This should fix:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30433
There are a couple of open questions about the codegen:
1. Should we let scalar ops be scalars and avoid vector constant loads/splats?
2. Should we have a pass to combine constants such as the inverted pair that we have here?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25165
llvm-svn: 283119
I don't know for sure that we truly needs this, but its the only vector load that isn't rematerializable. Making it consistent allows it to not be a special case in the td files.
llvm-svn: 283083
To allow broadcast loads of a non-zero'th vector element, lowerVectorShuffleAsBroadcast can replace a load with a new load with an adjusted address, but unfortunately we weren't ensuring that the new load respected the same dependencies.
This patch adds a TokenFactor and updates all dependencies of the old load to reference the new load instead.
Bug found during internal testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25039
llvm-svn: 283070
Now we can commute to BLENDPD/BLENDPS on SSE41+ targets if necessary, so simplify the combine matching where we can.
This required me to add a couple of scalar math movsd/moss fold patterns that hadn't been needed in the past.
llvm-svn: 283038
Instead of selecting between MOVSD/MOVSS and BLENDPD/BLENDPS at shuffle lowering by subtarget this will help us select the instruction based on actual commutation requirements.
We could possibly add BLENDPD/BLENDPS -> MOVSD/MOVSS commutation and MOVSD/MOVSS memory folding using a similar approach if it proves useful
I avoided adding AVX512 handling as I'm not sure when we should be making use of VBLENDPD/VBLENDPS on EVEX targets
llvm-svn: 283037
-Remove OptForSize. Not all of the backend follows the same rules for creating broadcasts and there is no conflicting pattern.
-Don't stop selecting VEX VMOVDDUP when AVX512 is supported. We need VLX for EVEX VMOVDDUP.
-Only use VMOVDDUP for v2i64 broadcasts if AVX2 is not supported.
llvm-svn: 283020
We can't use Jcc to leave a Win64 function in general, because that
confuses the unwinder. However, for "leaf" functions, that is, functions
where the return address is always on top of the stack and which don't
have unwind info, it's OK.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24836
llvm-svn: 282920
I'm not completely sure what this method does or why all the 256-bit VTs returned VR128RegClass when the comments on the method definiton say it should return the largest super register class. I just figured AVX-512 should be similar.
llvm-svn: 282836
If AVX512 is disabled, the registers should already be marked reserved. Pattern predicates and register classes on instructions should take care of most of the rest. Loads/stores and physical register copies for XMM16-31 and YMM16-31 without VLX have already been taken care of.
I'm a little unclear why this changed the register allocation of the SSE2 run of the sad.ll test, but the registers selected appear to be valid after this change.
llvm-svn: 282835
The shuffle mask decodes have a large amount of repeated code extracting/splitting mask values from Constant data.
This patch pulls all of this duplicated code into a single helper function to identify undef elements and combine/split constant integer data into the requested shuffle mask elements.
Updated PSHUFB/VPERMIL/VPERMIL2/VPPERM decoders to use it (VPERMV/VPERMV3 could be converted as well in the future).
llvm-svn: 282720
This adds new pseudo instructions that can be selected during register allocation to represent loads and stores of XMM/YMM registers when AVX512F is available, but VLX isn't. They will be converted to VEX encoded moves if the register turns out to be XMM0-15/YMM0-15. Otherwise either an EVEX VEXTRACT(store) or VBROADCAST(load) will be used.
Fixes one of the cases from PR29112.
llvm-svn: 282690
Implement 'retn' simply by aliasing it to the relevant 'ret' instruction
Commit on behalf of coby
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24346
llvm-svn: 282601
The KORTEST was introduced due to a bug where a TEST instruction used a K register.
but, turns out that the opposite case of KORTEST using a GPR is now happening
The change removes the KORTEST flow and adds a COPY instruction from the K reg to a GPR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24953
llvm-svn: 282580
The 'or' case shows up in copysign. The copysign code also had
redundant checking for a scalar zero operand with 'and', so I
removed that.
