Profile and profile summary are usually read only once and then annotated
on IR. The profile summary metadata on IR should include the value of the
newly added partial profile flag, so that compilation phase like thinlto
postlink can get the full set of profile information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78310
This means AttrBuilder will always create a sorted set of attributes and
we can skip the sorting step. Sorting attributes is surprisingly
expensive, and I recently made it worse by making it use array_pod_sort.
Attributes are currently stored as a simple list. Enum attributes
additionally use a bitset to allow quickly determining whether an
attribute is set. String attributes on the other hand require a
full scan of the list. As functions tend to have a lot of string
attributes (at least when clang is used), this is a noticeable
performance issue.
This patch adds an additional name => attribute map to the
AttributeSetNode, which allows querying string attributes quickly.
This results in a 3% reduction in instructions retired on CTMark.
Changes to memory usage seem to be in the noise (attribute sets are
uniqued, and we don't tend to have more than a few dozen or hundred
unique attribute sets, so adding an extra map does not have a
noticeable cost.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78859
The CallSite and ImmutableCallSite were removed in a previous
commit. So rename the file to match the remaining class and
the name of the cpp that implements it.
Summary:
- Whether or not a vector is scalable is a function of its type. Since
all instances of ScalableVectorType will have true for this value and
all instances of FixedVectorType will have false for this value, there
is no need to store it as a class member.
Reviewers: efriedma, fpetrogalli, kmclaughlin
Reviewed By: fpetrogalli
Subscribers: tschuett, hiraditya, rkruppe, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78601
Summary:
Piggy-back off of TypeSize's STRICT_FIXED_SIZE_VECTORS flag and:
- if it is defined, assert that the vector is not scalable
- if it is not defined, complain if the vector is scalable
Reviewers: efriedma, sdesmalen, c-rhodes
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Subscribers: hiraditya, mgorny, tschuett, rkruppe, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78576
Summary:
* VectorType::getBitWidth() is just an unsafe version of
getPrimitiveSizeInBits() that assumes all vectors are fixed width.
Reviewers: efriedma, sdesmalen, huntergr, craig.topper
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: tschuett, hiraditya, rkruppe, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77833
CallSite will likely be removed soon, but AbstractCallSite serves a different purpose and won't be going away.
This patch switches it to internally store a CallBase* instead of a
CallSite. The only interface changes are the removal of the getCallSite
method and getCallBackUses now takes a CallBase&. These methods had only
a few callers that were easy enough to update without needing a
compatibility shim.
In the future once the other CallSites are gone, the CallSite.h
header should be renamed to AbstractCallSite.h
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78322
Remove unused BasicBlock forward declaration from Pass.h and Attributes/BasicBlock includes from Pass.cpp
Add BasicBlock forward declaration to UnifyFunctionExitNodes.h which was relying on Pass.h
The current strategy LICM uses when sinking for debuginfo is
that of picking the debug location of one of the uses.
This causes stepping to be wrong sometimes, see, e.g. PR45523.
This patch introduces a generalization of getMergedLocation(),
that operates on a vector of locations instead of two, and try
to merge all them together, and use the new API in LICM.
<rdar://problem/61750950>
Summary:
AbstractCallSite::getCallbackUses() does not check that callback callee index from
the callback metadata does not exceed the total number of call arguments. This patch
add such validation check.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78112
It can be used to avoid passing the begin and end of a range.
This makes the code shorter and it is consistent with another
wrappers we already have.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78016
Summary:
StringPool has many caveats and isn't used in the monorepo. I will
propose removing it as a patch separate from this refactoring patch.
Reviewers: rriddle
Subscribers: hiraditya, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77976
Summary:
Remove usages of asserting vector getters in Type in preparation for the
VectorType refactor. The existence of these functions complicates the
refactor while adding little value.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, sdesmalen, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77276
When constrained floating point is enabled the AArch64-specific builtins don't use constrained intrinsics in some cases. Fix that.
Neon is part of this patch, so ARM is affected as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77074
This replaces the ChildrenGetter inside the DominatorTree with
GraphTraits over a GraphDiff object, an object which encapsulated the
view of the previous CFG.
This also simplifies the extentions in clang which use DominatorTree, as
GraphDiff also filters nullptrs.
Re-land a90374988e after moving CFGDiff.h
to Support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77341
This reverts commit a90374988e and 5da1671bf8.
A new dependency is introduced here from Support to IR which seems like
a layering violation. It also breaks the MLIR build at the moment.
Summary:
This replaces the ChildrenGetter inside the DominatorTree with
GraphTraits over a GraphDiff object, an object which encapsulated the
view of the previous CFG.
This also simplifies the extentions in clang which use DominatorTree, as
GraphDiff also filters nullptrs.
Reviewers: kuhar, dblaikie, NutshellySima
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77341
Now compiler defines 5 sets of constants to represent rounding mode.
These are:
1. `llvm::APFloatBase::roundingMode`. It specifies all 5 rounding modes
defined by IEEE-754 and is used in `APFloat` implementation.
