functions/static data members of class template specializations that
do not have definitions. This is the latter part of [temp.explicit]p4;
the former part still needs more testing.
llvm-svn: 84182
template as a specialization. For example, this occurs with:
template<typename T>
struct X {
template<typename U> struct Inner { /* ... */ };
};
template<> template<typename T>
struct X<int>::Inner {
T member;
};
We need to treat templates that are member specializations as special
in two contexts:
- When looking for a definition of a member template, we look
through the instantiation chain until we hit the primary template
*or a member specialization*. This allows us to distinguish
between the primary "Inner" definition and the X<int>::Inner
definition, above.
- When computing all of the levels of template arguments needed to
instantiate a member template, don't add template arguments
from contexts outside of the instantiation of a member
specialization, since the user has already manually substituted
those arguments.
Fix up the existing test for p18, which was actually wrong (but we
didn't diagnose it because of our poor handling of member
specializations of templates), and add a new test for member
specializations of templates.
llvm-svn: 83974
function templates.
This commit ensures that friend function templates are constructed as
FunctionTemplateDecls rather than partial FunctionDecls (as they
previously were). It then implements template instantiation for friend
function templates, injecting the friend function template only when
no previous declaration exists at the time of instantiation.
Oh, and make sure that explicit specialization declarations are not
friends.
llvm-svn: 83970
that the scope in which it is being declared is complete. Also, when
instantiating a member class template's ClassTemplateDecl, be sure to
delay type creation so that the resulting type is dependent. Ick.
llvm-svn: 83923
that are declarations (rather than definitions). Also, be sure to set
the access specifiers properly when instantiating the declarations of
member function templates.
llvm-svn: 83911
templates, and keep track of how those member classes were
instantiated or specialized.
Make sure that we don't try to instantiate an explicitly-specialized
member class of a class template, when that explicit specialization
was a declaration rather than a definition.
llvm-svn: 83547
track of the kind of specialization or instantiation. Also, check the
scope of the specialization and ensure that a specialization
declaration without an initializer is not a definition.
llvm-svn: 83533
function of a class template was implicitly instantiated, explicitly
instantiated (declaration or definition), or explicitly
specialized. The same MemberSpecializationInfo structure will be used
for static data members and member classes as well.
llvm-svn: 83509
its definition may be defined, including in a class.
Also, put in an assertion when trying to instantiate a class template
partial specialization of a member template, which is not yet
implemented.
llvm-svn: 83469
Several of the existing methods were identical to their respective
specializations, and so have been removed entirely. Several more 'leaf'
optimizations were introduced.
The getAsFoo() methods which imposed extra conditions, like
getAsObjCInterfacePointerType(), have been left in place.
llvm-svn: 82501
when we are not instantiating the corresponding "current
instantiation." This happens, e.g., when we are instantiating a
declaration reference that refers into the "current instantiation" but
occurs in a default function argument. The libstdc++ vector default
constructor now instantiates properly.
llvm-svn: 82069
instantiation definition can follow an explicit instantiation
declaration. This is as far as I want to go with extern templates now,
but they will still need quite a bit more work to get all of the C++0x
semantics right.
llvm-svn: 81573
templates. We now distinguish between an explicit instantiation
declaration and an explicit instantiation definition, and know not to
instantiate explicit instantiation declarations. Unfortunately, there
is some remaining confusion w.r.t. instantiation of out-of-line member
function definitions that causes trouble here.
llvm-svn: 81053
improved if there were a consistent name for getInstantiatedFromMemberX()
across all classes. Cheap refactor if someone wants to do it, but let's get the
buildbots happy first.
llvm-svn: 80425
When performing template instantiation of the definitions of member
templates (or members thereof), we build a data structure containing
the template arguments from each "level" of template
instantiation. During template instantiation, we substitute all levels
of template arguments simultaneously.
llvm-svn: 80389
declarations of same, introduce a single AST class and add appropriate bits
(encoded in the namespace) for whether a decl is "real" or not. Much hackery
about previously-declared / not-previously-declared, but it's essentially
mandated by the standard that friends alter lookup, and this is at least
fairly non-intrusive.
Refactor the Sema methods specific to friends for cleaner flow and less nesting.
Incidentally solve a few bugs, but I remain confident that we can put them back.
llvm-svn: 80353
templates within class templates, producing a member function template
of a class template specialization. If you can parse that, I'm
sorry. Example:
template<typename T>
struct X {
template<typename U> void f(T, U);
};
When we instantiate X<int>, we now instantiate the declaration
X<int>::f, which looks like this:
template<typename U> void X<int>::f(int, U);
The path this takes through
TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitCXXMethodDecl is convoluted and
ugly, but I don't know how to improve it yet. I'm resting my hopes on
the multi-level substitution required to instantiate definitions of
nested templates, which may simplify this code as well.
More testing to come...
llvm-svn: 80252
John McCall