I'm not sure how to test vector 'and', 'andn', and 'xor' yet,
but it seems better to just include all of the logic ops since
we're fixing 'or' anyway.
llvm-svn: 282546
Summary:
Replace a LEA instruction of the form 'lea (%esp), %ebx' --> 'mov %esp, %ebx'
MOV is preferable over LEA because usually there are more issue-slots available to execute MOVs than LEAs. Latest processors also support zero-latency MOVs.
Fixes pr29022.
Reviewers: hfinkel, delena, igorb, myatsina, mkuper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24705
llvm-svn: 282385
This is similar to:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL279958
By not prematurely lowering to loads, we should be able to more easily eliminate
the 'or' with zero instructions seen in copysign-constant-magnitude.ll.
We should also be able to extend this code to handle vectors.
llvm-svn: 282312
This revealed that scalar intrinsics could create nodes with a rounding mode of FROUND_CUR_DIRECTION, but the patterns didn't check for it. It just worked because isel doesn't check operand count and we had a pattern without the rounding mode argument at all.
llvm-svn: 282231
According to MSDN (see the PR), functions which don't touch any callee-saved
registers (including %rsp) don't need any unwind info.
This patch makes LLVM not emit unwind info for such functions, to save
binary size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24748
llvm-svn: 282185
VPTERNLOG is a ternary instruction with an immediate specifying the logical operation to perform. For each bit position in the 3 source vectors the bit from each source is concatenated together and the resulting 3-bit value is used to select a bit in the immediate. This bit value is written to the result vector.
We can commute this by swapping operands and modifying the immediate. To modify the immediate we need to swap two pairs of bits. The pairs correspond to the locations in the immediate where the commuted operands bits have opposite values and the uncommuted operand has the same value. Bits 0 and 7 will never be swapped since the relevant bits from all sources are the same value.
This refactors and reuses parts of the FMA3 commuting code which is also a three operand instruction.
llvm-svn: 282132
It turns out isel is really not robust against having different type profiles for the same opcode. It turns out that if you put an illegal rounding mode(i.e. not CUR_DIRECTION or NO_EXC) on a comiss intrinsic we would generate the FSETCC form with the rounding mode added, but then pattern match to an instruction with ROUND_CUR_DIRECTION.
We can probably get away with just one FSETCCM opcode that always contains the rounding mode and explicitly put ROUND_CUR_DIRECTION in the pattern, but I'll leave that for future work.
With this change the clang tests for the comiss intrinsics that used an incorrect rounding mode of 3 properly fail isel instead of silently doing the wrong thing. Those clang tests will be fixed in a follow up commit and I also plan to add rounding mode checking to clang.
llvm-svn: 282055
There was no way to control its value so it was always FROUND_CURRENT making it unnecessary. The true rounding mode is encoded in the immediate operand of the instruction.
This also removes the pattern from the rb form of the instructions since there is no way to specify the FROUND_NO_EXC rounding mode it required.
llvm-svn: 282052
We would assert that the FP setup CFI used esp/rsp always. This held up in
practice when the code was generated from IR. However, with the integrated
assembler, it is possible to have the input be user specified assembly. In such
a case, we cannot assume that the function implementation has a compact unwind
representation. Loosen the assertion into a check and bail if we cannot
represent the frame pointer in the compact unwinding.
Addresses PR30453!
llvm-svn: 281986
SUBREG_TO_REG is supposed to indicate that the super register has been zeroed, but we can't prove that if we don't know where it came from.
llvm-svn: 281885
This is a port of XRay to ARM 32-bit, without Thumb support yet. The XRay instrumentation support is moving up to AsmPrinter.
This is one of 3 commits to different repositories of XRay ARM port. The other 2 are:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23932 (Clang test)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23933 (compiler-rt)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23931
llvm-svn: 281878
With D24253 we can now use SelectionDAG::SignBitIsZero with vector operations.
This patch uses SelectionDAG::SignBitIsZero to recognise that a zero sign bit means that we can use a sitofp instead of a uitofp (which is not directly support on pre-AVX512 hardware).
