Commit Graph

12719 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sanjay Patel 059ebc90ee [x86] try to make test immune to better div optimization; NFCI
llvm-svn: 345639
2018-10-30 20:42:03 +00:00
Craig Topper 6958b5ffa9 [X86] In lowerVectorShuffleAsBroadcast, make peeking through CONCAT_VECTORS work correctly if we already walked through a bitcast that changed the element size.
The CONCAT_VECTORS case was using the original mask element count to determine how to adjust the broadcast index. But if we looked through a bitcast the original mask size doesn't tell us anything about the concat_vectors.

This patch switchs to using the concat_vectors input element count directly instead.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53823

llvm-svn: 345626
2018-10-30 18:48:42 +00:00
Jonas Paulsson 611b533f1d [SchedModel] Fix for read advance cycles with implicit pseudo operands.
The SchedModel allows the addition of ReadAdvances to express that certain
operands of the instructions are needed at a later point than the others.

RegAlloc may add pseudo operands that are not part of the instruction
descriptor, and therefore cannot have any read advance entries. This meant
that in some cases the desired read advance was nullified by such a pseudo
operand, which still had the original latency.

This patch fixes this by making sure that such pseudo operands get a zero
latency during DAG construction.

Review: Matthias Braun, Ulrich Weigand.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49671

llvm-svn: 345606
2018-10-30 15:04:40 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 8b207defea [DAGCombiner] narrow vector binops when extraction is cheap
Narrowing vector binops came up in the demanded bits discussion in D52912.

I don't think we're going to be able to do this transform in IR as a canonicalization 
because of the risk of creating unsupported widths for vector ops, but we already have 
a DAG TLI hook to allow what I was hoping for: isExtractSubvectorCheap(). This is 
currently enabled for x86, ARM, and AArch64 (although only x86 has existing regression 
test diffs).

This is artificially limited to not look through bitcasts because there are so many 
test diffs already, but that's marked with a TODO and is a small follow-up.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53784

llvm-svn: 345602
2018-10-30 14:14:34 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih 85d3f1ee8f [llc] Error out when -print-machineinstrs is used with an unknown pass
We used to assert instead of reporting an error.

PR39494

llvm-svn: 345589
2018-10-30 12:07:18 +00:00
Roman Lebedev 9ffca9b83c [X86] Add extra-uses on the mask of pattern c of extract-{low,}bits.ll tests
Summary:
Because of the D48768, that pattern is always unfolded into pattern d,
thus we had no test coverage.

Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53574

llvm-svn: 345583
2018-10-30 11:12:29 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 858303b827 [SelectionDAG] Add FoldBUILD_VECTOR to simplify new BUILD_VECTOR nodes
Similar to FoldCONCAT_VECTORS, this patch adds FoldBUILD_VECTOR to simplify cases that can avoid the creation of the BUILD_VECTOR - if all the operands are UNDEF or if the BUILD_VECTOR simplifies to a copy.

This exposed an assumption in some AMDGPU code that getBuildVector was guaranteed to be a BUILD_VECTOR node that I've tried to handle.	
	
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53760

llvm-svn: 345578
2018-10-30 10:32:11 +00:00
David Bolvansky dfdbb038e8 [DAGCombiner] Improve X div/rem Y fold if single bit element type
Summary: Tests by @spatel, thanks

Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon

Reviewed By: spatel

Subscribers: sdardis, atanasyan, llvm-commits, spatel

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52668

llvm-svn: 345575
2018-10-30 09:07:22 +00:00
Matthias Braun c045c557b0 Relax fast register allocator related test cases; NFC
- Relex hard coded registers and stack frame sizes
- Some test cleanups
- Change phi-dbg.ll to match on mir output after phi elimination instead
  of going through the whole codegen pipeline.

This is in preparation for https://reviews.llvm.org/D52010
I'm committing all the test changes upfront that work before and after
independently.

llvm-svn: 345532
2018-10-29 20:10:42 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 3a2f3c2c0a [X86][SSE] getFauxShuffleMask - Fix shuffle mask adjustment for multiple inserted subvectors
Part of the issue discovered in PR39483, although its not fully exposed until I reapply rL345395 (by reverting rL345451)

llvm-svn: 345520
2018-10-29 18:25:48 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih 61c9de7565 [X86] Enable the MachineVerifier by default
The machine verifier was disabled for x86 by default. There are now only
9 tests failing, compared to what previously was between 20 and 30.

