On Ubuntu 18.04 with GCC 7.5 Intel trace code fails to build due to
failure to convert from
lldb_private::process_linux::IntelPTPerThreadProcessTraceUP to
Expected<lldb_private::process_linux::IntelPTPerThreadProcessTraceUP>.
This commit explicitely marks those unique_ptr values as being moved
which fixes the conversion error.
Reviewed By: wallace
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126402
The concept specialization expression should start at the location of
the nested qualifiers when it has nested qualifiers.
This ensures that libclang reports correct source ranges that include
all subexpressions when visiting the expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126332
If we don't specify the result index while matching operand with the
result of certain operation, it's supposed to match all the results of
the operation with the operand. For registered op, it's easy to do that
by either indexing with number or name. For unregistered op, this commit
enables the numeric result indexing for this use case.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126330
A new instruction encoding. Some of these instructions were previously VOP3
encoded.
Contributors:
Carl Ritson <carl.ritson@amd.com>
Patch 11/N for upstreaming of AMDGPU gfx11 architecture.
Depends on D125824
Reviewed By: critson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125989
Addresses tests flakes described in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55460
The test being updated can fail in FileCheck to match when given long
enough stack traces. This can be problematic when file system paths
become long enough to cause the majority of the long function name to
become truncated. We found in our CI that the truncated output would
often fail to match, thereby causing the test to fail when it should not.
Here we change the test to match on sybolizer output that should be more
reliable than matching inside the long function name.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126102
A recent fix beefed up semantics checking to catch the case of a call
to an external assumed-length character function; this check has false
positives in the case of an assumed-length character function that is
a dummy procedure. These do have a length that is passed in extra
compiler-created arguments. This patch refines the check and undoes some
changes to tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126390
Const class members may be initialized with a defaulted default
constructor under the same conditions it would be allowed for a const
object elsewhere.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126170
be2cb8 fixes the case which triggered the revert. Reapply, and let's see if anything else falls out.
Original commit message:
These asserts are believed to hold after several recent miscompiles have been fixed. If you see an assertion failure on this change, please toggle the default back and make sure you file a bug with a reproducer. We may have as yet uncaught miscompiles lurking in this code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125271
Use the LLVM build system's cross-compilation support for the tool, so
that the build works for both host and cross-compilation scenarios.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126397
These symbols are understood to not be used for client API consumption
by convention so they should not appear in the generated symbol graph.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125678
This moves mutation entirely out of the main algorithm.
The immediate trigger is that we hit another case of the same issue I thought we'd fixed in 72925d9. It turns out we hadn't considered the cross block case.
As a brief summary, the issue being fixed is that if we mutate a previous vsetvli in phase 3, there's a possibility that some later use of that vsetvli changes "compatibility". In the cross_block_mutate test, this later vsetvli occurs in another block (and is thus visit order dependent too!). This causes us to fail strict asserts. (To be explicit, the current on by default workaround should compensate. It's only when we turn that off that we have problems.)
Now, I want to explicitly call out an alternate workaround. We could leave the mutation in phase 3, and simplify restrict it to the case where the previous vsetvli's GPR result is unused. That covers the case we've actually seen. (I'll note that codegen regressions with a simple form of this were significant. We might have to check specifically for the use outside block case to keep them reasonable, which complicates the workaround slightly.)
Personally, I'm at the point where I want the mutation pulled out just for robustness sake. I'm worried there's yet one more form of this bug we haven't thought about.
The other motivation for this change is that it does give us a couple of minor codegen wins. None appear to be hugely significant, but improvements never hurt right?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125270
Warns when end-of-file is reached without seeing all matching
'omp end declare target' directives. The diagnostic shows the
location of the related begin directive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126331
A later change will add a 3rd user, so factoring out the common code
seems useful.
Reorganizing the executeInWaterfallLoop causes some more COPYs to be
generated, but those all fold away during instruction selection.
Generating the comparisons uses generic instructions over machine
instructions now which admittedly shouldn't make a difference
(though it should make it easier to move the waterfall loop generation
to another place).
(Resubmit with missing test added.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125324
This commit fixes `Tensor_InsertSliceOp` `sizes` inputs/attributes
description.
Before this commit, the description says the `sizes` inputs/attributes
denote the size of the return type. But according to the
`InsertSliceOpConstantArgumentFolder` in
`lib/Dialect/Tensor/IR/TensorOps.cpp`, the `sizes` inputs/attributes
actually denote the size of the source type.
