers to be handled in a way similar to `typeof()`.
This is enough to:
- Prevent misinterpreting declarations of pointers to such types as expressions (`STACK_OF(int) * foo` -> `STACK_OF(int) *foo`),
- Avoid surprising line breaks in variable/struct field declarations (`STACK_OF(int)\nfoo;` -> `STACK_OF(int) foo;`, see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30353).
Reviewers: Typz, krasimir, djasper
Reviewed By: Typz
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57184
llvm-svn: 361986
As pointed out in https://reviews.llvm.org/D37813#inline-555026, the
code which is formatted does not match LLVM formatting style.
Technically this is not a problem since these tests bypass most of the
formatter, but it can be misleading.
llvm-svn: 361984
Summary:
The `before` and `after` selectors allow users to specify a zero-length range --
a point -- at the relevant location in an AST-node's source. Point ranges can
be useful, for example, to insert a change using an API that takes a range to be
modified (e.g. `tooling::change()`).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62419
llvm-svn: 361955
Summary:
ASTImporter makes now difference between classes with same name in different
translation units if these are not visible outside. These classes are not linked
into one decl chain.
Reviewers: martong, a.sidorin, shafik
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62312
llvm-svn: 361752
Summary:
Conceptually, a single-case RewriteRule has a matcher, edit(s) and an (optional)
explanation. `makeRule` previously only took the matcher and edit(s). This
change adds (optional) support for the explanation.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62390
llvm-svn: 361643
Add support for creating a `StencilPart` from any `RangeSelector`, which
broadens the scope of `Stencil`.
Correspondingly, deprecate Stencil's specialized combinators `node` and `sNode`
in favor of using the new `selection` combinator directly (with the appropriate
range selector).
Reviewers: sbenza
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62160
llvm-svn: 361413
Transformer provides an enum to indicate the range of source text to be edited.
That support is now redundant with the new (and more general) RangeSelector
library, so we remove the custom enum support in favor of supporting any
RangeSelector.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62149
llvm-svn: 361392
Fixes a redundant dependency and moves another to its proper place.
Reviewers: thakis
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62201
llvm-svn: 361285
To be more consistent with conventions used in the codebase. The new
name will be a better fit when more bits of the syntax library land.
llvm-svn: 361264
When a preamble is created an unsaved file not existing on disk is
already part of PrecompiledPreamble::FilesInPreamble. However, when
checking whether the preamble can be re-used, a failed stat of such an
unsaved file invalidated the preamble, which led to pointless and time
consuming preamble regenerations on subsequent reparses.
Do not require anymore that unsaved files should exist on disk.
This avoids costly preamble invalidations depending on timing issues for
the cases where the file on disk might be removed just to be regenerated
a bit later.
It also allows an IDE to provide in-memory files that might not exist on
disk, e.g. because the build system hasn't generated those yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41005
llvm-svn: 361226
Summary:
`std::apply` in C++14 and above is defined with two unrestricted arguments, and
it wins overload resolution in this case.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits, ymandel
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62150
llvm-svn: 361170
Summary:
The RangeSelector library defines a combinator language for specifying source
ranges based on bound ids for AST nodes. The combinator approach follows the
design of the AST matchers. The RangeSelectors defined here will be used in
both RewriteRule, for specifying source affected by edit, and in Stencil for
specifying source to use constructively in a replacement.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61774
llvm-svn: 361152
Summary:
TokenBuffer stores the list of tokens for a file obtained after
preprocessing. This is a base building block for syntax trees,
see [1] for the full proposal on syntax trees.
This commits also starts a new sub-library of ClangTooling, which
would be the home for the syntax trees and syntax-tree-based refactoring
utilities.
[1]: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-February/061414.html
Reviewers: gribozavr, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgrang, riccibruno, Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59887
llvm-svn: 361148
Since D57922, the config table contains every checker option, and it's default
value, so having it as an argument for getChecker*Option is redundant.
By the time any of the getChecker*Option function is called, we verified the
value in CheckerRegistry (after D57860), so we can confidently assert here, as
any irregularities detected at this point must be a programmer error. However,
in compatibility mode, verification won't happen, so the default value must be
restored.
