Summary:
If a `CallSite` has operand bundles, then do not peek into the called
function to get a more precise `ModRef` answer.
This is tested using `argmemonly`, `-basicaa` and `-gvn`; but the
functionality is not specific to any of these.
Depends on D13961
Reviewers: reames, chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13962
llvm-svn: 250974
Summary:
This makes attribute accessors on `CallInst` and `InvokeInst` do the
(conservatively) right thing. This essentially involves, in some
cases, *not* falling back querying the attributes on the called
`llvm::Function` when operand bundles are present.
Attributes locally present on the `CallInst` or `InvokeInst` will still
override operand bundle semantics. The LangRef has been amended to
reflect this. Note: this change does not do anything prevent
`-function-attrs` from inferring `CallSite` local attributes after
inspecting the called function -- that will be done as a separate
change.
I've used `-adce` and `-early-cse` to test these changes. There is
nothing special about these passes (and they did not require any
changes) except that they seemed be the easiest way to write the tests.
This change does not add deal with `argmemonly`. That's a later change
because alias analysis requires a related fix before `argmemonly` can be
tested.
Reviewers: reames, chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13961
llvm-svn: 250973
These were the cause of a verifier error when building 7zip with
-verify-machineinstrs. Running 'make check' with the verifier
triggered the same error on the test here so i've updated the test
to run the verifier on one of its runs instead of adding a new one.
While looking at this code, there was a stale comment that these
instructions were only used for disassembly. This probably used to
be the case, but they are now used in the 'ARM load / store optimization pass' too.
This reapplies r242300 which was reverted in r242428 due to bot failures.
Ultimately those failures were spurious and completely unrelated to this commit. I reverted this
at the time because it was thought to be at fault.
llvm-svn: 250969
When removing out-of-date modules we might have left behind a VisitOrder
that contains pointers to freed ModuleFiles. This was very rarely seen,
because it only happens when modules go out of date and the VisitOrder
happens to have the right size to not be recomputed.
Thanks ASan!
rdar://23181512
llvm-svn: 250963
There may be other use operands that also need their kill flags cleared.
This happens in a few tests when SIFoldOperands is moved after
PeepholeOptimizer.
PeepholeOptimizer rewrites cases that look like:
%vreg0 = ...
%vreg1 = COPY %vreg0
use %vreg1<kill>
%vreg2 = COPY %vreg0
use %vreg2<kill>
to use the earlier source to
%vreg0 = ...
use %vreg0
use %vreg0
Currently SIFoldOperands sees the copied registers, so there is
only one use. So far I haven't managed to come up with a test
that currently has multiple uses of a foldable VGPR -> VGPR copy.
llvm-svn: 250960
This commit introduces an option, --preallocate, so that we can get memory
upfront and use it in small memory model tests (in order to get
reliable results).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13630
llvm-svn: 250956
This is almost entirely a matter of just flipping a switch. 99% of
the runtime support is available all the way back to when it was
implemented in the non-fragile runtime, i.e. in Lion. However,
fragile runtimes do not recognize ARC-style ivar layout strings,
which means that accessing __strong or __weak ivars reflectively
(e.g. via object_setIvar) will end up accessing the ivar as if it
were __unsafe_unretained. Therefore, when using reflective
technologies like KVC, be sure that your paths always refer to a
property.
rdar://23209307
llvm-svn: 250955
The ELF symbol visibilities are:
- internal: Not visibile across DSOs, cannot pass address across DSOs
- hidden: Not visibile across DSOs, can be called indirectly
- default: Usually visible across DSOs, possibly interposable
- protected: Visible across DSOs, not interposable
LLVM only supports the latter 3 visibilities. Internal visibility is in
theory useful, as it allows you to assume that the caller is maintaining
a PIC register for you in %ebx, or in some other pre-arranged location.
As far as LLVM is concerned, this isn't worth the trouble. Using hidden
visibility is always correct, so we can just do that.