2. `clang::LangOptions::FPRoundingModeKind`. It specifies 4 of 5 IEEE-754
rounding modes and a special value for dynamic rounding mode. It is used
in clang frontend.
3. `llvm::fp::RoundingMode`. Defines the same values as
`clang::LangOptions::FPRoundingModeKind` but in different order. It is
used to specify rounding mode in in IR and functions that operate IR.
4. Rounding mode representation used by `FLT_ROUNDS` (C11, 5.2.4.2.2p7).
Besides constants for rounding mode it also uses a special value to
indicate error. It is convenient to use in intrinsic functions, as it
represents platform-independent representation for rounding mode. In this
role it is used in some pending patches.
5. Values like `FE_DOWNWARD` and other, which specify rounding mode in
library calls `fesetround` and `fegetround`. Often they represent bits
of some control register, so they are target-dependent. The same names
(not values) and a special name `FE_DYNAMIC` are used in
`#pragma STDC FENV_ROUND`.
The first 4 sets of constants are target independent and could have the
same numerical representation. It would simplify conversion between the
representations. Also now `clang::LangOptions::FPRoundingModeKind` and
`llvm::fp::RoundingMode` do not contain the value for IEEE-754 rounding
direction `roundTiesToAway`, although it is supported natively on
some targets.
This change defines all the rounding mode type via one `llvm::RoundingMode`,
which also contains rounding mode for IEEE rounding direction `roundTiesToAway`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77379
Now that we have scalable vectors, there's a distinction that isn't
getting captured in the original SequentialType: some vectors don't have
a known element count, so counting the number of elements doesn't make
sense.
In some cases, there's a better way to express the commonality using
other methods. If we're dealing with GEPs, there's GEP methods; if we're
dealing with a ConstantDataSequential, we can query its element type
directly.
In the relatively few remaining cases, I just decided to write out
the type checks. We're talking about relatively few places, and I think
the abstraction doesn't really carry its weight. (See thread "[RFC]
Refactor class hierarchy of VectorType in the IR" on llvmdev.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75661
Summary:
Thanks to Bill Wendling (void) for the report and steps to reproduce. It looks
like this was missed during r350508's cleanup of the CallSite split into
CallBase, CallInst, and CallBrInst.
This was exposed by running pgo on a callbr, which was creating a ptrtoint to
the inline asm thinking it was an indirect call. The relevant callchain looks
like:
IndirectCallPromotionPlugin::run()
-> PGOIndirectCallVisitor::findIndirectCalls()
-> PGOIndirectCallVisitor::visitCallBase()
-> CallBase::isIndirectCall()
Reviewers: void, chandlerc
Reviewed By: void
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, craig.topper, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77600
Summary:
24 March 2020: LLVM 10.0.0 is out.
I gathered all deprecated function introduced between 9 and 10 and cleaned them up so they will be removed from 11.
> git log -p -S LLVM_ATTRIBUTE_DEPRECATED llvmorg-9.0.0..llvmorg-10.0.0
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77409
Since D73835 we no longer need to define the whole IRBuilder
implementation in the header. This patch moves some of the larger
methods out of line, into the C++ file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77332
Summary:
Splitting Knowledge retention into Queries in Analysis and Builder into Transform/Utils
allows Queries and Transform/Utils to use Analysis.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77171
If we have a must-tail call the callee and caller need to have matching
ABIs. Part of that is alignment which we might modify when we deduce
alignment of arguments of either. Since we would need to keep them in
sync, which is not as simple, we simply avoid deducing alignment for
arguments of the must-tail caller or callee.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76673
Currently ConstantRange::binaryAnd/binaryOr results are too pessimistic
for single element constant ranges.
If both operands are single element ranges, we can use APInt's AND and
OR implementations directly.
Note that some other binary operations on constant ranges can cover the
single element cases naturally, but for OR and AND this unfortunately is
not the case.
Reviewers: nikic, spatel, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76446
This patch adds checks to the verifier to ensure the dimension arguments
passed to the matrix intrinsics match the vector types for their
arugments/return values.
Reviewers: anemet, Gerolf, andrew.w.kaylor, LuoYuanke
Reviewed By: anemet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77129
Instead, represent the mask as out-of-line data in the instruction. This
should be more efficient in the places that currently use
getShuffleVector(), and paves the way for further changes to add new
shuffles for scalable vectors.
This doesn't change the syntax in textual IR. And I don't currently plan
to change the bitcode encoding in this patch, although we'll probably
need to do something once we extend shufflevector for scalable types.
I expect that once this is finished, we can then replace the raw "mask"
with something more appropriate for scalable vectors. Not sure exactly
what this looks like at the moment, but there are a few different ways
we could handle it. Maybe we could try to describe specific shuffles.
Or maybe we could define it in terms of a function to convert a fixed-length
array into an appropriate scalable vector, using a "step", or something
like that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72467
Wei Mi