While AVX512 does provide support for uitofp, the conversion to sitofp should not cause any regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24343
llvm-svn: 281852
Recommitting after fixing AsmParser initialization and X86 inline asm
error cleanup.
Allow errors to be deferred and emitted as part of clean up to simplify
and shorten Assembly parser code. This will allow error messages to be
emitted in helper functions and be modified by the caller which has
better context.
As part of this many minor cleanups to the Parser:
* Unify parser cleanup on error
* Add Workaround for incorrect return values in ParseDirective instances
* Tighten checks on error-signifying return values for parser functions
and fix in-tree TargetParsers to be more consistent with the changes.
* Fix AArch64 test cases checking for spurious error messages that are
now fixed.
These changes should be backwards compatible with current Target Parsers
so long as the error status are correctly returned in appropriate
functions.
Reviewers: rnk, majnemer
Subscribers: aemerson, jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24047
llvm-svn: 281762
Until AVX512DQ we only support i64/vXi64 sitofp conversion as scalars.
This patch sees if the sign bit extends far enough that we can truncate to a i32 type and then perform sitofp without loss of precision.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24345
llvm-svn: 281502
Recommitting after fixing AsmParser Initialization.
Allow errors to be deferred and emitted as part of clean up to simplify
and shorten Assembly parser code. This will allow error messages to be
emitted in helper functions and be modified by the caller which has
better context.
As part of this many minor cleanups to the Parser:
* Unify parser cleanup on error
* Add Workaround for incorrect return values in ParseDirective instances
* Tighten checks on error-signifying return values for parser functions
and fix in-tree TargetParsers to be more consistent with the changes.
* Fix AArch64 test cases checking for spurious error messages that are
now fixed.
These changes should be backwards compatible with current Target Parsers
so long as the error status are correctly returned in appropriate
functions.
Reviewers: rnk, majnemer
Subscribers: aemerson, jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24047
llvm-svn: 281336
Optimized (truncate (assertzext x) to i1) and anyext i1 to i8/16/32.
Optimization of this patterns is a one more step towards i1 optimization on AVX-512.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24456
llvm-svn: 281302
That confuses e.g. machine basic block placement, which then doesn't
realize that control can fall through a block that ends with a conditional
tail call. Instead, isBranch=1 should be set.
Also, mark EFLAGS as used by these instructions.
llvm-svn: 281281
Allow errors to be deferred and emitted as part of clean up to simplify
and shorten Assembly parser code. This will allow error messages to be
emitted in helper functions and be modified by the caller which has
better context.
As part of this many minor cleanups to the Parser:
* Unify parser cleanup on error
* Add Workaround for incorrect return values in ParseDirective instances
* Tighten checks on error-signifying return values for parser functions
and fix in-tree TargetParsers to be more consistent with the changes.
* Fix AArch64 test cases checking for spurious error messages that are
now fixed.
These changes should be backwards compatible with current Target Parsers
so long as the error status are correctly returned in appropriate
functions.
Reviewers: rnk, majnemer
Subscribers: aemerson, jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24047
llvm-svn: 281249
r280832 added 32-bit support for emitting conditional tail-calls, but
dropped imp-used parameter registers. This went unnoticed until
r281113, which added 64-bit support, as this is only exposed with
parameter passing via registers.
Don't drop the imp-used parameters.
llvm-svn: 281223
Now that MachineBasicBlock::reverse_instr_iterator knows when it's at
the end (since r281168 and r281170), implement
MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator directly on top of an
ilist::reverse_iterator by adding an IsReverse template parameter to
MachineInstrBundleIterator. This replaces another hard-to-reason-about
use of std::reverse_iterator on list iterators, matching the changes for
ilist::reverse_iterator from r280032 (see the "out of scope" section at
the end of that commit message). MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator
now has a handle to the current node and has obvious invalidation
semantics.
r280032 has a more detailed explanation of how list-style reverse
iterators (invalidated when the pointed-at node is deleted) are
different from vector-style reverse iterators like std::reverse_iterator
(invalidated on every operation). A great motivating example is this
commit's changes to lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp.