This is a good opportunity to file bugs for all the remaining issues,
then explicitly disable the failing tests and enabling the machine
verifier by default.

This allows us to avoid adding new tests that break the verifier.

PR27481

llvm-svn: 345513
2018-10-29 16:57:43 +00:00
Leonard Chan 905abe5b5d [Intrinsic] Signed and Unsigned Saturation Subtraction Intirnsics
Add an intrinsic that takes 2 integers and perform saturation subtraction on
them.

This is a part of implementing fixed point arithmetic in clang where some of
the more complex operations will be implemented as intrinsics.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53783

llvm-svn: 345512
2018-10-29 16:54:37 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih bb1bd9ed79 [X86] Remove outdated test
This test breaks the X86 MachineVerifier. It looks like the MIR part is
completely useless.

The original author suggests that it can be removed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53767

llvm-svn: 345501
2018-10-29 13:41:46 +00:00
Craig Topper aa5eb2fbaa [X86] Force floating point values in constant pool decoding to print in scientific notation so they can't be confused with integers.
When the floating point constants are whole numbers they have no decimal point so look like integers, but mean something very different in something like an 'and' instruction.

Ideally we would just print a decimal point and a 0, but I couldn't see how to make APFloat::toString do that.

llvm-svn: 345488
2018-10-29 04:52:04 +00:00
Craig Topper 42aa87143d [X86] Recognize constant splats in LowerFCOPYSIGN.
llvm-svn: 345484
2018-10-28 23:51:35 +00:00
Craig Topper 8164f3923e [X86] Add test case to show failure to handle splat vectors in the constant check in LowerFCOPYSIGN.
llvm-svn: 345483
2018-10-28 23:51:33 +00:00
Roman Lebedev 1c340bc7ca [X86][NFC] sse42-schedule.ll: disable XOP for BdVer2 tests
Else we are clearly testing the wrong instruction.

llvm-svn: 345476
2018-10-28 13:39:10 +00:00
Roman Lebedev 3adf88b746 [X86][NFC] sse41-schedule.ll: disable XOP for BdVer2 tests
Else we are clearly testing the wrong instruction.

llvm-svn: 345475
2018-10-28 13:39:06 +00:00
Roman Lebedev cc554e4456 [X86][NFC] sse2-schedule.ll: disable XOP for BdVer2 tests
Else we are clearly testing the wrong instruction.

llvm-svn: 345474
2018-10-28 13:39:01 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 9b77f0c291 [VectorLegalizer] Enable TargetLowering::expandFP_TO_UINT support.
Add vector support to TargetLowering::expandFP_TO_UINT.

This exposes an issue in X86TargetLowering::LowerVSELECT which was assuming that the select mask was the same width as the LHS/RHS ops - as long as the result is a sign splat we can easily sext/trunk this.

llvm-svn: 345473
2018-10-28 13:07:25 +00:00
Craig Topper c4b785ae1e [DAGCombiner] Better constant vector support for FCOPYSIGN.
Enable constant folding when both operands are vectors of constants.

Turn into FNEG/FABS when the RHS is a splat constant vector.

llvm-svn: 345469
2018-10-28 01:32:49 +00:00
Craig Topper f206447dcd [X86] Add test cases showing missed opportunities for optimizing vector fcopysign when the RHS is a splat constant.
llvm-svn: 345468
2018-10-28 01:32:47 +00:00
Roman Lebedev a5baf86744 AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
  * All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
  * Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
  They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...

To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!

# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark                                                                                        Time             CPU      Time Old      Time New       CPU Old       CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0607         -0.0604           234           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0630         -0.0626           233           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            +0.2581         +0.2587             1             2             1             2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0770         -0.0767           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0767         -0.0763           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            -0.4170         -0.4156             1             0             1             0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0271         -0.0270           463           450           463           450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0093         -0.0093           453           449           453           449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7280         -0.7280            13             4            13             4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0065         -0.0065           569           565           569           565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0077         -0.0077           569           564           569           564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +1.0077         +1.0068             2             5             2             5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0220          0.0199      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0006         +0.0007           312           312           312           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         +0.0031         +0.0032           311           312           311           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7069         -0.7072             4             1             4             1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0015         -0.0015           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0010         -0.0011           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1486         -0.1456             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.6139          0.8766      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0008         -0.0005            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0006         -0.0002            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1467         -0.1390             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0137          0.0137      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0002         +0.0002           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0015         -0.0014           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +3.3687         +3.3587             0             2             0             2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.4041          0.3933      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      +0.0004         +0.0004            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0000         -0.0000            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +0.1947         +0.1995             0             0             0             0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                              0.0074          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                               -0.0092         +0.0074           547           542            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                             -0.0054         +0.0115           544           541            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                             -0.4086         -0.3486             8             5             0             0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.3320          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         +0.0015         +0.0204           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                                       +0.0001         +0.0203           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +0.2259         +0.2023             1             1             0             0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       -0.0209         -0.0179            96            94            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median                                     -0.0182         -0.0155            95            93            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.6164         -0.2703             2             1             2             1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      -0.0098         -0.0098           176           175           176           175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0126         -0.0126           176           174           176           174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +6.9789         +6.9157             0             2             0             2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                 0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                  -0.0237         -0.0238           474           463           474           463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median                -0.0267         -0.0267           473           461           473           461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                +0.7179         +0.7178             3             5             3             5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                   0.6837          0.6554      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean                    -0.0014         -0.0013          1375          1373          1375          1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median                  +0.0018         +0.0019          1371          1374          1371          1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                  -0.7457         -0.7382            11             3            10             3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         -0.0080         -0.0289            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                       -0.0070         -0.0287            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +1.0977         +0.6614             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                       0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                        +0.0132         +0.0967            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                      +0.0132         +0.0956            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                      -0.0407         -0.1695             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       +0.0331         +0.1307            13            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                     +0.0430         +0.1373            12            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.9006         -0.8847             1             0             0             0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                            0.0016          0.0010      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                             -0.0023         -0.0024           395           394           395           394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median                                           -0.0029         -0.0030           395           394           395           393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                           -0.0275         -0.0375             1             1             1             1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0232          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0047         +0.0039           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0050         +0.0037           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.0599         -0.2683             1             1             0             0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                           +0.0206         +0.0207           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                         +0.0204         +0.0205           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                         +0.2155         +0.2212             1             1             1             1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                          -0.0109         -0.0108           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                        -0.0104         -0.0103           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                        -0.4919         -0.4800             0             0             0             0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0149         -0.0147           220           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0173         -0.0169           221           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        +1.0337         +1.0341             1             3             1             3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0001          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0019         -0.0019           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0021         -0.0021           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        -0.4441         -0.4282             0             0             0             0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                0.0000          0.4263      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                 +0.0258         -0.0006            81            83            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                               +0.0235         -0.0011            81            82            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                               +0.1634         +0.1070             1             1             0             0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.

llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}

Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh

Reviewed By: andreadb

Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779

llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-27 20:46:30 +00:00
Roman Lebedev a51921877a [NFC][X86] Baseline tests for AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Scheduler model
Adding the baseline tests in a preparatory NFC commit,
so that the actual commit shows the *diff*.

Yes, i'm aware that a few of these codegen-based sched tests
are testing wrong instructions, i will fix that afterwards.

For https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779

llvm-svn: 345462
2018-10-27 20:36:11 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 15aae98424 [x86] make test immune to improved extraction in D53784; NFC
llvm-svn: 345455
2018-10-27 16:46:10 +00:00
Craig Topper 4b89647b79 [X86] Add some isel patterns for scalar_to_vector/extract_vector_element that use the avx512 extended register classes when they are available.
llvm-svn: 345448
2018-10-27 05:35:20 +00:00
Jonas Devlieghere c5dd2995dc Further split cpus test
On GreenDragon, CodeGen/X86/cpus-no-x86_64.ll was still timing out even
after breaking up the original test. I further split off the intel and
AMD cpus which hopefully resolves this.

http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/clang-stage2-cmake-RgSan/

llvm-svn: 345438
2018-10-26 23:50:23 +00:00
Sanjay Patel bd48629041 [x86] adjust tests to preserve behavior; NFC
I'm planning a binop optimization that would subvert the 
domain forcing ops in these tests, so turning them into
zexts.

llvm-svn: 345437
2018-10-26 23:06:28 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 98d880fbd7 [Spectre] Fix MIR verifier errors in retpoline thunks
Summary:
The main challenge here is that X86InstrInfo::AnalyzeBranch doesn't
understand the way we're using a CALL instruction as a branch, so we
can't list the CallTarget MBB as a successor of the entry block. If we
don't list it as a successor, then the AsmPrinter doesn't print a label
for the MBB.