I had an off-line discussion with the authors of `TensorOps.td` and
`TensorOps.cpp`. We concluded that it was a typo in the Op description.
This commit updates the Op description to match the actual usage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126264
A later change will add a 3rd user, so factoring out the common code
seems useful.
Reorganizing the executeInWaterfallLoop causes some more COPYs to be
generated, but those all fold away during instruction selection.
Generating the comparisons uses generic instructions over machine
instructions now which admittedly shouldn't make a difference
(though it should make it easier to move the waterfall loop generation
to another place).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125324
This adds support for pointer types for `atomic xchg` and let us write
instructions such as `atomicrmw xchg i64** %0, i64* %1 seq_cst`. This
is similar to the patch for allowing atomicrmw xchg on floating point
types: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52416.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124728
Update test to check MIR after finalize-isel instead of debug output.
This is of course not the only place we should preserve FMF, but
it's the most obvious one.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126306
I think we need to be sure the load isn't volatile before we
duplicate and shrink it.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126353
As @rsmith commented on https://reviews.llvm.org/D111548: "That looks like it's
simply a bug as far as I can tell, and that call can be removed. MS attributes
will be parsed as part of the decl specifier sequence as needed and don't need
to be parsed as declaration attributes."
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126062
This is a straight forward extension of the PRE transform introduced in D124869 to handle the VLMAX case.
The test changes here look quite positive. This surprised me until I realized that all the tests are using @llvm.vscale to figure out the VLMAX, not the llvm.riscv.vsetvlmax intrinsic. If they'd used the later, these would have been full redundancy cases and fully handled by the data flow. I'm not really sure if use of vscale here is representative or not. If it is, we should probably look at using VSETVLI to lower vscale rather than a raw read of vlenb and some math.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126338
Using 64-bit integer/float type in interface storage classes would
require Int64/Float64 capability, per the Vulkan spec:
```
shaderInt64 specifies whether 64-bit integers (signed and unsigned) are
supported in shader code. If this feature is not enabled, 64-bit integer
types must not be used in shader code. This also specifies whether
shader modules can declare the Int64 capability. Declaring and using
64-bit integers is enabled for all storage classes that SPIR-V allows
with the Int64 capability.
```
This is different from, say, 16-bit element types, where:
```
shaderInt16 specifies whether 16-bit integers (signed and unsigned) are
supported in shader code. If this feature is not enabled, 16-bit integer
types must not be used in shader code. This also specifies whether
shader modules can declare the Int16 capability. However, this only
enables a subset of the storage classes that SPIR-V allows for the Int16
SPIR-V capability: Declaring and using 16-bit integers in the Private,
Workgroup (for non-Block variables), and Function storage classes is
enabled, while declaring them in the interface storage classes (e.g.,
UniformConstant, Uniform, StorageBuffer, Input, Output, and
PushConstant) is not enabled.
```
Reviewed By: hanchung
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126256
These attributes can carry useful information, e.g., pipelines
might use them to organize and chain patterns.
Reviewed By: hanchung
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126320
Uncomment the tests to ensure `std::ranges::rbegin` and friends are indeed
customization points objects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126325
Rely on lit substitution to provide the path to llvm-windres instead
of redundantly calling which(1) with the subtituted absolute path.
This fixes test failure on the happy systems without which(1) installed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126366
This patch adds support for obtaining a set corresponding to the domain/range
of the relation.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126326
When expanding VP reductions to non VP-code, the reduction pass was
ignoring the mask before. Fix this by keeping the mask and selecting
neutral elements where the mask is zero.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126362
Once we move off entirely from the legacy testing framework, this will
allow removing a bunch of code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126303
This would allow more AST nodes being preserved for broken code, and
have a more consistent valid bit for ref-type var decl (currently, a
ref-type var decl with a broken initializer is valid).
Per https://reviews.llvm.org/D76831#1973053, the initializer of a variable
should play no part in its "invalid" bit.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122935
Virtually all LLVM tools accept a `-o` flag, so add one. This will make it
possible to possibly add a --write-if-changed flag later. It also makes it
so that the file isn't partially written if the tool oesn't run successfully.
Marking --grammar as `Required` allows removing some manual
verification code for it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126373
Thomas Preud'homme