Note: If your out-of-tree backend deletes instructions while iterating
on a MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator or converts between
MachineBasicBlock::iterator and MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator,
you'll need to update your code in similar ways to r280032. The
following table might help:
[Old] ==> [New]
delete &*RI, RE = end() delete &*RI++
RI->erase(), RE = end() RI++->erase()
reverse_iterator(I) std::prev(I).getReverse()
reverse_iterator(I) ++I.getReverse()
--reverse_iterator(I) I.getReverse()
reverse_iterator(std::next(I)) I.getReverse()
RI.base() std::prev(RI).getReverse()
RI.base() ++RI.getReverse()
--RI.base() RI.getReverse()
std::next(RI).base() RI.getReverse()
(For more details, have a look at r280032.)
llvm-svn: 281172
Summary:
An IR load can be invariant, dereferenceable, neither, or both. But
currently, MI's notion of invariance is IR-invariant &&
IR-dereferenceable.
This patch splits up the notions of invariance and dereferenceability at
the MI level. It's NFC, so adds some probably-unnecessary
"is-dereferenceable" checks, which we can remove later if desired.
Reviewers: chandlerc, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23371
llvm-svn: 281151
Summary:
I want to separate out the notions of invariance and dereferenceability
at the MI level, so that they correspond to the equivalent concepts at
the IR level. (Currently an MI load is MI-invariant iff it's
IR-invariant and IR-dereferenceable.)
First step is renaming this function.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: MatzeB, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23370
llvm-svn: 281125
This extends the optimization in r280832 to also work for 64-bit. The only
quirk is that we can't do this for 64-bit Windows (yet).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24423
llvm-svn: 281113
The x64 ABI has two major function types:
- frame functions
- leaf functions
A frame function is one which requires a stack frame. A leaf function
is one which does not. A frame function may or may not have a frame
pointer.
A leaf function does not require a stack frame and may never modify SP
except via a return (RET, tail call via JMP).
A frame function which has a frame pointer is permitted to use the LEA
instruction in the epilogue, a frame function without which doesn't
establish a frame pointer must use ADD to adjust the stack pointer epilogue.
Fun fact: Leaf functions don't require a function table entry
(associated PDATA/XDATA).
llvm-svn: 281006
The REX prefix should be used on indirect jmps, but not direct ones.
For direct jumps, the unwinder looks at the offset to determine if
it's inside the current function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24359
llvm-svn: 281003
And associated commits, as they broke the Thumb bots.
This reverts commit r280935.
This reverts commit r280891.
This reverts commit r280888.
llvm-svn: 280967
This is a port of XRay to ARM 32-bit, without Thumb support yet. The XRay instrumentation support is moving up to AsmPrinter.
This is one of 3 commits to different repositories of XRay ARM port. The other 2 are:
1. https://reviews.llvm.org/D23932 (Clang test)
2. https://reviews.llvm.org/D23933 (compiler-rt)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23931
llvm-svn: 280888
The patch is to fix PR30298, which is caused by rL272694. The solution is to
bail out if the target has no SSE2.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24288
llvm-svn: 280837
When branching to a block that immediately tail calls, it is possible to fold
the call directly into the branch if the call is direct and there is no stack
adjustment, saving one byte.
Example:
define void @f(i32 %x, i32 %y) {
entry:
%p = icmp eq i32 %x, %y
br i1 %p, label %bb1, label %bb2
bb1:
tail call void @foo()
ret void
bb2:
tail call void @bar()
ret void
}
before:
f:
movl 4(%esp), %eax
cmpl 8(%esp), %eax
jne .LBB0_2
jmp foo
.LBB0_2:
jmp bar
after:
f:
movl 4(%esp), %eax
cmpl 8(%esp), %eax
jne bar
.LBB0_1:
jmp foo
I don't expect any significant size savings from this (on a Clang bootstrap I
saw 288 bytes), but it does make the code a little tighter.
This patch only does 32-bit, but 64-bit would work similarly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24108
llvm-svn: 280832
The previous commit (r280368 - https://reviews.llvm.org/D23313) does not cover AVX-512F, KNL set.