Fix the issue by inserting our own label at the beginning of the call
target block. We can rely on the AsmPrinter to always emit it, even
though the block appears to be unreachable, but address-taken.

Fixes PR38391.

Reviewers: thegameg, chandlerc, echristo

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53653

llvm-svn: 345426
2018-10-26 20:26:36 +00:00
Craig Topper 8315d9990c [X86] Stop promoting vector and/or/xor/andn to vXi64.
These promotions add additional bitcasts to the SelectionDAG that can pessimize computeKnownBits/computeNumSignBits. It also seems to interfere with broadcast formation.

This patch removes the promotion and adds isel patterns instead.

The increased table size is more than I would like, but hopefully we can find some canonicalizations or other tricks to start pruning out patterns going forward.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53268

llvm-svn: 345408
2018-10-26 17:21:26 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 6b40768f5a [x86] commute blendvb with constant condition op to allow load folding
This is a narrow fix for 1 of the problems mentioned in PR27780:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27780

I looked at more general solutions, but it's a mess. We canonicalize shuffle masks
based on the number of elements accessed from each operand, and that's not optional.
If you remove that, we'll crash because we fail to match isel patterns. So I'm
waiting until we're sure that we have blendvb with constant condition and then
commuting based on the load potential. Other cases like blend-with-immediate are
already handled elsewhere, so this is probably not a common problem anyway.

I didn't use "MayFoldLoad" because that checks for one-use and in these cases, we've
screwed that up by creating a temporary PSHUFB using these operands that we're counting
on to be killed later. Undoing that didn't look like a simple task because it's
intertwined with determining if we actually use both operands of the shuffle or not.a

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53737

llvm-svn: 345390
2018-10-26 14:58:13 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih 08d321c9f9 [CodeGen] Remove out operands from PATCHABLE_OP
The current model requires 1 out operand, but it is not used nor created.

This fixed an x86 machine verifier issue.

Part of PR27481.

llvm-svn: 345384
2018-10-26 13:37:25 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 11c01f402f Regenerate test
llvm-svn: 345379
2018-10-26 12:33:56 +00:00
George Rimar 088d96b43d [Codegen] - Implement basic .debug_loclists section emission (DWARF5).
.debug_loclists is the DWARF 5 version of the .debug_loc.
With that patch, it will be emitted when DWARF 5 is used.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53365

llvm-svn: 345377
2018-10-26 11:25:12 +00:00
Sanjay Patel c14aafdacc [x86] add tests for missed load folding; NFC
llvm-svn: 345325
2018-10-25 22:23:27 +00:00
Craig Topper 813064bf4d [X86] Change X86 backend to look for 'min-legal-vector-width' attribute instead of 'required-vector-width' when determining whether 512-bit vectors should be legal.
The required-vector-width attribute was only used for backend testing and has never been generated by clang.

I believe clang is now generating min-legal-vector-width for vector uses in user code.

With this I believe passing -mprefer-vector-width=256 to clang should prevent use of zmm registers in the generated assembly unless the user used a 512-bit intrinsic in their source code.

llvm-svn: 345317
2018-10-25 21:16:06 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih 5be9e6de89 [CodeGen] Remove operands from FENTRY_CALL
FENTRY_CALL is actually not taking any input / output operands. The
machine verifier complains now because the target description says that:

* It needs 1 unknown output
* It needs 1 or more variable inputs

llvm-svn: 345316
2018-10-25 21:12:15 +00:00
Craig Topper 4a825e7b29 [X86] Add some non-AVX512VL command lines to the *vl-vec-test-testn.ll tests.
This will expose some regressions in the WIP and/or/xor promotion removal patch.

llvm-svn: 345297
2018-10-25 18:23:48 +00:00
Craig Topper ce0bc3814b [X86] Add KNL command lines to movmsk-cmp.ll.
Some of this code looks pretty bad and we should probably still be using movmskb more with avx512f.

llvm-svn: 345293
2018-10-25 18:06:25 +00:00
Craig Topper 5d787ac4be [X86] Remove some uarch tuning flags from KNL that look to have been inherited from SNB/IVB incorrectly
KNL is based on a modified Silvermont core so I don't think these features apply. I think the LEA flag is probably also wrong, but I'm less sure as I barely understand the 3 LEA flags we have currently.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53671

llvm-svn: 345285
2018-10-25 17:28:57 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih 7d55dd673b [X86] Fix llc invocation on MIR test case
The current state of the llc invocation is:

* Running all the passes from dwarfehprepare to stack coloring
(included)
* It runs it from the LLVM IR included in the file
* It *ADDS* the generated MI from ISel to the MI in the MIR file
* The machine verifier doesn't like it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53698

llvm-svn: 345266
2018-10-25 14:11:07 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 838eb24014 [TargetLowering] Improve vXi64 UINT_TO_FP vXf64 support (P38226)
As suggested on D52965, this patch moves the i64 to f64 UINT_TO_FP expansion code from LegalizeDAG into TargetLowering and makes it available to LegalizeVectorOps as well.