This implies something else, other than adding removing one more potential point
of failure -- debug.ConfigDumper will always contain valid values for
checker/package options!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59195
llvm-svn: 361042
This revision updates `RewriteRule` to support multiple subrules that are
interpreted as an ordered-choice (apply the first one that matches). With this
feature, users can write the rules that appear later in the list of subrules
knowing that previous rules' patterns *have not matched*, freeing them from
reasoning about those cases in the current pattern.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61335
llvm-svn: 361037
Summary:
Make it usable outside of ASTMatchFinder. This will make it possible to
use this enum to control whether certain implicit nodes are skipped
while AST dumping for example.
Reviewers: klimek, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61836
llvm-svn: 360920
Summary:
This is the final phase of the refactoring towards using llvm::Expected
and llvm::Error in the ASTImporter API.
This involves the following:
- remove old Import functions which returned with a pointer,
- use the Import_New functions (which return with Err or Expected) everywhere
and handle their return value
- rename Import_New functions to Import
This affects both Clang and LLDB.
Reviewers: shafik, teemperor, aprantl, a_sidorin, balazske, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits, lldb-commits
Tags: #clang, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61438
llvm-svn: 360760
Summary:
Top-level "package" and "import" statements should generally be kept on
one line, for all languages.
----
This reverts commit rL356912.
The regression from rL356835 was fixed via rC358275.
Reviewers: krasimir, sammccall, MyDeveloperDay, xinz, dchai, klimek
Reviewed By: krasimir, xinz, dchai
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60661
llvm-svn: 360411
Summary: We treat them as headers, as the motivating case is C++ standard library.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61633
llvm-svn: 360153
This caused Clang to start erroring on the following:
struct S {
template <typename = int> explicit S();
};
struct T : S {};
struct U : T {
U();
};
U::U() {}
$ clang -c /tmp/x.cc
/tmp/x.cc:10:4: error: call to implicitly-deleted default constructor of 'T'
U::U() {}
^
/tmp/x.cc:5:12: note: default constructor of 'T' is implicitly deleted
because base class 'S' has no default constructor
struct T : S {};
^
1 error generated.
See discussion on the cfe-commits email thread.
This also reverts the follow-ups r359966 and r359968.
> this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
>
> Changes:
> - The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
> - The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
> - Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
> - Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
> - The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
> - Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
>
> This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
> Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
>
> Patch by Tyker
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 360024
this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
Changes:
- The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
- The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
- Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
- Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
- The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
- Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
Patch by Tyker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 359949
r359574 changed the way that failures are reported, which broke the test TransformerTest.NodePartNameDeclRefFailure which detects a faiure.
llvm-svn: 359578
Summary:
Changes the signature of the TextGenerator std::function to return an Expected<std::string>
instead of std::string to allow for (non-fatal) failures. Previously, we
expected that any failures would be expressed with assertions. However, that's
unfriendly to running the code in servers or other places that don't want their
library calls to crash the program.
Correspondingly, updates Transformer's handling of failures in TextGenerators
and the signature of `ChangeConsumer`.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61015
llvm-svn: 359574
Currently we always inline functions that have no branches, i.e. have exactly
three CFG blocks: ENTRY, some code, EXIT. This makes sense because when there
are no branches, it means that there's no exponential complexity introduced
by inlining such function. Such functions also don't trigger various fundamental
problems with our inlining mechanism, such as the problem of inlined
defensive checks.
Sometimes the CFG may contain more blocks, but in practice it still has
linear structure because all directions (except, at most, one) of all branches
turned out to be unreachable. When this happens, still treat the function
as "small". This is useful, in particular, for dealing with C++17 if constexpr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61051
llvm-svn: 359531
Summary:
We are currently implementing support in LLDB that reconstructs the STL templates from
the target program in the expression evaluator. This reconstruction happens during the
import process from our debug info AST into the expression evaluation AST, which means
we need a way to intercept the ASTImporter import process.
This patch adds an protected ImportImpl method that we can overwrite in LLDB to implement
our special importing logic (which is essentially just looking into a C++ module that is attached to
the target context). Because ImportImpl has to call MapImported/AddToLookup for the decls it
creates, this patch also exposes those via a new unified method and checks that we call it when
importing decls.
Reviewers: martong, balazske, a.sidorin, shafik, a_sidorin
Reviewed By: martong, a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, cfe-commits, lldb-commits, aprantl
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59485
llvm-svn: 359502
When more than one multilib flag matches, try to select the best
possible match based on priority. When two different multilibs with
the same same priority match, we still throw an error matching the
existing behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60990
llvm-svn: 359359
Francois Ferrand