FNEG(x) operation is lowered to (bitcast (vpxor (bitcast x), (bitcast constfp(0x80000000))).
It happens because FP XOR is not supported for 512-bit data types on KNL and we use integer XOR instead.
I added pattern match for integer XOR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24221
llvm-svn: 280785
We need to bitcast the index operand to a floating point type so that it matches the result type. If not then the passthru part of the DAG will be a bitcast from the index's original type to the destination type. This makes it very difficult to match. The other option would be to add 5 sets of patterns for every other possible type.
llvm-svn: 280696
The code is now written in terms of source and dest classes with feature checks inside each type of copy instead of having separate functions for each feature set.
llvm-svn: 280673
Previously we were extending to copying the whole ZMM register. The register allocator shouldn't use XMM16-31 or YMM16-31 in this configuration as the instructions to spill them aren't available.
llvm-svn: 280648
The only way to select them was in AVX512 mode because EVEX VMOVSS/SD was below them and the patterns weren't qualified properly for AVX only. So if you happened to have an aligned FR32/FR64 load in AVX512 you could get a VEX encoded VMOVAPS/VMOVAPD.
I tried to search back through history and it seems like these instructions were probably unselectable for at least 5 years, at least to the time the VEX versions were added. But I can't prove they ever were.
llvm-svn: 280644
For the store of a wide value merged from a pair of values, especially int-fp pair,
sometimes it is more efficent to split it into separate narrow stores, which can
remove the bitwise instructions or sink them to colder places.
Now the feature is only enabled on x86 target, and only store of int-fp pair is
splitted. It is possible that the application scope gets extended with perf evidence
support in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22840
llvm-svn: 280505
Prior to this, we could generate a vector_shuffle from an IR shuffle when the
size of the result was exactly the sum of the sizes of the input vectors.
If the output vector was narrower - e.g. a <12 x i8> being formed by a shuffle
with two <8 x i8> inputs - we would lower the shuffle to a sequence of extracts
and inserts.
Instead, we can form a larger vector_shuffle, and then extract a subvector
of the right size - e.g. shuffle the two <8 x i8> inputs into a <16 x i8>
and then extract a <12 x i8>.
This also includes a target-specific X86 combine that in the presence of
AVX2 combines:
(vector_shuffle <mask> (concat_vectors t1, undef)
(concat_vectors t2, undef))
into:
(vector_shuffle <mask> (concat_vectors t1, t2), undef)
in cases where this allows us to form VPERMD/VPERMQ.
(This is not a separate commit, as that pattern does not appear without
the DAGBuilder change.)
llvm-svn: 280418
According to spec cvtdq2pd and cvtps2pd instructions don't require memory operand to be aligned
to 16 bytes. This patch removes this requirement from the memory folding table.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23919
llvm-svn: 280402
Summary:
This change promotes the 'isTailCall(...)' member function to
TargetInstrInfo as a query interface for determining on a per-target
basis whether a given MachineInstr is a tail call instruction. We build
upon this in the XRay instrumentation pass to emit special sleds for
tail call optimisations, where we emit the correct kind of sled.
The tail call sleds look like a mix between the function entry and
function exit sleds. Form-wise, the sled comes before the "jmp"
instruction that implements the tail call similar to how we do it for
the function entry sled. Functionally, because we know this is a tail
call, it behaves much like an exit sled -- i.e. at runtime we may use
the exit trampolines instead of a different kind of trampoline.
A follow-up change to recognise these sleds will be done in compiler-rt,
so that we can start intercepting these initially as exits, but also
have the option to have different log entries to more accurately reflect
that this is actually a tail call.
Reviewers: echristo, rSerge, majnemer
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, dberris, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23986
llvm-svn: 280334
Reverse iterators to doubly-linked lists can be simpler (and cheaper)
than std::reverse_iterator. Make it so.
In particular, change ilist<T>::reverse_iterator so that it is *never*
invalidated unless the node it references is deleted. This matches the
guarantees of ilist<T>::iterator.