Resolves PR9183.
llvm-svn: 250954
This was checking for a variety of situations that should
never happen. This saves a tiny bit of compile time.
We should not be selecting instructions with invalid operands in the
first place. Most of the time for registers copys are inserted
to the correct operand register class.
For VOP3, since all operand types are supported and literal
constants never are, we just need to verify the constant bus
requirements (all immediates should be legal inline ones).
The only possibly tricky case to maybe worry about is if when
legalizing operands in moveToVALU with s_add_i32 and similar
instructions. If the original s_add_i32 had a literal constant
and we need to replace it with v_add_i32_e64 we would have an
unsupported literal operand. However, I don't think we should worry
about that because SIFoldOperands should handle folding literal
constant operands into the SALU instructions based on the uses.
At SIFoldOperands time, the legality and profitability of
operand types is a bit different.
llvm-svn: 250951
Since r249754 MemorySanitizer should work equally well for PIE and
non-PIE executables on Linux/x86_64.
Beware, with this change -fsanitize=memory no longer adds implicit
-fPIE -pie compiler/linker flags on Linux/x86_64.
This is a re-land of r250941, limited to Linux/x86_64 + a very minor
refactoring in SanitizerArgs.
llvm-svn: 250949
These classes are partially written, so almost all features
are FIXMEs. We do not want to add new FIXMEs to the classes
when we add new features to other non-stub classes.
llvm-svn: 250947
This will be used in future commits for AMDGPU to promote
operations on i64 vectors into operations on 32-bit vector
components.
This will be used / tested in future AMDGPU commits.
llvm-svn: 250945
Summary: ELF's STT_File symbols may overlap with regular globals in
other files, so we should ignore them here in order to avoid having
bogus entries in the symbol table that confuse us when resolving relocations.
Reviewers: lhames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13888
llvm-svn: 250942
Since r249754 MemorySanitizer should work equally well for PIE and
non-PIE executables.
Beware, with this change -fsanitize=memory no longer adds implicit
-fPIE -pie compiler/linker flags, unless the target defaults to PIE.
llvm-svn: 250941
Summary:
This check flags all calls to c-style vararg functions and all use
of va_list, va_start and va_arg.
Passing to varargs assumes the correct type will be read. This is
fragile because it cannot generally be enforced to be safe in the
language and so relies on programmer discipline to get it right.
This rule is part of the "Type safety" profile of the C++ Core
Guidelines, see
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#-type8-avoid-reading-from-varargs-or-passing-vararg-arguments-prefer-variadic-template-parameters-instead
This commits also reverts
"[clang-tidy] add cert's VariadicFunctionDefCheck as cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-vararg-def"
because that check makes the SFINAE use of vararg functions impossible.
Reviewers: alexfh, sbenza, bkramer, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13787
llvm-svn: 250939
Before, in the absence of any configured REPLs, LLDB would act as if there were
multiple possible REPL options, whereas actually no REPL language is supported.
Now we make a better error.
llvm-svn: 250931
Summary:
Along with this, support for an optional argument to the "num_children"
method of a Python synthetic child provider has also been added. These have
been added with the following use case in mind:
Synthetic child providers currently have a method "has_children" and
"num_children". While the former is good enough to know if there are
children, it does not give any insight into how many children there are.
Though the latter serves this purpose, calculating the number for children
of a data structure could be an O(N) operation if the data structure has N
children. The new method added in this change provide a middle ground.
One can call GetNumChildren(K) to know if a child exists at an index K
which can be as large as the callers tolerance can be. If the caller wants
to know about children beyond K, it can make an other call with 2K. If the
synthetic child provider maintains state about it counting till K
previosly, then the next call is only an O(K) operation. Infact, all
calls made progressively with steps of K will be O(K) operations.
Reviewers: vharron, clayborg, granata.enrico
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13778
llvm-svn: 250930
Sanjoy Das