Not only does this help perform X86 lowering as a true vectorization instead of (partially vectorized) scalar conversions, it avoids the HADDPD op from the scalar code which can be slow on most targets.

The AVX512F does have the vcvtusi2sdq scalar operation but we don't unroll to use it as it seems to only help for the v2f64 case - otherwise the unrolling cost will certainly be too high. My feeling is that we should leave it to the vectorizers - and if it generates the vector UINT_TO_FP we should use it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53649

llvm-svn: 345256
2018-10-25 11:15:57 +00:00
Carlos Alberto Enciso 9a24e1a7cd [DebugInfo][Dexter] Unreachable line stepped onto after SimplifyCFG.
When SimplifyCFG changes the PHI node into a select instruction, the debug line records becomes ambiguous. It causes the debugger to display unreachable source lines.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53287

llvm-svn: 345250
2018-10-25 09:58:59 +00:00
Reid Kleckner a6c6698217 [X86] Adjust MIR test case to pacify machine verifier
llvm-svn: 345227
2018-10-24 23:52:33 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 24d12c28e7 [X86] Fix pipeline tests when enabling MIR verification, NFC
llvm-svn: 345226
2018-10-24 23:52:22 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 49a24278ba [ELF] Fix large code model MIR verifier errors
Instead of using the MOVGOT64r pseudo, use the existing
MO_PIC_BASE_OFFSET support on symbol operands. Now I don't have to
create a "scratch register operand" for the pseudo to use, and the
register allocator can make better decisions.

Fixes some X86 verifier errors tracked in PR27481.

llvm-svn: 345219
2018-10-24 22:57:28 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 9c5bda652c [X86] Add *SP to tailcall register class to fix verifier error
It's possible to do a tail call to a stack argument. LLVM already
calculates the right stack offset to call through.

Fixes the sibcall* and musttail* verifier failures tracked at PR27481.

llvm-svn: 345197
2018-10-24 21:09:34 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim c5bb362b13 [X86][SSE] Add SimplifyDemandedBitsForTargetNode PMULDQ/PMULUDQ handling
Add X86 SimplifyDemandedBitsForTargetNode and use it to simplify PMULDQ/PMULUDQ target nodes.

This enables us to repeatedly simplify the node's arguments after the previous approach had to be reverted due to PR39398.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53643

llvm-svn: 345182
2018-10-24 19:11:28 +00:00
Craig Topper 2417273255 [X86] Bring back the MOV64r0 pseudo instruction
This patch brings back the MOV64r0 pseudo instruction for zeroing a 64-bit register. This replaces the SUBREG_TO_REG MOV32r0 sequence we use today. Post register allocation we will rewrite the MOV64r0 to a 32-bit xor with an implicit def of the 64-bit register similar to what we do for the various XMM/YMM/ZMM zeroing pseudos.

My main motivation is to enable the spill optimization in foldMemoryOperandImpl. As we were seeing some code that repeatedly did "xor eax, eax; store eax;" to spill several registers with a new xor for each store. With this optimization enabled we get a store of a 0 immediate instead of an xor. Though I admit the ideal solution would be one xor where there are multiple spills. I don't believe we have a test case that shows this optimization in here. I'll see if I can try to reduce one from the code were looking at.

There's definitely some other machine CSE(and maybe other passes) behavior changes exposed by this patch. So it seems like there might be some other deficiencies in SUBREG_TO_REG handling.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52757

llvm-svn: 345165
2018-10-24 17:32:09 +00:00
Robert Lougher 18bfb3a5ec [CodeGen] skip lifetime end marker in isInTailCallPosition
A lifetime end intrinsic between a tail call and the return should not
prevent the call from being tail call optimized.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53519

llvm-svn: 345163
2018-10-24 17:03:19 +00:00