(Note: MachineBasicBlock::iterator is *not* an ilist iterator, but a
MachineInstrBundleIterator<MachineInstr>. This commit does not change
MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator, but it does update
MachineBasicBlock::reverse_instr_iterator. See note at end of commit
message for details on bundle iterators.)
Given the list (with the Sentinel showing twice for simplicity):
[Sentinel] <-> A <-> B <-> [Sentinel]
the following is now true:
1. begin() represents A.
2. begin() holds the pointer for A.
3. end() represents [Sentinel].
4. end() holds the poitner for [Sentinel].
5. rbegin() represents B.
6. rbegin() holds the pointer for B.
7. rend() represents [Sentinel].
8. rend() holds the pointer for [Sentinel].
The changes are #6 and #8. Here are some properties from the old
scheme (which used std::reverse_iterator):
- rbegin() held the pointer for [Sentinel] and rend() held the pointer
for A;
- operator*() cost two dereferences instead of one;
- converting from a valid iterator to its valid reverse_iterator
involved a confusing increment; and
- "RI++->erase()" left RI invalid. The unintuitive replacement was
"RI->erase(), RE = end()".
With vector-like data structures these properties are hard to avoid
(since past-the-beginning is not a valid pointer), and don't impose a
real cost (since there's still only one dereference, and all iterators
are invalidated on erase). But with lists, this was a poor design.
Specifically, the following code (which obviously works with normal
iterators) now works with ilist::reverse_iterator as well:
for (auto RI = L.rbegin(), RE = L.rend(); RI != RE;)
fooThatMightRemoveArgFromList(*RI++);
Converting between iterator and reverse_iterator for the same node uses
the getReverse() function.
reverse_iterator iterator::getReverse();
iterator reverse_iterator::getReverse();
Why doesn't iterator <=> reverse_iterator conversion use constructors?
In order to catch and update old code, reverse_iterator does not even
have an explicit conversion from iterator. It wouldn't be safe because
there would be no reasonable way to catch all the bugs from the changed
semantic (see the changes at call sites that are part of this patch).
Old code used this API:
std::reverse_iterator::reverse_iterator(iterator);
iterator std::reverse_iterator::base();
Here's how to update from old code to new (that incorporates the
semantic change), assuming I is an ilist<>::iterator and RI is an
ilist<>::reverse_iterator:
[Old] ==> [New]
reverse_iterator(I) (--I).getReverse()
reverse_iterator(I) ++I.getReverse()
--reverse_iterator(I) I.getReverse()
reverse_iterator(++I) I.getReverse()
RI.base() (--RI).getReverse()
RI.base() ++RI.getReverse()
--RI.base() RI.getReverse()
(++RI).base() RI.getReverse()
delete &*RI, RE = end() delete &*RI++
RI->erase(), RE = end() RI++->erase()
=======================================
Note: bundle iterators are out of scope
=======================================
MachineBasicBlock::iterator, also known as
MachineInstrBundleIterator<MachineInstr>, is a wrapper to represent
MachineInstr bundles. The idea is that each operator++ takes you to the
beginning of the next bundle. Implementing a sane reverse iterator for
this is harder than ilist. Here are the options:
- Use std::reverse_iterator<MBB::i>. Store a handle to the beginning of
the next bundle. A call to operator*() runs a loop (usually
operator--() will be called 1 time, for unbundled instructions).
Increment/decrement just works. This is the status quo.
- Store a handle to the final node in the bundle. A call to operator*()
still runs a loop, but it iterates one time fewer (usually
operator--() will be called 0 times, for unbundled instructions).
Increment/decrement just works.
- Make the ilist_sentinel<MachineInstr> *always* store that it's the
sentinel (instead of just in asserts mode). Then the bundle iterator
can sniff the sentinel bit in operator++().
I initially tried implementing the end() option as part of this commit,
but updating iterator/reverse_iterator conversion call sites was
error-prone. I have a WIP series of patches that implements the final
option.
llvm-svn: 280032
Over eager combing prevents the correct folding of writemasks.
At the moment this occurs for ALL EVEX shuffles, in the future we need to check that the user of the root shuffle is a VSELECT that can fold to a writemask.
llvm-svn: 279934
Previously we weren't creating masked logical operations if bitcasts appeared between the logic operation and the select. The IR optimizers can move bitcasts across logic operations and create these cases. To minimize the number of cases we need to handle, this change promotes all logic ops to an i64 vector type just like when only SSE or AVX is available.
Unfortunately, this also has the consequence of making it difficult to select unmasked VPANDD/VPORD/VPXORD in all the cases it was previously used. This is the cause of most of the test change. This shouldn't result in any functional change though.
llvm-svn: 279929
This reverts most of r274613 (AKA r274626) and its follow-ups (r276347, r277289),
due to miscompiles in the test suite. The FastISel change was left in, because
it apparently fixes an unrelated issue.
(Recommit of r279782 which was broken due to a bad merge.)
This fixes 4 out of the 5 test failures in PR29112.
llvm-svn: 279788
This reverts most of r274613 and its follow-ups (r276347, r277289), due to
miscompiles in the test suite. The FastISel change was left in, because it
apparently fixes an unrelated issue.
This fixes 4 out of the 5 test failures in PR29112.
llvm-svn: 279782
Fix VPAVG detection to require AVX512BW, not AVX512F for 512-bit widths,
and change associated asserts to assert in the right direction...
This fixes PR29111.
llvm-svn: 279755
There's no reason for it to return a signed type. Just return the operand bias in each if instead of starting from 0 and adding in the 'if'.
llvm-svn: 279720
Rename AllVRegsAllocated to NoVRegs. This avoids the connotation of
running after register and simply describes that no vregs are used in
a machine function. With that we can simply compute the property and do
not need to dump/parse it in .mir files.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23850
llvm-svn: 279698
These are no different in load behaviour to the existing ADD/SUB/MUL/DIV scalar ops but were missing from isNonFoldablePartialRegisterLoad
llvm-svn: 279652
Includes adding more general support for the pattern: VZEXT_MOVL(VZEXT_LOAD(ptr)) -> VZEXT_LOAD(ptr)
This has unearthed a couple of latent poor codegen issues (MINSS/MAXSS scalar load folding and MOVDDUP/BROADCAST load folding patterns), which will be fixed shortly.
Its also reduced a couple of tests so that they no longer reach the instruction threshold necessary to be combined to PSHUFB (see PR26183).
llvm-svn: 279646
Consecutive load matching (EltsFromConsecutiveLoads) currently uses VZEXT_LOAD (load scalar into lowest element and zero uppers) for vXi64 / vXf64 vectors only.
For vXi32 / vXf32 vectors it instead creates a scalar load, SCALAR_TO_VECTOR and finally VZEXT_MOVL (zero upper vector elements), relying on tablegen patterns to match this into an equivalent of VZEXT_LOAD.
This patch adds the VZEXT_LOAD patterns for vXi32 / vXf32 vectors directly and updates EltsFromConsecutiveLoads to use this.
This has proven necessary to allow us to easily make VZEXT_MOVL a full member of the target shuffle set - without this change the call to combineShuffle (which is the main caller of EltsFromConsecutiveLoads) tended to recursively recreate VZEXT_MOVL nodes......
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23673
llvm-svn: 279619
As discussed on PR26491, we are missing the opportunity to make use of the smaller MOVHLPS instruction because we set both arguments of a SHUFPD when using it to lower a single input shuffle.
This patch sets the lowered argument to UNDEF if that shuffle element is undefined. This in turn makes it easier for target shuffle combining to decode UNDEF shuffle elements, allowing combines to MOVHLPS to occur.
A fix to match against MOVHPD stores was necessary as well.
This builds on the improved MOVLHPS/MOVHLPS lowering and memory folding support added in D16956
Adding similar support for SHUFPS will have to wait until have better support for target combining of binary shuffles.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23027
llvm-svn: 279430
Sanjay Patel